{"id":204872,"date":"2010-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010"},"modified":"2014-01-13T13:28:15","modified_gmt":"2014-01-13T07:58:15","slug":"sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V &#8230; vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt &#8230; on 10 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V &#8230; vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt &#8230; on 10 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>l<br \/>\n{N THE HiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE<\/p>\n<p>DATED THIS THE 10&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010<br \/>\nBEFORE:<\/p>\n<p>THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTiCE ANAND  _<\/p>\n<p>REGULAR SECOND APPEAENQ.1_&#8211;3&#8217;6&#8217;i&#8221;Dff,2(TT)fi&#8217;_ f  <\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n<p>S1&#8217;i.Vin0d Redciy\ufb02 A<br \/>\nSon of Late K.V.Nurayuna Reddy&#8217;,a._ D&#8217; _<br \/>\nAged about 40 years,   _<br \/>\nResiding at Kithiganur&#8221;.Zi&#8217;I&#8217;1\u00ab-ageg 3. V  ~<br \/>\nBidarahaiii Hobii, A A<br \/>\nBangalore S0uthA71_&#8221;z1iuk,   _  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>B3nga10re&#8211;56{_&#8217;), e;r3p;;- T&#8217;  APPELLANT<\/p>\n<p>(By &#8216;:1&#8211;;r1.:_(:i&#8221;S:&#8217;1;\u00a7.i\\\/I.D_Anurz1(iha, Advocates)<\/p>\n<p>AND:\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;    1.   311;. I&lt;,_.M..K&#039;1&#039;Visvi:-:13Reddy,<\/p>\n<p> Su\ufb01 gf&#039;Late N[UF}ES1&#039;lLilT1\u00a31pp\u00a3l,<br \/>\nT  _ Ageci &quot;about 72 years.\n<\/p>\n<p> R\ufb013&#8217;\u00a7_i\u20ac1__iI&#8217;kg&#8217;L1D[ Ki-thiganur Viliatge.<br \/>\nBVi\u20aciara_i&#8217;i\u00e91lii H()bli,<br \/>\nB:1ng\u00e91l01&#8217;e South Taiuk,<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; Ba:3ng211o:&#8217;e-560 036.\n<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217;   Sri.K.N.Ramucha:ndra Redcly.\n<\/p>\n<p>Son of Late K.\\\/&#8217;.Na.rayana Reddy,<br \/>\nAged 47 years.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a5\\J<\/p>\n<p>Residing at Kithiganur Village,<\/p>\n<p>Bidarahalii Hobli,<\/p>\n<p>Bangalore South Taluk,<br \/>\nBangmon&gt;560036. .H Raspcmeaewrssk.\n<\/p>\n<p>(By Shri.H.R.Ar1anthaki&#8217;ishna Murthy, <\/p>\n<p>No.1,  . .4 _ ._<br \/>\nSouthem Law Associates for Resp()r1,dei1t&#8217;N\u00a2:;.2)..  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>.5}: ::{:&#8217;&gt;E\u00a7 &gt;1: &gt;[&lt;<\/p>\n<p>This Regular Seeond Apep.c::ai&#039;i&quot;.i_s*fjled L1tT(&#8211;ft.3_tf Seeti&lt;)1i.i()(&#039;) of<br \/>\nCode of Civii Procedu:&quot;&#039;__e..fxl908 aige&quot;1ii:1st.,ti&quot;ie fudgment and decree<br \/>\ndated: 23.1.2007 ptkss\ufb02d&quot;i11&quot;R&#039;A.\u00a7;5\u00a7t3.17.022003 on the file of the<br \/>\nPresiding Officer, Fast &#039;Af_1&#039;;1ek._C\u20ac)u:ft-I*I;~.VBa\u00a7ga&#039;Eore Rural District,<br \/>\nBarigaiore, a11owirigthe;_&#039;appea1 and\u00ab..settii1g&#039;:aside the judgment and<br \/>\ntxmmedmat\ufb02oeemngmgaim\u00a3IsNo2\ufb01ymm4onme\ufb01mt\ufb01<br \/>\nthe Additi()&#039;ri\u00e91i&quot;_E..{&#039;\u20ac&#039;i&#039;*2.\u00a7l 3-u\u00e9.ge~.(_J&quot;t;ii&#039;i&#039;or Divisicin), Bangaitire Rural<\/p>\n<p>District, Ba1*iga&#039;i\u00bboi:{e an&lt;*I.&#039;e\u20ac.c.&quot;,=f \u00ab.<\/p>\n<p>  -&#8216;for hearing this day, the Court<br \/>\ndehveredthe \ufb01ut9wing:\u00bb,&#8221;~ v<\/p>\n<p>Rj\u00a7DGMENT<\/p>\n<p>in . f;ft:3&#8221;;t1&#8243;(Ri&#8217;t~\u00a7i&#8217;1f3  for the appeiiant and the Counsei for the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216; 1fe&#8217;sipoiidefnt.s.  &#8216; V .\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;fhe appeal having been acimitted, the following<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217;  sL2i)s_t:111t&#8217;Ea1i questioiis of Eaw were frarned:<\/p>\n<p>S<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\ni. Whether the appellate c.ourt was justified in revestsing the<\/p>\n<p>judgment and decree passed by the trial court without<br \/>\nconsidering the aspect of limitation&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p>Whether in the facts and cilctanstanees\u00a7_h&#8217;l&#8221;t.lj&#8217;\u00a7.,,,&#8217;9ll:s,e&#8221;the<\/p>\n<p>av<\/p>\n<p>appellate court was justified En re\\2&#8217;e1&#8217;si:1;g&#8217;v the j&#8217;L1Vdgvsmeh.F_ <\/p>\n<p>and decree passed by the&#8221;:.t:&#8217;i:i_llc&#8217;OLIft~.basedll(eh&#8217;~~.l\u00a7Xlhlbit l<\/p>\n<p>P. 1?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The facts as la-:f_eip&#8221;1&#8217;ele;__\\I:\u00ab;11:ttw fOr_&#8217;the&#8217;~tlbisp()sal of this appeal<\/p>\n<p>are as follows:   .\n<\/p>\n<p>   _1fefei&#8217;red .teWby their rank before the trial<\/p>\n<p>court for the sal&lt;e_Oiledttvehletiee.\n<\/p>\n<p>_ The \u00e9ippellaht \\A2vasl&#8221;&#8216;t&#8217;he second defendant in the suit. The<\/p>\n<p> first{:&#8217;es&#8217;pon&lt;;lent wlaslltlie plaintiff. The plaintiff&quot; claimed that he<\/p>\n<p> E11e&#039;~a.bs&lt;ji.uVtle owner in possession and enjoyment of the<\/p>\n<p>pt&#039;dpe.:&quot;t;_;&#039;l11.l&#039;{hata No.26, House List n0.40 0fl(ithiganu1&#039; Village,<\/p>\n<p>H   Bidarah&#039;alli Hobli, Bangalore South Taiak. it was eiear that the<\/p>\n<p>lprlijperty was his ancestral property and after the death of his<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>father, the. plaintiff and his brother has succeeded to the _~;ame and<\/p>\n<p>the khata of the property stood in his name. It was his: i&#8217;t&#8217;urthpe&#8217;:&lt;.4case<\/p>\n<p>that the suit property was allotted to him under a&quot;fainilyt:Settienfteint.._<\/p>\n<p>dated 25.4.1993 and that he was i.r&#039;iieXc&#039;lt!:5i%xe p{)\u00a7:$.\u00a7L&#039;.S&#039;_f&#039;}l(i)iFi&#039;it)lLT{hEi._<\/p>\n<p>same and that the plaintiff reeicles  the&#039;:S.;:.it&quot;propertyiand<br \/>\nsince there is no toilet fmsility    to put<br \/>\nup a bath room and    commenced<br \/>\ndigging foundation to  on 18.6.1994.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Clefend_a4nt.is otltime and therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff_was&#8221;&#8216;coits;E:r;i_ine:iitqifile a..st;it5fc)r permanent injunction.<\/p>\n<p>Th&#8217;e_4&#8217;tlCftei1gi\u00e91:&#8211;itsu&#8217;e.!_1.tE1&#8217;ed appearance and the second<\/p>\n<p>defe:j1Li&#8217;ant liere\u00e9nideiiiie\ufb01 that the plaintifi&#8217; had any title to the suit<\/p>\n<p>:ip::Qpert)} .i&amp;in_&#8221;tl.1._e written statement. The plaiiitiff had after a<\/p>\n<p>iieons_i.derah_i_e__delay ofeight years from such denial of title, filed an<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V app_l4icat&#8217;i&#8217;oVnineeking amendment of the pleadings. to include the<\/p>\n<p>..ff.rel&#8217;ietI&#8217;t)f&#8217; declaration of his title to the property. This application<\/p>\n<p>i  v\u00a7;h_i&lt;;h was filed during the pendency of the suit was allowed and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nthe suit was converted into one for declaration ol&#8217; title. and for<\/p>\n<p>permanent injunction. The trial court in its judgment proceeded to<br \/>\nhold that the plaintiff disentitled himself to claim the declaration<\/p>\n<p>of title on account of the amendineiit having beenmstitig-Efit&#8221;afte\u00abi&#8217;_ a<\/p>\n<p>lapse of eight years from the date of denia_i&#8221;of-.h&#8217;iisblt&#8217;i.tle_b36_lthisl&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>defendant in the pleadings. This li&#8217;avin&#8221;g.h&#8217;een._e&#8217;hal&#8217;lenged hetiire if<\/p>\n<p>the first appellate court. the fi:&#8217;.s.t&#8221;&#8216;appell&#8217;ate oo_ui&#8217;t,  aside the<br \/>\nfinding of the trial coart- on tlieit-b&#8211;arl&#8217;ot&#8217;l&#8217;i~m_itationvandiiiias held that<\/p>\n<p>the amendment dated baeletol  suit and hence the<\/p>\n<p>lirnitation and  &#8220;set aside the finding of the Trial<\/p>\n<p>Court wliiiiel vl&#8217;ui~th_ei*._liolding that since the application for<\/p>\n<p>  ztifjeiidianestt has heevn&#8230;.al&#8217;lc)w&#8217;ecl uiiconditionaily. it may be prestimed<\/p>\n<p> that&#8217;t.|ie-_i&#8217;el.ieli_dated back to the date of suit. it is this which is<\/p>\n<p> to. ged.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  The pi&#8217;imai&#8221;y contention of the counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n<p>  is..that the suit was for bare injunction. Upon denial of the title. of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the plaintil&#8217;t&#8217;, the cause of action, if any, iiiso\ufb01.-ti&#8217;  seeking<\/p>\n<p>declaration of title arose to the plaintiff. The plai:htivti&#8217;_f&#8217;L&#8211;\u00ab.V1fia.ying<\/p>\n<p>eho:.~;en to file an application after 2} delay of eigtlit ,yettit:;iiiw*&lt;iut1ld<\/p>\n<p>clearly be l&quot;&#039;ai&#8217;i&#8221;;\u00a7et, l%3i  would<br \/>\nsubmit that the SUbStaFEtliai&#8221;:\u00a3\u00a7uE3E.ttilti\u00a7l1i.i have to<br \/>\nbe answered in favoui&#8217; mitheiii  of the first<br \/>\nappellate   to the date of suit<br \/>\nwas   relationwbaek would not<br \/>\napply  all amendments that are permitted<\/p>\n<p>and especiti&#8221;itl..yii;1V ttt:a,s&#8221;e_ which involves the bar of limitation and<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;by \\;j\u00bbi1*i2t1e:gL1eli a&#8217;me.r:1.t:h&#8217;neiit being allowed. it cannot be said that<\/p>\n<p>the law_of&#8217;liih&#8217;ittati&#8217;n<\/p>\n<p>wot: id stand ieffaeed.\n<\/p>\n<p> A&#8217;   the other hand. the counsel for the iespendent would<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;t&#8221;SLli;tIT1l[ that the 1&#8217;eastming of the first appellate court was in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>brought beyond the period of limitation, but is eiitertained by the<\/p>\n<p>court and is not rejected at the outset on the bar oflE1nitat\u00bbi_io-niand it<\/p>\n<p>is by the judgment and decree, that the questi()i&lt;:..i:ol&quot; vliirnitaitioh&#039; is <\/p>\n<p>answered agtiiitst the plaintift&#039;s. Siii1ilarly.4 it is the1iefo_i&#039;evineorrect 7<\/p>\n<p>to contend that by virtue of the _applicav\u20ac.ion_for &#039;dm&#039;\u00a7&#039;A.&#039;l}ii(1&quot;I&quot;t&#039;=.i&#039;f3l1l3~4llitvlltrg<\/p>\n<p>been allowed on the doctrine of\u00bbrel3.tion&#8211;bacl{;efhezamendment<br \/>\nwould have to be consti&#039;u_ed~._as being ieffeeiti*.the1&#8243;-ha1iIti._it&#8217; warsa._sui1&#8243;&#8216;t&#8217;t&gt;i&#8217; bare injurtction. The defendant<\/p>\n<p>having tlisp(&gt;ssewssed &#8216;i&#8217;thelplaintif&#8217;t&#8217; during the pendency of the suit..<\/p>\n<p>il:1nViappli&#8217;t:atibny_. was filed seeking to include the relief of<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;(;&#8217;ec&#8217;li5;1_i&#8217;2;1ti&#8217;t.)n&#8217;of title&#8217;. and recovery of ptissessitm The question that<\/p>\n<p>_ was i&#8221;deei&#8217;ded&#8221;by the Supreme Court was that such an amendment<\/p>\n<p>:&#8221;&gt;CULi&#8217;l(\u00a7l_bC allowed if the plaintiff therein was entitled to file an<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  indepehde.iit suit for recox&#8211;tery of ;)os.~;e.ssion within the period of<\/p>\n<p>Z<\/p>\n<p>IE)<\/p>\n<p>Sic\/dc:fiitgm-m-Ha and cIi&#8221;I()I\/&#8217;28!&#8217; 1&#8217;18&#8217;. Mcmtifm 5lmzu}j_<\/p>\n<p>{2()()1)&#8217;8 SCC SM}.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. In this view. it czumot be said that the&#8217; d.i(j)c:tt1m:T&#8217;r:\u00abt&#8211;.T_n&#8217;\u00a7 oflaw._av2&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;~answet&#8217;ed in favour of<br \/>\nthe :;1ppel1ant_ The j&#8217;udgAt&#8221;:ie.mf()t&#8221;*the &#8216;fi 1&#8217;_staItptjeilate court is set<\/p>\n<p>aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>The. ;.1pp\u00e92:Erisf&#8217;2t:E;:It)_w&#8217;eti.V.::v&#8217;<br \/>\n% %  t t Scl\/&#8217;:_<\/p>\n<p> hv~_<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V &#8230; vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt &#8230; on 10 February, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy l {N THE HiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010 BEFORE: THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTiCE ANAND _ REGULAR SECOND APPEAENQ.1_&#8211;3&#8217;6&#8217;i&#8221;Dff,2(TT)fi&#8217;_ f [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204872","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V ... vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt ... on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V ... vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt ... on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-01-13T07:58:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Vinod Reddy S\\\/O Late K V &#8230; vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\\\/O Lt &#8230; on 10 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-13T07:58:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1410,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Vinod Reddy S\\\/O Late K V ... vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\\\/O Lt ... on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-01-13T07:58:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Vinod Reddy S\\\/O Late K V &#8230; vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\\\/O Lt &#8230; on 10 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V ... vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt ... on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V ... vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt ... on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-01-13T07:58:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V &#8230; vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt &#8230; on 10 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-13T07:58:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010"},"wordCount":1410,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010","name":"Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V ... vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt ... on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-01-13T07:58:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-vinod-reddy-so-late-k-v-vs-sri-k-m-krishna-reddy-so-lt-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Vinod Reddy S\/O Late K V &#8230; vs Sri K M Krishna Reddy S\/O Lt &#8230; on 10 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204872","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204872"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204872\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204872"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204872"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204872"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}