{"id":205013,"date":"2009-05-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009"},"modified":"2019-03-13T08:20:51","modified_gmt":"2019-03-13T02:50:51","slug":"m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 26th DAY 01?    \n\nPRESENT... .\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. RD. D:NAKAR.5N,  JI}si'1c:E L  \n\nAND  % q \nTHE HON'BLE MR.JU'3.'\ufb01CE v..* \" '\n.  GNANABHARATHI ROAD\n' 'mamgaaaavig\n\n    !'\u00a7A(?:AR B.l~_iAVi POST-560072\n\n ~2' --.._'ASh\u00a7\u00a5_';\u00bb.S\u00a7\u00a7Af\u00a7THAMMA\n\n D[G.LA*i'E MUNIYAPPA\n AGED\" ABOUT 50 YEARS,\n'RIA NO. 192\n+. ,  GNANABHARATHI ROAD\n_  NAGARABHAVI,\n'  NAGARBHAVI POST\n\n 'V -,.\" ws 4 01? THE\nKARNATAKA gzazaj-c0URr A.\u00a3'P\u00ab.PR}_iY1NG'TO SET ASIDE THE\nORBER 1=Ass;:_E1::PI_r~z ft':-IE. W121? PE'I'1'I'ION. No.42-43\/2009\nDATED 20;?{)4;_?.0(}'9';__   \"  \n\nT5336'  comm' g up for i3I\\':3  '\nHearing Of} day,  J., delivered the following.\n\ngunammn?\n\n'A   appeals are filed by the petitioners in\n\n being aggac\ufb01vcd by the order da\ufb01ed\n\n\" \" ' 9 7 L ---  disgaissea the writ petition.\n\n20. 4~.\u00a7J()ii9 wilcmin the I\ufb02arneci Single Judge of this court has\n\n\\H\n\n\n\n2. The appellants herein \ufb01led \n\nseeking for a dimctioxa to the respondents    \"<\/pre>\n
xeprcsenta\ufb01ons dated 8.7.2098,.:4′.9..30C\u00a7\u00a7V ;siri\u00a7i”  7′.:.\u00a7;2o0_\u00a7 ” <\/p>\n
submitted by the first respondent  of\ufb01rg\u00e9 <\/p>\n
a\ufb01davit \ufb01lsd by the pctitioncfTsv”i11V accor<1a:3.ceT"m1der. L'<\/p>\n
Section 48 of the    Act for
\ndeno\ufb01\ufb01ca\ufb01on]withdra\\vvalV:~"   proceedings of<\/p>\n
land Sy.No.78 of VNa.gg\u00a3'\ufb01}*#:i\u00a7*i ._ sg\u00e9shivanthpur Hobli,<\/p>\n
Ba\ufb02g   an area of 5 acres 13<\/p>\n
   layout and a direction to the<\/p>\n
second reoL1:r\u00a7i1de;: zt..I1t;\u00bbt"fzftake illegal action to demolish the<\/p>\n
 V. A_ cxi\ufb01\ufb01ng constfuctipzm or to evict the occupants and<\/p>\n
  the petitioners from the land—Sy.No.'78 of<\/p>\n
H  Yeshwanthpura Hobli, Bangalore North<\/p>\n
–V Tal\ufb01k,  5 acres 13 guntas.\n<\/p>\n
  It is averted in the writ petition that<\/p>\n
K  the petitioners’ mother~Huchamma was the owner<\/p>\n
xs?”\n<\/p>\n
of the land bearing Sy.No.78, Nagarabhavi village, haying<\/p>\n
acquired the same under registered sale decaf’ <\/p>\n
19.10.196′? and her name was ordemd to be  ‘<\/p>\n
shown in the revcmue records. Theaaid\u00e9 Iarsd  VV<\/p>\n
extent of 10 acres 8 gunfas including  1:<\/p>\n
guntas of kharab land. The ‘p:_(_-.’t”it.joI1t=:’i~’s    (Sf <\/p>\n
Smt\ufb01uchamma. Huchamma  2000<\/p>\n
leaving behind the pe\ufb01\ufb01icx\ufb01xis #23  to succeed to her 1<\/p>\n
cstateujlt   year 1978 the second
\nmspond\u00e9ni ‘issuc;{\ufb01o1.i\ufb01c;.=\u00a7tio\ufb02 proposizag to acquire various<\/p>\n
la\ufb01ii\ufb01to a11 “t:x tVc12.t’.’of ’12\u00abI.(.) acres 35 guntas in Nagarbhavi<\/p>\n
 V’   v\ufb02]z\u00a7g\u00e9’9’iIic1uding the petitioners land Sy.No.78<\/p>\n
  _.ofi’ for implementation of an improvement<\/p>\n
\u00e9\u00e9hf\u00e9\ufb01te f\u00a73:\u00a2*’V”tI?.;.-\u00e9iforzzzatioza of Nagarbhavi iayeut under Section<\/p>\n
17 of? VEDA Act, 1975. Noti\ufb01cation dated 15.7.1982<\/p>\n
% \ufb01gg\ufb01tj\ufb01shed in the Karnataka Gazette on 19.8.1982. The first<\/p>\n
 xigspondent issued a \ufb01nal noti\ufb01caizion 91:: 16.8.1985<\/p>\n
 wifublishecl in the gazette on ‘?.1I. 1985 notifying an extent: of<\/p>\n
518 acms 29 guntas said to be acquired for Nagarabhavti I<\/p>\n
W”\n<\/p>\n
Stage Layout. The second respondent-BDA’  K V’ <\/p>\n
any steps to implement the    <\/p>\n
smmunding Lands are being <_ievelo:f)cd:"w:.ith   <\/p>\n
consisting of buildings, the    the V<\/p>\n
land in question and    the
\nsecond mspendcnt   awani during
\nthe year 1938;.    District
\nCo-opcrativss    ' '\u20ac',Vo-operative Society<\/p>\n
Ltd.,  my  \u00a5the Society') moved the
\nseccmd xia$po:\u00a7de1;i?V~~1:'\u00e9q11es\ufb01ng for yant of pcnnission<\/p>\n
to form pxi\u00a7i'ia'te_:V1ay\u00a2utAb11V'i:kV:ha}f of the: land owner and \ufb01led<\/p>\n
 '*.W.i5;\u00a7io:,.12i'19\/1\u00a7i38 —- "siecking directions. The sand' writ<\/p>\n
  on 13.1o.1%3 and the appeal \ufb01led<\/p>\n
   in W.A.No.1696\/88 was dismissed on<\/p>\n
7.__23.a. and mcrm\ufb01er Civil Appeal No.17\/91 before the<\/p>\n
  5]” Court was disposed of homing that the same ma<\/p>\n
‘  Bagc\ufb01mc infructuous and second respondent-Bl)A had not<\/p>\n
Wiiakcn any steps for formation of Layout and allotment of sites<\/p>\n
formm in the land in question. The second mspondent-EBA<\/p>\n
\\>\/’<\/p>\n
issued noti\ufb01catian dated 6.4.1998 proposing to, <\/p>\n
ailotment of land in question for res\u00bbiAc}e11t:ia1_-{~g:*z:xii1:j1;1  ‘A V. <\/p>\n
puirpoms and EDA had dropped    ai.\":\nlayout in implementation of fthg:    V  L.\nmother was alive at that time  Vcamc\n\n<\/pre>\n
to the schedule iand   Aug\ufb01gi, 5000, she
\nappmached this court   on the gonad<\/p>\n
that the  the award was not<\/p>\n
  TA ”  ch 1z1n  the pcndency of the writ
\npetition, *pe\ufb01tion\u00a2f${:V’;:\ufb01G’\u00a3\u00a7\u00e9r  in December, 2000 and<\/p>\n
petitioners  \ufb01n  as legal zep11=:se1:”1wt.ivr:s and<\/p>\n
   \u00a7#rit”‘”pc\ufb01tion. ‘E’herea\ufb01:er, the pciitioncrs<\/p>\n
   grounds that the proposed scheme has<\/p>\n
   27 of the am Act and writ petition<\/p>\n
 __was ~~ Being aggrieved by the same,<\/p>\n
A .,:j:\u00a2”4’;f.A?.L.’f’\u20ac9.2945\/ 2004 was \ufb01ied and Division Bench of this court<\/p>\n
‘  dismissed the writ agxpeal on the sole ground of delay and<\/p>\n
” W’];%ac11es. The Apex court dismissed SLP.No.2I’73\/2005 on the<\/p>\n
gonad of dchy and haches on 14.1.2009. During the<\/p>\n
K9}<\/p>\n
pcndency of the petition before thc_I*Iae3,I_1_’b}g:_. ” ” V<\/p>\n
petitioners submit that repzeseniatixjts <\/p>\n
second respondent bringing  \ufb01o\ufb01\u00e9c of   ‘<\/p>\n
that an area of 2 acres 30  -ouf   for
\nformatjon of 80 feet     guntas of
\nfand u\ufb01liscd for    mm of 4
\nacres being  5 acres \u00a33 guntas
\nin land   is built up with
\nconsu1,;i\u00a7’}1:{\u00e91%1s’,.: ‘  V  establishment,
\nkalyan  ehurch anti private layout has<\/p>\n
been  in the surrounding area of the<\/p>\n
 ‘~  . :iI3%,.A’-cgus:2s,tionV”Vf\u00e9rivate layouts have been dcvcibped and<\/p>\n
     any layout and petitioners made<\/p>\n
 that they are ready and w111m’ ‘ g to give up<\/p>\n
 ,_their el\ufb01imvaver u\ufb01lisad land of an area of 4 acres and<\/p>\n
A  to delete an area of 5 acres 13 guntas built up<\/p>\n
‘   with private layout from acquisition p  and<\/p>\n
.4  they shall not claim any compensation in mspcct of<\/p>\n
utilised land and Withdraw all litigations. On the suggcation<\/p>\n
ks?’<\/p>\n
of the second respond:-.nt~BDA petitioners  ‘V _  <\/p>\n
u\ufb01dcrtak1n’ g amdavit on stamp  <\/p>\n
that behalf. In continuation pf   a1:\u00bb3.; )}_\u00a7;\u00a2\u00e9tti\u00a2a1iV  ~.<\/p>\n
undertaking a\ufb01davit  the”  ‘V<\/p>\n
3135., the petitioners     \u00e9i}…jrepf\u00a2*s;e=ntaEt:ion on
\n20.9.2007 to the first c\u00a7\u00a7;vc.\u00bb.;nment in that
\nbehalf. The sgaug   \ufb01le regarding
\niof _  proceedings _ in
\nmspecffur\ufb02if   village to an extent
\nof 5 ac\ufb02sts   with private layout on the<\/p>\n
basis cf   and unequivocal tmdcrtaking<\/p>\n
 ‘~    The grievance of the pctzitzioners was<\/p>\n
 L’  . 1 ”  to the State Government by<\/p>\n
s:i.:\u00bba’.P.i{1\u00a75<;;a::ei\u00a7wamy, MLA of Mudigcre, Chiclanagaiur<\/p>\n
 I)ist44i'i<;tV"';i.s?}1.i$ has foxwarded the xetter dated 3.7.2003 in this<\/p>\n
x V' V.tieh.a1\u00a3 \u00e9fhe \ufb01rst respondent enquired into the matter a\ufb01er<\/p>\n
  for infomxation from the second rcspondent~BDA and<\/p>\n
  conducting spot inspection zeganiing the factual<\/p>\n
situation of surrounding area in respect of Sy.No.?8 of<\/p>\n
K93<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
Nagarabhavi village and the BDA  <\/p>\n
submitted sketch and raped stating that _a}.E.   ‘ <\/p>\n
area of Sy.No.78 of Nagarabhavi  <\/p>\n
private layouts and EDA has not  az:;3,r1″1%.1\u00e9\u00a7koi1m’;–:}’<\/p>\n
these 13-acts are brought to the’ of th\u00a2\u00a7 in
\nSLP with regard to the for co\ufb01\ufb01iid\u00e9ia\ufb01on for
\ndenoti\ufb01cation from  an area of 5<\/p>\n
acres 13   however, the Apex<\/p>\n
Court   “th e= ‘  is altogether
\ndi\ufb02’eIez:it_  ‘   of power by the State<\/p>\n
Govemmc\ufb01”…  48 of Land Acquisition Act to be<\/p>\n
 .,  indeiizcngicn\ufb02y  by the State Government under its<\/p>\n
 ‘p Owe;r sf domain anti dismissed SLP by order dated<\/p>\n
H ground of delay and iachcs without going<\/p>\n
  qiies\ufb01on cf exercise of power by the Stairs<\/p>\n
K V” V  (3ov\u00a2mm ” mt under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act and in<\/p>\n
”   ‘\u00e9bove sand” facts and cizcumstances the o\ufb01ciais of<\/p>\n
 ‘”second respondent abruptly without any notice nor any<\/p>\n
communication to the petitioners, with their squad cams<\/p>\n
:03?\n<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
petition and pc\ufb01tioncrs have stated in para-21 of th\u00e9<\/p>\n
pctiblon that there are no other iitigations or  3<\/p>\n
either pending or decided before any court    <\/p>\n
In writ petition is liable to be  <\/p>\n
averted that all the four petitzion\u00e9rs   ~_<\/p>\n
challenged the acquisition    ‘ A<\/p>\n
oouxt\/Apex couxt as  the  and~.t1:p.s’\u00a7 pm-sent<\/p>\n
writ petition is \ufb01led to   Asjssucs which have<\/p>\n
been  against the petitioners in the
\nearlier  ” _ 3’11+.gs’.A:-j.’I’tb  avermd ‘that award was<\/p>\n
passxsd. on ‘uI2._.:S.’1E$88.”-pnsscssion of 5 acres 13 guratas<\/p>\n
 *-gegceiiiaisxg the khafa\ufb01\u00e9iand) is taken on 30.6.1988 under<\/p>\n
  ‘g: the Land Acquisition Act, 1961. A<\/p>\n
  been issued and respondent No.2-BEA has<\/p>\n
‘V._frmed’  layout consisting of 1588 sites in Nagarahhavi<\/p>\n
A “ii and aliottcd the sites to S\u20acVf’:I’aI ehgib’ in persons and<\/p>\n
‘  has issued possession certi\ufb01cates, sak: dc\ufb01s to respective<\/p>\n
 Hsllotccs. It is further avcrrcd that writ petitimcx has been \ufb01led<\/p>\n
ts prevent the second respondent-BDA from implementing<\/p>\n
Q<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
the order dated 14.1.2009 passed by the   _  <\/p>\n
Court. All the grounds allegad in s1’v1Jpfii<\u00a7\u00a3*i\u00abQf"-the <\/p>\n
in respect ofwrit petitioners right,   int\u00e9tg\u00e9t   ..<\/p>\n
gone into in the o:dt:r; "'w-A\u00bbdat\u00a7a".. . V   in 'V<\/p>\n
w.p.No.mr671\/2000 which ha-.2:"':;:1Ei:;c:,\ufb01\u00e9ic:;i@  ..i3e1:iaonez~
\nN<3.4 has \ufb01rm 0ng)na' ' 1 S:.;i1 'rs.\u00ab.\u00a7';\u00bb\u00a7%1  before the City
\nCivil Court in.\u00bb :=s{g'.p~cct    based on
\ncertain  VIE}   law and therefore,
\nthe    <\/p>\n
5. ‘Fh:cM~ leamv’    Judge after oonsiderm g the<\/p>\n
ooigtggh\ufb01an df   counsel appearing for the writ<\/p>\n
  AGA., appealing for respom:1ez1twNo. 1 and<\/p>\n
1  for respondents 2 and 3 by oxdcr<\/p>\n
da\ufb01lcl  hem that the acquisition proceedings have<\/p>\n
 ..&};ahc1d in the earlier  s  by the<\/p>\n
K ”  of the pc\ufb01\ufb01oners-Snat. Huchmmaa in<\/p>\n
.&:v’_Vv_\\\u00a5i?.P.No.276?1\/2000. Bruring the pcndency of the writ<\/p>\n
petition, Huchamma dim! and petitioners were bmught on<\/p>\n
xi?’<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
Apex ccmrt has also speci\ufb01cally ruled that    ‘ <\/p>\n
taken on 30.6.1988 and the1eforc;;:’thc\u00a71:1E:’ isjtadi<\/p>\n
Writ petition and accordizigly,’  the’  <\/p>\n
Being aggrieved by the salt!’ or<i t\u00a7i'\u00bb.\u00a7:.i;isan1issii1g_  p\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01on
\non 20.4.2009, the *~V.;_}c1jii\u00a7z'\u00a7':–V_1i}:\u00a3"'.*\u00a7._   these<\/p>\n
appeals.\n<\/p>\n
6. W;  \u00ab  ‘  appeaxing for
\nthe: appgllantggi-.   for mspondent
\nNo.2~BDA   :”\u00a3}o:r:$i-nmxnt Advocate appearing<\/p>\n
\ufb01or the r63P011ci\u00e99t NAo.i.’V.. \u00abV  ” U<\/p>\n
   for the appellants<\/p>\n
-.  the acqtiisi\ufb01on proceedings have<\/p>\n
 H pmcccdm gs m’ mated’ ‘ by the writ<\/p>\n
 iv 1\u00a73.ed\u00a2V ”  \\av.P.No.276’71\/2600 The second<\/p>\n
.1  has not implemented the pian r\ufb01axtiing<\/p>\n
  of  ‘ layaut and %ession of the<\/p>\n
 ‘  T  comprised in Sy.No.78 bclongkxg to the petitioners
\n not been talwn and tlixzrcforc, the scheme has lapsed<\/p>\n
~\\3\/’$7<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
under Sec\u00ae\u00bbn 2′?’ of the BBA Act anti the  .<\/p>\n
\ufb01ver: by the petitioners for dcno\ufb01\ufb01cgiion is  ” = <\/p>\n
the Government and the  it;\n<\/p>\n
SLP.No.290\/ 2009 is also   Am if.\n<\/p>\n
therefore, the learned smgle’ Ju\u00a7ge_V%wa;;’-   in
\ndismissing the writ    ought to<\/p>\n
have been allowed.\n<\/p>\n
8,.\u00bb ”  for respondent no.2~
\nEBA  \u00e9oyit\u00e9ntions raised in the present<\/p>\n
writ pctit:ii5n._ V11.’1sV4V’E2v.e\u00a3-.1;\u00a7:_  by Huchamma in the earlier<\/p>\n
 _ writ. \u00ab\u00a7f:;\u00a7:iti:>;;1~\\\\fV;’i3′;–}\\V.’l:;v;f’f’27fS71]2000 which has been dismissed<\/p>\n
  appeal by the {)ivis\u00a3on Bench of this court<\/p>\n
  by the Appellate Court and thercfom, no<\/p>\n
 _   which have almady become \ufb01nai cannot be<\/p>\n
V.   was the petitioners are para” ‘es in the sand’ writ<\/p>\n
   being thc”LRs of Huchamma who died during the<\/p>\n
  ~~p<;,11d\u20acI1cy of the writ petition.<\/p>\n
K'?\n<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
9. Learned Government Advocate _.  . A   <\/p>\n
respondent No.1 submitted that <\/p>\n
been already taken and quesfsiee of dev’i1oti\ufb01c2:tio;..1v\u00bb:\u20aci\u00ab\u20ac>ee’;  L\u00bb<\/p>\n
arise and all the conten\ufb01ons  are    earlier
\nwrit petition have been the pei\ufb01tieners and
\nhas become \ufb01nal and    be reopened<\/p>\n
by \ufb01ling \ufb01e-.311  <\/p>\n
   consideration to the
\nconte1i”ijon_  _  appearm’ g for the partle’ s<\/p>\n
and  the” en record.\n<\/p>\n
  The zxieiteri-.9103 xeconi wouid dearly show that the<\/p>\n
 L’ fieti\ufb01ca\ufb01on was published by the second<\/p>\n
 proposing to acquire lands for the<\/p>\n
 fore\ufb01iatien  Nagaxbhavi Residential Layout under Section<\/p>\n
  meme (3). Notx\ufb01ca’ mm’ dated 15.37.1982 was published in<\/p>\n
 12;; gazette dated 19.3. \u00a3982 proposing to acquired 73; acres<\/p>\n
  gunias in Nagarbhavi village and 478 acres 39 gtmtae in<\/p>\n
Malagala village inclu\u00e9ing Sy.No.78 measudng 9 acres 13<\/p>\n
\\9\/9′<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
acquisition and negativing the contcntion t\u00a7uf’ti.’:\u00a2-ii ” = <\/p>\n
herein who are the LRS of <\/p>\n
peti\ufb01oner that the scheme has-.__;~;;1ps\u00e92d.V_tin(1erT.   0i’  L,<\/p>\n
the am Act and therefore,  .:;V1’ot”(‘}j’:-_ex:;*.’1’v’:to }ti1e writ
\npetitioncrwappellants V      ” \u00abmnm\ufb01\ufb01  that the
\nscheme has lapsed. A   given in the
\nsaid writ   belonging to
\nthe mothezjgf   have succeeded
\nwas   has not iapsed under
\nSectio11v 2′? ‘of  and therefore, it is not open to<\/p>\n
the pf’1itiOIi\u00e9’I’3_TtO  \u00e9diitcnd that acquisition proceedings<\/p>\n
 V’   ~  ‘S-E\u00e9\ufb01on 27 of the BDA Act and in aI’I’I’V’111’ ‘ S<\/p>\n
  at  :.\u00a3\u00a7u:t:ic-Z\ufb01zsion that the  scheme has not lapsed,<\/p>\n
 reiicd upon the decision of tlim wart in<\/p>\n
 Kalsimamumm vs. BANGALGRE DEVELOPMENT<\/p>\n
%  .\u00a7\u00a7O1*}10Rm (11.12 1996 KAR1258) and BANGALORE<\/p>\n
‘i)E’\u00a7’A’ELOPMENT AUTHURITY vs. DR.H.S.HANUMAN’I’HAPPA<\/p>\n
V ‘(ILR 1.996 KARNATAKA 542). Even otherwise, it is ch;-,a\u00a3 that<\/p>\n
there is no force in the contmtnlon of the id counsel<\/p>\n
K33′<\/p>\n
2′!<\/p>\n
therefore, it is ciear that the contention of the <\/p>\n
that acquisition is vitiate\u00e9 and the scheme    <\/p>\n
View of the provisions of Section 27 ;or’thc .3135  \u00a2…m:..b\u00a2.’ V’<\/p>\n
accepted and the same is liable   eis~ i._<\/p>\n
any merit. The material on m<?\u00b0   woA1.1'i-'1 <:l\u00a2'\u00ab,?i1'1,}'  " L?<\/p>\n
Horfble Supreme Court has   ;\u00a7\u00e9ssing.\u00bb'\u00e9he order
\ndated 14.1.2009 that pets:\u00a7essi'(:;;V\u00a7'\u00a7diTt.1Eie..V:ia,\u00ab\u00a71d has been taken<\/p>\n
on 30.6.1998 a:1d.__thenef6'n;;::   Vtieraoti\ufb01cation or<\/p>\n
Withdn\ufb01vai   ings under Section
\n48 of the   would not arise at this stage.<\/p>\n
Mere fact  reibxeserifa\ufb01ons have been made by the<\/p>\n
 .   before\ufb02the\ufb01vtate Government to denotify the land<\/p>\n
  2 acquisi\ufb01on_ pedings would not by<\/p>\n
 beg.'  ts set aside the acquisition pmceedm gs<\/p>\n
 iiasvbeeu con\ufb01rmed in the earlier pedings in<\/p>\n
  ~Ief"\\i\u00a7(.'i5'.**z.\u00a7:o.2'?6?1\/2000 initiated by the mother of the<\/p>\n
.' iietitioners who are impleaded as 1.85 of theix mother who<\/p>\n
'4  durm' g the pendency of the writ petition. Accordingly,<\/p>\n
':97<\/p>\n
22<\/span><\/p>\n
we hold that, then: is no merit in thcgsgappeais’   ” ” ‘V<\/p>\n
following ordcix”.\n<\/p>\n
The writ appeals are dismj\u00a7:scd.     1,.’ <\/p>\n
 w.~.\u00bb.-;3;.,.\u00ab_.3;\ufb021<,:;,<\/p>\n
 v  Ih\u00e9'3?\u00a7::.Y\u00a7$\/ 510   , ….. .. e<\/p>\n
 v\u00bb%}s-.45 .H9s::'\u00a5'\u00a2\u00a7]'r4o<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 26th DAY 01? PRESENT… . THE HONBLE MR. RD. D:NAKAR.5N, JI}si’1c:E L AND % q THE HON’BLE MR.JU’3.’\ufb01CE v..* ” ‘ . GNANABHARATHI ROAD ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-205013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-13T02:50:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.Seebaiah S\\\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-13T02:50:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2150,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009\",\"name\":\"M.Seebaiah S\\\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-13T02:50:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.Seebaiah S\\\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-13T02:50:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-13T02:50:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009"},"wordCount":2150,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009","name":"M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-13T02:50:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-seebaiah-so-late-miniyappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.Seebaiah S\/O Late Miniyappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}