{"id":208926,"date":"2009-06-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-26T20:59:47","modified_gmt":"2017-08-26T15:29:47","slug":"doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
1 Cri.RF 23\/2906\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 37\" DAY OF JUNE 2009\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE i-i{)N'BLi-E MR.JUS\"}'IC.E A.s.PAcaH,g;5\u00a7)R'\ufb01;\"--'   -\n\nCRIMINAL REVISEON PETITIVQN. N0.    \n\nBEYWEEN\n\nDoddayailaiah,\n\nS] 0 Siddanzzaiiaiah,\n\nAged about 58 years,\n\nR\/' a1;V(3kkodivi]]age, :   =    \n'I'un1I{13.rTa1uk and Dist   '_  VV  ITIONER\/S\n\n(S151.  .  qaya_;}rakash, A\u00e9vs.)\n\nStats: <91" Karnata}-:a  \n\n \u00bb ._Stai:2':x")\ufb01. H()i1.ag3 om\u00a2er.. ..... .. -\n\n\u00a7andiI.:.a$m*s.ra1:-1 Police\n\n '--._Stta.ti'{,---n, Tiiilivmkere Taluk\n\nmm.1;u;.;:~   RESPONDENT\/S<\/pre>\n
  (S2; 3.  HCGP.)<\/p>\n
 V’ , A’  Criminal Revision Peiitian is \ufb01led under Scction
\n 39″?{3_.~) 3z. 401 Cr.P.C by the advocate for the peti\ufb01oncz” praying<\/p>\n
_V -.AjA’.-that this Hozfble aourt may be pleasc\u00e9 {:0 set aside the
\n  _j11d?;ment dt. 1′?.10.05 passed by the R0,, \u00a7””l”C–IiI,  , in
\n ‘\u00ab. Cfr’1.A.No.36\/O5 am} con\ufb01rming the gudgmani: passed by the
\n . 1’ )C.J,(..Jz–.Dn) 35 JMF’C., ‘Turuvekere, in 0.3.910. 169\/95 \u00e9t.<\/p>\n
225.34.\n<\/p>\n
This Cziminal Revision Pe\ufb01\ufb01on coming on fbr Blaming;
\nthis day, the Cmxrt, made the following:<\/p>\n
3 Cri.RP 2152966
\nthe pass book but did net credit the amount into the o\ufb01ce<\/p>\n
acceunt as such, it is aiieged that the accused misappropriated<\/p>\n
Rs.15196\/-.\n<\/p>\n
3. PW.1 — S.R. Dinamaai after the i11$\u00a7Jtcfjgt;;f};_:”V;a\ufb01{\u00a7;.<\/p>\n
veri\ufb01cation submitted his oompiaint Ex.P.14   wfaei _  <\/p>\n
registered and therea\ufb01er an }’11V(:STig:f;i;\u00a72i{}f:}.:A4\\?\u00a5’1{3,i#”}’VV7_<\/p>\n
and 7′ who seized tbs elocumen\ufb01sand ‘m\ufb01cmed <\/p>\n
cf Pws. 3. to 4 and a\ufb01er the comgjiittgi\u00e9n cf t\ufb01c_Vi1:1v.’:\u00a7:33ti\u00a7g1ti(VV)V31 \ufb01led<\/p>\n
the chargesheet.\n<\/p>\n
4. lfi\ufb01sgg”.i\u00a7\u00e9 fr&1;\ufb01i;.\ufb01g’\u20ac>f’t_1;e–c:ha2rgti:, the prosecution led the<\/p>\n
evidemze  8 and in their evidence got<\/p>\n
markepithg ti.<).(V31i;."\u00a3;'if3};'1\u00a7ZS E.xs.P.} to 13.15. The statement of the<\/p>\n
   \u00a7*e::;ox'dt3:d"2;z1der Scctioza 313 Cr.I-"KC. He has takan<\/p>\n
  {ienial and has not 1661 any defence<\/p>\n
  evid\u00e9nm. v_'v'i'}1;\u00a7f–TTx~ial Court after htzaxing the appellant and the<\/p>\n
_ i;' 'r_ e:i{n;;nscl tthe accused and on appzecia\ufb01on of the material on<\/p>\n
A   \ufb01axivicicd the petitioner fer tbs o\ufb01cace under Sactivn<\/p>\n
  WC and crdmteci him is undergs imprisonment for a period<\/p>\n
1.5;}? cane year and \u00a30 pay a \ufb01ne of R:-3.3,(}%\/– in \u00e9efault ta<\/p>\n
underge SJ. far two mmzths. Aggxieved by the conviction and<\/p>\n
the scmiencs, the igetitioner approached the Sessions Court in<\/p>\n
5\/;\n<\/p>\n
4 CIERP 2i.I’2006<\/p>\n
Cri.A.N0.36[i2{)(}4 and the said appeal came to be dismissed
\nvide judgment and ereier dated 1′?.1(‘).i2(}(}5. Aggzieved by the
\nconcunent \ufb01ndings of conviction, the petitionett”‘\u00bbthas<\/p>\n
a\u00a7proached this Court in revision.\n<\/p>\n
5. I have heart’. the learned cou,._r:-..sei_ for they  V’<\/p>\n
also: the Government Pieader. The  ivtltat’ ‘atisewt VfGr \u20ac’1i’.1\u00a7t’
\neonsi\u00e9eratien are: ‘
\ni. Whether the judg\ufb01ie\ufb01t  \u00ab–oft1er V} of
\nconviction for the  ._offc\u00a7nee:  pjtnqishahie uttder<\/p>\n
Section 409 WC ~E’s.entei2vs\u00a7e..v”t’e__ere01:1 as
\nO1\u00a5tj}6I’\u20ac(!i_  an\u00e9 ttonfirmed in the<\/p>\n
ag\ufb01peai is V\ufb01letgaat “.’33:id _.\n<\/p>\n
  c:>rc”.3,er’F-‘.\n<\/p>\n
. V.  \u00a2 ”  3-.ITt iiathe ee\ufb01ten\ufb01on of the learned counsei fer the<\/p>\n
  is ac} material on recor\u00e9 ts prove the<\/p>\n
 and there was no entrustxnent of the amount<\/p>\n
  “in the haxt\u00e9is ef the accused and so also it is his eenten\ufb01on that<\/p>\n
  V”\u00a7i;eV:}_e’.””A_of the Witnesses have state\u00e9 anything abeut the<\/p>\n
‘ miiaapgarept\u00e9ation. In the circumstances, it is his contention<\/p>\n
u that the Courts below were wmng in arrivtng at the \ufb01nding ef<\/p>\n
the znisappropriation an\ufb01 therefore sought for setting asitie the<\/p>\n
conviction. Per contra, the Ieexxzed Government Pleader<\/p>\n
.3<\/p>\n
CELRP 2152996<\/p>\n
U:\n<\/p>\n
supports the impngne\u00e9 judgtncnt and orders of thaj:<\/p>\n
below.\n<\/p>\n
1?. As could be from the t:Vi{i(.’i13.{:tttbAAb}tt3 \u00a7i ih\u00e9rfs is <\/p>\n
so far as the misapprc>pIiation_fQr astrai\ufb01ount  <\/p>\n
concerned and the prosecti’tit\u00a7i1 hhasl ‘mutt:
\nChandrakantha 8. Hang}.   kiiepigsitsd the
\namount of RS500\/\u00ab. In  regazvding
\nthe degaosit a11d\u00a7.t1’1’t*.~V4V   vtscncerned, I have
\nto conclucid    to prove the<\/p>\n
 oft’ <\/p>\n
3. Sc ufaihas PW;’2″is”c-Q\ufb01c’\u00a7:mcd, it is in his evi\ufb01ence that<\/p>\n
he was\u00a7’ciewsiti13..gA the amount in his RI.) account every month<\/p>\n
 \u00e9\ufb01    deposit was over, he raqucste\u00e9. the<\/p>\n
 ~.v him to withdraw the amount and the<\/p>\n
t  aCC”ti;:’-\u00e9\ufb01d ftktie $ig:rxatur:e on two forms Exs.P.6 and 13.3′ as<\/p>\n
 Exs;.P.}3?(b) and P.?'(b) and asked PW2 to come after a week<\/p>\n
 to,’ ‘.:?:\u00a2::\u00a7iVe the mexmy. Later, them was an enquixy regarding<\/p>\n
  .\u00ab misappmpsriation in the Post O\ufb02ce of the accused and he<\/p>\n
 went there and gava his statement as per Eix.P.8. Though<\/p>\n
P’W.2 has been crc>ss\u00ab-e:xam:\u00a3nc{,i at length, there is ncathing 1:0<\/p>\n
disbelieve the: evidence of PW.2 so far as the :t3.on~paymcnt of<\/p>\n
v\u00e9<\/p>\n
6 CILR? 2152006<\/p>\n
Rs.5696\/ ~ from his RD account. There is no I*easo11’:Vfc\u00a5;;:”L:P\u00a7\u00a7.5.,.2<\/p>\n
‘\u00a30 make a %ls\u20ac statement if he had received  <\/p>\n
his RD aocoutxt. In that View of the” matt\u00e9r, {I18<\/p>\n
ammmt of Rs.S,696\/– is concerned,  “(iv-f <\/p>\n
the evicience of PW2 is suf\ufb01ci\u00e9iz\ufb01 \u00b0a1r_;c3.  Jallfilji: <\/p>\n
has signed Ex.P.6 and  forVA’={\u00a7:cci;\\}\u00e9d .1;hc \u00a7111oney is
\niiself not su\ufb01cient =;\u00a7rid.\u00a2nce. In the
\n{zircumstan-zres, th\u00e9itfridexzce’  of the other
\nevidence ied_  4′   \u00a7i\u00a7 \u00e9ient to prove the<\/p>\n
misappmpxf\ufb01a\ufb01mi  \/ ~ by the accused.\n<\/p>\n
9.    in a Factory at Ammasandra<\/p>\n
Village, He \u00a3:1ep\u00a7svi.$\u00e9{3_;an”:\u00e91mount of Rs.250(}\/ – and the said<\/p>\n
 wg\ufb01s Vvgnada\u00e9’  cierk Subramanyan who is not<\/p>\n
 Fmsecu\ufb01on. He states that monthly, he used<\/p>\n
to ‘:”‘s\u00bbt.=:.n”\u00ab:V’1’r11v-:>’}:.\u00abz\u00e93f_ Vt:-i)vVthe post o\ufb01ce for deposit and after learning<\/p>\n
 ‘that is hz\ufb01isappropziation in the Post Office, he mquasted<\/p>\n
 V’  \u00e9lmjk 13$ get the account chased and at that time, his ckirk<\/p>\n
–. .?()\u00a7;tfE\u00a7  that \ufb01tters is no entry with mgaxti to the deposit of<\/p>\n
“–\u00ab uR’\u00e9$.’4,0{}0\/- in the accannts of the Post O\ufb01fice. He adnlits th\ufb01<\/p>\n
u :I’\u20ac{;’:\u20aci\u00a7iit cf Rs.4,0{)0\/~ a\ufb01rrr abeut a year of the ciosum of his<\/p>\n
accaunt. it is reievant to note that the clerk 0f PW.3 is<\/p>\n
\u00a3><.\n<\/p>\n
1?’ C\ufb01.R? 21f2{)9\u00e9<\/p>\n
examiner} by the prosecution and PW.3 admits the F\u20ac’f3E1\u00a7L\ufb02Ei;i<\/p>\n
of the amount of Rs.4,800\/– and in the   ‘<\/p>\n
caxmot bi: said that the accused misappmpziat\u00e9ii’   u u<\/p>\n
Rs.4,0{)O\/– deposited by :>w.3 in the ;;a\u00a2sAi:M*M*\u00a2\ufb01ic\u00e9T’bg*x\u00a7\u00a2.g<\/p>\n
ce\ufb01i\ufb01caies,<\/p>\n
10. In thr: CiI’C”\u00a31mSt’:’i.IiC\u00a73S,   2*Lh e$”Ae\u00a3ii;ience led
\nby the pmsecution though  \ufb01iji;2’\u00bb’;j;isappr0p17%ati0n
\nof Rs.4,9{)0\/-  by mr\u00a7 ‘F1i\u00ab\u00e9\u00a5i\u00a7_”-i$_._$};1$:iicient materia} to
\nprove   the said amount was
\nentzustcgi’  %;\u00a2%}fg\u00a3)””ii;as the post master of
\nAmmasa1’idr\u00e9lPcs tVV   “is ha who had receive\u00e9 the<\/p>\n
money i3t’0111’I3’*’.\u00a7.!A’.2 u’.n:1\u00e9r,R[} accounts. But any’ haw it is<\/p>\n
 ‘~ the  misgz-i’pp.mxgria\ufb01on as it is atimitted by P2W.2 that<\/p>\n
 V–.Latr.:i*”i1c1z’@{i\u20ac;i$$\u00e9:ci”\u00a37iae amount frem the Acctmrzd and nothing is<\/p>\n
du\u00e9 .t<5'*h.inv1A.  View of the mafter, I am of the opinion that<\/p>\n
 ' [the   the Courts b-slaw Se far as the misappropsriation.<\/p>\n
 "xix? iiie".1;;1o1;\u20acy af PW12 is concerned cannot be \u00e9i\ufb01tzxr\ufb01\u00e9d. in the<\/p>\n
'– . -'zixtjnmstaacrszx the accused is guilirgg fer the o\ufb01hnce under<\/p>\n
"'\u00ab.:S\u00e9\u00a2tion 409 [PC for misappmpria\ufb01ng an amazmt 01;" \u00a3335,596} -.<\/p>\n
I 1., T116: Iaaxmid C\u00a3)B_\ufb01S\u20ac\u00a7 aliema\ufb01vely submittad to Show<\/p>\n
leniency to {\u00a316 accugsd as he is new aged more than 617} years<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure 1 Cri.RF 23\/2906 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 37″ DAY OF JUNE 2009 BEFORE THE i-i{)N’BLi-E MR.JUS”}’IC.E A.s.PAcaH,g;5\u00a7)R’\ufb01;”–‘ – CRIMINAL REVISEON PETITIVQN. N0. BEYWEEN Doddayailaiah, S] 0 Siddanzzaiiaiah, Aged about 58 years, R\/’ a1;V(3kkodivi]]age, : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDoddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-26T15:29:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-26T15:29:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1218,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-26T15:29:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-26T15:29:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-26T15:29:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009"},"wordCount":1218,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009","name":"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-26T15:29:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/doddayallaiah-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-9-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Doddayallaiah vs State Of Karnataka on 9 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208926"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208926\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}