{"id":207502,"date":"2010-01-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010"},"modified":"2015-06-18T17:05:18","modified_gmt":"2015-06-18T11:35:18","slug":"vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 29\"' DAY OF JANUARY, 2o\u00ab1of  \n\nBEFORE\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE A\"R'AL_i'r\u00a2AG_ARA3A'-- \nCRIMINAL PETITION No'f?..1A21_\/2o1ov_''_i_f * O' 1'\n\nBETWEEN: O V'\nVittai Baban Nakade\n\nS\/o Baban Nakade\n\nAge: 25 years   \u00ab\n\nR\/o Near Rohiya Coilege-~-- _  '\n\nNear Petroi Pur_.nT.'=Arg_   _,   ~. _  .\n\nSai Biswa Hogsing;l:'3o.c\u00a7ety L;t_.cE., _  \" \n\nL.M.Road, |3fa'dE3_r--,., Niurijba-i_gj--\u00ab.__V  _ \" _   '\n\nMaharastra State ;j_ '   ..    PETITIONER\n(By SriV:'\"Ravi  Cot\ufb01sel \"for Sri.J.Basa\\\/araj, Adv)\nAND: V 'O O 'O O\n\nStates of K3 mata i&lt;-as\n\n&quot;&#039;-.Repre&#039;se--r&#039;ited by its  &quot;&quot;&quot; \nV_ .High_ Court Public Prosecutor\n ,___i-iigh&#039; &#039;Com: of&#039; i\ufb01arnata ka\nC.irc--u_it Ben*c.h,&#039;~if)i&#039;Tarwad  RESPONDENT\n\n(Esysri:A--i\u00a7.H-\ufb01otkhinde, HCGP)\n\nTr.-&#039;i\u00e9; Crl.P is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying\n\nA &quot;t\u00b0toVOa&#039;i~i_ow this petition and eniarge the petitioner on baii in\n&#039;icrtme No.51\/2007 of Nippani PS (CC No.710\/2007) of\n\nlearned Civii Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Nippani pending trial\n\n .\u00bb.of the case and grant such other orders deemed fit in the\n\ncircumstances of the case.\n\nc...._(&quot;*&quot;&#039;~\u00bb-\n\n\n\nThis CrI.P is coming on for Orders this day, the Court\nmade the foiiowing:  \n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Accused No.7 in cc No.710\/2007 (ccgggixiociz\/2~oios) <\/p>\n<p>on the file of the learned JMFC, l&#8217;i0ippaAn&#8217;i\u00abivfe_r <\/p>\n<p>under Section 395 of IPC and; _Sectioni25 of \u00a7n1cliga&#8217;ii&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Act has filed the present peti&#8217;t&#8217;ii&#8217;o:n&#8217;under._\u00a7ect&#8217;i:on\u00b0;fi\u00a79 of<br \/>\nCr.P.C. His earlier bail vpTet.iction&#8217;iti&#8217;i:edi&#8217;heio&#8217;re thevleafneo Prl.<br \/>\nSessions Judge, Belgaui&#8217;nLha&#8217;s__l&gt;ee&#8217;nV&#8217;V  This petition<br \/>\nis opposed by a|&#8217;9Um\u20ac0tS Of<br \/>\nSri.Ravi B  for the petitioner<br \/>\nand   Court Government<br \/>\nPleader vfzoruthew <\/p>\n<p> L In&#8217;iti_aiI~,;,&#8217;.&#8217;~Cr&#8217;;&#8217;!\\lo&#8217;ZS1\/2007 of Nippani PS came to<\/p>\n<p> reg&#8221;istere&#8221;ot,gfor0Vth&#8217;e&#8221;&#8221;orience under Section 395 of IPC<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;a..g&#8217;\u00e9.i_nstr  Sandeep and four other unknown<\/p>\n<p>accused  basis of the complaint dated 09.04.2007<\/p>\n<p>filed by&#8221; one Manoj Patil, the owner of the jewelry shop at<\/p>\n<p>   alleging that at about 2.45 pm. on 09.04.2007<\/p>\n<p>0.0%&#8221;&#8211;tiwhiile he was in his jewelry shop, 5 persons holding<\/p>\n<p>F\/*v&#8221;*&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;-.\u00bb&#8211;*'&#8221;*-=-&#8230;..~\u00ab<br \/>\n\ufb01_%._.\n<\/p>\n<p>country pistoi entered into his shop, closed down__._the<\/p>\n<p>shuttegthreatened him showing the pistol and too!\u00a7&#8221;ayv&#8211;aly*.,A<\/p>\n<p>from his shop the gold ornaments totaily&#8217; 9J=l*\u20ac:\u00a5l&#8217;*\u00e9&#8217;;i:\ufb01&#8217;lg&#8221;&#8216;,ygaT?\u00a33f5Ut;&#8217;~._._g <\/p>\n<p>\/N\\M_f_\/&#8211;._,<\/p>\n<p>322 grams worth Rs.3,14,000\/&#8211; and_one_4of<br \/>\nnamely accused Nio.1 Sandeep could <\/p>\n<p>the neighbors of comp|ainant&#8217;xs\/hl.o&#8217;;3&#8230;,V_<\/p>\n<p>3. It is pertinent~~.r_to  \u00e9cvomplainant<br \/>\ncouid not give the names_o_f&#8217;-aniflofijth.a.:VVf&#8217;o.&#8221;g&#8217;rV__other persons<br \/>\nsaid to have committed  a&#8217;|&#8217;o:nlgw~itl1T.accused No.1 on<br \/>\nthe said data&#8217; in his further<br \/>\nstatement  it was not only 5<br \/>\npersons   on the said date and time<br \/>\nin the 55,id i3.:,iVt.&#8217;-itA&#8217;i_yas&#8217;.llV7 accused persons and he has<\/p>\n<p>.3V.giV\u00a2Fl&gt;:..:;thg-.&#8217;v: ravaymeslllwio\ufb01all the 7 persons including the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;petltloher:aVccLlseci~.. N o. 7.\n<\/p>\n<p>V3\u00bb.  careful reading of his further statementkno<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;oi-r_ea.sons are assigned by the complainant as to how he was<br \/>\n &#8220;\u00a2;;.&#8221;&lt;S_.-3v~&quot;lV\u20ac.-  14-&#039;3zvxa;._,\u00a7 {Le -\/g&quot;i.:z\u00bbvw&#8211;e.j  ,~wf&quot;&quot;&#039;&quot;&quot;&quot;&#039;<\/p>\n<p>_&#039;  the other 6 accused and why he did not give their<br \/>\n3\u00bb &lt;.i&#039;u.?&#039;-\u00bb&#039;\\_<\/p>\n<p>Vi &#039;:&#039;_&quot;&quot;nas*rles in his complaint flied &quot;immediately after the<\/p>\n<p>er&quot;&#8211;{\\&quot;&quot;&quot;&#039;&quot;&#039;r<\/p>\n<p>occurrence of the said incident. He has further stated in<\/p>\n<p>his statement dated \u00a30.G-4.2007 that though he has_sta_&#039;te&#039;d._&#039;<\/p>\n<p>5\/uo&lt;io;,\u00ab\u00a7airw;r<\/p>\n<p>in his complaint that gold ornaments v\u00a2a\u00a2% &#039; <\/p>\n<p>&quot;M 5&#039;: ~&#039;?&quot;*&quot; \u00abei\u00e9wi\ufb01l  +9&quot;-&quot;&quot;.&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>were takenluaviray \u00a7FeN@_ the said  je&#8217;vveiry&#8221;  in<\/p>\n<p>taken forcibly by the said dacoits from  <\/p>\n<p>said date and time.\n<\/p>\n<p>S. Admittediy,  the iipetitioneriajccused<br \/>\nNo.7 has been residing   material on<br \/>\nrecord to  was known to<br \/>\nthe complairs&#8217;an&#8217;t:.&#8221;so&#8221;&#8216;as h&#8221;i-.m\u00bb&#8211;to give his name in<br \/>\nhis   as one of the 6<br \/>\nother pevrsons  to have committed dacoity<br \/>\non thaAt.dateVi&#8217;* A it <\/p>\n<p>  H_aving&#8217;V&#8221;&#8216;&#8212;-regard to all these facts and<\/p>\n<p>the case, I feel that the present petitioner<\/p>\n<p>deserves _t&#8217;hve&#8217;i__g::rant of bail. The apprehension of the<\/p>\n<p>Vi&#8221;&#8211;\u00ab.__&#8217;vprosecution that since the petitioner is from Mumabi, he<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;~maiyVn&#8217;i_isuse liberty, if he is granted baii may be met with<\/p>\n<p> .___&#8221;\u00b0byV&#8217;imposing suitabie conditions. Hence, the following:<\/p>\n<p>,&#8211;f&#8221;7&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>cf) he shall produce, to the satisfaction of the learned<\/p>\n<p>JMFC, the Identity Card issued by the <\/p>\n<p>Commission of India or any such other;ciocL3&#8217;n9aj&#8217;e&#8212;-nt&#8217;v&#8211;.&#8211;_T&#8217; ~<\/p>\n<p>showing his permanent residenti\u00e9al   &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>A copy of this order shall be4&#8242;;~:e:nt. forthwith todtherii<\/p>\n<p>learned JMFC, Nippaoi and aiso&#8221;te.:VV:the PSI&#8221;ciVf&#8217;Nirjpa.&#8217;iva:i  for<br \/>\ninformation and compii\u00e9hce.  H K &#8216;V A H<br \/>\n       Sd\/-r<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF JANUARY, 2o\u00ab1of BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE A&#8221;R&#8217;AL_i&#8217;r\u00a2AG_ARA3A&#8217;&#8211; CRIMINAL PETITION No&#8217;f?..1A21_\/2o1ov_&#8221;_i_f * O&#8217; 1&#8242; BETWEEN: O V&#8217; Vittai Baban Nakade S\/o Baban Nakade [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-18T11:35:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-18T11:35:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":647,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-18T11:35:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-18T11:35:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-18T11:35:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010"},"wordCount":647,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010","name":"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-18T11:35:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vittal-baban-nakade-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-29-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vittal Baban Nakade vs State Of Karnataka on 29 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207502\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}