{"id":208287,"date":"2009-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009"},"modified":"2018-11-19T06:54:43","modified_gmt":"2018-11-19T01:24:43","slug":"shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri &#8230; vs The Assistant General Manager And &#8230; on 16 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri &#8230; vs The Assistant General Manager And &#8230; on 16 April, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 1673 DAY OF APRIL 2009\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSHCES ABDUL NAZEQ 3: \"  \n\n\u00a33;TPETIT{0NNO.6-M8\/20!}?     \n\nBetween:\n\nSri M. Nataraj,  \nS50 late Sri B.K_Mallikaljunaizii:,V_  V' '\n\nAged about 55 years,   _ '\n\nRfa CEO Sxi Vijayendra Kumar, V V ~ \nNo.7, Poomima E.11clam3,8'\" Main-Rmd;   \n(Nanda lslumar _51.1'ehziI1i,g -. \"  \nRatnanjaneya Nagar,  \nBangalom W S6OE{}61'-   \n\n   Petitioner.\n\n   (By hI\u00a3\u20ac$ 'M.1\\if &amp;ga_:aj &amp; 'AfS_,.._Advs.)\n\n Dissipiinary Authority,\n=  A.  oflviysore,\n _ Rgegion-4, Bangalore zone,\n . 'KG. Road,\n Bangalore \u00bb 560 002.\n\n\n\n'2 Sri C.N.Shank.ar,\n\nManager and Enquiry O\ufb01eer,\n\nState Bank of Mysore, _\n\nFort Branch, No.303,   \n\nPlatinum Jubilee Bldg, : '\n\n2'\" Floor, SLN Charities Premises,\n\nBangalore ---- 560 002. '    ., Respondeiate... \n\n(By Sri R Narayana, Adv.)\n\nThis Writ Petit\u00a7en..is \ufb02lj\ufb01i\ufb02une    . &amp; 227 ofthe\nCcmstitution, prayisig 'gas 'dizfeet the  ' ' 1.. to permit the\npetitioner to avai\ufb01 eee   agi Advecajze to defend the charges\n\ufb02amed agaimt  _d\u00a7\u00a7cipi\u00a7na:\u00a7r.eequiz*y prpeeedings, etc.\n\n   for Hearing in 'B'\nGroup this day,  Ceiii\ufb01 i!1\u00a7id$3\ufb01}!.?5f\u00a3'H0Wi11g;\n\nAA -    ;0ReER\n\n   as a Head Cashier with the State\n\n Kkkoad Branch, Bangalore. Diecipiinary\n\n    against him alleging that he has\n\n acts of irregularities, acts of omissicrn and\n\nA  ec\u00a21\u00a7n;;;gg\u00a2,, as detailed tmrein. The charges against' the petitioner\n\n   charge sheet are as under:\n\n1\nswig\n\n\n\n\"CHARGE SHEET\n\nThat, while working as Hmd Cashier' at   L   \u00e9 A\nBranch since 2.7.1993, you are t\u00e9\u00bb..hm:5a   \ncommitted certain serious actsT0f_ irregirlarities,  \n\nomission and commission as  hereuiiderf* T \n\nCHARGE! T       _\nYou have on 2.3.08  'Branch\npremises a\ufb01g\u00e9r\u00e9 ;~j\u00a7gaing1%.:11e% am   j\" is. \"reg\u00a7Ster, when\nyou came't \u00ab5   auditor\nand   the -Qashjv not handed over\nthe  kgys -'held by you to the\n\n yo\u00a7iE1atze_... .\n\n    Branch work: to suffer for wan: of\n\nV \" ~  to open the safe;\n\n  of cash by the Auditor, there\n\n was a physical cash shortage of Rs.I2,6G,0OO\/-\n\n was detected in 36 sections of Rs.500;'-\ndenominations held by branch cash balance\nunderjoinst cfzstody.\n\n\n\nOn aoeount of your above deliberate alleged acts, the\nBank is exposed to a \ufb01nancial loss of Rs.l2,60,100\/-\n\n(Rupees twelve Iakh sixty thousand one ixundred only.\nCHARGE II\n\nYou have failed to detect the coumerfeit notes in   ok\n\nJoint Custody in the following cases.\n\nTaI3'lore13r. Rs. C\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01t\ufb02fe\ufb02\ufb02\ufb02f\u00e9\ufb01, .3  Rs. '- \" \"\n\nRemittance sent Denomination No.ofpiec;?5 of\"w&amp;  K238' V \" \n\n04.07.08 i0(}i1I\/==\n\n04.07.03 5011\/\u00bb 2 .V  *;;m _ , \" \n' 2(}v}o.;  _\n\n\"  \"'15$a '\n\n11.0208 500%\n\nTOTAL (59?  E\n\n   i\u00a7ie\"geouineness of the\n   loss to an extent of\n1zs.4,s0oz* (12upeeg exam  \ufb01ve hundred only)\nto gm      \n\nV  authority appointed an enquiry officer\n mag an  The petitioner filed an appiication before\n\n--  authority as per Annexure 'C' seeking permission\n\nV'   an Advocate to defend his cam, which has been\n\nE\n\nK.\n\n\n\ndismissed as per the oncier at Annexure 'D' dated 27.2.2009...__\n\nFeeling aggrieved by the same, petitioner has filed this i\n\npetition.\n\n3. Leamed Counsel for the petitioner oomo\ufb01dithoz moi'\/\u00a7oiii.iii\n\nmatter involves complicated questiono  few  fact   \npetitioner is not able to defend~himse1f' \nTherefore: petitioner requested   to permit\nhim to appoint an ,gxon\u00a3oooto   has been\nrejected by the       i\n\n4.   Cfolsrxsel appearing for the\n\nrespondent     does not involve any<\/pre>\n<p> quesiions oi&#8217;law&#8221;ai3d fact. The petitioner was working<\/p>\n<p>  charges alieged against him relate to<\/p>\n<p>i   of omission and commission while he<\/p>\n<p>  :v..\u00a7aai1dli:1g the  at the strong room. Therefore, if the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>4:   Lheii\u00e9alsistance of a omemployee to defend him, the Bank has<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;:29<\/p>\n<p>an<\/p>\n<p>no objection whatsoever for the same. However, he is not entitled<\/p>\n<p>for appointmem of an Advocate to defend his case.<\/p>\n<p>5. I have care\ufb01iliy considered the a1&#8217;gum_  bouts man&#8221;  ii  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>teamed Counsel at the Bar and perused   <\/p>\n<p>record.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. In a disciplinary     be<br \/>\nrepresented by a lawyeroand it i3..at:\ufb011.e   concerned<br \/>\nauthority. Ifthe    of assistance<br \/>\nby an Advooai\u00e9iwiiiioot  the rules of natural<br \/>\njustice. It is o%1?I\u00a7i when of oerious or complex nature<\/p>\n<p>and the devligxque-\u00a7i1~V is} m,;ab;.g defend himself, he should be<\/p>\n<p>  a  Division Bench of this Court in<\/p>\n<p>  BANK &amp; ANOTHER VS.\n<\/p>\n<p>1 i 2990 11 Lu 456 has held that assistance of<\/p>\n<p>  l enquiry cannot be given unless<\/p>\n<p>4:   questions of law and fact are involved in the case.<\/p>\n<p>i<br \/>\nE<\/p>\n<p>7. In the present ease, the charges levelled 4&#8242; <\/p>\n<p>petitioner are that he has eommi1:\u00a3e&#8217; d certain i_xteg;;lazitieS&#8221;&#8216;a\ufb01ntl&#8217;_feiledV   &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>to detect counterfeit notes while he was a 73<\/p>\n<p>Admittedly, he was a Head  the&#8221;=ef<\/p>\n<p>time. The matter does not involj;_re any  questicms Qtiijew<br \/>\nand fact. The petitioner can&#8217;  tr!-{ray take the<br \/>\nassistance of a ce~erep\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7,-$3 tegdeifeiiii.   View that<br \/>\nthe disciplinary  &#8216;eiiplication of the<br \/>\npetitioner.   petition and it is<\/p>\n<p>accordingly dismissed. &#8221; __ H<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\u00bb<br \/>\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri &#8230; vs The Assistant General Manager And &#8230; on 16 April, 2009 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1673 DAY OF APRIL 2009 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSHCES ABDUL NAZEQ 3: &#8221; \u00a33;TPETIT{0NNO.6-M8\/20!}? Between: Sri M. Nataraj, S50 late [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri ... vs The Assistant General Manager And ... on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri ... vs The Assistant General Manager And ... on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-19T01:24:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri M Nataraj S\\\/O Late Shri &#8230; vs The Assistant General Manager And &#8230; on 16 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-19T01:24:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":294,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri M Nataraj S\\\/O Late Shri ... vs The Assistant General Manager And ... on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-19T01:24:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri M Nataraj S\\\/O Late Shri &#8230; vs The Assistant General Manager And &#8230; on 16 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri ... vs The Assistant General Manager And ... on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri ... vs The Assistant General Manager And ... on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-19T01:24:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri &#8230; vs The Assistant General Manager And &#8230; on 16 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-19T01:24:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009"},"wordCount":294,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009","name":"Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri ... vs The Assistant General Manager And ... on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-19T01:24:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nataraj-so-late-shri-vs-the-assistant-general-manager-and-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri M Nataraj S\/O Late Shri &#8230; vs The Assistant General Manager And &#8230; on 16 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208287"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208287\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208287"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208287"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}