{"id":206866,"date":"2009-08-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-19T02:53:46","modified_gmt":"2017-05-18T21:23:46","slug":"bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>C.R. No. 1734 of 2008                                                          1\n\nIN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT\n              CHANDIGARH\n\n                                C.R. No. 1734 of 2008 (O&amp;M)\n                                Date of Decision : 5.8.2009\nBhup Singh\n\n                                                            .......... Petitioner\n                                Versus\n\nDalip &amp; another\n                                                           ...... Respondents\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA\n\nPresent :    Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate\n             for the petitioner.\n\n             Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate\n             for the respondents.\n\n                   ****\n\nVINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL)\n<\/pre>\n<p>             The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under<\/p>\n<p>Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the order dated<\/p>\n<p>11.3.2008 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Hisar vide which the<\/p>\n<p>appeal filed by the plaintiff \/ respondents against the order dated 21.1.2008<\/p>\n<p>passed by the learned trial Court dismissing their application for ad interim<\/p>\n<p>injunction has been accepted.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The petitioner by way of impugned judgment and order have<\/p>\n<p>been restrained from changing the nature of the suit land and from raising<\/p>\n<p>any construction thereon.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The plaintiffs claiming themselves to be co-sharer in the<\/p>\n<p>property sought injunction against the defendant from changing the nature<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.R. No. 1734 of 2008                                                         2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of agricultural land to residential \/ commercial or to raise construction over<\/p>\n<p>specific killa numbers situated within the revenue estate of village Mirkan<\/p>\n<p>on the main Hisar Tosham Bhiwani road having great potential value.<\/p>\n<p>             It was claimed that the petitioner \/ defendant illegally tried to<\/p>\n<p>raise construction over the specific khasra numbers which are otherwise<\/p>\n<p>joint, and further that in case the petitioner \/ defendant succeeded in raising<\/p>\n<p>the construction the plaintiff \/ respondents would suffer irreparable loss.<\/p>\n<p>             The suit was contested, wherein preliminary objection was<\/p>\n<p>taken that the suit filed by the plaintiffs was not maintainable. The suit was<\/p>\n<p>bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. It was the case set up by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner herein that he purchased land measuring 8 Kanals i.e. 160\/2182<\/p>\n<p>share comprised in khewat No.163 and possession of specific khasra<\/p>\n<p>number was delivered to defendant at the spot by the vendor. Though the<\/p>\n<p>sale qua specific khasra number is to be sale qua share only, still it was<\/p>\n<p>proved on record that the petitioner was put in exclusive possession of the<\/p>\n<p>property, though as co-owner.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The learned trial Court in view of the law laid down by this<\/p>\n<p>Court in the case of Bachan Singh Vs. Swaran Singh 2000(3) P.L.R. 416<\/p>\n<p>and other cases, held that the plaintiff \/ respondents were not entitled to<\/p>\n<p>relief of injunction as the remedy with the plaintiff \/ respondents was to file<\/p>\n<p>a suit for partition, therefore, the relief of injunction was barred under<\/p>\n<p>Section 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The learned lower appellate Court has been pleased to reverse<\/p>\n<p>the finding by observing that the defendant \/ petitioner had not purchased<\/p>\n<p>any particular khasra numbers so he was merely a co-owner with the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.R. No. 1734 of 2008                                                            3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>plaintiff. The learned lower appellate Court held that the co-owner cannot<\/p>\n<p>raise construction on particular khasra number till the land is partitioned by<\/p>\n<p>meets and bounds.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The learned counsel for the petitioner has impugned the order<\/p>\n<p>passed by the learned lower appellate Court primarily on the ground that in<\/p>\n<p>view of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Bachan Singh Vs.<\/p>\n<p>Swaran Singh ( supra) holding that a co-owner who is not in possession of<\/p>\n<p>any part of the property is not entitled to seek injunction against another co-<\/p>\n<p>owner, who is in exclusive possession of common property, unless any act<\/p>\n<p>of person in possession of property amounts to ouster, prejudicial or adverse<\/p>\n<p>to interest of co-owner out of possession; mere construction or improvement<\/p>\n<p>in common property does not amount to ouster.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The reliance was also placed on the judgment of this Court in<\/p>\n<p>the case of Bhartu Vs. Ram Sarup 1981 PLJ 204, wherein it has been held<\/p>\n<p>that co-owner in possession is held entitled to enjoy the property in his<\/p>\n<p>possession till the joint holding partitioned. He is even eligible to transfer it.<\/p>\n<p>             Mr. Jawant Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents, however, supported the order passed by the learned lower<\/p>\n<p>appellate Court by placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case<\/p>\n<p>of New India Construction Co. Ltd. And others Vs. Desh Raj and others<\/p>\n<p>2007(1) R.C.R. ( Civil) 387 wherein this Court was pleased to held that<\/p>\n<p>injunction against co-owner can be granted if the act of co-owner amounts<\/p>\n<p>to ouster or adverse to interest of co-owner out of possession. A co-owner<\/p>\n<p>can seek injunction, in case it is proved, that he is in exclusive possession.<\/p>\n<p>In the present case the exclusive possession of the defendant \/ respondent<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.R. No. 1734 of 2008                                                        4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>was proved as per a sale deed.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Reliance was also placed on the judgment of this Court in the<\/p>\n<p>case of Ram Niwas Vs. Jai Ram alias Tej Raj 2000(3) RCR (Civil) 738,<\/p>\n<p>wherein this Court has been pleased to lay down that a joint owner \/ co-<\/p>\n<p>sharer cannot change the nature of joint property by raising construction<\/p>\n<p>detrimental to the interest of other co-owner \/ co-sharer. This judgment can<\/p>\n<p>be of no help in view of the Division Bench judgment in the case of Bachan<\/p>\n<p>Singh Vs. Swaran Singh (Supra), wherein it has been laid down that suit<\/p>\n<p>by a co-owner for injunction is not competent. The learned trial Court was,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, right in holding that the plaintiff \/ respondents had an alternative<\/p>\n<p>remedy of filing a suit for partition. The claim of injunction was, therefore,<\/p>\n<p>barred under the provisions of the Specific Relief Act.<\/p>\n<p>            For the reasons stated above, this revision petition is allowed.<\/p>\n<p>The judgment and order passed by the learned lower appellate Court is set<\/p>\n<p>aside and that of the learned trial Court is restored but with no order as to<\/p>\n<p>costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>5.8.2009                                         ( VINOD K. SHARMA )\n  'sp'                                                JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009 C.R. No. 1734 of 2008 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1734 of 2008 (O&amp;M) Date of Decision : 5.8.2009 Bhup Singh &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. Petitioner Versus Dalip &amp; another &#8230;&#8230; Respondents CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-18T21:23:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-18T21:23:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":889,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-18T21:23:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-18T21:23:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-18T21:23:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009"},"wordCount":889,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009","name":"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-18T21:23:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhup-singh-vs-dalip-another-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bhup Singh vs Dalip &amp; Another on 5 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}