{"id":206520,"date":"2008-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008"},"modified":"2018-05-25T23:34:03","modified_gmt":"2018-05-25T18:04:03","slug":"rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal … vs Government Of Karnataka By … on 15 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal … vs Government Of Karnataka By … on 15 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda<\/div>\n
  \u00bb .2-1:35:15; DEPARTMENT\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALQRI_E3\u00ab~.V_:\nDATED THIS THE 15:11 DAY OF JUL'? 2003..  ' if   \n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'i3LE MR. JUSTICE 1{.Sz.?\u00a74EE:I::>'\u00a7:1f;m 4'   \u00e9  E\nAND  % .. .V ._ A  V~. \nTHE I-E{)N'BLl3} MR. JUSTICE B.'\u00e9R.\u00a7\u00a7*{EN;vAsE \nliF.P.(HC) Ne..z46;o7:   \nw.r.(Hcmo.146Io1 A    \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nRMGOPAL MVARDA-   _  %\n\n3\/0 LATE MANGILAI, M;'\u00a7RDA\u00bb .. % %\n\nAGED46YEARS M    \n\nN04 SIDDANNA\"LAI'IE \n\nRAMANAPET (moss \"  V. \n\nBANGALORE-'$3   -   PETITIONER\n\n(l\u00e9sgr\u00e9g\ufb01i: \u00abKV\u00a7R'a1~\u00a3%%'%$.\u00a7';a;*1ALI & GIRISH B S,ADVOCATE)\n Anm 'V     \nT? 'Vv. i'}V(}OVEI\u00a7PE\"MEZ\u00a7$'F  KARNATAKA\n 'BY P'R1NCi?AL_ SECRETARY\n% W a i.\"HOi'v.'.E smmmmanw\n.:  VIEHANAASOUDHA\n m.Nr5m..oi2E-1\n\n':TE2;;i;D'p1\u00a7 CHIEF' SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL\n'SECREFARY TO GOVT op' KARNATAKA\n\n  VIDHANA SOUDI-IA\n BANGALORE1\n\n%\/\n\n \n\n\n\nBY SM'? VATSALA WATSA\n\n3 semen SUPERINTENDENT\nCENTRAL PRISON     \nBANGALOREJO0    \n\n(By :SInt Geetha Manon, AGA FDR A.\n\nW.P.(I-IC) FILED U\/A 226 85 227_%0F THE 'GQNSTITUTION 012'\nINDIA BY THE ADV. FOR THE PETI'i?ION_ER PRAYING To ISSUE A\nWRIT in THE NATURE 01?? HABEA--L:s%.c'@?RPUs 0?. ANY OTHER\nAPPROPRIATE WRIT, OR\u00a3)_ER OR I)iVRE'.,_t'3.TI'ON BECLARING THE\nDEFENTION op SI-{R1 BALO0 ?Ar{::':\u00bbmR1\u00a5AA.@*~23ALAJ1, s\/0. SHRI\nRAMBILAS PANCHARIA, Bf: \"0r<::;E;f< rm ; SCF 2007 DATED\n21.9.2007 (ANNEXUREW) AS '1L1;,EGAL..\u00a2ND\u00abVyo1b ABINITIG.\n\nW'..P.(HC) 1vo.1g1:r_}ar3_%2*1':j:_?:[  ~ "\n\nMR MAHESH MUL<'.:{1J\u00a7If_I3.   \nsxo KUBERAPQPA MULGI)r\u00e9D'j;.\nAGED 32 YEARS   .  '-- \n\nNO.B[1:2,"K..H.B. (30.1-ONY:\n\n "  '  ..... V'\n5.YELAHANKA "\n\n  (By.Sr.:i"KA :'ra'n'.V"'.'3_.'.'J\u00a7'V\u00abraIi and: GIRXSH BSADV )\n\nK :_   EMVERNMENT op KARNATAKA\n\nBA'N.GALORE'-6_5~ I'   PETITIONER\n\n BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY\nHOME DEPARTMENT\nVIDHANA SGUDI-EA\nSANGALORE-O1\n\n \n\n\n\n$5\n\npassed after consuiting the Home Minister which is bad\nin law.\n\n8. in the petition averments, there was a  e\ufb01ega\ufb01en\n\nthat the statements of Shanthilal, Nemichand  \nShanna have been recorded by the  'au\u20acI1<:2rity  seine\u00bb 7. n\n\nhave noi been placed before the  \n\nrespondents 1 and 3 in the coun\u00a7\u00e9;rVbstatemei1't.denied<\/pre>\n
the said petition avexmenti-3 nor.eha1.re’~s\u00a7i\u00e9tted t1\ufb013\u00a31t”theV: same have<\/p>\n
been furnished to the empowk’   –\n<\/p>\n
9. 7.’_I’}:1e_  2 iater on by an interlocutory<\/p>\n
aiaplicationg  ‘adVdi.1io11″al’eeunter statement wherein it is<\/p>\n
admitted ‘that t1:.ie’-stgitemehtef Shanthjlai and Vikas Nemichand is<\/p>\n
   ‘the  has been farms’ bed to the empowered<\/p>\n
  allegation that the authorities Iecorded the<\/p>\n
  statement pf Bhegavathi Sharma is denied as false.<\/p>\n
 A. ,  ‘f’*Iie case file of the empowered authority i3 secured for<\/p>\n
  The order sheet pertaining to WP (HC) No.146\/ ()7 reads<\/p>\n
* :””ah.1::’.\u00e9:-\n<\/p>\n
thus: –\n<\/p>\n
“16) On considezing the documents and the screening
\ndetention. of Shri Baioo
\nPanchariya is justified. Hence he may issue the
\ndetention order U] s sway of the COFEPOSA Ac’i:.1 _ *
\nsd\/–\n<\/p>\n
(Vatsala Wzits\u00e9ti ~~ f jj =.. f ~12   .
\nPrl. Sccmtaxyhto (‘reyt.”, % — ‘<\/p>\n
con1mittee’s report, the<\/p>\n
Home &Tra21sf;\u00bbori’~.Ee.pt  u 2 <\/p>\n
1?. Horfblc Minister for Homcv”; — app:gv\u00a2d%.%< —  v  "
\n_ 4_ 'MB. pmgmhv 2
\niv-iiaiistcr f()i'pI\ufb02IE;, Law, Lmsiice<\/p>\n
 l2ights*:a3;d'?ar13;.A\ufb02airs"\n<\/p>\n
11..VThe%\u00a7n\ufb01i\u00a2\u00a7’:’\u00a7met%  WP (HG) No.14?\/O7 reads<\/p>\n
   ()’ n._sin:_”..4cxamination of documents and<\/p>\n
  tlie Skzmening Committee, the proposal of<\/p>\n
‘ . :._{‘)R.i’~.  Kubeerappa and Shri Panchariya
\n‘ ” ‘Vanda: C1_OF’EPOSAis fully substantiated. Hence, he
\n the detention order U\/s 3(1)(I) of
\nA ‘–4.__CG_.FEP3GSA for Shri Subhas Mulgund Kuberappa.<\/p>\n
Sci] –\n<\/p>\n
(Vatsaia Watsa)
\nPrl. Secretary to Govt,
\nHome 85 Transport Dept\n<\/p>\n
16. I-Ioxfbie Minister for Home — Approved<\/p>\n
Sdl –\n<\/p>\n
MB. Prakash
\nMinister for Home, Law, Jus\ufb01cc
\nHuman Rights and Par1y.A\ufb02’a.irs”<\/p>\n
\u00a32. The pmceedings in the order sheet flrxat<\/p>\n
the empoweied authority has not exercised.’v_A’_’i.\u00a7s’  <\/p>\n
independently in passing the    1<\/p>\n
otherwise diseiose that the 6II1p\u20ac)>VV\u00a72IBdV43\u00a211:\ufb02f1OI’it\u00a7Ff1.1\u00a7i?\u00a7A. <\/p>\n
the discretion to the Home  to” ap_;;m=i\u00ab.-  Hoxeder
\ndeten\ufb01on. The imyugned Iexjder  h”p’p’i’ova1 by the
\nHome Minister on 20.8.07    above material
\nwould patently s3:_1:o1u~:%;;\ufb02-lzxat   authority
\nin getting the   the Home Minister is
\nillegai    aThe….p\u00a7e-titions are allowed. The
\n  both the cases) are set aside.\n<\/p>\n
The dete:\u00a3111es”‘2.=,_z_fe’  to. eet free forthwith if not required to<\/p>\n
__be detaiifged in ‘other <\/p>\n
   V’  with the record, we are impelled to<\/p>\n
   obsei;ve”%Athai.  :j)ract:ices and the procedures in vogue with URI<\/p>\n
 _\u00e9u.1f\u00a3horit’y  the empowered authority are totally improper if not<\/p>\n
  Vie wish to make the following obsezvations for the future<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
14. The statements desirably are to be  \/41<\/p>\n
narrative manner. In the present cast. the mannenof  <\/p>\n
recorded is not in a prudent manner.  :i1_1usn”‘ste”  excerpts-Vouf \u00bb _ <\/p>\n
the statement recorded is extracted hefeunf:let’:fjv  1 d ‘<\/p>\n
“To the query whether on app1icaf;ion’V_ under”
\nDFRC to avail Customs” i)uty*~ .Exen1pt’i:m.
\nScheme has been made-_ by  Hansa
\nAgencies, Bangalore. E state’At3mt”‘no application
\nunder DFRC  1t:ade~–..by”M\/s Hansa
\nAgencies, Bangaloreg’  Balsji. and Shri
\nSubash Mulgund didnot ‘Bene\ufb01t in
\nthe entire..t:1″ansa{:I:ion”.2u1c1″‘Sl31_i ‘Bn?.aji did the
\nemzire treinsiete\ufb01ons\u00e9fot nae, as he’is~\u00a3ny brother.<\/p>\n
To      seen the sarees
\n ii::,_t11e–e.1_f.1m_1r1e oi-‘–M\/’s Hausa Agencies
\nand exfp0:fted;i. state that I have not seen the<\/p>\n
same.” .\n<\/p>\n
15, The ntjoxfe steteiizent recorded is neither in a nanative<\/p>\n
gfomn   aevtguestion-‘–a;nswer form. It is desirable that the<\/p>\n
 ” jeooxding the statement should do better to<\/p>\n
 dine .sfstenient in a proper style of narrative form. _<\/p>\n
 nsopnetimes iii; Inay he necessaiy that the statement may be<\/p>\n
  a ques\ufb01onranswer form by writing the question and<\/p>\n
    the question separately.\n<\/p>\n
16. The sponsoring authority should submit all the<\/p>\n
” necessary documents, which are relied upon to the Empowerizlg<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
1}<\/p>\n
Authority. Wltile doing so, the sponsoring Authoxitjtt\u00e9make<\/p>\n
the list of the documents furnished  <\/p>\n
acknowledgement to that e\ufb02ect frori.i tl:ie’o\u00a3:}3ee  <\/p>\n
Authority to obviate the suspicion     and
\nplanting mateml documents the    of the<\/p>\n
detention order.\n<\/p>\n
1’7. In t:he pzese1A1t   authority has
\nsurrezude-red its”    the \ufb01le to the Home
\nMinister to    Smt Geetha Mellon,
\nGovt, ueiitntvnaitted that placing the \ufb01le
\nbefore Home t.-ttppmval would not be illegal in View<\/p>\n
of the pmvieions’  Section 1 1 of the COFEPOSA ACT.<\/p>\n
 ‘~  coti\u00e9ideza\ufb01on, of the provisions of Section 11 of the<\/p>\n
V.’-.Act,twe_\ufb01x:tti~  -the Government does have power to revoke or<\/p>\n
 order at any stage. But the discretion of the<\/p>\n
elnthvl\u00e9tj\/s 11 of the Act is a separate and distinct<\/p>\n
“gfuxisdigtio\ufb01. The jurisdiction of the Empowexed authority u\/s<\/p>\n
t.ttt’3{‘1e):(i) of the COFEPOSA Act is a distinct jurisdiction conferred by<\/p>\n
T  to be exercised independently by the empowered authority<\/p>\n
3 u 3 alone. in this case, the empowered authority has surrendered its<\/p>\n
C:\/\/.\n<\/p>\n
discnztion and acted as per the dictates 0f the Home   A’<\/p>\n
While passing the order, which is totally contrary to IawfV__I f1′  %<\/p>\n
View the petitions are allowed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal … vs Government Of Karnataka By … on 15 July, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda \u00bb .2-1:35:15; DEPARTMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALQRI_E3\u00ab~.V_: DATED THIS THE 15:11 DAY OF JUL’? 2003.. ‘ if PRESENT THE HON’i3LE MR. JUSTICE 1{.Sz.?\u00a74EE:I::>’\u00a7:1f;m 4’ \u00e9 E AND % .. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal ... vs Government Of Karnataka By ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal ... vs Government Of Karnataka By ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-25T18:04:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rajgopal Marda S\\\/O Late Mangilal … vs Government Of Karnataka By … on 15 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-25T18:04:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":862,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Rajgopal Marda S\\\/O Late Mangilal ... vs Government Of Karnataka By ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-25T18:04:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajgopal Marda S\\\/O Late Mangilal … vs Government Of Karnataka By … on 15 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal ... vs Government Of Karnataka By ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal ... vs Government Of Karnataka By ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-25T18:04:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal … vs Government Of Karnataka By … on 15 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-25T18:04:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008"},"wordCount":862,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008","name":"Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal ... vs Government Of Karnataka By ... on 15 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-25T18:04:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajgopal-marda-so-late-mangilal-vs-government-of-karnataka-by-on-15-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajgopal Marda S\/O Late Mangilal … vs Government Of Karnataka By … on 15 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}