{"id":204810,"date":"2010-12-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010"},"modified":"2018-12-15T02:51:07","modified_gmt":"2018-12-14T21:21:07","slug":"ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam &#8230; vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam &#8230; vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 9402 of 2010(O)\n\n\n1. ANSARUL MUSLIMEEN SANGAM SECRETARY\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. ANSARUL MUSLIMEEN SANGAM REPRESENTED\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KALAKAPPARA AHAMED HAJI,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THAYYIL MOOSA, S\/O.KUNHALAVI.\n\n3. KALAKAPPARA UNIT AVARANKUTTY,\n\n4. VATTAKANDAN UMMER HAJI,\n\n5. MADARI KARUVANTHODY MOHAMMED,\n\n6. MADARI MELVEETTIL MAJEED,\n\n7. CHAKKAPARAMBAN KUNHIMOHAMMED,\n\n8. MADARA PALLIYALIL MOIDEEN,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :02\/12\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                       HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.\n                        ------------------------\n                      W.P.(C).No.9402 Of 2010\n                         ----------------------\n            Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2010.\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.436 of 1990 on the<\/p>\n<p>file of the Munsiff Court, Manjeri. They are the appellants 2 &amp; 3<\/p>\n<p>in A.S.No.47 of 1997 on the file of the Additional District Court,<\/p>\n<p>Manjeri. Respondents are the defendants in the suit. Suit was<\/p>\n<p>instituted for a declaration that Mahdanul Uloom Madrassa is<\/p>\n<p>under the management of Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam headed by<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners and that the registration of another sangam as per<\/p>\n<p>registration No.253\/1983 of District Registrar, Malappuram by<\/p>\n<p>the defendants is not valid and binding on the plaintiffs or the<\/p>\n<p>Madrassa. Consequential prohibitory injunction was also prayed<\/p>\n<p>for in the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.    It is alleged by the petitioners that defendants in the<\/p>\n<p>written statement did not as such challenge the frame of the suit.<\/p>\n<p>The trial court, while deciding the issues framed, held that the<\/p>\n<p>suit is not maintainable and that the plaintiffs are not legally<\/p>\n<p>competent to represent the sangam which is not a registered<\/p>\n<p>society. The trial court while dealing with issue No.1 observed<\/p>\n<p>that the Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam is not a registered society<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.9402 Of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                  ::2::\n<\/p>\n<p>that the plaintiffs are not entitled to institute the suit on behalf of<\/p>\n<p>the said sangam since no steps were taken by the plaintiffs to file<\/p>\n<p>an application under Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/p>\n<p>in order to represent all the persons interested in the sangam.<\/p>\n<p>The trial court after considering the case on merits as well<\/p>\n<p>dismissed the suit finding that the plaintiffs are not entitled to<\/p>\n<p>any reliefs claimed in the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.      Plaintiffs preferred appeal in 1997.     Pending appeal<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs filed I.A.No.737 of 2004 seeking permission to institute<\/p>\n<p>the suit in a representative capacity and also to prosecute the<\/p>\n<p>above appeal under Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P3 application was filed, which according to the appellants, is<\/p>\n<p>to rectify the technical difficulty in not filing the suit in a<\/p>\n<p>representative capacity. Ext.P4 is the counter affidavit filed by<\/p>\n<p>the respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.      The learned Judge did not pass any orders within a<\/p>\n<p>reasonable time though the application was filed on 27.10.2004.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Judge considered Ext.P3 application on 1.3.2010.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Judge dismissed Ext.P3 application stating the<\/p>\n<p>reason that the application is a belated one and is filed to drag<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.9402 Of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                ::3::\n<\/p>\n<p>the disposal of the appeal. The learned Judge observed that if<\/p>\n<p>the petition is allowed it has to be published as per Order I Rule<\/p>\n<p>of the Code of Civil Procedure, new parties may appear and they<\/p>\n<p>will be given an opportunity to file their statement and fresh<\/p>\n<p>issues are to be raised and the case has to be remanded to the<\/p>\n<p>lower court for fresh disposal. Ext.P5 is the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>learned Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.    The reasons stated by the court are irrelevant or I<\/p>\n<p>may say irrelevant for the purpose of deciding an application of<\/p>\n<p>this nature. The learned Judge should not have observed that if<\/p>\n<p>the petition is allowed then it has to be published as per Order I<\/p>\n<p>Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, new parties may appear<\/p>\n<p>and they should be given opportunity to file written statement<\/p>\n<p>and the court may have to remand the case to the lower court.<\/p>\n<p>Essentially, the application was filed for publication. The question<\/p>\n<p>is whether an application filed though belatedly is to be allowed<\/p>\n<p>or not. The learned counsel pointed out that the respondents did<\/p>\n<p>not raise any contentions in the written statement that the suit is<\/p>\n<p>not properly framed and that the publication under Order I Rule 8<\/p>\n<p>of the Code of Civil Procedure is necessary.         The trial court<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.9402 Of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                ::4::\n<\/p>\n<p>noticed the defect in the filing of the suit while passing the<\/p>\n<p>judgment and held that the plaintiffs are not legally competent to<\/p>\n<p>represent the sangam which is not a registered society.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore it has become necessary to file application under Order<\/p>\n<p>I Rule of the Code of Civil Procedure in order to bind the<\/p>\n<p>members of the sangam. It is true that such application was filed<\/p>\n<p>before the appellate court belatedly. For that reason alone the<\/p>\n<p>court may not be justified in dismissing the application. In this<\/p>\n<p>case, the learned Judge, for so many other reasons which are<\/p>\n<p>extraneous for considering an application of this nature, held that<\/p>\n<p>the prayer cannot be allowed. In fact, in order to rectify the<\/p>\n<p>technical defect the learned Judge ought to have heard the<\/p>\n<p>application within a reasonable time from the date of filing of the<\/p>\n<p>application.    It took about 6 years for considering Ext.P3<\/p>\n<p>application. In the circumstances, this Court is of the view that<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5 order is not sustainable in law. Hence, Ext.P5 order is set<\/p>\n<p>aside. The application is filed after 7 years from the filing of the<\/p>\n<p>appeal. Considering the conduct of the appellants in filing the<\/p>\n<p>application so belatedly, this Court order that Ext.P3 application<\/p>\n<p>can be allowed on terms. Ext.P3 is allowed on condition that the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.9402 Of 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                 ::5::\n<\/p>\n<p>petitioners shall pay Rs.2,500\/- (Rupees Two Thousand and Five<\/p>\n<p>Hundred only) each as cost to the counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>respondents 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 &amp; 8 and the counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>respondents 9 &amp; 10, within a period of two weeks from today.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Judge shall order publication immediately and the<\/p>\n<p>publication shall be effected within a period of 45 days from the<\/p>\n<p>date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The learned Judge<\/p>\n<p>shall also hear and dispose of the appeal within a period of four<\/p>\n<p>months thereafter.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The writ petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              HARUN-UL-RASHID,<br \/>\n                                                    Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>bkn\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam &#8230; vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 9402 of 2010(O) 1. ANSARUL MUSLIMEEN SANGAM SECRETARY &#8230; Petitioner 2. ANSARUL MUSLIMEEN SANGAM REPRESENTED Vs 1. KALAKAPPARA AHAMED HAJI, &#8230; Respondent 2. THAYYIL MOOSA, S\/O.KUNHALAVI. 3. KALAKAPPARA UNIT AVARANKUTTY, 4. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam ... vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam ... vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-14T21:21:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam &#8230; vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-14T21:21:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":957,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam ... vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-14T21:21:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam &#8230; vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam ... vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam ... vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-14T21:21:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam &#8230; vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-14T21:21:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010"},"wordCount":957,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010","name":"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam ... vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-14T21:21:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ansarul-muslimeen-sangam-vs-kalakappara-ahamed-haji-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ansarul Muslimeen Sangam &#8230; vs Kalakappara Ahamed Haji on 2 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204810\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}