{"id":208034,"date":"2011-08-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011"},"modified":"2016-11-20T15:27:15","modified_gmt":"2016-11-20T09:57:15","slug":"mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                          In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                   at\n                                                          New\u00a0Delhi\n\n               \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001222\n                                                                                            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0        \u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a02,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a02,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n\n           Shri\u00a0Radhey\u00a0Shyam\n           Bungalow\u00a0No.\u00a06,\u00a0Rail\u00a0Saurabh\n           Burn\u00a0Company\n           Jabalpur.\n\n           Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0on\u00a0Audio.\u00a0\n\n\n\n           Respondent(s)\n\n           Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railway\n           Joint\u00a0Secy\u00a0(G)\u00a0\u00a0&amp;\u00a0PIO\u00adII\n           Railway\u00a0Board\n           Rail\u00a0Bhawan\n           New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0               Shri\u00a0\u00a0S\u00a0C\u00a0Krishna,\u00a0US\u00a0(Confdl)\n                                             Shri\u00a0Kundan\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Assistant.\n\n\n                      Information\u00a0Commissioner    :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                              In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                               at\n                                                      New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                                                           \u00a0\n                      \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001222\n\n\n                                                           ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>     1.   The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a022.7.2010\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          Railway\u00a0Board,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0\u00a0information:<\/p>\n<p>     a)   Any\u00a0 letter\u00a0 written\u00a0 to \u00a0 Shri\u00a0 U\u00a0 K\u00a0 Singh,\u00a0the\u00a0 then\u00a0CCM\u00a0and\u00a0presently\u00a0 working\u00a0as\u00a0 Chief\u00a0Operations \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          Manager,\u00a0North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Allahabad\u00a0for\u00a0his\u00a0comments\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0representation\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a0adverse \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          entries\u00a0recorded\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0ACR\u00a0\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02008\u00ad09.<\/p>\n<p>     b)   Reply\u00a0and\u00a0comments\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0U\u00a0K\u00a0Singh,\u00a0COM\/NCR\u00a0on\u00a0item\u00a0no.\u00a01.<\/p>\n<p>     c)   Office\u00a0notings\u00a0on\u00a0file\u00a0when\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0representation\u00a0was\u00a0put\u00a0for\u00a0consideration.<\/p>\n<p>     d)   Remarks\u00a0and\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0competent\u00a0authority\u00a0who\u00a0took\u00a0decision\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0representation.<\/p>\n<p>     e)   Name\u00a0and\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Competent\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Authority\u00a0who\u00a0decided\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0representation.<\/p>\n<p>2.   The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a0 \u00a027.1.11\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0Directorate\u00a0who\u00a0denied\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     information\u00a0against\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0points\u00a0 \u00a0under\u00a0section\u00a08(1)(j)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0According\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     was\u00a0not\u00a0going\u00a0to\u00a0serve\u00a0any\u00a0public\u00a0interest.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0dated\u00a03.2.11\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     the\u00a0information\u00a0once\u00a0again.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a01.3.11\u00a0\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0&#8221;\u00a0With\u00a0reference\u00a0to\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     adverse\u00a0remarks\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0ACR\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02008\u00ad09\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0competent\u00a0authority\u00a0has\u00a0already \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     been\u00a0conveyed\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0applicant.\u00a0\u00a0As\u00a0regards\u00a0the\u00a0request\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0for\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0letters\u00a0&amp;\u00a0notes,\u00a0it\u00a0is \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     stated\u00a0that\u00a0these\u00a0are\u00a0only\u00a0a\u00a0thinking\u00a0process\u00a0preceding\u00a0the\u00a0final\u00a0decision\u00a0which\u00a0can&#8217;t\u00a0be\u00a0categorized\u00a0as \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     &#8216;information&#8217;\u00a0defined\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0Further,\u00a0meaning\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0read\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0section\u00a08(1)(e) \u00a0<br \/>\n       and\u00a0section\u00ad11\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0that\u00a0provide\u00a0for\u00a0exemption\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0fiduciary\u00a0relationship\u00a0and \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      protection\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0third\u00a0party.\u00a0\u00a0Since\u00a0the\u00a0definition\u00a0of\u00a0third\u00a0party\u00a0also\u00a0includes\u00a0a\u00a0Public \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      Authority\u00a0the\u00a0officers\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0who\u00a0express\u00a0their\u00a0views\u00a0are\u00a0also\u00a0entitled\u00a0to\u00a0protection\u00a0as\u00a0a \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      &#8220;third\u00a0party&#8221;.\u00a0 \u00a0Moreover,\u00a0citizens\u00a0have\u00a0the\u00a0right\u00a0to\u00a0demand\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0in\u00a0public \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      interest\u00a0and\u00a0relevant.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0case\u00a0what\u00a0is\u00a0in\u00a0public\u00a0interest\u00a0and\u00a0relevant\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0itself\u00a0(which \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      has \u00a0 already \u00a0 been \u00a0 conveyed) \u00a0 \u00a0 and \u00a0 not \u00a0 who \u00a0 expressed \u00a0 what \u00a0 view. \u00a0 \u00a0 As \u00a0 such \u00a0 the \u00a0 disclosure \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      information\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0warranted.&#8221;\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>      his\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.<\/p>\n<p>Decision.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02.   The\u00a0\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0required\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           after\u00a0judicious\u00a0use\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0sec\u00a010(1)\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0sever\u00a0any\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0exempt\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           from\u00a0disclosure\u00a0under\u00a0any\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0subclauses\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           provided\u00a0by\u00a05th\u00a0September\u00a02011.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a03.    The\u00a0\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                                            \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                            (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                   Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>1.         Shri\u00a0Radhey\u00a0Shyam<br \/>\n           Bungalow\u00a0No.\u00a06,\u00a0Rail\u00a0Saurabh<br \/>\n           Burn\u00a0Company<br \/>\n           Jabalpur.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.           The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n             Joint\u00a0Secy\u00a0(G)\u00a0\u00a0&amp;\u00a0PIO\u00adII<br \/>\n           Railway\u00a0Board<br \/>\n          Rail\u00a0Bhawan<br \/>\n          New\u00a0Delhi.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.        The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n          Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n          Secretary\u00a0&amp;\u00a0AA\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0II<br \/>\n          Railway\u00a0Board<br \/>\n          Rail\u00a0Bhawan,<br \/>\n          New\u00a0Delhi.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.        Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0.\n<\/p>\n<p>           \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001222 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a02,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a02,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Radhey\u00a0Shyam Bungalow\u00a0No.\u00a06,\u00a0Rail\u00a0Saurabh Burn\u00a0Company Jabalpur. Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0on\u00a0Audio.\u00a0 Respondent(s) Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railway Joint\u00a0Secy\u00a0(G)\u00a0\u00a0&amp;\u00a0PIO\u00adII Railway\u00a0Board Rail\u00a0Bhawan New\u00a0Delhi. Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0 Shri\u00a0\u00a0S\u00a0C\u00a0Krishna,\u00a0US\u00a0(Confdl) Shri\u00a0Kundan\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Assistant. Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001222 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a022.7.2010\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways,\u00a0 Railway\u00a0Board,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0\u00a0information: a) Any\u00a0 letter\u00a0 written\u00a0 to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-20T09:57:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-20T09:57:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":612,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-20T09:57:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-20T09:57:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-20T09:57:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011"},"wordCount":612,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011","name":"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-20T09:57:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-radhey-shyam-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-2-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Radhey Shyam vs Ministry Of Railways on 2 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208034\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}