{"id":208746,"date":"2008-04-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008"},"modified":"2015-11-25T01:37:05","modified_gmt":"2015-11-24T20:07:05","slug":"arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late … vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri … on 17 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late … vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri … on 17 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Rahim<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH cone: or KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE\nDATED THIS THE 17\"' um' OF APRIL, 20.93:  T\nPRESENT    \n\nTHE H\u20ac)N'B\u00bbLE MR. 3usncEK;sREs2uHAa \nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE JAWAD RAM\u00bb: =  <\/pre>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1 ARASAII’\u00a75*\u00a74C’-{N0 141633\/0 LATETV HQNNAIAH
\nBLGCKEP3 if  T  ‘~  1: V
\nCENTF!AL_PRI$ON ,    :\n<\/p>\n
3ANGA;V_ gR\u00a7;’;_ ‘   ..\n<\/p>\n
  L _  % _  T APPELLANT
\n(av sax.   spraasu\u00e9iwz  Aw. AS AMICUS wane)<\/p>\n
 AND\u00ab.\u00a7   <\/p>\n
] 1.  sT\u00e9TE:\u00abGE KARNATAKA BY mxem \u00a5’OLICE<\/p>\n
L  L     aespomam
\n(av~sa1.G. TTa}–tAvAN1s1NsH,spP )
\ncm\u00a7.A PREFERRED BY THE APPELLANT\/co:mcT\/Accuses<\/p>\n
  ;*..THRQUGH SUPRDT., CENTRAL mxsou, BANGALORE, AGAINST
\n ‘ma JUDGMENT DT. 22.02.05 PASSED av THE P.O., F.T.C-II,
\n~  MANDYA. IN s.c.No.159\/2003 ~ CONVICTING TBE<\/p>\n
APPELLANT\/CONVICT\/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENSE PIU\/S. 498-A,<\/p>\n
 3:32 AND 201 or IPC Am sewmacxaa FOR oH=mce P\/UIS.
\n= 4934; or we To uuosaeo IMPRISONEMNT ma 3 YEARS mo<\/p>\n
TO PAY FINE OF RS. 5000\/’ A?\\!D 1.0.. T0 UHDERGO
\nIMPRISONMENT FOR A FURTHER PERIOD OF THREE MONTHS<\/p>\n
ETC. ETC.\n<\/p>\n
\u00e9’*”\n<\/p>\n
This appeal coming on for hearing this <\/p>\n
RAHIM 3., delivered the foliowingw<\/p>\n
Convicted accused is In appezelvattese\ufb01ttti\ufb01\u00e9 <\/p>\n
in Sessions Case No.159\/03–\u00a7re.V_the”\ufb01ie’  ‘\u00b0FI’C,”t’<\/p>\n
Mandya passed on 24.295. 3 _\n<\/p>\n
2. The centext\ufb01effacte    _V
\nMahadevanfme (s:i1c.e–   tn the
\naccused    begotten three
\nchildren  rt-Vltace \ufb01tteen years prior
\nto 24.4393,  batman the accused and the<\/p>\n
deceased west set  the accused was persistently<\/p>\n
_ derawegdding: her”‘tc\u00a7 ti1’anefe1.’ the site aiven by her varents ta<\/p>\n
 ‘there metriaae. Unable ta bear the contimaous<\/p>\n
I t’o:t*t:i_re and mental, perpetrated upon her and the-<\/p>\n
:  _ dettberateeee\ufb01tect by the accused to maintain her Efid her<\/p>\n
Ache managed to secure a job in a bank In<\/p>\n
A  : !’~’:e’z’:z’.i’\u00e9a’g;ere Viifeae. Upon securing the job she Item <\/p>\n
t   .chtidren with her parents for their upkeep as the accused<\/p>\n
 ‘  had rdused to malatatn them. Perforce, she had to hire a<\/p>\n
\ufb01e<\/p>\n
so as to sort out the differancas and if he was d\u00a25\u00a3i;a:i;3$.V_ef<\/p>\n
divorce that would also be sorted out. The  <\/p>\n
house of Mahadevamnafs parent’s house v <\/p>\n
“nothing doing, I wili teach her a  “In:<\/p>\n
the visit ended.\n<\/p>\n
5.. Mahad-evammxa ret;2r–:”n\u00e9’\u00a2_3.to~-.MandA\u00e9\u00a7oro~ond lived
\nin than said room. 0ne’ oAa\u00a7_}rA  the accused
\nvisited the bui\u00a7o\u00a7ne.,_  — Mohamed
\nZakariwa and {his  The aocum ism
\nseen In _the of’.’:\u00a7Ioh’aoovan1ma even In the night
\nwhen Paw-3. ‘tho ‘oon.teen run by him at the<\/p>\n
raliway s\u00a3ati_on_   and the deceased were<\/p>\n
 _ therefg\u00a7ro,s’~!ast   company of each otha:<\/p>\n
V “Gk  next morning i.e., 24.4.03, at around<\/p>\n
 PW-3 Mohamed Zakariyya was doing<\/p>\n
‘basin-ess_ i’n his canteen at ra\ufb02way station, the crowd<\/p>\n
‘    around the platform aftor noticing the dead body<\/p>\n
  .._ o.of  woman. Pws 2 and 3 went to the spot and Edmtl\ufb01eo<\/p>\n
  ;’the dead bodv as that of Mahadevarnma. He immediatefv<\/p>\n
K\/’Q[L<\/p>\n
\u20ac__,”‘\\<\/p>\n
Informed the Station Master ef the Railway ‘fr.<\/p>\n
turn communicated the message to the   <\/p>\n
Station at Mandaaere in rapanfz\u00e9geh te <\/p>\n
Inspector of Police Srikanta <\/p>\n
message at 11.25 am. on 24.4–.’\u00a73.andv.  eiace <\/p>\n
where the body was f\u00a3’3,l.:’z”t’i\u00a3\u00a7\ufb02. g  woman
\nlying on the platform  Station and
\nregistered the  in  report to the
\nSub-DIvIsIor’.-.561  The s-ab-Divlsiaersa\u00e9
\nMagistrate”wee;v:.\u00a7ti.i%?\u00a7mo’eet\u00a3:v’e’z\u00a7r3*:r;”\u00a7his pr\ufb01e\ufb01ter the b0dY
\nwas fufthet  CW-1 the breather of the
\ndeceased \u00e9ireiaisyei   3. on the stout, the favor:<\/p>\n
 \u00ab_QlVe:\u00a7t’;’\u00ab:.  i3.an;ae”” \u00abwasv rmistered as a complaint we<\/p>\n
\u00b0._I:a$;’eet,Igatie:j’\u00ab9}es_ taken up. Inquest was coneuctw on the<\/p>\n
 victim and statement of witnem was<\/p>\n
*VVrece’t\u00a7’:ied”vreia’tina to the case of death.<\/p>\n
AA  Mohamed Zakarlvya PW-3 has In his version,<\/p>\n
f\ufb01eetiened about the presence cf the accused with the<\/p>\n
VT Ii” -deeeased an the night prior to the discovery of the dead<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
body and also revealed discovery of the deed <\/p>\n
piatform.\n<\/p>\n
8. The body was therea\ufb02fzer’ fto41’e’uto9\u00a7’:t <\/p>\n
and It revealed that death of MahatE4evetr1″eha’ttwes..oue<\/p>\n
Injury at the neck by use’\u00bbto_ff-V.e% s\ufb01atp was’-L’<\/p>\n
therefore, declared as a  death,  Further
\nInvestigation led to   ‘earn and taii from
\nthe i\ufb01remlse-5 wtgere :’73ae also mat and
\ncotton bed git-\u00a7’it:j_1    From the dead
\nbody,  ear-studs, enklet and
\ntoe ri\ufb02es  vvdocomented. Since the offence<\/p>\n
was comtmttedv  tt\u00a7’e:..e.”ji3Nrisd!c\ufb01ona! Poitce Station, the<\/p>\n
_ SH\u20ac}._\u00a7f’ Rellw\ufb01  v\ufb01wsore, forwarded the report to the<\/p>\n
 1VjAu’rieoiz:tii’or;evS”police officer who re-registered the sane and<\/p>\n
Atooi<___oo":tirrthe\u00a7f'V\u00a7hv%tioation. PW-26 Balarameeowdt was<\/p>\n
 _ the  AI.O. who- received the property seized during.<\/p>\n
lyhthetjnxtesxtiuation and \ufb01led cha-ro@heet. The accused was<\/p>\n
4'_'_'.11"a:op:eii':ended with the heir: of the staff and on Interrogation,<\/p>\n
  -the accused led the police officer to the oietmrn where be<\/p>\n
A V’  had disposed off the dead body from the room occuplw by<\/p>\n
Mahadevamma and pointed to the reef of the <\/p>\n
he had cencealed the chopher used in the .c\ufb01:?h:ev\u00a7;i&”theh_”” <\/p>\n
ted the palice officers to a wal whefethe ~hvat3_  t<\/p>\n
chopper. 1.0. summoned the  ane’v_*vr.&\ufb01ev’e\u00a7’the.VVL<\/p>\n
chcpper as shown by the acctzsed.\n<\/p>\n
on the basis of the sta:teh1er_t\ufb02”ef.I anti  that the
\naccused was seen with  her death
\nand on the lrgasistof V’ brother at the
\ndeceased,  that the acctmed had.\n<\/p>\n
been treatise: \u00e9tsitiiweruelty continuously for a
\npertoetr over  the fact that he visited.
\nthe deceased setttetir.1es::.'”i5efore the incident led to filing of<\/p>\n
 ..V_the;’:%1j\u00a23hei_tfA\u00a7e:sheet’ eeehtst the accused to erraignln-a him fer<\/p>\n
 L_’a.-hprinciv9I’eetfehce under Section 392 -0!’ IPC and aim for<\/p>\n
dFfehtcevt1h\u00a7\u00a7st:’vSec\ufb02on 498-A IPC and Sections 3 8: 4 of<\/p>\n
 cm-\u00e9rtt Ittphrbrtsan Act.\n<\/p>\n
H   The accusw was subjected to trial during whkh<\/p>\n
__the prosecution reited on the ocular testimony of 27<\/p>\n
 witnesses, 24 documents and 15 material objects.<\/p>\n
Constderina the evidence so hreuaht on record, the teamw<\/p>\n
(941<\/p>\n
OD<\/p>\n
triai judge found it anti lncuipateci the <\/p>\n
recorded the quilt against him and   K <\/p>\n
to the punishment as seen from <\/p>\n
Against it, he is before us.\n<\/p>\n
10. Learned counsei ‘e;.1:V;:5ee\ufb01no”*.forCthe’,ieccused it<\/p>\n
commenced his araumeht sa$2i’hh:’  mieicase against
\nthe accused is totaiiy based’  evidence, the
\nprosecution ha\ufb01 ‘te._\u00a7*.on*}’i_nc\u00a7’hVe?iy ‘estebiishfcfthat:<\/p>\n
(I)  -the deceased at the
\nreievanff  .  V   <\/p>\n
(ii) 1′ the seeci\ufb01c motive to commit her<\/p>\n
murder;\n<\/p>\n
  the Aecciised was the person when shined the<\/p>\n
   rgiom where the offence was committed to<\/p>\n
the,1:;\u00a7’ietforh\u00a7’i.f,\u00bbihere the body was discovered;<\/p>\n
(hi)t. the accused was the only person who had access<\/p>\n
A ‘5.’ room occupied by Hahadevamma.<\/p>\n
(V) the material object – chopper sawed by the<\/p>\n
1′ prosecution was used by the accused in commission of the<\/p>\n
crime.\n<\/p>\n
99%<\/p>\n
11. Relying upon these circmnsta-n-ces <\/p>\n
that the evidence ied by prosecution is _ <\/p>\n
haw the accused had shifted the bred?’ of izii\u00e9s<\/p>\n
mom to the pia\ufb02arm. T’here_ is ni1a”.__eiii5\\c;iA.<=:nce\ufb01_iff..:A<\/p>\n
the accused had visited the  .\u00a7@mezif\ufb01eVxE\u00a7f6r\u00a7; he-r' <\/p>\n
death.\n<\/p>\n
12. on time gram, that the
\nconviction of fife’   matenai
\nand the  in convicting him for
\n  ivhen it was shown by
\nevidencazi:ifia”tVthai9\u00a5[\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7_\u00a7..,:.\u00a7\u00a7’c”p-roof reoardina demand for<\/p>\n
dowry, .. LA<\/p>\n
LA   ‘A~.La.xs;tiy, he contends that even if it is construed<\/p>\n
tiiazi\ufb01ime vV\u00e9:i\u00a7;:’:;seji:i”iiad visited the deceased, the prosacrution<\/p>\n
V has f$ii\u00a2;d’*’ii:’\u00e9\u00a7tabiish that he was and author of the injuries
\n tithe victim and none else. Pointing out to certain
\n.’_’i\u00ab’\u00a7.n\ufb01fri#ities in the prosecution theory as also inconsistency in<\/p>\n
T ‘:’..:v’\u00e9vidence, he seeks acquittai.<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
14. Per contra, the laarnw 5%’ has <\/p>\n
judgement lmpuonw which we shat! rafer  <\/p>\n
paras.\n<\/p>\n
15. To beam with, it ts nttgttfy ttit%;a*ter\u00abt<\/p>\n
relationship between the aetet\u00e9tttz artd uthe, \u00e9ven ‘V<\/p>\n
though they were knitv!n…t31atr\u00a7i”r1tt.f[V’\u00a75_\ufb01hus5&’ttd~a\u00a7nd wife.
\nThe prosecution evidetk:t=:_”  through
\nevidence of the’.Vct:tftip_lair;’Aa”t\u00a7'<;:   the parents
\nof the   had takan
\nmace \ufb01i'1:s*.et*r.Au3'?A'ey\u00e9'rs* ::g,3riorj'.tts:v'Attie-ttntitient and the \u00abism!
\nhad olvsn  the accused, her life was
\nmiserable.'  rtiatie by the accused calling upon<\/p>\n
 the \u00e9stsssed td"p'att___yqith the site eivm to her In marriage<\/p>\n
\u00e9.n\u00bb\u00a7ssu__e persisting for this period. The 'fact that<\/p>\n
thaws .\u00bb.ot.t;s.tst.tt that the actusm hardly maintatned his<\/p>\n
V \u00abvfami\ufb01k; ..ItV:[s'a7i'so estabiished fram the circumstance and net<\/p>\n
thy the accused that the decased had left her<\/p>\n
 with her parents in Mandya and um alone In a<\/p>\n
T 'Q'r\u00e9'dm at Manda after securing a job In a bank. It certainly<\/p>\n
a u x establishes that the accused was not a part of \ufb01w famliy af<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
the deceasw at the time ef the incident. UndeubtM$\u00a7yr\u00ab..:az1d<\/p>\n
indisputably the accused was leading life  <\/p>\n
wltheut sharing the responsibility _cf. _r_helhteih\u00a3h\u00a7_.'hieV'_'ve?e " <\/p>\n
and chlldren. From It, it could  <\/p>\n
deceased was left to fend forV1h'e;fseit'ehid ":g_:.z.h:qkeftet- <\/p>\n
her children while the accueee":A'\u00bbsees_\u00bb Il\ufb01ineeiche. The
\nstatement of witnesses recordeti  tite;"\u00a7resecuticn that the
\naccused had  treated he'
\ncruelly ls well..    Incident but the
\nclrcumstasjcee.  was facing each
\nordeai fer setreteit thfsecurhaa a jab in a bank. It<\/p>\n
Is only    she had to rernain at the<\/p>\n
 puaceot workm Elehdytu and left her children at her parents'<\/p>\n
  Ihhltihhiehdya. The seconei circumstance is the visit of<\/p>\n
Athe'ecchVeect___eAV.'few days prior to the date of Incident when<\/p>\n
H V' _ deceased 'v.vei'e In her parents' house. The accused had<\/p>\n
' W H "  chzwdtqubtecity compeiled her to part with the site ebteinw by<\/p>\n
  item her parents and on her refuse! the accused<\/p>\n
 -erioclaimlng “nothing demo, ‘1 will teach he a lesson” Idt<\/p>\n
V the place. The parents of the victim have clearly daaosed<\/p>\n
at<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
the Court. The chiidren cf the deceased <\/p>\n
witnesses. Nandlni one cf the chtidren of the   K <\/p>\n
aiso spoken as to how her father tr\u00e9\u00e9ted \ufb01h\u00e9a.-r  hi’ <\/p>\n
am also speaks about the visit’ 9!’ We the  <\/p>\n
Ugadi while she stayed In  cf hefr’V.g’ta:V\u00a7ti: \ufb01a’rcnm. <\/p>\n
She aiso reveais as to wgwat  \u00abiii-32* vicit. The
\naccusw is said to have  towards the
\nchlidren and 2rge;:;~\u00a7[;fr;:\u00bbthe::\u00e9;  has  before the
\nCeurt In evisi\u00e9\ufb01iga   threatened her that
\nhe wouia’*’k5\u00a3.{ :if\u00e9rk\u00e9rs’\u00abwut\u00e9\ufb01ai\u00e9\u00e9’ ‘hevvw\ufb01iled her mother if she
\nrevealsSur.:h a statement is made by<\/p>\n
the accuseudc~\u00a7\ufb01arV thc”5_\ufb01c!\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9nt in which the deceased died.<\/p>\n
 “The V.\u00bbe\u00a7;i\u00a2\u00a7\u00a7rsc\u00a2 oV’r\u00a7A”‘rec\u00a2:_rc\u00a7 is therefere, overwhelming and In<\/p>\n
 “.__ti2\u00a2”abse\u00a7jce:cf’any expianatlon from the accused as ta why<\/p>\n
!i.e~v)\u00a7’as ‘\u00e9\u00ab\u00a7.i;fI\ufb01e\ufb01\u00a7uith the deceased, it is acceptable.<\/p>\n
i7.”c: Ccmlna to the Incident wager, theuah the case<\/p>\n
. .1?  j<;f"pra\u00a7eci}tlon is based circumstantial evidence, we find that<\/p>\n
 instant case, the prosecution has nediad on the<\/p>\n
"'4:VVVVf'\u00e9ficwlng most Important circumstances:<\/p>\n
\u00e9gzc<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
(i) The accused was the person last swzgi”o.Tthe<\/p>\n
company of the decoaed soon were ha” doath;…._ij   ” <\/p>\n
(II) The karlmanl saro and tau of  K <\/p>\n
not on her body but were found In     <\/p>\n
(iii) The woman was done   ofan <\/p>\n
object cutting ha neck;\n<\/p>\n
18. we hire soon,:f:oro._’oi}Le of PW\u00bb-3 M.Z.
\nthe owner of   PW-4 that the
\naccused  23.4.03 i.o., they
\nfound   in the room. PW-3
\nhas statu e’d,!t’i1aVt  of house after havino food and<\/p>\n
saw the oec41\u00e9’oso:i’s;ittIf:oV\u00abo.n a Jaaa\ufb02. In fact, he spoke with<\/p>\n
and”‘”\u00e9Skod whether he had dinner and<\/p>\n
 ot\ufb01or\u00e9ofi\u00e9\ufb01tvi\u00e9otofoed. on the very next day, !.e., 24.4.93,<\/p>\n
.   heA::oticod’dfo–ao body of the victim.<\/p>\n
V ”  similarly, PW-4 son of the owner of the house<\/p>\n
1’  opoaks of having seen the accused with the deceased<\/p>\n
T  ‘boar or in the room occupied by then. ‘ms drcumotance<\/p>\n
U and evidence ted supporting it -Is formidable. The accused<\/p>\n
has failed to elicit anything from the <\/p>\n
these witnesses so as to salvage any mate\u00a7iai1:.1\u00a7vhi\u00a7:hn’l’a;hei\u00a7  <\/p>\n
render the testimony doubtful. On;”tea’otnrfaiea\u00a3\u00abof_:’evfloence;’.<\/p>\n
we are satisfied that neither PW-;3__ nor have’:ian\u00a7i’~..V<\/p>\n
adverse animus towards the  <\/p>\n
him if he was not izresent invA’thel\u00a7fhVon.;e at”thatjreievant
\ntime. In fact what  only of the
\npresence of    not attributm
\nanything else.  tiiaclosure of fact by these
\n what was within thar
\nknowieooe; narrows that the accused was the<\/p>\n
last person’ tobe oeenln ‘the company of the dmeasm.
\n ‘i’irnev\u00abfa;tor, is also relevant. Plus 3 and 4 have<\/p>\n
 alga j;e,3 na’.m\u00a7’*haccusea on 23′” and 24″‘ of April, zms and<\/p>\n
lnoify-..next’V”_daf.;;’rnorninq around 11.08 am. (on 24.04.83)<\/p>\n
V -V   has found at the railway raatfonn. The mat and<\/p>\n
“‘.’A44″l:thoegottoh bed seized by the prosecution which are marked<\/p>\n
  an ‘M55 7 and 8 reveal that both than objects were stained<\/p>\n
T  “with human blood. It is also material to note that<\/p>\n
inspection of scene of occurrence reveaied that Karhnani<\/p>\n
gill<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
sara as also tail was found in the said room. If tho’:<\/p>\n
was anybody eise there was no reason whyv\ufb01hhai\u00e9’ <\/p>\n
removed the karlmani sara and <\/p>\n
indicates the vengeance and the  <\/p>\n
towards the victim and white”-going  dsoh’<\/p>\n
rsuded her from the  rn_atrfrrioh$si uv’r’n\u00a7na:asl’asutro. This
\nclrcumstamze is therefor\u00e9, motive placed
\nby the prosecot\u00a7ohVL:Vin  circumstance is
\nthat none ofvhorn by the deceased wore
\nremovod’.”Thog oi””ths deceased had the gold
\near stuvci-sis;  rings. Had the murda been<\/p>\n
comm_itteoV’o’*for’v  offends’ wouid have wtalnly<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.,dec\u00a7:!hpso __w\u00a7th vaiuabies. The only conclusion<\/p>\n
Lth.\u00e9refore;*isvV4\u00a7ha person who did cause the death of the<\/p>\n
ae;sase\u00a2’no monetary gain In mind but had other<\/p>\n
‘VV_’reasonsV”‘to commit the crime. The motive In the mind of the<\/p>\n
 “V~Icfaccused ‘co rid of his wife therefore, appears to he the cause<\/p>\n
‘   comrnission of the said crime. It Is also materiat to note<\/p>\n
 “chat the Medical Df\ufb01cer who conducted the autopsy has<\/p>\n
reveaied that he found conspicuous cut injury on the neck<\/p>\n
8%<\/p>\n
cf the deceased. Such an injury according to ‘ttjfevitstfedgicat<\/p>\n
officer Dr.K.V. Satish PW-16 coule’ have   <\/p>\n
sharp object tike the chopper  . ‘_ <\/p>\n
21. The presecution’ -.___evidV’e:t_ci’e V  <\/p>\n
interracatlon of the accused, he’e:e\u00a7;eue steiutjtery etatement
\nand led the police omcefs _tAo7:ia We poed\ufb02vwas deep
\n\ufb01ned with water. Thett’I.t.%tet-ftpatatzeremegowda had to
\nrequisition  Into the pond
\nfilled with    xeearch, rarieved the
\nchoppec teetere the Trial Court and
\nmarked ‘MtO’.-ichabper so retrieved was seized.<\/p>\n
The {place ‘where stiehv chopper was recovered gains<\/p>\n
 V. “‘imp’ettatice ‘in_the ctfce\u00e9\ufb01wstances of this case. The pond was<\/p>\n
 \ufb01liedx The praence of chopper at the bottam of<\/p>\n
the-taonv’d  oniy be known to the person who was<\/p>\n
  ‘-responsttdie for its dumping. It is theraore, knew he and in<\/p>\n
t   :”th’e.._e\u00a7tclusive knowledge of the persen who did It. In the<\/p>\n
‘  …_\ufb02’_?;p_\u00a7ta\ufb02t case, the voluntary mtemwt of the accused beers<\/p>\n
 \u00bb  testimony to the fact that it is the accused who teak the<\/p>\n
police officers to the pond. The said Information revealed<\/p>\n
by the accused is indicative of the fact that be e  .<\/p>\n
who had concealed the chopper. Consequently   <\/p>\n
is safely to be construed as the ohj\u00e9ci*\u00abueed  it<\/p>\n
i.e., used in cutting of the neclcof <\/p>\n
the absence of blood stains’ on:””~the .cnopeeVr’v_:v\u00a7iiilcn” {Mes ‘ V<\/p>\n
submerged in water is of so im=.36xtejnce\u00bbo.e_nd net-fetet to the<\/p>\n
prosecution case so far asitne \u00e9eefiferyf’ iisv”coi1–cemed.<\/p>\n
22. In_the”:.1;y~eculiar 7fects:”af.nvdV.’circumstances of the
\ncase, we fee\u00a7i..gVh’et eeteblished between use
\nof M’Q_..f10  ‘iniurii caused to the person of<\/p>\n
the victint’ and that implies that the user is the<\/p>\n
accus4ed–vaAnd .'”he.i’\u00e9sdti1e author of such injury. Since<\/p>\n
:’V:’._v.deetVi$”:’hia5%is j’re\u00a7uited”W\ufb01*Vom such an injury; he is also<\/p>\n
‘%oepe”nsit.$fIe._foif–the homicidal death of the victim. The<\/p>\n
  4 o\ufb01en-see tl\u00a7’erei’ete falls within the ambit of Section 300 of IPC<\/p>\n
R”””–..V’\u00e9’ndVLnot-tinder its exception. The evidence referred to<\/p>\n
A  ja’bVoue.u.–‘is therefore, convincing and is clincher to show that<\/p>\n
–   ellicircumstances form a complete chain which is consistent<\/p>\n
 ‘ eoniy with the guilt of the accused and is inconsistent Mth<\/p>\n
his innocence. The Trial Court an appreciation of evidence<\/p>\n
N”\n<\/p>\n
Q<\/p>\n
1?\n<\/p>\n
reached conclusion that the accused has cemmitted <\/p>\n
of Mahadevamma which \u00a35 wen analyzed and is _<\/p>\n
by reasons. We \ufb01nd rm reasons ta Interfere1.w!t\u00a7j’::w!tV\u00e9.ijd.w\u00a7 ” –\u00ab <\/p>\n
therefere, confirm the verdlzz, In ‘fig-;”*resu\u00a71;::..”.t!i\u00e9  <\/p>\n
faits. We confirm the judgement’ “:a!’.:&anvIcti”eri ‘bfjhih\u00e9ivg\ufb01iused
\npassed on 22.02.05 in  .\u00a7h~.the \ufb01vii\u00e9 bf FTC-II,
\nMandya, impugned in thlswap-ti_e;\u00e9Ll’;_””   ” *<\/p>\n
23. We \u00a7’.=.u\u00a7a\u00e9{\u00e9L_~:or:  \ufb01rs.-_j  rendered by
\nthe amic;;s__;ui*5\u00a7\u00e9 \u00a73\u00a7l.S’;\u00a7:r3}\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7s3:A\u00a7\u00a7:i\u00a7\u00a7_r.:\ufb01.neadi. Fee of amicus
\ncuriae I\u00e9,A\ufb02xedA ‘\u00e9i:v.3\u00a7;5QGL\u00a7);\u00ab…wh’ich shall be borne by the<\/p>\n
State.\n<\/p>\n
A’   …..  ‘
\nJudge<\/p>\n
Sd\/\u00abZ
\nIudgfe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late … vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri … on 17 April, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Rahim IN THE HIGH cone: or KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE DATED THIS THE 17″‘ um’ OF APRIL, 20.93: T PRESENT THE H\u20ac)N’B\u00bbLE MR. 3usncEK;sREs2uHAa THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE JAWAD RAM\u00bb: = BETWEEN: 1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nArasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-24T20:07:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\\\/O Late … vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri … on 17 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-24T20:07:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2906,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\\\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-24T20:07:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\\\/O Late … vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri … on 17 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-24T20:07:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late … vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri … on 17 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-24T20:07:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008"},"wordCount":2906,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008","name":"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-24T20:07:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arasaiah-ct-no-14168-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kikkeri-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arasaiah Ct No 14168 S\/O Late … vs State Of Karnataka By Kikkeri … on 17 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}