{"id":208780,"date":"2009-08-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-10-24T17:16:40","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24T11:46:40","slug":"kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>            In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh\n                                     ......\n\n\n                         C.W.P. No.12381 of 2009\n                                   .....\n\n                                                 Date of decision:17.8.2009\n\n\n                                Kabul Singh\n                                                                .....Petitioner\n                                     v.\n\n                         State of Haryana and others\n                                                            .....Respondents\n                                     ....\n\n\nPresent:      Mr. Sharad Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.\n                                   .....\n\nS.S. Saron, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>              After the death of Shri Issar Singh, the previous Lambardar of<\/p>\n<p>Village Saharanwas, Tehsil and District Rewari a proclamation was made in<\/p>\n<p>the Village on 23.2.2004 inviting applications for appointment of<\/p>\n<p>Lambardar from interested persons. Three persons, namely, Kabul Singh<\/p>\n<p>(petitioner), Khub Lal (respondent No.4) and Sunil Kumar (respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.5) applied for the post. On the basis of the material placed on record the<\/p>\n<p>Tehsildar recommended the name of Kabul Singh (petitioner) for<\/p>\n<p>appointment as Lambardar. The Assistant Collector-cum-SDM after going<\/p>\n<p>through the material on record also recommended the name of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>for appointment as Lambardar.         The petitioner appeared before the<\/p>\n<p>Collector, District Rewari (respondent No.3) on 6.7.2004. Respondents<\/p>\n<p>No.4 and 5, it is stated, did not appear before the Collector (respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.3).     Accordingly, the Collector (respondent No.3) vide order dated<\/p>\n<p>6.7.2004 (Annexure-P.1) appointed the petitioner as Lambardar of the<\/p>\n<p>village finding him to be most suitable. Aggrieved against the order dated<br \/>\n                                                  C.W.P. No.12381 of 2009<br \/>\n                                    [2]<\/p>\n<p>6.7.2004 (Annexure-P.1), Khub Lal (respondent No.4) filed an appeal<\/p>\n<p>before the Commissioner, Gurgaon Division, Gurgaon (respondent No.2).<\/p>\n<p>The Commissioner vide his order dated 23.11.2006 (Annexure-P.2) set<\/p>\n<p>aside the order dated 6.7.2004 (Annexure-P.1) passed by the District<\/p>\n<p>Collector, Rewari.    The Commissioner in his order dated 23.11.2006<\/p>\n<p>(Annexure-P.2) observed that Khub Lal (respondent No.4) had experience<\/p>\n<p>of the work of Lambardar as he was son of deceased Lambardar. Besides,<\/p>\n<p>he is an ex-serviceman and more literate than Kabul Singh (petitioner).<\/p>\n<p>Khub Lal (respondent No.4), it was observed, had 7.5 acres of land and his<\/p>\n<p>economic condition in relation to Kabul Singh (petitioner) was very good.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, it was observed that an ex-serviceman is to be given preference for<\/p>\n<p>the post of Lambardar.    Accordingly, Khub Lal (respondent No.4) was<\/p>\n<p>appointed as Lambardar. The petitioner aggrieved against the order dated<\/p>\n<p>23.11.2006 (Annexure-P.2) passed by the Commissioner, Gurgaon Division<\/p>\n<p>filed a revision petition under Section 16 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act,<\/p>\n<p>1887 before the Financial Commissioner, Haryana. The learned Financial<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner after going through the evidence and material on record vide<\/p>\n<p>order dated 27.1.2009 (Annexure-P.3) observed that Kabul Singh<\/p>\n<p>(petitioner) though was younger in age but Khub Lal (respondent No.4) was<\/p>\n<p>physically fit and could discharge functions of the Lambardar effectively.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, it was observed that Khub Lal (respondent No.4) being son of the<\/p>\n<p>Lambardar would be well versed with the functioning of the post of<\/p>\n<p>Lambardar. It was also observed that Khub Lal (respondent No.4) was an<\/p>\n<p>ex-serviceman who is to be given preference in the matter of appointment.<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 27.1.2009 (Annexure-P.3)<br \/>\n                                                    C.W.P. No.12381 of 2009<br \/>\n                                     [3]<\/p>\n<p>passed by the learned Financial Commissioner has filed the present petition.<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is more suitable than respondent No.4 for appointment as<\/p>\n<p>Lambardar.       It is submitted that respondent No.4 is suffering from<\/p>\n<p>tuberculosis. A reference has been made to the certificate dated 17.8.2006<\/p>\n<p>(Annexure-P.4). Besides, it is submitted that respondent No.4 is 72 years of<\/p>\n<p>age whereas the petitioner is 44 years of age. It is also submitted that<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.4 is in illegal possession of 2 Kanals 2 Marlas of land of the<\/p>\n<p>panchayat. A reference has been made to the copy of demarcation report<\/p>\n<p>dated 4.12.2005 (Annexure-P.5).       It is also submitted that Khub Lal<\/p>\n<p>(respondent No.4) himself had not appeared before the Collector and,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, was not considered and has rendered himself ineligible for<\/p>\n<p>consideration.\n<\/p>\n<p>             I have given my thoughtful consideration to the matter and with<\/p>\n<p>the assistance of the learned counsel gone through the record. It may be<\/p>\n<p>noticed that in the matter of appointment of Lambardar, the choice of the<\/p>\n<p>District Collector is normally to be preferred and not lightly set aside unless<\/p>\n<p>there is some gross irregularity, perversity or patent error in the order<\/p>\n<p>appointing the Lambardar.      Nevertheless the hearing of an appeal is a<\/p>\n<p>continuation of the original petition. At the time of hearing before the<\/p>\n<p>District Collector, Khub Lal (respondent No.4) was proceeded ex parte as<\/p>\n<p>he did not put in appearance. He, however, preferred an appeal against the<\/p>\n<p>order of the District Collector before the Commissioner. The Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>after considering the inter se merit of the candidates found Khub Lal<\/p>\n<p>(respondent No.4) to be more suitable. As already noticed it was observed<\/p>\n<p>that Khub Lal (respondent No.4) was son of the deceased Lambardar and he<br \/>\n                                                  C.W.P. No.12381 of 2009<br \/>\n                                    [4]<\/p>\n<p>was an ex-serviceman. Besides, he had more land than the petitioner. His<\/p>\n<p>economic condition was also observed to be better than the petitioner. The<\/p>\n<p>order of the Commissioner has been upheld by the learned Financial<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>            For the appointment of the Village Headman Rule 15 of the<\/p>\n<p>Punjab Land Revenue Rules (as applicable in Haryana) (`Rules&#8217; &#8211; for short)<\/p>\n<p>provides for matters to be considered in first appointment. Rule 15 reads as<\/p>\n<p>under:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;15. Matters to be considered in first appointments.&#8211; In all<\/p>\n<p>            first appointments of headman, regard shall be had among other<\/p>\n<p>            matters to&#8211;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (a)   his hereditary claims;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (b)   extent of property in the estate possessed by the<\/p>\n<p>            candidate.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (c)   services rendered to the State by himself or by his family;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (d)   his personal influence, character, ability and freedom<\/p>\n<p>            from indebtedness;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (e)   the strength and importance of the community from<\/p>\n<p>            which selection of a headman is to be made;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (f)   services rendered by himself or by his family in the<\/p>\n<p>            national movements to secure freedom of India.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>      A perusal of the above provides for guidance for appointment.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Hereditary claim is one of the factors which are to be taken into account for<\/p>\n<p>consideration for appointment as Lambardar. Besides, even the holdings of<\/p>\n<p>a person and services rendered to the State by the candidate himself or by<br \/>\n                                                     C.W.P. No.12381 of 2009<br \/>\n                                      [5]<\/p>\n<p>his family are necessary to be taken into consideration for appointment as<\/p>\n<p>Lambardar. The petitioner has been son of the deceased Lambardar.<\/p>\n<p>             The grounds taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner are<\/p>\n<p>that respondent No.4 is not suitable and that he is suffering from<\/p>\n<p>tuberculosis. A reference has been made to the certificate dated 17.8.2006<\/p>\n<p>(Annexure-P.4). A perusal of the said certificate shows that upto the month<\/p>\n<p>of August 2006 the petitioner had been taking treatment for TB. However,<\/p>\n<p>there is nothing on record to show that after the issuance of the certificate in<\/p>\n<p>2006, respondent No.4 continues to suffer from the disease further. As<\/p>\n<p>regards the demarcation report dated 4.12.2005 (Annexure-P.5) it is not<\/p>\n<p>shown that the same was placed before the revenue authorities at the time of<\/p>\n<p>consideration of appointment as Lambardar. This Court in exercise of its<\/p>\n<p>supervisory writ jurisdiction is not to sit in appeal over the findings and<\/p>\n<p>conclusions reached at by the revenue authorities on the relative assessment<\/p>\n<p>of the inter se merit of the candidates. Neither is this Court to substitute its<\/p>\n<p>decision for that recorded by the revenue authorities after due consideration<\/p>\n<p>of the merits and demerits of the candidates. The fact that petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>proceeded against ex-parte before the Collector is of no consequence as he<\/p>\n<p>is not estopped from availing his statutory right of appeal.<\/p>\n<p>             In the circumstances, there is no merit in this petition and the<\/p>\n<p>same is accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>August 17, 2009.                                           (S.S. Saron)<br \/>\n                                                                Judge<br \/>\n*hsp*<\/p>\n<p>NOTE: Whether to be referred to the Reporter or not:Yes\/No\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh &#8230;&#8230; C.W.P. No.12381 of 2009 &#8230;.. Date of decision:17.8.2009 Kabul Singh &#8230;..Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others &#8230;..Respondents &#8230;. Present: Mr. Sharad Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. &#8230;.. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208780","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-24T11:46:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-24T11:46:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1204,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-24T11:46:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-24T11:46:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-24T11:46:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009"},"wordCount":1204,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009","name":"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-24T11:46:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kabul-singh-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kabul Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208780","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208780"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208780\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}