{"id":206319,"date":"2009-03-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009"},"modified":"2015-01-12T19:34:20","modified_gmt":"2015-01-12T14:04:20","slug":"narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nFAO.No. 236 of 2008()\n\n\n1. NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED 50, S\/O.RAMAN NAIR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. PREETHI, AGED 38, W\/O.NATHAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. NEETHU, AGED 12, D\/O.NATHAN, KIZHAKKE\n\n3. NEENU, AGED 12, D\/O.NATHAN, KIZHAKKE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :24\/03\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n          ===========================\n          F.A.O.  NO.236    OF 2008\n          ===========================\n\n     Dated this the 24th day of March,2009\n\n                   JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>    Plaintiff in O.S.170\/2002 on the file of<\/p>\n<p>Munsiff  Court,  Perumbavoor   who   is     the<\/p>\n<p>respondent in A.S.114\/2007, is the appellant.<\/p>\n<p>Second defendant and defendants 3 and 4 the<\/p>\n<p>other legal heirs of deceased first defendant<\/p>\n<p>who are the appellants in A.S.114\/2007 on the<\/p>\n<p>file  of   Sub  court,   Perumbavoor  are   the<\/p>\n<p>respondents.  Appellant instituted O.S.170\/2002<\/p>\n<p>claiming damages for defamation      originally<\/p>\n<p>from the first defendant and his first wife the<\/p>\n<p>first respondent.   On the death of the first<\/p>\n<p>defendant,  respondents  2  and  3   were  also<\/p>\n<p>impleaded as additional defendants.     Learned<\/p>\n<p>Munsiff granted a decree in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant to realise Rs.50,000\/- as damages.<\/p>\n<p>It was challenged before Sub Court, Perumbavoor<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">F.A.O.236\/2008               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>in A.S.114\/2007.      Learned Sub Judge   after hearing<\/p>\n<p>the     appeal,   as   per  judgment   dated  16.2.2008<\/p>\n<p>remanded the suit to the trial court for fresh<\/p>\n<p>disposal      after   granting   opportunity   to   the<\/p>\n<p>respondents to adduce defence evidence.      The order<\/p>\n<p>of remand is challenged in this appeal.<\/p>\n<p>      2. The appeal was admitted on the following<\/p>\n<p>substantial question of law.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>               Whether the order of<\/p>\n<p>            remand   by    the   first<\/p>\n<p>            appellate court is legal<\/p>\n<p>            when the appellants in the<\/p>\n<p>            first appeal have no case<\/p>\n<p>            that they were not granted<\/p>\n<p>            opportunity   to    adduce<\/p>\n<p>            evidence or were prevented<\/p>\n<p>            from adducing evidence.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.       Learned   counsel   appearing  for  the<\/p>\n<p>appellant and respondents were heard.<\/p>\n<p>      4.     The suit was for damages contending that<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">F.A.O.236\/2008               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the     defendants   by   filing  a  complaint   before<\/p>\n<p>Kunnathunad      Police registered as Crime No.144\/2001<\/p>\n<p>under section 324 of IPC caused damages to the<\/p>\n<p>reputation       of   the   appellant   by  committing<\/p>\n<p>defamation       and therefore he is entitled to get<\/p>\n<p>damages.       The suit was resisted by    respondents<\/p>\n<p>contending that Police has registered the case and<\/p>\n<p>there was justification for lodging the complaint<\/p>\n<p>and the reputation of the appellant            was not<\/p>\n<p>affected by the complaint and it is justified by<\/p>\n<p>truth and therefore the suit is not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p>      5. Before the trial court appellant and three<\/p>\n<p>witnesses were examined on his side and on the side<\/p>\n<p>of    the    respondent  first  respondent the   second<\/p>\n<p>defendant was examined and Exts.A1 to A6 were<\/p>\n<p>marked.       It is on that evidence, learned Munsiff<\/p>\n<p>granted a decree.       The learned Sub Judge did not<\/p>\n<p>analyse the evidence or found that     appreciation of<\/p>\n<p>evidence by the trial court was not proper.     On the<\/p>\n<p>other hand after narrating the arguments raised by<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">F.A.O.236\/2008              4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the appellants and respondents in the first appeal,<\/p>\n<p>the     learned   Sub  Judge  remanded the suit  as<\/p>\n<p>follows:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>          &#8220;The   burden  is   on   the<\/p>\n<p>           defendant  to  prove   that<\/p>\n<p>           they   are   justified   in<\/p>\n<p>           filing the complaint.  The<\/p>\n<p>           defendant  did  not  adduce<\/p>\n<p>           evidence  to   prove   this<\/p>\n<p>           aspect.    Therefore,   the<\/p>\n<p>           counsel      wants       an<\/p>\n<p>           opportunity  for   adducing<\/p>\n<p>           fresh evidence.  It can be<\/p>\n<p>           seen   that    the    first<\/p>\n<p>           defendant is no more.  The<\/p>\n<p>           2nd defendant  is  a  widow<\/p>\n<p>           with  two  minor  children.<\/p>\n<p>           Considering this aspect it<\/p>\n<p>           is   necessary   that   the<\/p>\n<p>           defendant should be given<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">F.A.O.236\/2008               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           an  opportunity  to  adduce<\/p>\n<p>           evidence  regarding   their<\/p>\n<p>           defence.    Therefore,  the<\/p>\n<p>           judgment and decree of the<\/p>\n<p>           lower court is set aside.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Learned counsel appearing for the appellant made<\/p>\n<p>available      copy of the appeal memorandum.   It is<\/p>\n<p>seen from the appeal memorandum that there was no<\/p>\n<p>case for the respondents in the appeal that they<\/p>\n<p>were not granted sufficient opportunity to adduce<\/p>\n<p>evidence.      There is also no case that any of the<\/p>\n<p>witnesses who were sought to be examined could not<\/p>\n<p>be examined for any reason.       There was no prayer<\/p>\n<p>for a remand of the suit for adducing further<\/p>\n<p>evidence.     Learned Sub Judge also did not find that<\/p>\n<p>the appellants in the first appeal were prevented<\/p>\n<p>from adducing necessary evidence either by an act<\/p>\n<p>of the trial court or for any other reason.         In<\/p>\n<p>such     circumstance,   learned  Sub Judge  was  not<\/p>\n<p>justified in setting aside the decree and judgment<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">F.A.O.236\/2008              6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of the trial court and remanding        the suit for<\/p>\n<p>granting an opportunity to the defendants to adduce<\/p>\n<p>evidence      without  considering  the  evidence  on<\/p>\n<p>record.       It is more so when even the defendants<\/p>\n<p>themselves have no case that they did not get<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to adduce evidence.<\/p>\n<p>      In such circumstance, appeal is allowed. The<\/p>\n<p>judgment       in   A.S.114\/2007   is    set   aside.<\/p>\n<p>A.S.114\/2007 is remanded to     Sub Court, Perumbavoor<\/p>\n<p>for fresh disposal in accordance with law.    Learned<\/p>\n<p>Sub Judge       to hear the appeal and dispose    the<\/p>\n<p>appeal on merits.      Parties are directed to appear<\/p>\n<p>before the Sub Court, Perumbavoor on 26.5.2009.<\/p>\n<p>                                  M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR<br \/>\n                                           JUDGE<br \/>\ntpl\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>      W.P.(C).NO. \/06\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>     SEPTEMBER,2006<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM FAO.No. 236 of 2008() 1. NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED 50, S\/O.RAMAN NAIR, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. PREETHI, AGED 38, W\/O.NATHAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. NEETHU, AGED 12, D\/O.NATHAN, KIZHAKKE 3. NEENU, AGED 12, D\/O.NATHAN, KIZHAKKE For Petitioner :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-12T14:04:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-12T14:04:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":755,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-12T14:04:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-12T14:04:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-12T14:04:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009"},"wordCount":755,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009","name":"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-12T14:04:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanan-nair-vs-preethi-on-24-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Narayanan Nair vs Preethi on 24 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206319\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}