{"id":207264,"date":"2011-07-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-05-07T19:30:59","modified_gmt":"2016-05-07T14:00:59","slug":"mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                  at\n                                           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                    File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001768\u00adAD\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a025,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a025,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n\n\n           Appellant\n\n\u00a0          Shri\u00a0Harit\u00a0Marwah\n           A\u00ad4\/62,\u00a01st\u00a0&amp;\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,\n           Paschim\u00a0Vihar,\u00a0\n           Near\u00a0Mandir,\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0063\n\n           The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\n\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n\n           Delhi\u00a0Jal\u00a0Board\n\n\n\n       Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Paras\u00a0Ram,\u00a0Joint\u00a0Director\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.K.\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0ZRO\u00a0West\u00a0\u00adI\n       \u00a0\n                    Information\u00a0Commissioner             :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                             at\n                                                     New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                     File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001768\u00adAD\n                                                          ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a021.04.2011,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Jal\u00a0Board,\u00a0New\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Delhi,\u00a0sought\u00a0various\u00a0information\u00a0(9\u00a0items)\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0water\u00a0connections.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0on\u00a023.05.2011,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        informed\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0ZRO,\u00a0West\u00a0II\u00a0P\u00a0B,\u00a0whose\u00a0assistance\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sought\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        matter,\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0replied\u00a0so\u00a0far,\u00a0a\u00a0reminder\u00a0letter\u00a0is\u00a0being\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0an\u00a0advice\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0should\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        furnish\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0directly\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant.\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0PIO\u00a0or\u00a0deemed\u00a0PIO,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0(AA)\u00a0on\u00a004.06.2011.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0AA,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        on \u00a0 14.06.2011, \u00a0 after \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant, \u00a0 directed \u00a0 the \u00a0 APIO \u00a0 (i.e \u00a0 ZRO(W)\u00adII) \u00a0 to \u00a0 furnish \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a020.06.2011.\u00a0The\u00a0ZRO,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0meanwhile,\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0communication\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        dated\u00a006.06.2011,\u00a0had\u00a0furnished\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0demanded\u00a0the\u00a0requisite\u00a0fee\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        wherever\u00a0required.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0filed\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0petition\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        25.06.2011\u00a0alleging\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0supplied\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0APIO\/ZRO\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete\u00a0and\u00a0false.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        demanded \u00a0 that \u00a0 penal \u00a0 action \u00a0 be \u00a0 initiated \u00a0 against \u00a0 officers \u00a0 responsible \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 delay \u00a0 and \u00a0 for \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        harassment\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0undergo..\n<\/p>\n<p>\nDecision<\/p>\n<p>2.      During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that \u00a0 he \u00a0 is \u00a0 presently \u00a0 interested \u00a0 in \u00a0 receiving\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        answers\/information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0queries\u00a0at\u00a0item\u00a0nos.\u00a06\u00a0and\u00a07\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication.\u00a0These\u00a0queries\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        were\u00a0accordingly\u00a0discussed\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0below:\n<\/p>\n<p>Item\u00a0No.\u00a06:\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      This\u00a0query\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0fit\u00a0into\u00a0the\u00a0definition\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0Section\u00a02(f)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        fails\u00a0to\u00a0identify\u00a0any\u00a0material\u00a0information\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        No\u00a0disclosure\u00a0obligation\u00a0can,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0be\u00a0cast\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0to\u00a0answer\u00a0this\u00a0query.<\/p>\n<p>Item\u00a0No.\u00a07:\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.       The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0requests\u00a0made\u00a0regarding\u00a0stoppage\u00a0of\u00a0water\u00a0connections\u00a0till\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0completion\u00a0of\u00a0construction\u00a0work\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0their\u00a0resumption\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0completion\u00a0of\u00a0construction\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         work.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0agreed\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0PIO\u00a0should\u00a0furnish\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a025.08.2011.<\/p>\n<p>5.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>6.       As\u00a0regard\u00a0complaint\u00a0about\u00a0delayed\u00a0supply\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0the\u00a0ZRO(W)\u00adII\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0penalty\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a020(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         for\u00a0delaying\u00a0the\u00a0transmission\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0Returnable\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0by\u00a012.08.2011.<\/p>\n<p>7.       The\u00a0PIO\u00a0shall\u00a0serve\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0ZRO(W)\u00adII\u00a0for\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0comply\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0direction\u00a0above.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                              (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Harit\u00a0Marwah<br \/>\n         A\u00ad4\/62,\u00a01st\u00a0&amp;\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,<br \/>\n         Paschim\u00a0Vihar,\u00a0<br \/>\n         Near\u00a0Mandir,<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0063<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         Delhi\u00a0Jal\u00a0Board<br \/>\n         Room\u00a0No.\u00a0512,\u00a0Varunalaya\u00a0Phase\u00adII<br \/>\n         Karol\u00a0Bagh<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n         Delhi\u00a0Jal\u00a0Board<br \/>\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Joint\u00a0Director\u00a0(R)\u00a0S\/SW<br \/>\n         Jal\u00a0Sadan,\u00a0Lajpat\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.        Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/\u00a0Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001768\u00adAD Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a025,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a025,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant \u00a0 Shri\u00a0Harit\u00a0Marwah A\u00ad4\/62,\u00a01st\u00a0&amp;\u00a0II\u00a0Floor, Paschim\u00a0Vihar,\u00a0 Near\u00a0Mandir, New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0063 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present. Respondents Delhi\u00a0Jal\u00a0Board Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Paras\u00a0Ram,\u00a0Joint\u00a0Director\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.K.\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0ZRO\u00a0West\u00a0\u00adI \u00a0 Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001768\u00adAD ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a021.04.2011,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Jal\u00a0Board,\u00a0New\u00a0 Delhi,\u00a0sought\u00a0various\u00a0information\u00a0(9\u00a0items)\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0water\u00a0connections.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0on\u00a023.05.2011,\u00a0 informed\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0ZRO,\u00a0West\u00a0II\u00a0P\u00a0B,\u00a0whose\u00a0assistance\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sought\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0 matter,\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0replied\u00a0so\u00a0far,\u00a0a\u00a0reminder\u00a0letter\u00a0is\u00a0being\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0an\u00a0advice\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0should\u00a0 furnish\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0directly\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant.\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0 the\u00a0PIO\u00a0or\u00a0deemed\u00a0PIO,\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0(AA)\u00a0on\u00a004.06.2011.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0AA,\u00a0 on \u00a0 14.06.2011, \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207264","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-07T14:00:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-07T14:00:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":589,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-07T14:00:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-07T14:00:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-07T14:00:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011"},"wordCount":589,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011","name":"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-07T14:00:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-harit-marwah-vs-delhi-jal-board-gnctd-on-25-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Harit Marwah vs Delhi Jal Board, Gnctd on 25 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207264","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207264"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207264\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}