{"id":208155,"date":"2008-01-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008"},"modified":"2017-11-22T17:17:50","modified_gmt":"2017-11-22T11:47:50","slug":"state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nST Rev No. 512 of 2004()\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. A.YOUNUS KUNJU,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON\n\nThe Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :02\/01\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                      H.L.DATTU, C.J. &amp; K.M.JOSEPH, J.\n                           ------------------------------------------\n                               S.T.Rev.No.512 of 2004\n                           ------------------------------------------\n                     Dated, this the 2nd day of January, 2008\n\n                                      ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>H.L.Dattu, C.J.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The Revenue being aggrieved by the orders passed by the Kerala Sales<\/p>\n<p>Tax Appellate Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram in T.A.No.252 of 2002 dated 29th<\/p>\n<p>June, 2002 is before us in this sales tax revision.<\/p>\n<p>       (2) The assessee is a dealer registered both under the provisions of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (&#8216;KGST Act&#8217; for short) and the Central<\/p>\n<p>Sales Tax Act, 1956 (&#8216;CST Act&#8217; for short).\n<\/p>\n<p>       (3) The assessing authority had completed the assessments under the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of the CST Act for the assessment year 1988-89 by its order dated<\/p>\n<p>23.2.1998. In the said assessment order, the assessing authority had rejected<\/p>\n<p>the exemption claimed by the assessee on its consignment sales by producing<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;F&#8217; Forms,   solely on the ground that the &#8216;F&#8217; Forms so produced by the<\/p>\n<p>assessee are issued by bogus dealers using fictitious registration numbers.<\/p>\n<p>       (4) Aggrieved by the said assessment order, the assessee had carried<\/p>\n<p>the matter in second appeal before the Tribunal in T.A.No.370 of 1999 .         The<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal after holding that the assessing authority without proper verification<\/p>\n<p>and enquiry could not have come to the conclusion that &#8216;F&#8217; Form declarations<\/p>\n<p>produced by the assessee are bogus as issued              by fictitious dealers and,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, had directed the assessing authority to allow the claim of exemption<\/p>\n<p>made by the assessee.\n<\/p>\n<p>       (5) After such remand, the assessing authority has passed yet another<\/p>\n<p>order dated 25.7.2001 and has allowed the claim only in respect of the turnover<\/p>\n<p>S.T.Rev.No.512 of 2004<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                             2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of consignment sales which are supported by &#8216;F&#8217; Form declarations. Aggrieved<\/p>\n<p>by the said order of the assessing authority, the assessee was before the first<\/p>\n<p>appellate authority, who by its order dated 18.3.2002 had rejected the<\/p>\n<p>assessee&#8217;s appeal. The assessee had carried the matter by way of second<\/p>\n<p>appeal before the Tribunal in T.A.No.252 of 2002. The Tribunal has allowed<\/p>\n<p>the assessee&#8217;s appeal and has further directed the assessing authority to grant<\/p>\n<p>the entire claim of the assessee on consignment sales. Aggrieved by the said<\/p>\n<p>direction issued by the Tribunal, the Revenue is before us in this sales tax<\/p>\n<p>revision.\n<\/p>\n<p>       (6) The Revenue has framed the following question of law for our<\/p>\n<p>consideration and decision, The same is as under:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the<\/p>\n<p>       case the Tribunal is justified in directing the Assessing<\/p>\n<p>       Authority to allow the exemption claimed by the assessee in<\/p>\n<p>       respect of stock transferred to outside the State and held as<\/p>\n<p>       closing stock thee for which no &#8216;F&#8217; Form was filed.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       (7)     Sri.Mohammed Rafiq, learned senior Government Pleader<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the Revenue, would submit that the Tribunal was not justified in<\/p>\n<p>directing the assessing authority to allow the claim of exemption even on the<\/p>\n<p>consignment sales which are not supported by &#8216;F&#8217; Forms and, therefore,<\/p>\n<p>requests this Court to set aside that portion of the order passed by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>       (8) Per contra, Sri.Hari Sankar V.Menon, learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the assessee sought to justify the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p>       (9) In the earlier round of litigation, the Tribunal at paragraph 3 of its<\/p>\n<p>order had stated as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>S.T.Rev.No.512 of 2004<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       &#8220;Therefore, &#8216;F&#8217; Form rejected by the assessing authority is not<\/p>\n<p>       proper and not in accordance with law. To prove that certain<\/p>\n<p>       dealers at Delhi are using fictitious registration numbers no<\/p>\n<p>       materials are collected by the assessing authority. No report is<\/p>\n<p>       collected to prove that the said &#8216;F&#8217; forms are invalidated by the<\/p>\n<p>       assessing authority by any proceedings. Therefore, we are of<\/p>\n<p>       the view that the appellant has proved the claim of exemption<\/p>\n<p>       as per 6A(1) of the C.S.T. Act and Rule 12 by production of F<\/p>\n<p>       forms and the assessing authority has not proved by proper<\/p>\n<p>       enquiry as per Proviso 2 of Section 6(A) of the C.S.T. Act that<\/p>\n<p>       the entries in the &#8216;F&#8217; forms are incorrect       and the claim of<\/p>\n<p>       exemption to the consignment sales disallowed are wrong.<\/p>\n<p>       We, therefore, direct the assessing authority to allow the claim<\/p>\n<p>       of exemption.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>       (10) A reading of the aforesaid paragraph would only indicate that the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal had directed the assessing authority to allow the claim of the assessee<\/p>\n<p>in respect of the consignment sales which are supported by &#8216;F&#8217; Form<\/p>\n<p>declarations. However, in the last sentence of that paragraph, the Tribunal had<\/p>\n<p>directed the assessing authority to allow the claim of exemption. The order<\/p>\n<p>passed by the Tribunal, if it is read in toto, it only means that the Tribunal had<\/p>\n<p>directed the assessing authority to allow the claim of exemption on the<\/p>\n<p>consignment sales which are supported by &#8216;F&#8217; Form declarations and not on the<\/p>\n<p>claims made by the assessee without the support of any &#8216;F&#8217; Form declaration.<\/p>\n<p>The Tribunal by the impugned order has carried away by the last sentence in<\/p>\n<p>paragraph 3 of the order to hold that the assessee is eligible and entitled for<\/p>\n<p>exemption even on the consignment sales which are not supported by &#8216;F&#8217; Form<\/p>\n<p>declarations. This conclusion of the Tribunal, in our opinion, is contrary to the<\/p>\n<p>observations and directions issued by them while disposing of T.A.No.370 of<\/p>\n<p>S.T.Rev.No.512 of 2004<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1999 dated 10th November, 2000.        Therefore, the revision petition field by the<\/p>\n<p>State requires to be allowed and the order passed by the Tribunal requires to<\/p>\n<p>be set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>        (11) Accordingly we pass the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>                                ORDER<\/p>\n<p>        i) Sales tax revision is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>        ii) The direction issued by the Tribunal to allow the claim of the<\/p>\n<p>assessee for exemption even on the consignment sales which are not<\/p>\n<p>supported by &#8216;F&#8217; Form declarations is set aside.<\/p>\n<p>        iii) Accordingly we answer the question of law framed by the Revenue in<\/p>\n<p>the affirmative and against the assessee.\n<\/p>\n<p>        iv) However, liberty is reserved to the assessee, if he so desires, to<\/p>\n<p>produce the &#8216;F&#8217; Form declarations within two months from today before the<\/p>\n<p>assessing authority in support of his claim for exemption for the assessment<\/p>\n<p>year 1988-89.     If such declaration forms are produced by the assessee, the<\/p>\n<p>assessing authority shall take note of those forms and redo the assessment.<\/p>\n<p>        Ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                          (H.L.DATTU)<br \/>\n                                                        CHIEF JUSTICE<\/p>\n<p>                                                          (K.M.JOSEPH)<br \/>\n                                                              JUDGE<br \/>\nvns<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ST Rev No. 512 of 2004() 1. STATE OF KERALA, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. A.YOUNUS KUNJU, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER For Respondent :SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON The Hon&#8217;ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-01-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-22T11:47:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-22T11:47:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1025,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-22T11:47:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-01-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-22T11:47:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008","datePublished":"2008-01-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-22T11:47:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008"},"wordCount":1025,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008","name":"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-01-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-22T11:47:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-a-younus-kunju-on-2-january-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Kerala vs A.Younus Kunju on 2 January, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208155"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208155\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}