{"id":207715,"date":"2011-09-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"},"modified":"2017-05-17T07:21:05","modified_gmt":"2017-05-17T01:51:05","slug":"mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011<\/div>\n
                          \u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                   at\n                                                          New\u00a0Delhi\n\n               \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001759\n                                                                                            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0        \u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Masood\u00a0\u00a0Ahmad\n           C\u00ad1\/50,\u00a0\u00a0Yamuna\u00a0Vihar\n           Delhi.\n\n\n\n           Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0\u00a0not\u00a0\u00a0present.\n\n           Respondent(s)\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Govt\u00a0of\u00a0NCT\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Tis\u00a0Hazari\u00a0Court\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0B\u00a0S\u00a0\u00a0Kain\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution\/PIO\n           \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Naresh\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0UDC\n\n\n                     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner                    :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                                 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                 at\n                                                        New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                                                                       \u00a0\n                        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001759\n\n\n                                                              ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
  \u00a0\u00a0\u00a01.   The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a01.3.11\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution,\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Tis\u00a0Hazari\u00a0Court,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 \u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0one\u00a0Mr.\u00a0S\u00a0C\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Officer\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Directorate \u00a0 of \u00a0 Prosecution \u00a0 against \u00a0 9 \u00a0 points \u00a0 including \u00a0 the \u00a0 date \u00a0 on \u00a0 which \u00a0 Mr.S \u00a0 C \u00a0 Sharma \u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n
          designated \u00a0 as \u00a0 Vigilance \u00a0 Officer, \u00a0 \u00a0 attested \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of \u00a0 all \u00a0 the \u00a0 property \u00a0 returns \u00a0 of \u00a0 movable \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n
          immovable\u00a0property\u00a0of\u00a0Mr.S\u00a0C\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Officer;\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0memos\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0Mr.S\u00a0C\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Sharma\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0complaints\u00a0\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Directorate\u00a0against\u00a0Mr.S\u00a0C\u00a0Sharma\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0<\/p>\n
          replied \u00a0 on \u00a0 29.3.11 \u00a0 providing\u00a0 point\u00a0 wise\u00a0 information\u00a0 and\u00a0 also\u00a0 \u00a0 denying\u00a0 the\u00a0 information\u00a0 \u00a0 which\u00a0 is\u00a0<\/p>\n
          personal\u00a0in\u00a0nature.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0denied\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a07\u00a0and\u00a08\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0same\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
          complaints\u00a0received\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0office\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0confidential.\u00a0 \u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 his \u00a0 first \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 on \u00a0 \u00a0 26.4.11 \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 has \u00a0 deliberately \u00a0 \u00a0 withheld \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          information\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a01\u00a0to\u00a09.\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a02,3\u00a0and\u00a04\u00a0he\u00a0contended\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0PIO\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
          provided\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0As\u00a0for\u00a0point\u00a05\u00a0he\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0has\u00a0transferred\u00a0the\u00a0point\u00a0no.5\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Home\u00a0Department\u00a0although\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0available\u00a0\u00a0with\u00a0him\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
          6.6.11\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0dated\u00a029.3.11\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0clear\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
          declined\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0\u00a0has\u00a0sought\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0various\u00a0issues\u00a0thereby\u00a0trying\u00a0<\/p>\n
          to\u00a0influence\u00a0the\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Officer\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Directorate\u00a0\u00a0for\u00a0his\u00a0vested\u00a0interest.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0then\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n
          his\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission.\n<\/p>\n
 Decision.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
     \u00a02\u00a0. The\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a0reviewing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0each\u00a0\u00a0point\u00a0decided\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0below\u00a0:<\/p>\n
               Point \u00a0 1 \u00a0 : \u00a0 \u00a0Complete\u00a0 information\u00a0 \u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0S\u00a0C\u00a0Sharma\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
               provided.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
               Point\u00a02\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0belongs\u00a0to\u00a03rd\u00a0party,\u00a0and\u00a0is\u00a0personal\u00a0in\u00a0nature\u00a0<\/p>\n
               the \u00a0 disclosure \u00a0 of \u00a0 which \u00a0 \u00a0 has \u00a0 no \u00a0 relation \u00a0 with \u00a0 any \u00a0 public \u00a0 interest \u00a0 or \u00a0 activity. \u00a0 The \u00a0 disclosure \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n
               information\u00a0is\u00a0therefore\u00a0denied\u00a0.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Points\u00a03\u00a0and\u00a04\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0memos\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0issued\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0S\u00a0C\u00a0<\/p>\n
               Sharma’s\u00a0immovable\u00a0property.\u00a0Hence\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0need\u00a0be\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n
               Point\u00a05\u00a0:\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0no\u00a0complaint\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0DOP\u00a0against\u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n
               Sharma.\u00a0\u00a0This\u00a0fact\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0intimated\u00a0formally\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.<\/p>\n
               Point\u00a06\u00a0:\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0i.e.\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0orders\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<\/p>\n
               have\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him.\n<\/p>\n
     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Points\u00a07\u00a0&\u00a08\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0denies\u00a0the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0under\u00a0\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)(g)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n
               Act.\n<\/p>\n
     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Point\u00a09\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a023.4.11.<\/p>\n
     3.        Information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a025.1011.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
     4.        The\u00a0Commission\u00a0disposes\u00a0off\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                                                                                      (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                                             Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
1.             Shri\u00a0Masood\u00a0\u00a0Ahmad
\n               C\u00ad1\/50,\u00a0\u00a0Yamuna\u00a0Vihar
\n               Delhi.\n<\/p>\n
 2.\u00a0\u00a0          The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Govt\u00a0of\u00a0NCT\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Tis\u00a0Hazari\u00a0Court\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n\n3.            The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Govt\u00a0of\u00a0NCT\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Tis\u00a0Hazari\u00a0Court\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n\n4.        Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
In\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0above\u00a0directives\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0complied\u00a0with\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0the\u00a0
\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0giving\u00a0
\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO’s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0
\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0
\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 \u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001759 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a0\u00a026,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Masood\u00a0\u00a0Ahmad C\u00ad1\/50,\u00a0\u00a0Yamuna\u00a0Vihar Delhi. Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0\u00a0not\u00a0\u00a0present. Respondent(s) \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Govt\u00a0of\u00a0NCT\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Tis\u00a0Hazari\u00a0Court \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0B\u00a0S\u00a0\u00a0Kain\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution\/PIO \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Naresh\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0UDC \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001759 ORDER Background \u00a0\u00a0\u00a01. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a01.3.11\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Prosecution,\u00a0 Tis\u00a0Hazari\u00a0Court,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 \u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0one\u00a0Mr.\u00a0S\u00a0C\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Officer\u00a0of\u00a0 Directorate \u00a0 of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-207715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-17T01:51:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-17T01:51:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":574,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-17T01:51:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-17T01:51:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-17T01:51:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"},"wordCount":574,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011","name":"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-17T01:51:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-masood-ahmad-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-26-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Masood Ahmad vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207715\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}