{"id":206390,"date":"2011-09-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"},"modified":"2016-01-07T02:53:22","modified_gmt":"2016-01-06T21:23:22","slug":"mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                            \u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                     at\n                                                            New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001768\n                                                                                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0        \u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n\n           Shri\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Kant\u00a0Soni\n           E\u00ad258,\u00a0Greater\u00a0Kailash=1\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0048.\n\n           Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\n\n\n\n           Respondent(s)\n\n           Department\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Archives\n           18\u00adA,\u00a0satsang\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Marg\n           Spl.\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area\n           New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Girish\u00a0Pandey\n           \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Akash\u00a0Mohapatra\n           \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Sanjiv\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0PIO\n\n\n\n           \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n                                   Information\u00a0Commissioner                       :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                             In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                              at\n                                                     New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                                                           \u00a0\n                     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001768\n\n\n                                                          ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>    1.   The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a0\u00a08.4.11\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Archives,\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0Sale\u00a0Deed\u00a0of\u00a0property\u00a0bearing\u00a0No.\u00a0E\u00a0258\u00a0Greater\u00a0Lao;asj\u00adI,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         which\u00a0was\u00a0registered\u00a0on\u00a02.3.1981\u00a0vide\u00a0Registration\u00a0No.\u00a0930\u00a0in\u00a0\u00a0Book\u00a0No.1\u00a0Vol\u00a0No.\u00a04434,\u00a0including\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0document.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0status\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0sale\u00a0deed\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0certified\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0\u00a0Sale\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Deed\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Sale\u00a0Deed\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0registered\u00a0or\u00a0not,\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         on \u00a0 \u00a0 24.5.11 \u00a0 providing \u00a0 point \u00a0 wise\u00a0 information\u00a0 and\u00a0 also\u00a0 stating\u00a0 that\u00a0 \u00a0 the\u00a0 Department\u00a0 is \u00a0 only\u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         custodian\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 records\u00a0 transferred\u00a0from\u00a0 Sub\u00a0 Registrar\u00a0Office\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0 Department\u00a0cannot\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         ascertain\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0Document\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0registered\u00a0or\u00a0not\u00a0since\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0pasted\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Volume\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         No.\u00a04434.\u00a0Hence\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0position\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0document.\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0 \u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a0 \u00a025.5.11.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         dated\u00a021.6.11\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0apparent\u00a0\u00a0from\u00a0his\u00a0query\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0sale\u00a0deed\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         registered\u00a0on\u00a02.3.1981\u00a0vide\u00a0Regn\u00a0No.\u00a0930\u00a0in\u00a0Book\u00a0No.1\u00a0Volume\u00a0No.\u00a04434\u00a0at\u00a0pages\u00a097\u00a0to\u00a0102.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Accordingly\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0two\u00a0queries\u00a0are\u00a0self\u00a0answered.\u00a0\u00a0However\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0SR\u00a0III\u00a0to\u00a0confirm\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         needs\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0a\u00a0look\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0document.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0therefore\u00a0\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0Appellant\u00a0will\u00a0\u00a0have\u00a0to\u00a0go\u00a0through\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0prescribed\u00a0procedure\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0the\u00a0Indian\u00a0Registration\u00a0Act\u00a0for\u00a0obtaining\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply\u00a0filed\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0requesting\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         for\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0document.\n<\/p>\n<p> Decision.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a02\u00a0. During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 Department \u00a0 of \u00a0 Archives \u00a0 produced \u00a0 before \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Commission\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0Vol.No.4434\u00a0of\u00a0Book\u00a0no.\u00a01\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0 \u00a0them\u00a0containing\u00a0the\u00a0pasted\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        records \u00a0 of \u00a0 various \u00a0 properties, \u00a0 which \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 archived \u00a0 \u00a0 while \u00a0 pointing \u00a0 out \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 pasted\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        documents\u00a0of\u00a0properties\u00a0\u00a0are\u00a0available\u00a0till\u00a0pages\u00a092\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0that\u00a0from\u00a0\u00a0pages\u00a0103\u00a0onwards\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0pages\u00a092\u00a0to\u00a0102\u00a0are\u00a0missing\u00a0.\u00a0He\u00a0concluded\u00a0that\u00a0these\u00a0 \u00a0pages\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0pasted\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Volume\u00a04434\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0When\u00a0\u00a0questioned\u00a0\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0where\u00a0information\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        can\u00a0be\u00a0located,\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0 Respondent\u00a0 \u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Archives\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0these\u00a0documents\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        available\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Registrar&#8217;s\u00a0Office\u00a0(3).\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Representative\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Registrar\u00a0Office\u00a0(3)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        who\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0only\u00a0information\u00a0that\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        available\u00a0with\u00a0them\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0reference\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Registration\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0property\u00a0E\u00a0258,\u00a0Greater\u00a0kailash\u00a0I,\u00a0New\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Delhi\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Index\u00a0register\u00a0of\u00a0Book\u00a0I\u00a0.\u00a0He\u00a0admitted\u00a0that\u00a0from\u00a0this\u00a0register\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0evident\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0property\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        had\u00a0indeed\u00a0been\u00a0registered\u00a0 \u00a0in\u00a0GK\u00adI.\u00a0However,\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0possible\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        ascertain\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0property\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Index\u00a0Register.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0very\u00a0little\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        likelihood\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0pages\u00a097\u00a0to\u00a0102\u00a0\u00a0being\u00a0pasted\u00a0in\u00a0some\u00a0other\u00a0Volume\u00a0other\u00a0than\u00a0\u00a0Volume\u00a0no.\u00a0\u00a04434.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        since\u00a0pages\u00a0are\u00a0pasted\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0serial\u00a0order.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   3.   After\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0possible\u00a0to\u00a0authorize\u00a0supply\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0sale\u00a0deed\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0since\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0other\u00a0than\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Index\u00a0Register\u00a0is\u00a0available\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        with\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0However,\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0recommends\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        that\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0matter\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0missing\u00a0sale\u00a0deed\u00a0be\u00a0enquired\u00a0into\u00a0\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0evidence\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0 \u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0existence\u00a0of\u00a0such\u00a0a\u00a0document\u00a0 \u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0any\u00a0documents\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0under\u00a0cover\u00a0of\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0genuineness\u00a0of\u00a0those\u00a0documents,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        with\u00a0the\u00a0objective\u00a0of\u00a0exploring\u00a0the\u00a0possibility\u00a0of\u00a0providing\u00a0a\u00a0duplicate\u00a0sale\u00a0deed\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>   4.   \u00a0The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0closed.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                        (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                               Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.        Shri\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Kant\u00a0Soni<br \/>\n          E\u00ad258,\u00a0Greater\u00a0Kailash=1<br \/>\n          New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110\u00a0048.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>2.\u00a0\u00a0         The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Department\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Archives\n             18\u00adA,\u00a0satsang\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Marg\n             Spl.\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area\n             New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n\n\n\n3.            The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\n              Deputy\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0(Central)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a014,\u00a0Daryaganj\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0002.\n\n\n\n\n4.            \u00a0Sub\u00a0Registrar\u00adIII\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Sub\u00a0Registrar\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0III\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a04\/7\u00a0Asaf\u00a0Ali\u00a0Road\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0002.\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 \u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001768 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Kant\u00a0Soni E\u00ad258,\u00a0Greater\u00a0Kailash=1 New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110\u00a0048. Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present. Respondent(s) Department\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Archives 18\u00adA,\u00a0satsang\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Marg Spl.\u00a0Institutional\u00a0Area New\u00a0Delhi. Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Girish\u00a0Pandey \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Akash\u00a0Mohapatra \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Sanjiv\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0PIO \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001768 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a0\u00a08.4.11\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Archives,\u00a0seeking\u00a0 information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0Sale\u00a0Deed\u00a0of\u00a0property\u00a0bearing\u00a0No.\u00a0E\u00a0258\u00a0Greater\u00a0Lao;asj\u00adI,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 which\u00a0was\u00a0registered\u00a0on\u00a02.3.1981\u00a0vide\u00a0Registration\u00a0No.\u00a0930\u00a0in\u00a0\u00a0Book\u00a0No.1\u00a0Vol\u00a0No.\u00a04434,\u00a0including\u00a0a\u00a0 copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0document.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0status\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0sale\u00a0deed\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0certified\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0\u00a0Sale\u00a0 Deed\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Sale\u00a0Deed\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0registered\u00a0or\u00a0not,\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-06T21:23:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-06T21:23:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":669,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-06T21:23:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-06T21:23:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-06T21:23:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"},"wordCount":669,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","name":"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-06T21:23:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-suresh-kant-soni-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Suresh Kant Soni vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206390\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}