{"id":204389,"date":"2009-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-14T00:39:57","modified_gmt":"2016-07-13T19:09:57","slug":"k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
  \n\nIN THE HIGH scum 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE-\nSATED THIS THE 7-rs: my 0? JULY 2009 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE H()N'BL\u00a73) MR. JUSFICE K.N.KESHA'!.&1\u00a7'A\u00a7%A\u00a7fANA\u00bb  \" u .V \n\nR.S.A.NO. 1c)\u00bb=;*;%:A1\/2c>:_c')'6 ;  '1' = V'\nBETWEEN: M\n\n1. KKANNAPPA  *\nAGED ABOUT 45 YEARS  '\n\n2. K.MUNISWAMY    ;\nAGED ABGUT 50 YEARS  '\n\nBCYFH ARE sow:-'.50? LA.TE.'KANDH;<~.PPA\n\nAim Ri'A'\u00a5'~A\u00a7'jPENi\u00a7\u00a7I"\u00a3ALLl'--VIi;LP1i3~Ei,\nKAMAsAMUD\u00a3%--A..HC:BL4I%V  . '\n\nBANGARAPET 'mIf;U;V.)\n\n A \u00a7?;BA1AKRi'S.\u00a7f~iNA\nX gm 1'!3E*\u00a3KP.TA.P.PA\n\nAGED ABS-\u00a3}T;=45 YEARS\nRig APPE_N}%HALLI VILLAGE\nKAM:As;.sMuDRAM HOBLI,\n\n\u00bb- -. _ _' ' BAN GARAPET TALL: K,\n3 B;=kN GARAPET -- 563 :14.  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
;SY’\u00e9R1.B.vEERAPpA, ADV, FOR C;\/ R)<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
am.\n<\/p>\n
THIS R.S.A. IS TTLED U\/S 100 OF CPC1 A\u00a73;5:.i~:$T’fr\u00a7Tg
\nJUDGMENT AND DEGREE DATED :3.3.2Do5:—PASSEDf’:=:a;<\/p>\n
R.A.NO.l49[O1 0:51 THE FILE DTP TH}?~<:i$,I1L'T~w.;JLIAD<}*E,"Tw <\/p>\n
(SR'.DN.) KOLAR GOLD F1aLDs,:;'AL:,\u00a7&\u00a51':~{TG-1 'fr;e1iE.;a1\u00a7'P'E;5i:,
\nAND SETTING ASDIEI THE JUD*GE\u00a7a;E:\u00a7ITT';z\u00a7\u00e9D.D
\nDATED 30.22.2001 PAssaD__':.:\u00a7\u00a7 0.5%ri0..53$j\u00a7i3'\u00ab–TQ.N–9THE."
\nFILE 012' THE I ADDL. CEVIL  (gR.i)N.\u00a2_j:,D I\u00ab\u00a7:G1'f;&. ETC.<\/p>\n
THIS R.S.A. {3Ct\u00a7v\ufb02\u00a7\u00a7\u00a5T'G' {EN 2}?"{'TR'T–4\u00a7g{);'NII,SSION THIS DAY,
\nTHE COURT DELIVEREQf\u00a5'HV!:5'vF'{\u00a7VLLfL3W'i\u00a7\u00a7<\/p>\n
   directed against the:\n<\/p>\n
divarg\u00e9ntf’  below.\n<\/p>\n
5 T  T1 ie  were defendants 1 and 2 in<\/p>\n
.  ” \u20ac}.’S;.;N<\u00a7\u00a7'L\u00a3'3:"iS,f&93 <)z:V1u"'&A1e file of the I \ufb02dditienal Civil Judge<\/p>\n
   The respendant herein was the sole<\/p>\n
 '  plaintiff \ufb01led the suit against defendants 1<\/p>\n
   "for sgwci\ufb01c pexfermance of the agreement<\/p>\n
   contending that defendants 1 and 2 being {ha<\/p>\n
  ""(3@'E\u20acFS 0f the \ufb01end bearing Smvey No.13 m\u00e9asuring 1<\/p>\n
acre 16 gtmtas and Smvey ND 14 measmiing 15%<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nguntas situated at Kethaganahalli village agreed to se\ufb02<\/p>\n
those properties te the plejn\ufb01\ufb01 for a total consideration
\nof Rs.3,800\/-. In that behalf they executed an<\/p>\n
agreement dated 8.2.1985 and on the date”. “the<\/p>\n
agreement, the defendants received the __   _<\/p>\n
eensideratior}. and pieced the  it”:   = <\/p>\n
the property. It was further a\ufb02egede <\/p>\n
there was a prohibition for’tVa1ienatiet1′ ef pre’pAe;*ty’Vee  *<\/p>\n
the previsions ef  the   Preyehf\ufb01on of<\/p>\n
 of Holdings Act,
\n1966  ), they agreed to execute<\/p>\n
thegjsele deed. _e’fte1″h’th.e prohibitien is lifted. It is the<\/p>\n
 il:.t;ti:e?’1;:A.e\u20acV\u00a74tttention of the plaintiff that the said Act<\/p>\n
 Htt:aa”.’i;fe’A3e\u00e9\u00a3)ea}ed in the year 1991 and thereafter<\/p>\n
 he   the defendants to execute the sale deed<\/p>\n
‘V V’ ~ iii “geesl\ufb01geet of the properties. Despite ef the repeated<\/p>\n
Aiaeqtzests, the defendants failed te exeeute the saie deed.<\/p>\n
‘Therefere the piainti\ufb02’ issued notice eallmg upon the<\/p>\n
defendants to execute the sale deed and though the
\ndefendants were served with the said notice, they
\nneither repiied appeared me}? complied <\/p>\n
demands made theneirl.\n<\/p>\n
8. O1″: service of suit smnrglpns,  ulv <\/p>\n
and 2 apmared before the   <\/p>\n
suit. denying the ease of    *<\/p>\n
the case of plaintiff ‘that the_y i te.  pmperty<\/p>\n
by  _ ‘ez:V\u00a7hsidef\u00e9\u00a3ti0n of Rs.3,8{)(}\/~ and
\nhandee Vmzer  of the properties to the<\/p>\n
piajnt\ufb02f. ‘Tt\ufb01ey.  contended that they did net<\/p>\n
.  –. c;g\u00a2~;;;1;i;*\u00a2= any agfeeiizent in favour of p1ai11ti;t’f. They<\/p>\n
  :’~~.\u00abeef1:i:ef1ded that they ha\u00e9 raised a loan by<\/p>\n
\ufb011ertgegLr\u00e9g’fhe suit schedule property in favour of the<\/p>\n
   PLD  as such there was I10 occasion for them to<\/p>\n
‘ Keixtez’ 311:0 any ageemerzt ef sale with the plaintiff.<\/p>\n
\/&<\/p>\n
S\n<\/p>\n
4. The Trig} Court, on the basis of the pleaciings of<\/p>\n
the parties, framed the following issues:<\/p>\n
1. Whether the plaintiff proves the
\nof agreement of saio in respect _of– Stiiito<\/p>\n
schedule proyerty by
\nfavour of the plaintj\ufb01’ asA1’o;i’\u00ab8′{‘2.  . \u00ab. ” <\/p>\n
2. Whether the p1ai11ti1″f:’f111*iI1.ef.}jro1}\u20ac:sA “i3io;f’
\nin yuIsuaI3.<;r:3.of tl1\u20ac"'se:1o \u00e9zgroem\u00e9nt. dated
\n8.2.1985 he" iiad"– o__1:)};f\u00ab.1V'1\u00a2:<:1  ontire sale<\/p>\n
of f2S;'3~;–83{)O\/~ in favour of
\n ciefe\ufb01iianjis oas\u00a7%;;s.2. 1985 itself?<\/p>\n
3. u'{}’iif2j1%VeE;\u00a71for\u00bb__tf:h;o”  further proves that<\/p>\n
 ‘V  he \u00a71as;V:vVbe\u00a2\u00a7.1 ever ready and wiliing to<\/p>\n
‘ :p:g1*f\u00a7’Wn  part: of oomraot as mt the<\/p>\n
 To  and conciitions of the sale.\n<\/p>\n
L’ \u00abagreement \u00e9atod 8.2.1985′?\n<\/p>\n
“<\u00a7'1-Whether me plaintiff is emi\ufb02ed for the
\nsought reiiei?\n<\/p>\n
5. What order or decreo?\n<\/p>\n
ta<\/p>\n
6<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
5. After the parties led evidence, the Trial Court an<\/p>\n
appreciation of the oral and documentary evideriee, by<\/p>\n
its judgement dated 30.11.2001 answered <\/p>\n
2 in the a\ufb01irmative but issues 3 and  :iieg_ative., <\/p>\n
and consequently dismissed the  j;\n<\/p>\n
held. that the agreernerit ieatgid ciia\ufb01iitio    L.<\/p>\n
prohibition under Section  (3.)” ’35’: [tile if-‘\u00a381; from
\nalienatimg the prope1*t.j.5}:e’*s1_11<i_  agreement entered into<\/p>\n
by the defendaifits i1:..fai}{):ur' ~z')_f;._tIie' amounts to<\/p>\n
aheneiiiozi;  '$3.80 held that the suit was<\/p>\n
barred i5'y.__4 .:BiggI'ievec1 by the judgment alfld<\/p>\n
 aecifeem\u00e9 the piainti\ufb01 \ufb02ied appeal in<\/p>\n
 e \u00a7\u00a7;'.';'XiNt7i3i4\u00a7'3:\/2001 on the \ufb01le of the em Judge (Sr.Dn.),<\/p>\n
mp.\n<\/p>\n
‘ ‘;Ti1e Lower Appellate Court after heariltlg both<\/p>\n
 sides and 0:1 reappxeciatien ef the evidence, by its<\/p>\n
it   _:];:i1\u20ac1gf3B1f:’I1’E dated 13.3.2{){)6 allowed the appeal by<\/p>\n
reversing the judgmeiit and decree of the Trial Court<\/p>\n
(‘1<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
and \u00e9ecreeci the suit of the piairzti\ufb01” \ufb01zag<\/p>\n
defen\u00e9ants to execute sale d\u00e9tid in respec\ufb01iiixf fjizii\u00e9   <\/p>\n
schedule pmperties in favour” “t’1.;::V “4pIe1.izit_i\ufb01’,VV <\/p>\n
three: months frem that c\u00a5ay._ ‘I’11\u00a3\u00e9n\u00a7g6*aver A151;-\u00a71}ateVC’,\u00a3\u00a7uI;\u00a3’\u00bb. L\u00bb<\/p>\n
held that the judgement,  V_  the V<\/p>\n
agreement was voi@.\u00e9;;.. by’ v\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9fion 28 of
\nthe Indiazx Centxact   and <:0ntra.Iy
\nto law. 'I'he_     heid that the
\nsuit is  It was fmher
\nheld     not justi\ufb01ed in holding
\nthat ti'1A\u20ac:V  feady and wining to perform<\/p>\n
his part; of 'V agjf\u00e9time\ufb02t. In this View of the matter, \u20ac116<\/p>\n
   Crmrt decreed the suit for speci\ufb01c<\/p>\n
  aggieved by. the judgment and<\/p>\n
da\u00e9ree  Lower Appeliat\u00e9: Court, defendants 1 and 2<\/p>\n
"   ham prefemd this second appeaz.\n<\/p>\n
‘7’. I have haar\u00e9 Sri.K.H.S0I::1ashekam, learned<\/p>\n
sounsel for the appeliants arzd SI’i.B.Ve\u20ac:;f’appa, {earned<\/p>\n
@<\/p>\n
9 .\n<\/p>\n
ready and wi\ufb02ing to perform his part of the: aontragt and<\/p>\n
the Lower Appeilate Court was not correct in mfefsiug<\/p>\n
the fmding of the ma; com. Learned 09.4336; <\/p>\n
appellant relies upon ths d\u20acCi’5-E81714  of <\/p>\n
Aliahabad in the case of Nutan  _
\nAdditional District Judge,    i\u00a7f>oi”i\u00e9d in” V
\nAIR 1994 A.LLA1~1ABAn;z98 193$;-.3E\u00a7cH)Z’  <\/p>\n
9. I have   \ufb01fien\ufb01en to the<\/p>\n
su\u00a7:m1i$$i:”>r1s;> \ufb01izifd\u00e9  ‘ ieaxned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appeI1a;1\u00a3s._4 . \u00a3 ‘   \ufb01nd any substance in his<\/p>\n
 \u00e9_ su_b\u00a7;;1iSsiir.);1s. A’V”‘l’\\.Y.Q___.\u00a3\u00a7OtIbt there: is prohibitic\ufb02 under<\/p>\n
 ‘ S’ec1:ipn4’5:v0.f ihe Act. The prohibition C0}”1t8;iI1\u20acd in the<\/p>\n
 0:11}; to sail or lease: the property which<\/p>\n
 21as”b\u00a7:Vi\u00a7:fs. Iioti\ufb01ed as fragment. Reading 01′ Secticn 5 (1)<\/p>\n
A 5.’ {;3,~:}jL”<::f the Act ciearly indicates that the said prohibitiem<\/p>\n
   appiicabie to the 9mp&1*t3s' in respect 01' which a natice<\/p>\n
undar sub~Secti<':2z1 (2) of Section 4 of the Act had been<\/p>\n
: ix-\n<\/p>\n
issued rzotifying such land as a fragment. Its\u00e9only if a
\n5″}<\/p>\n
W”\n<\/p>\n
\u00a30
\nbit of iarzd had been deciared and noti\ufb01ed as \ufb01gment<\/p>\n
as provided under Section 4(2) of the Act, pmmbition
\nprovided under Section 5 would be applicable. .1-no<\/p>\n
such declaration had been made and neieice\ufb02  <\/p>\n
effect ha\u00e9 not been issued as _require(i    x<\/p>\n
4(2) of the Act, Section 5 has
\nland. The reading of the  of  ii$e1ow’* ‘
\ndo not indicate as to  I2-ei1_d we;s’deeiered and<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01ed as fragment.  is Iietf5tLt:’:e the defendants<\/p>\n
that the ereiifeehejciuiejebprepet ties had been declared and
\n1’i()tifi\u20ac(i  35$ 21 “eQe4’fequired under Section 4(2) of<\/p>\n
t:he_;}Aetu.and iie\ufb01ee  requ\u00e9reei therein had been issued<\/p>\n
.A :}eC1eIji:\u00e9g.4i’i\u00ab-._as a fragment. In the absence of such<\/p>\n
 :\u00a7etiee’,”  open for the defendants to eontend<\/p>\n
theft  was a prohibi\ufb01en fer alienation of the<\/p>\n
K ‘V V’   The Trial Court, without eeneiden\u00e9ng this<\/p>\n
;-mes: ef the matter, proceeded te held that the<\/p>\n
V’  eagreement entered into was void and hit by Section 23<\/p>\n
of the Indian Centraet: Act. in the Eight ef the<\/p>\n
39%<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
prehibitien under Sec\ufb01on ;3(1)(a) of the Act, the said
\nfm\u00e9ing has been rightly corrected by the V.-Lewer<\/p>\n
Appeilate Court. in addition to this wha1;\u00e9.._i\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7S<\/p>\n
prohibite\u00e9. {Hider Section 5 is enly a sale  Vvieasei;  <\/p>\n
Agreement to sen even a bit of  declared V:\u00e9)r_r1_{>’ti\ufb01ed<\/p>\n
as 3. fragment also is not pI'()hibiit\u20ac~’\u00a7’.uI1(i(33f?.”_S\u00a7’3C’\u00a3iOI1 Ii\ufb01aofr,<\/p>\n
the Act. Ageement. to sell ci{3e:’Se\u00bb:1ot  tfansfer<\/p>\n
of property. Therefo\u00a7e,_ ag;t?eefz1ie::ti,.vvi’entere\ufb01i’Akite by the
\ndefendants cannot   ._{h6 prohibition<\/p>\n
 tiieu Therefere, the Lower
\nAppeiieite e \u00a7Z’V,0u1ff’.V jieaa\u00e9asjiuni\ufb01ed in holding that the<\/p>\n
agreemenii\u00e9’i3_:Vne\u00a37’ve\u00e9;d  it is not hit by Section 23 of<\/p>\n
.  – the a’Irit\u00a7i.ai1..\u00e9&_Conif\u00e9;\u20ac:t Act. There is no error of law”<\/p>\n
   itile Lower Appeilate Clourt, in this regard.<\/p>\n
The deeieieiii relied upon by the Immed eeunsel for the<\/p>\n
  appeiia\ufb01t in Nutan Kumar’s case refezrred te supra has<\/p>\n
i  aipptieation 120 the facts Of this case. In said deeisien,<\/p>\n
   {he Caurf: was eozzsiderizzg as ta whether an ageememt<\/p>\n
(if lease beiween the iandlord and tenant for letting<\/p>\n
-@<\/p>\n
12<\/span>
\nGccupation ef the building in contravention of the UP<\/p>\n
Urban Buildirags {Reglna\ufb01on of Letting, Rt-:z11:’–. aRd<\/p>\n
Eviction) Act, 191712 is void. As per the <\/p>\n
there was a clear prohibitiexi under  L”   <\/p>\n
leasing the property. in the p;*\u00e9\u00e9et1t._c\u00e91se,’  Vn (:><\/p>\n
prohibition from entering 113:0 afiagceemsixi;  c}f Sale bait’=.L<\/p>\n
What was prohibited was sailzz-gar Ieasfe, ‘F.;;s  has
\nalso foun\u00e9 that even  pf;(\u00a71)ibi\u00a5ZiQf}L’=’!;\u00a5}d\u20acI’V’S\u20acf\u00a33ti0I1 5 of
\nthe Act has no app\ufb01gation   this case: as<\/p>\n
the 1a:1dS’ ‘;1u\u00e9\u00a7i’ia\ufb01’hgt;e nbtvh\u00e9en noti\ufb01ed as fragment
\nas reqiiifed  :4 (2) of the Act. Therefore, no
\nSL\u00a7S{j\u20acI1aI}{f(}CE1I1})x’?, ti:1:aw’i1 \ufb01mn the said clecisien.<\/p>\n
*   The ‘:&+is.:e::emrt rscerded a definite fmdmg that<\/p>\n
    proved the execution of ageement by<\/p>\n
:de,_t:’\u00a7\u00e9191d.:a *(‘1;\u00a3x:\u00bb*;..V_A.T:;1 and 2 and also receipt of sale<\/p>\n
 consid\ufb01\u00e9ira\ufb01on of Rss.3,8{}0\/\u00bb from the plaiziti\ufb01’, The<\/p>\n
\u00e9ef\u00e9ndants did not question the <::0rre<:me$s of the said<\/p>\n
' V'  fiiidizig. This \ufb01rzding recorded by the Trial Court on that<\/p>\n
13<\/span>
\naemet ef the matter became \ufb01nal. In this appeal aiso<\/p>\n
the correctness of the said fmding is not questioned.<\/p>\n
The recitals in the agreement clearly in\u00e9icatee teat on<\/p>\n
aeceunt of the prohibition for registsratierz.’ <\/p>\n
agricultural {and as per Governmem’..,x,1Vg\u00a7;:ijice.t\u00e9?e:1..  <\/p>\n
mentioned therein, the d\ufb01fefi\ufb01allf\ufb01 L<\/p>\n
dif\ufb01et\ufb02ties in executing the rieed   ;<\/p>\n
execute the saie deed soon  the  is lifted.
\nTherefore, the pimn\ufb01\ufb01 __ac:1:i0n to \ufb01le the<\/p>\n
suit    that prohibitiorz is<\/p>\n
1if’ted. “.i’1?iere ie:  the Act was repealed en<\/p>\n
5.2.1991.’ “‘~I\u00a7”ie_en;13:_\u00bberrrepeal of the Act, the plaintiff’<\/p>\n
   eetitie\ufb01 “te””enforee the agreement. There is no<\/p>\n
  eer”ieugS.. that thereafter the piaintiff get issued<\/p>\n
   !:0 the defendants calling upon them to<\/p>\n
 exeetiter’ the sale deed as per the ageement and<\/p>\n
V.”V?.,Aad:eitted1y me defendants did not execute the sale dee\u00e9.<\/p>\n
   …_.’fherea\ufb01:er the suit: came to be \ufb01led en. 6.10.1993 within<\/p>\n
a periee 03′ 3 years from the date of repeal of the Act.<\/p>\n
e’<\/p>\n
15<\/span>
\nLower Appellate Court Hence, the appeal does not<\/p>\n
involve any question of Law, much less substantial<\/p>\n
quzfsstion of }aw.\n<\/p>\n
11. Accordingly, the appeal is dis3:t1i–::i\u00a7\u00e9'(“3:’   <\/p>\n
stage cf admisssiori.\n<\/p>\n
R3,!’<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH scum 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE- SATED THIS THE 7-rs: my 0? JULY 2009 BEFORE THE H()N’BL\u00a73) MR. JUSFICE K.N.KESHA’!.&1\u00a7’A\u00a7%A\u00a7fANA\u00bb ” u .V R.S.A.NO. 1c)\u00bb=;*;%:A1\/2c>:_c’)’6 ; ‘1’ = V’ BETWEEN: M 1. KKANNAPPA * […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nK Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-13T19:09:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K Kannappa S\\\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\\\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-13T19:09:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1913,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009\",\"name\":\"K Kannappa S\\\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\\\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-13T19:09:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K Kannappa S\\\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\\\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-13T19:09:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-13T19:09:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009"},"wordCount":1913,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009","name":"K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-13T19:09:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-kannappa-so-late-kandhappa-vs-v-balakrishna-so-venkatappa-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K Kannappa S\/O Late Kandhappa vs V Balakrishna S\/O Venkatappa on 7 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204389\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}