{"id":204403,"date":"2009-03-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-18T15:10:03","modified_gmt":"2019-01-18T09:40:03","slug":"santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                       CHANDIGARH\n\n\n\n\n                               Criminal Misc M-32775 of 2008\n\n                               Date of decision: 18.3.2009\n\n\nSantosh                                                   ...Petitioner\n\n                         Versus\n\nState of Haryana                                          ...Respondent\n\n\nPresent:    Mr Sanjay Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner.\n            Mr AS Ghangas, DAG Haryana.\n\n\nS.S.SARON, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>             Heard counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered against her<\/p>\n<p>for the offences under Sections 302\/201\/34 IPC at PS Civil Lines, Bhiwani.<\/p>\n<p>            The FIR has been registered on the statement of Sudhir Rathi,<\/p>\n<p>who stated that on 28.7.2008 at about 1 p.m., he was going ahead of the ESI<\/p>\n<p>Dispensary on the road of Mohta factory, Sector 21, Bhiwani when he saw a<\/p>\n<p>dead body of a young boy lying on the road side of the road in the grass.<\/p>\n<p>Deep injuries had been inflicted on the head and forehead of the unknown<\/p>\n<p>dead body and blood had oozed out. The clothes and sandals were blood<\/p>\n<p>stained. On making inquiries, the dead body could not be identified. It<\/p>\n<p>appears that some unknown person had left the unknown dead body after<\/p>\n<p>causing injuries. On the basis of the said information, the Police conducted<\/p>\n<p>the investigation and during investigation, the dead body was identified to<\/p>\n<p>be that of Ombir. Sushila wife of Satish and daughter of the petitioner, it<\/p>\n<p>was found, had an affair with said Ombir (deceased). In the investigation,<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Cr Misc M-32775 of 2008                                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sushila wife of Satish, the petitioner, her son &#8211; Ram Niwas and grandson of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner namely Sanjiv son of Ram Niwas were held to be involved in<\/p>\n<p>the murder. The statement of said Sushila who is also a co-accused, was<\/p>\n<p>recorded on 1.8.2008 (P1). Sushila in her statement before the Police stated<\/p>\n<p>that after the death of her earlier husband namely Parshottam, her father &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Hawa Singh had constructed a house in a plot at Bhiwani. Sushila was<\/p>\n<p>living with her children and father in the said house. During her stay, she<\/p>\n<p>developed illicit relations with her neighbour&#8217;s son namely Ombir son of<\/p>\n<p>Rajinder. This was not liked by both the families. On 15.1.2008, she was<\/p>\n<p>married second time to her husband&#8217;s younger brother (Dewar) namely<\/p>\n<p>Satish and she started living with her children with Satish at village Baas<\/p>\n<p>Badhshahpur. However, for the last one month, Ombir had started meeting<\/p>\n<p>and visiting her at her house. She had refused to meet him and had also told<\/p>\n<p>him not to spoil her settled family but he did not understand. This matter<\/p>\n<p>came to the knowledge of her mother (petitioner) and brother &#8211; Ram Niwas.<\/p>\n<p>The brother of Sushila namely Ram Niwas serves in the Army. On<\/p>\n<p>27.7.2008, Ram Niwas came to the house of Sushila and inquired about the<\/p>\n<p>visit of Ombir. Sushila told him everything and then Ram Niwas brought<\/p>\n<p>Sushila at their house in Paluwaas where she was given a beating by her<\/p>\n<p>mother (petitioner) &#8211; Santosh and Ram Niwas. A plan was made that Ombir<\/p>\n<p>would be taught a lesson by calling him at night. As per the plan on<\/p>\n<p>27.7.2008, during night at 8 and 10 through mobile number of Sushila, a<\/p>\n<p>call was made on the mobile of Ombir on the pretext that family members<\/p>\n<p>had gone to Haridwar and he should come and meet Sushila at village<\/p>\n<p>Paluwaas. The father, brother&#8217;s wife (Bhabhi) and children of Sushila went<\/p>\n<p>to sleep on the roof. As per the plan, Santosh (petitioner), Ram Niwas and<\/p>\n<p>nephew of Sushila namely Sanjiv hid themselves in a Kotha of a courtyard.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Cr Misc M-32775 of 2008                                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>At about 10 during night, Ombir came to meet Sushila. By switching on the<\/p>\n<p>TV, Sushila and Ombir lied on a cot by bolting the courtyard gate from<\/p>\n<p>inside. While they were in the room, Ram Niwas, brother of Sushila came<\/p>\n<p>from the Kotha with a piece of iron rod and mother (petitioner) and nephew<\/p>\n<p>of Sushila namely Sanjiv started beating Ombir with a Danda. Ombir tried<\/p>\n<p>to run towards the gate by getting himself freed but Ram Niwas gave a<\/p>\n<p>heavy pipe blow on his head and he fell on the floor. While he was lying,<\/p>\n<p>Santosh (petitioner) picked up a knife lying on the TV and hit the same on<\/p>\n<p>the head and forehead of Ombir. Due to this, Ombir became unconscious.<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter, Santosh &#8211; petitioner took out 3-4 tablets of Sulphos from a<\/p>\n<p>packet and poured the same on the mouth and face of Ombir after mixing it<\/p>\n<p>in water. During night at about 2-3, he was taken on the rear seat of Maruti<\/p>\n<p>Car by Sushila, her nephew &#8211; Sanjiv and brother &#8211; Ram Niwas and the dead<\/p>\n<p>body of Ombir was thrown in the big grass in the Industrial Area, Bhiwani<\/p>\n<p>on the roadside near ESI hospital. Thereafter Sushila and her mother<\/p>\n<p>(petitioner) cleaned the floor and clothes with     soap    and water.   On<\/p>\n<p>28.7.2008 in the morning at 8 a.m., Sushila went back to her matrimonial<\/p>\n<p>home at Baas. On 1.8.2008, she had appeared before the Police and stated<\/p>\n<p>that she could get the places demarcated where in the area of courtyard of<\/p>\n<p>her home Ombir was killed and the place where he was thrown.<\/p>\n<p>            The case, therefore, of the prosecution is based on the<\/p>\n<p>statement of co-accused of the petitioner namely Sushila who is none other<\/p>\n<p>than the daughter of the petitioner. The statement of a co-accused as is well<\/p>\n<p>known by itself cannot be treated as a substantive piece of evidence and it<\/p>\n<p>has been held to be safe to rely on other corroborative evidence as well. In<\/p>\n<p>any case, this aspect need not be gone into at this stage while considering<\/p>\n<p>the application for the grant of regular bail and this would more<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Cr Misc M-32775 of 2008                                                      4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>appropriately be gone into by the trial Court after evidence has been led. It<\/p>\n<p>may, however, be noticed that the petitioner is a lady and she is in custody<\/p>\n<p>since 3.8.2008. The question whether she was indeed involved in the<\/p>\n<p>occurrence would depend on the nature of evidence that is led in the case.<\/p>\n<p>             In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it<\/p>\n<p>would be just and expedient that she is admitted to bail.<\/p>\n<p>             Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner, on her<\/p>\n<p>furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of CJM Bhiwani,<\/p>\n<p>shall be admitted to bail.\n<\/p>\n<pre>18.3.2009                                           ( S.S.SARON )\nASR                                                      Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc M-32775 of 2008 Date of decision: 18.3.2009 Santosh &#8230;Petitioner Versus State of Haryana &#8230;Respondent Present: Mr Sanjay Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr AS Ghangas, DAG Haryana. S.S.SARON, J. Heard counsel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-18T09:40:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-18T09:40:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1019,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-18T09:40:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-18T09:40:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-18T09:40:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009"},"wordCount":1019,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009","name":"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-18T09:40:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/santosh-vs-state-of-haryana-on-18-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Santosh vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}