{"id":205294,"date":"2009-09-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009"},"modified":"2015-03-20T12:28:45","modified_gmt":"2015-03-20T06:58:45","slug":"k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD\nDATED Tms THE 10TH DAY or sEPTEMBE=;\u00a7 f  _\n\nBefore\n\nTHE H\"0N'BLE MR JUSTICE HICILUYJAAEJI G 1   a, 7\n\nCriminal Revision Petiticm NoV.':26'9\/2008 '    3\n\nBetween:\n\nK. Manjunath, _e  ;\n\nS\/o K. Bheemappa, V   '\n\nAged about 26 years, V A ' V _  ' . _ _ s_ .\n\nOcc: Tractor Driver,      \"   \nR\/atA1aburvi11age, ;'   ._  'V   V\"   \u00bb\n\nH.B.Ha11i Taluk. ' _ :\ufb01__   \u00bb    PETITIONER\n\n(By Sri.G. R. (}u:,\u00a3\u00a5ur;ia{tn;5\u00bb,{ad;}f';   \nAnd: ' V V A\n\nState,  * _ \nBy S'\u00a72.1V:&gt;~Insp.6%r\u00a7\u00a7toro*of Po1iCe.,.. A V\nKottur \u00a7'vo1iceve..Sta,.'AtiOn;.A  \"\"\" \nKottur, .  _    RESPONDENT\n\n';{By Sri. P.HR}otk\u00a7iioC1i';}\u00a3'CGP)\n\n_  Criminal Revision Petition is fiied under S397 r\/W S401\n Cr.\"F'C',~~praying to~set--aside the judgment and conviction dated }6.1.2008\n '1Vp'a:ssed'~.Lb3rV the Addl. -District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track No.1}! at\n\"-- \"~,\u00a7-{ospet i13Cr1iA.No.113\/2007 con\ufb01rming the judgment and conviction\n  daj\u00e9e_d'2'5.7';.20'07 in C.C.No.294\/ 2006 passed by the Civii Judge (Jr.Dn) 86\n\n  I JMFCQTTHagaribomrnanahalli, and etc.\n\n5%\"\n\n\n\nThe petition coming on for hearing this day, the Court made the\nfollowing:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>This revision petition is by the accused seeking to set aside the<\/p>\n<p>order passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) 85 JMFC at <\/p>\n<p>in C.C.No.294\/2006 convicting and sentencing the accusediiof  <\/p>\n<p>1.1\/3 279 and 304A of IPC, as well as the judgnient. and  i T i<\/p>\n<p>the Fast Track Court No.III, Hospet, in Cr1.A.f\\7o.  &#8216;~ , \u00ab. if <\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioner has been sentenced if toundergo simple<br \/>\nimprisonment for six months andi_t'(3.,.pa3fif1neviofsV_P.sL3.OO0\/ &#8212; for the offence<br \/>\nu\/ s 304A and also sentenced to payi of -1&#8243;\u20ac~s..&#8217;~ for the offence<\/p>\n<p>u\/s 279 of IPC  for one month,<br \/>\nmodifying the orderggof  the Magistrate sentencing the<br \/>\naccused to undergo  iirnpriisonrinent for one year for the offence 11\/ s<br \/>\n3O4AI:and..in1pri:sonrnent of iisijfrrionths for the offence u\/ s 279 IPC and to<\/p>\n<p>pay fine   &#8216;]:Zs.1000\/&#8211; respectively, for aforesaid offences.<br \/>\n , 3. &#8216;qH&#8217;earc1.&#8217;  &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p> 4*&#8217; Etuiisx stated that the petitioner being driver of the tractor<\/p>\n<p> . =.gbe._arin&#8217;gi_Reg.No:K}ii35\/T&#8211;2790, on 28.3.2006 around 1.30 p.rn. drove the<\/p>\n<p>))f&#8217;\/<\/p>\n<p>tractor in a rash and negligent manner with the load of stones from<br \/>\nMallanayakanahalli to Alabur, and at a place called Sangameshwara<br \/>\nCross on the way between Ittigi to Kottur near the land of Banakar<\/p>\n<p>Nagabasappa, the deceased by name Kote alias Koteppa who wasialliowed<\/p>\n<p>to sit on the mudguard of the Engine of the said Tractor__fe~ll <\/p>\n<p>over by the tractor and trailer, due to which the deceased&#8221;s&#8221;i;:ccumbedv_gto&#8217; \u00bb so <\/p>\n<p>injuries. The petitioner was charge sheetett.<br \/>\nafter trial passed an order of conviction xa_n&#8217;d__sentenced  i<\/p>\n<p>As against the said order of: convictiong:.thezpet.iitioner &#8216;preferred an<br \/>\nappeal before the learned  :.was dismissed by<\/p>\n<p>reducin the order of im risonment&#8221;froi&#8217;n  ear .to7six months for the<br \/>\nP ._ . . .. . .4<\/p>\n<p>offence u\/ s 304:}-X  the sentence so far as fine is<\/p>\n<p>concerned. Hence,*the petitioner is..i_n&#8221;&#8216;tl*iis revision petition.<\/p>\n<p> Theqievidence Rajappa is to the effect that the<br \/>\ndeceased  sitting&#8211;_on_the mudguard on his own and due to his<br \/>\nnegligence&#8221;  sustained injuries though the vehicle was<\/p>\n<p>driven in a moderate speed. Even the persons who were travelling in the<\/p>\n<p> Sand 6 also turned hostile. The learned Magistrate<\/p>\n<p>_iintoV_icon&#8217;sideration the evidence of all the witnesses, formed an<\/p>\n<p> the deceased Kote alias Koteppa was allowed to sit by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;W<\/p>\n<p>petitioner on the bumper of the engine by his side. The tractor which<br \/>\nwas loaded with stones was driven by the accused in a rash&#8221;&#8216;manner<\/p>\n<p>consequent to which the deceased fell down and run over l)y_Jthe*ltrac~ror.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Magistrate held: that allowing the deceasedVt__o  <\/p>\n<p>mudguard portion of the engine of the tractor: &#8216;_arno}.=_ntsi._ to&#8217;-.anVi&#8221;actii&#8217; if<\/p>\n<p>negligence and rashness, which attracts theilllingredlientsgtot&#8221;<br \/>\nand 304A of IPC. The learned Magistrate  &#8220;the<br \/>\nMahazar, has observed that atthe spot&#8221;of..ac.cident the&#8217;re.  humps on<br \/>\naccount of road repair where the &#8216;have exercised care<br \/>\nand caution . The postnfiortcni   cause of death<br \/>\nwas due to  which may be due to<br \/>\nblunt force applied.td&#8221;thef&#8217;le;ft._sider:of  which may due to road<br \/>\ntraffic accident;Th.erefore;:- &#8216;Magistrate held that the fact of<br \/>\ndeceased run  trailer is sufficiently proved and<br \/>\nestalglished, y,.}gt\\ccordingl3r.::Vlthe learned Magistrate holding the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>responsil3le\u00ab  death of deceased having permitted the deceased to<\/p>\n<p>{sit on thel&#8221;iniudg&#8217;iia.r\u00a7i&#8217;\ufb02poirtion of the engine, formed an opinion that<\/p>\n<p>p1etitiio_ner  c.orn:rilitted offence of negligence and rashness which<\/p>\n<p> of sections u\/ s 279 and 304A of IPC. Accordingly, he<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Chas c_lonv&#8217;ict&#8217;ed7and sentenced the accused.<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>6. In appeal the learned Fast Tract Court Judge on re-<br \/>\nappreciation of entire evidence has held that rrierely because eye<\/p>\n<p>witnesses have turned hostile, it does not mean that rash ggand,iVneig1iigent<\/p>\n<p>act of the accused is not proved. Having noticed that the    <\/p>\n<p>is a straight road with humps on which the &#8220;accused d:rovei._tlie&#8217;&#8211;.tractori T<\/p>\n<p>negligently in great speed as a result of whiiichideiceasedriifell <\/p>\n<p>succumbed to injuries instantaneouslygvlyithe learned Judge<\/p>\n<p>held that by allowing the deceased z to sigti&#8217;o&#8217;11..&#8217;humper&#8217; by his side, the<br \/>\naccused has committed offence ofiiras&#8217;hn&#8217;es.i3  negligence. Accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>the learned appellate  modified&#8217; the ofi-learned Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p>7. The learned  the petitioner in support<br \/>\nof his subrnissioinisi,i_i of Ori.ssa High Court<br \/>\nreported in 19\u20aclG in the case of Penn Vs. State,<br \/>\nwherein the deceased&#8221;  tractor slowly and carefully and<\/p>\n<p>that.&#8217;jthe\u00bb.tra(:tor had=c.overed&#8221;&#8216;on&#8217;liy 18 miles in 3 hours and accused was<\/p>\n<p>driving &#8216;the traetor._tinith_e &#8220;night only on the instructions of his immediate<\/p>\n<p>boss, the dcceased.,i&#8217;v\u00a7:hAo had taken a seat in the tractor i.n a precarious<\/p>\n<p> .p.ositi4on__withoutv caring for the risk and consequences of the same and<\/p>\n<p> mindful of the expected jolts and bumps of the tractor<\/p>\n<p>iwhjiile_i&#8221;:nov;ing on the said road, held that no criminal rashness or<\/p>\n<p>W&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>negligence could be attributed to the accused to hold him guilty u \/s 297<br \/>\nand 304&#8211;A of the Penal Code. He submits that in the case on hand, as<br \/>\nobserved by the Sessions Court, from the evidence on recordhwhat is<br \/>\nbeing noticed is that at the spot of the accident there were  The<\/p>\n<p>deceased was sitting on the mudguard on his own initial&#8221;precaI.&#8217;ioiJ.,s<\/p>\n<p>position without caring for the risk and consequences*&#8217;of:the&#8221;~same and <\/p>\n<p>without being mindful of the expected jolts&#8217;: andLbulrnpis..lofilthettractor l&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>while moving on the said road and there. is contributory&#8217;negligegnce on<\/p>\n<p>the part of the deceased also. Further  abstence of eye witnesses<br \/>\nsupporting the case of the pros._ec&#8217;1.1tion, :the~\u00ab._pe_ititi.oner cannot be held<\/p>\n<p>guilty of the aforesaid offences.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. As seen   &#8216;evidence onwrecord, the driver has driven<br \/>\nthe tractor loadeidtwith &#8216;storiesiiira._fs~pe&#8217;ed and rashness on the humps,<br \/>\nconsequent to .which'&#8221;&#8216;th_:e d.e&#8217;ceasediwho was sitting on the bumper fell<\/p>\n<p>down.&#8217; as&#8211;obse.rvedsV.byvi&#8211; the coiurtsvbelow. The evidence of eye&#8211;witnesses as<\/p>\n<p>is elicited &#8216;in_ tl1.eii%.cr&#8217;oVss&#8211;&#8216;cxarnination is, that the vehicle was moving in<\/p>\n<p>li.r,j:i&#8217;od\u00bberate speed. _ ,lBt_e7:that as it may, admittedly, the petitioner has<\/p>\n<p> the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act by allowing the deceased to<\/p>\n<p> the mtid_.guard by his side, which is a rash and negligent act of the<\/p>\n<p>dri_ver&#8217;.'&#8221;l In such circumstances, the driver of tractor was expected to<\/p>\n<p>\\&gt;&lt;\/<\/p>\n<p>exercise due care in not allowing any person to sit on the bumper by his<br \/>\nside. In the circumstances, opinion formed by both the courts beiow<\/p>\n<p>cannot be found fauit with. Moreover, speed is no.t__ithVe&#039;icriteria.<\/p>\n<p>Whether the vehicle was driven fast or slow but the&#039;t\u00abi.possibViiiity~<\/p>\n<p>person sitting on the bumper falling down Wiili be.r_nore,; &#039;at a&#039; <\/p>\n<p>piace where there are humps. Even contribtitory &quot;the<\/p>\n<p>deceased petitioner cannot be exonerate&#8211;di&quot;&#039;~<\/p>\n<p>9. in the circurnstanc.esp;&#8211; the rev&#8221;i&#8217;sion&#8221;\u00abpetition is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>Send back the records.\n<\/p>\n<p>   3UDGE<\/p>\n<p>Sub\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD DATED Tms THE 10TH DAY or sEPTEMBE=;\u00a7 f _ Before THE H&#8221;0N&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE HICILUYJAAEJI G 1 a, 7 Criminal Revision Petiticm NoV.&#8217;:26&#8217;9\/2008 &#8216; 3 Between: K. Manjunath, _e ; S\/o [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-205294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-20T06:58:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-20T06:58:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1195,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009\",\"name\":\"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-20T06:58:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-20T06:58:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-20T06:58:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009"},"wordCount":1195,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009","name":"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-20T06:58:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-manjunath-vs-state-on-10-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K Manjunath vs State on 10 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205294\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}