{"id":207575,"date":"2009-01-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-26T13:25:02","modified_gmt":"2016-11-26T07:55:02","slug":"ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n<pre>IN TIE EEIGH C{}{\u00a7ET \u20ac333' KAR?\\3AT2%.KA AT BANGALQRLE '.\u00a5P.2*\u00e9{). HE C}? 2%\n\n_;_\n\nIN THE i-368 CGURT OF KARMA TAKA ATBANGALGRE\n\nmmn mm ms 29?}; mar 9:2' JANUARY.   w\n\n8EFORE\n\nwe HONBLE me. ass r:c:.--=+~.s&lt;.pAf:g[ &amp; f E     \n\n8E&#039;\u00a5&#039;\u00a5&#039;a%&#039;EE M\n\n1 gm Haazmztz AGENCEES\napp %NBU$TRiAL ESTATE\n3 H RGA3, ru:.a:&lt;;s.;R V &#039;_ \nREF av its FROPRSETGR. . _ -- \u00bb\n39; V N JsWA%;EERTH\u00a3   v &quot;\nmes Aaaur ewEARs._,..  &#039;\n\n  0 2  AA Psrerscwe\ufb01\n{By 3;: H B 2: PA:-.*:L ;&#039;8;_\u00ab3;;a:z&quot;v; 1:~*-:_i\u00a215\u00ab:Az..a&#039;_rV~;.2__::&#039;=\u00bb;\u00ab2\\1f;:;\u00ab  m*;z.1cA*\u00a7Es ;\n\nAND ;\n\nTHE 2&#039;:es:sTA:e\u00a2.\u00a2:2\u00a7$a4\u00a7se:\u00a7\u00a7::ER\n0? eQa.*e:s.+:ERc2Aa--IAXgs\u00ab {%2:::{:ov2mi;\n?umKwR;. - ,&#039;, a &#039;v\n\n&quot;A.\n\nH  &quot;&quot;&quot; &quot; &quot;  RESPGNEENT\n\n &#039;-{By  :4.&#039; \u00a7.s~;..$Hs&#039;g*.-:mf\u20ac3a&lt;%2s*evAe.ev; HCGP ;\n\n&quot; . &quot;&#039;taas&quot;w&#039;.&quot;\u00a7\u00e9\u00bb&#039;._&#039;:s{&#039;\u00a33\u00e9L\u00a3n snags? ARWCLES 225 AM?) 22? as THE\n\u00a2C:?\u00a7S?&quot;iT1.\u00a7T:0N 5.2:: = swam pzzgym &quot;re QUASH THE zrapusmsa\n\n&#039;  E2&#039;4DQRE3E%v\u00a3E.&#039;f? ~.E\u20ac\u00bbS\u00abUE{} 8&#039;?&#039; THE RESPOE*&amp;BENT ET&#039; ?..1&#039;L2%8 WEE\n\nA\u00a3*=%\u00a3&#039;~\u00a7E){i.}R$~Q&quot;.;VD\u00a7F2ECT RESPQNSENT A%.\u00a5THORiTY TQ CONSQER THE\n\n~  ; .-  A\u00a7+~.9:.:c.:a&#039;z&quot;2a3~.4 FELEE 3-: Tag PE&quot;{iTi{}NER 91 31 1512993 was Amaiuas.\n\n  V&#039; -3&quot; &#039;RP. CQEWNG Qb\u00e9 FOR FURTHER 0F\u20acI}ER$ THES GAY, THE\n\n3   ._\u00a7;-augzjz&#039; MAGE &quot;me mL:.ox2%.:::\u00ab:&lt;2:\n\nE33 \u00a7&quot;&#039;3~\u00a7.E HEGH CQLRT Q? KAR}JLA.TA\u00a7\u00a3A 5%.&#039;? BARGALQRE W&#039;j&#039;.}\u20ac0, 1493?&#039;) CF .&#039;2\u20ac\u00a5{$\n\nW.P.N\u20ac3. 14999 of 2oc2,_gT;:{s\u00a7**:    \n\n\n\nE153 T\u00a7\u00a7E E-332% QTCEURT SF }n wi\ufb01 be taker: by the  \n\naccar\u00e9arsce w\ufb01h faw.\n\n4. P\u00a7a&lt;::%ng the abave $ubm\u00a7s;::~f\u00a7%o:j::_\ufb01fsa\u20aci?e &#039;\ufb01y&#039;--.%\u00e92urnL:ef\u00e9 :&#039;\n\nGevernment Pieader appearing fspr r\u00e9$;;}d&#039;:1\u00e9er:=f\u20ac&#039;ts\u00a7:  V%\n\nihe instant writ petition \ufb02ied  &#039;is; sf,\n:.\u00ab;i=:h 331$ &#039;fmiowi\ufb01g a;rec:san\u00a7;;   \n(i) The u\u00a7:g&#039;\u00a7i:v__pet\u00a7?!*i\u00e9f*s ~\u00a7%\u00a7;%~\u20ac;V\u00a7&#039;  is a\u00e9iawed\n3&quot;\u00bb%s:\u00a7%r\u00a7\\A&#039;\u00a7i\u00a7[% 31 % i  %  \n{ii}  issued by the\n   Ne.&#039;\u20ac&#039;i}&#039;17G?512GG2\u00ab-G3\nQategiv  vi\u00e9e \ufb01&quot;mnex&#039;ura--~{) is hereby\n      \nV &quot;&#039; &#039;_(&#039;%iE)  jS.t3r1\u00e9s remitted back &#039;:6 the respondent<\/pre>\n<p> %A  t\u00a5:*s%:&#8211;..e$ans\u00a7der the appi\u00e9cafion \ufb02ied by petitioner<br \/>\n&#8221; &#8220;.\\.A;$f\u00a7de Armaxure-C dated 31.19.2993 and ta<\/p>\n<p>take appropriate decisien in accardance with<\/p>\n<p>iaw, after affording reasonabie opportunity to<\/p>\n<p>._&#8230;.&#8212;&#8211;v&#8211;&#8221;*&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;'&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>E159! TIE HIGH CQERT QF K.AR.?*I\u00a3ATAJ=IA AT BA.Z\\}&#8217;GAL\u20ac3RE &#8220;s?\u20ac.1&#8242;.N{}. 149&#8242;)? Q? 121%<\/p>\n<p> TEE HIGH {2&#8242;{.&#8217;-URT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA}&#8217;,{kR\u00a3. W.P&#8217;.2&#8217;$:{}. 249&#8242;)? 0:33&#8242; 2398<br \/>\n\u00bb$~<\/p>\n<p>the petiiiener and dispcse of the<br \/>\n\u00e9xpeditiousiy as poss\u00e9bie, within  &#8211;<br \/>\nfrom the date of receiptv_r3f\u00bb~a._ccp.\u00a7\u00e9.V\u00a3$f&#8217;  u<br \/>\nLearned Government P\u00a3eadt-Ea.\n<\/p>\n<p>meme caf appearance fer :*e.\u00abV5*b.;:\u00bb::Lf_\u00a7\ufb01ri&gt;et*1tA.,V&#8217;wi\u00a7h\u00a7h\u00bbj&#8217;$\u00a7\\}E\u00a7vv\u00bb&#8217;i\u00a7J\u00e9\u00e9ks<br \/>\nfram today.  &#8216; A :\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\u00a7<br \/>\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;E&#8217;}3I\u00a3 EESH COSRT Q? KARNATAKA A3&#8242; BA?&#8217;-3G\ufb01.I&#8230;OR5 W.]&#8221;.NG. \u00a749\u00a7?f} OF 2988<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil IN TIE EEIGH C{}{\u00a7ET \u20ac333&#8242; KAR?\\3AT2%.KA AT BANGALQRLE &#8216;.\u00a5P.2*\u00e9{). HE C}? 2% _;_ IN THE i-368 CGURT OF KARMA TAKA ATBANGALGRE mmn mm ms 29?}; mar 9:2&#8217; JANUARY. w 8EFORE we HONBLE me. ass r:c:.&#8211;=+~.s&lt;.pAf:g[ &amp; f E 8E&#039;\u00a5&#039;\u00a5&#039;a%&#039;EE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-26T07:55:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T07:55:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":160,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T07:55:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-26T07:55:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T07:55:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009"},"wordCount":160,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009","name":"M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T07:55:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-harihar-agencies-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Harihar Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner on 29 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}