{"id":20810,"date":"2008-11-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-07-25T17:11:28","modified_gmt":"2016-07-25T11:41:28","slug":"ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And Gowda<\/div>\n
 \"  Road, B\u20acI}.?a'y.\n [\ufb02a\ufb01eiv\u00e9i\ufb01\u00e9garaja Adv.)\n\n and'?\n\nIN '1'!-1:3 HIGH comrr or rmnzurrazm \n\nxrmmnwan    k A  \nDATED nus mm 21\u00bb my  T \nTHE HODPBLE nm.m$frI\u00ae  \nTHE HoH*m.E%;m.JUsT:cE comm\n of 2&4 (CFC:\n\nBetween:\n\n \n\nM \/ s Samala1_M'am;>_pa 8s..S'c-.ns, j\n\nBy its Propricter_ '   \n\nS. Ramacharldxa Redkdy _  '\n\nS \/ o Samala i~*'--aIvathappa;  \"\n\nAged 4;') 'years, Opp: 'Ray\"adurga Bus Stand.\n\n...Appd1ant\n\n \n\n'M T  . '_ . 2  i  ., M \/~s P.'avan Agencies\n\n: AA  its Managing Partner,\n . _Sif.'. K. Prabhakar,\n Sfo Hanumantlxappa, major.\n\nJ  Sri K. Ravindra Babu,\n\nS \/ 0 K. Hanumanthappa,\nAged 27 years,\nPartner of M] s Pavan Agcncics.\n\n\n\nK. Prabhakar, major,\nS\/() K. Hanumanthappa,\n\nK. Mallikatjuna, aged: major, I\nS\/() K. Pampanna,\n\nK. Raxnanjaneyulu,\nAge: major,\nS \/ 0 K. Nagappa,\n\nN. Srinivasalu, ' $  'V '\nMajor, 8\/0 An\u00e9ancyalu;   \n\nSmt. N.  ~     V \"\" \"\nAge: major, KEV\/>dVN\".--SIfi I1TiVV\u00a5\u00a7.SE%lu,\"v.\u00a7 \n\nResp:3nd61it.$._1 tci 7' area\" .\nRcsidi_ng_ at VDCQ:-'..  193'}. I0;\nNear Kanekai' Road _B't;t$\" *Stand,\nBellary. \" _   \" \n\n Pedd\u00e9\u00e9a Q\ufb01fay\u00e9xtaappa,\n\n  --. S\/La\"Ci\"1e1Ia..Kom1a\"p'pa, major,\n \u00bb 126-$id::_11t%cIfF'sgtarapaHi Village,\n' Rgdduiig \ufb01iaamalam\n\nPen.akondaTa1uk, Anan\ufb02lapura District,\nAm;_lhI\"\u00a7i Pmdesh.\n\n'\"   P, Ramaidas, major\n.. f u S\/e..Ye1Ioji Rae,\n'  Door No.182,\n\n Ward, Tank Band Road,\n\n Respondents<\/pre>\n
(By Sri Gods Nagaraj, Adv. ) <\/p>\n
This MFA is \ufb01led under Order 43 me ‘i{:;’}’~: dope<\/p>\n
against the order dated 18.12.2003 passed-._oni};A Ne;zxz\u00ab ire,<\/p>\n
o.s. No.:3o\/2000 by the Ac1c11.i_oivji1″Judge”-(Sr. eesorzg _
\nBelflary anewing IA No. W 1i1edunde:\u00bb..os;der~ 2 1-  58 of ”
\nCFC to set aside the order “of ?_ioridiiio11″aI attachment ‘ ‘A<\/p>\n
before judgment dated 15.’4._!2000’.=  <\/p>\n
This appeal comingd”e~..o”1’1 ford”  this day,
\nN. KUMAR. J., dekivered the–foliowingz  <\/p>\n
This   preferred against
\nH13 OM63′    an appiieation \ufb01led
\nby thdezz-‘\u00a5.1’Ie\u00a7iV’ev1′” oreeezz Rule 53 of the Code of<\/p>\n
Civil ” that the eiaimarzts property has<\/p>\n
been  attf*.;aehSed””dt’in the suit 0.8. No. 130\/2000 on .<\/p>\n
 –    t1%ie}*\ufb011eAV:of._tA!1e Adeaeenm Civil Judge (Sr. om, Bellaxy.<\/p>\n
  ‘r\ufb01eea?\u00a7ope11ent\/plagnee’ \ufb01led suit o.s. No.13o\/2000<\/p>\n
foi”  of money in a sum of Rs.5,71,861.60<\/p>\n
‘    the defendants who are respondents 1 to 7 herein.<\/p>\n
dli\ufb01dedddd\ufb01led an application under Order 38 Rule 5 CPO<\/p>\n
  “praying for an order of attachment which was granted on<\/p>\n
15.4.2000. Respondents 8 and 9 \ufb01led an application<\/p>\n
la,\/’<\/p>\n
under Order 38 Rule 8 read with Order 21 A CPO<\/p>\n
seeking raising of the attachment on the <\/p>\n
are the owners of the property which is’  <\/p>\n
property has been wrongly    J<\/p>\n
objection contesting the   ‘<\/p>\n
3. The trial Cotiftili\u00e9iftei.  _,ihe both the parties
\nheld that map Qrde?’ of  gigs not been duly<\/p>\n
served on  :jriefend’a;1t.e” end. therefore it was not<\/p>\n
a\ufb01eeiivel   cleiii:e_ant_s leave purchased the preperty
\n \ufb01gliep  “the proceedings, as on the day<\/p>\n
they ”  ‘lithe property it was not attached. The<\/p>\n
   ettachment is not effective. Aggrieved by the said<\/p>\n
I   \ufb01led Writ: petition before this Court 32.11<\/p>\n
W’;’P.N.o..32f479\/2004. The said writ petition came to be<\/p>\n
   Adeismissied on the gmmd that the pe\u00a5:itioner\/ plaintiff has<\/p>\n
‘ ”I\ufb01a’1tei’r1ative remedy by way of an appeal. It is thereafter the<\/p>\n
id  “”‘preseI1t appeal is filed. In the process there is a delay of<\/p>\n
274\u00bb days in \ufb01ling the appeal. Therefore an application is<\/p>\n
iv<\/p>\n
\ufb01led under Section 5 of the Limitatiori Ace  <\/p>\n
condonation of delay. Notice” –is   e’..ri;-.wd <\/p>\n
respondents are duly served  }eep1ee$eI1t.ed ”  A<\/p>\n
respective counsel.\n<\/p>\n
4\u00bb. We have hearcV1″‘i;..1;e~  for the parties.<\/p>\n
5. As the    a wrong Forum\nby \ufb01ling   of the same he\nhas *\u00a7>.:thi's'    the cause shown for\n<\/pre>\n
contlionafjoe  constitute suf\ufb01cient cause
\nand thefefore   condoned.\n<\/p>\n
   order. passed by the trial Court raising<\/p>\n
 ~a:t:tecfi:1″;eL::t,’A’e:=.is an order passed on an application filed<\/p>\n
u3{\u20ac1er””VQr\u00a3ier 2 1 Rule 58 CFC. It is deemed to be 21 decree.<\/p>\n
 V’ V. Ea’  appeal is to be preferred against the said order<\/p>\n
A’ \u00a7\u00a3\u00a7iI\u00a7{“1 I}.\u00a3}t a miscellaneous fJT’S’\u00a5L appea} un\u00e9er Order 43 Rule<\/p>\n
V’ m 1(q} CPO. However even the said regular appea} is to be<\/p>\n
filed to this Court only. Having regard to the pendency of<\/p>\n
 u<\/p>\n
the case for the last, decade we are of the View ‘*i.:ef.e1*{1er to<\/p>\n
do cempiete justice between the pa11jes;-  ‘be<\/p>\n
proper to treat this as a reg1\ufb02ar\u00bbAappee1”  of  <\/p>\n
same on merit.\n<\/p>\n
7. When an e.pp1fieat;ig;Q_\u00a35′-‘fj1ed_vLbe  under
\nOrder 21 Rule 58   -the Court to raise
\nattachmem \u00e9tliievu by the
\nCourt a\ufb01    41 Rule 58. Sub\u00bb
\nseceon —  __’c:\u00a2e1tegoriea1ly provides that all
\nquestiofxe.  question as to right, ri\ufb02e and<\/p>\n
i.1V’_.1\u00a3:.\u00b0:1’\u00a7.-.__:\u00a7t  \ufb02:e…__;)_mperty attached arising between the<\/p>\n
‘ ‘proceeding or their representatives under this<\/p>\n
 f__@1eva11t to the adjudication of the claim or<\/p>\n
ebiieeviieny, she}! be determined by the Couri dealing with<\/p>\n
“IT  claim or ebgeetion and not by 3 Separate suit.<\/p>\n
   }’i’herefo:’e in law the application filed by the ajpplieamt is te<\/p>\n
be treatee as a plejnt in a suit and trial is to be conducted<\/p>\n
and the dispute is to be adjudicated and the right of me<\/p>\n
u’\/._<\/p>\n
parties a\ufb01ected have to be determined. Unfqrt\u00a3i1iiat.e1y in
\nthis case it was not done. No triai  ‘A<\/p>\n
opportunity is gven to the plaintiff to sheiv*:’\u20ac;i1s’;t;’ tine <\/p>\n
of attachment was duly seIve<i1i:\u00ab\u00e9'i'I\u00e9.'eref0re   is "<\/p>\n
not hit by the  A"':'.I'I';e.re:fore
\nentire proceedings   is vveoniraxy to the
\nmandatory requirerseiit' .  S8 CPC and
\ntherefore   'V Hence we
\npass the  '':-{'j'-: A'<\/p>\n
 i.app'eai"5s
\nii   order is hereby set aside.\n<\/p>\n
  frziiatter is remitted to the tria} Court for<\/p>\n
aej\ufb01\u00e9ies\ufb01on in accordance with law under Order 2 1 Ruie<\/p>\n
‘*  ‘T58  Both the parties are directed to appear before the<\/p>\n
 trial Court on 1511 December, 2008 vritheut waiting<\/p>\n
h.\/<\/p>\n
netice from the court below, and cooperate with the c:\u00a7{1t’t<\/p>\n
in sgeeciy trial of the case.\n<\/p>\n
%T; sd\/:;L *<\/p>\n
vb\/-  &&&&    <\/p>\n
}T\ufb02dq\u00a7 \u00a7f fg 37<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008 Author: N.Kumar And Gowda ” Road, B\u20acI}.?a’y. [\ufb02a\ufb01eiv\u00e9i\ufb01\u00e9garaja Adv.) and’? IN ‘1’!-1:3 HIGH comrr or rmnzurrazm xrmmnwan k A DATED nus mm 21\u00bb my T THE HODPBLE nm.m$frI\u00ae THE HoH*m.E%;m.JUsT:cE comm of 2&4 (CFC: Between: M \/ s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-25T11:41:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\\\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-25T11:41:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":821,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\\\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-25T11:41:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\\\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-25T11:41:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-25T11:41:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008"},"wordCount":821,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008","name":"M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-25T11:41:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-kamala-mareppa-and-sons-vs-ms-pavan-agencies-firm-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Kamala Mareppa And Sons vs M\/S Pavan Agencies Firm on 21 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20810\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}