{"id":204835,"date":"2011-03-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011"},"modified":"2016-02-03T07:42:28","modified_gmt":"2016-02-03T02:12:28","slug":"pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Md Shah,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.MA\/10199\/2010\t 5\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 10199 of 2010\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nPRAVINKUMAR\nRAMPRATAP SHARMA & 5 - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMRPRATIKYJASANI\nfor\nApplicant(s) : 1 - 6. \nMr.L.R.Pujari, APP  for Respondent(s) :\n1, \nMRRUSHABHRSHAH for Respondent(s) :\n2, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE MD SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 03\/03\/2011 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
Heard
\n\tlearned advocate, Mr.Jasani for the petitioners, learned APP,
\n\tMr.L.R.Pujari for the respondent No.1 and learned advocate,
\n\tMr.Rushab Shah for the respondent No.2.\n<\/p>\n
Rule.\n<\/p>\n
\tLearned APP, Mr.L.R.Pujari for the respondent No.1 and learned
\n\tadvocate, Mr.Rushab Shah for the respondent No.2 waive service of
\n\tnotice of rule.\n<\/p>\n
By
\n\tthe order passed by this Court, this matter was referred to
\n\tMediation Centre and a report along with consent terms of settlement
\n\tin writing is received from Mediator which is placed on record of
\n\tthis matter. As per the report of the Mediator, matter is settled
\n\tbetween the parties and a specific terms of settlement is arrived at
\n\tbetween the parties.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tlearned advocates for the respective parties have jointly submitted
\n\tthat as the matter is settled between the parties, the complaint may
\n\tbe quashed.\n<\/p>\n
It
\n\tis clear that the parties have settled the matter by arriving at a
\n\tcompromise and a consent terms  settlement is also placed on record.
\n\tReliance is placed on a decision of the Apex Court reported in  AIR
\n\t2005 SUPREME COURT 757 in the case of  Mohd. Shamim v.
\n\tNahid Begum<\/a> wherein it has been held by the Apex Court in
\n\tparagraph Nos.12, 13, 14 and 15 as under:\n<\/p>\n
“12.\n<\/p>\n
In view of the fact that the settlement was arrived at the
\nintervention of a judicial officer of the rank of the Additional
\nSessions Judge, we are of the opinion, the contention of the First
\nRespondent herein to the effect that she was not aware of the
\ncontents thereof and the said agreement as also the affidavit which
\nwere got signed by her by misrepresentation of facts must be
\nrejected. In the facts and circumstances of this case, we have no
\ndoubt in our mind that the denial of execution of the said deed of
\nsettlement is an afterthought on the part of the Respondent No.1
\nherein.\n<\/p>\n
13.
\nEx facie the settlement between the parties appears to be genuine. If
\nthe contention of the First Respondent herein is to be accepted, she
\nwould not have accepted the sum of Rs. 2,25,000\/- and in any event,
\nshe could have filed an appropriate application in that behalf before
\nthe Court of S.N. Gupta, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. What was
\nleast expected of her was that she would return the said sum of
\nRupees 2,25,000\/- to the Appellants herein.\n<\/p>\n
14.
\nSection 406 is a compoundable offence with the permission of the
\ncourt. It is true that Section 498-A IPC is not compoundable.\n<\/p>\n
15.
\nThis Court in Ruchi Agarwal v. Amit Kumar Agrawal and others<\/a> (2004
\n(8) Supreme 525), in almost a similar situation has quashed a
\ncriminal proceeding against the husband, stating:\n<\/p>\n
“…\n<\/p>\n
Therefore, we are of the opinion that the appellant having received
\nthe relief she wanted without contest on the basis of the terms of
\nthe compromise, we cannot now accept the argument of the learned
\ncounsel for the appellant. In our opinion, the conduct of the
\nappellant indicates that the criminal complaint from which this
\nappeal arises was filed by the wife only to harass the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
8.
\nIn view of the above said subsequent events and the conduct of the
\nappellant, it would be an abuse of the process of the court if the
\ncriminal proceedings from which this appeal arises is allowed to
\ncontinue..”\n<\/p>\n
In
\n\tview of the conduct of the First Respondent in entering into the
\n\taforementioned settlement, the continuance of the criminal
\n\tproceeding pending against the Appellants, in our opinion, in this
\n\tcase also, would be an abuse of the process of the court. The
\n\tAppellant No.1, however, would be entitled to withdraw the sum of
\n\tRs. 50,000\/- which has been deposited in the court. We, therefore,
\n\tin exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the
\n\tConstitution of India direct that the impugned judgment be set
\n\taside. The First Information Report lodged against the Appellants is
\n\tquashed. The Appeal is allowed. However, this order should not be
\n\ttreated as a precedent.”\n<\/p>\n
Reliance
\n\tis also placed on another decision of the Apex Court reported in  AIR
\n\t2003 SUPREME COURT 1386 in
\n\tthe case of  B. S. Joshi v. State  of
\n\tHaryana wherein complaint for the offence under Sec.498-A
\n\thas been quashed by using the inherent power of the  Court under
\n\tSec.482 of Cr.P.C. It has been held by the Apex Court in paras 14
\n\tand 15 of the said judgment as under:\n<\/p>\n
“14.\n<\/p>\n
\tThere is no doubt that the object of introducing Chapter XX-A
\n\tcontaining Section 498A in the Indian Penal Code was to prevent the
\n\ttorture to a woman by her husband or by relatives of her husband.
\n\tSection 498A was added with a view to punishing a husband and his
\n\trelatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her
\n\trelatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. The hyper-technical
\n\tview would be counter productive and would act against interests of
\n\twomen and against the object for which this provision was added.
\n\tThere is every likelihood that non-exercise of inherent power to
\n\tquash the proceedings to meet the ends of justice would prevent
\n\twomen from settling earlier. That is not the object of Chapter XXA
\n\tof Indian Penal Code.\n<\/p>\n
15.
\n\tIn view of the above discussion, we hold that the High Court in
\n\texercise of its inherent powers can quash criminal proceedings or
\n\tFIR or complaint and Section 320 of the Code does not limit or
\n\taffect the powers under Section 482 of the Code.”\n<\/p>\n
Applying
\n\tthe above ratio to the facts of the present case, since the matter
\n\thas been settled between the parties, I am of the opinion that no
\n\tuseful purpose would be served by permitting the criminal
\n\tproceedings pending against the petitioners to continue as it would
\n\tbe abuse of process of the court. Hence, the complaint in question
\n\tis required to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n
In
\n\tview of the above, FIR registered as C.R.No.I-191 of 2010 at Isanpur
\n\tPolice Station, Ahmedabad, is quashed. As per the settlement terms,
\n\tboth the parties are directed to go before the Family Court for
\n\tobtaining decree of divorce under Sec.13-B of Hindu Marriage Act and
\n\tcan seek early hearing. This Cri.Misc.Application is accordingly
\n\tallowed. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t(M.D.SHAH,J.)<\/p>\n
radhan<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011 Author: Md Shah,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.MA\/10199\/2010 5\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 10199 of 2010 ========================================================= PRAVINKUMAR RAMPRATAP SHARMA & 5 – Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 – Respondent(s) ========================================================= […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204835","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-03T02:12:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-03T02:12:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1048,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-03T02:12:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-03T02:12:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-03T02:12:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011"},"wordCount":1048,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011","name":"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-03T02:12:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravinkumar-vs-state-on-3-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pravinkumar vs State on 3 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204835","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204835"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204835\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204835"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204835"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204835"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}