{"id":208930,"date":"2010-06-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010"},"modified":"2016-09-05T13:46:45","modified_gmt":"2016-09-05T08:16:45","slug":"jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nLA.App..No. 815 of 2009()\n\n\n1. JAMEELA, W\/O. HAMSA, NAUSHAD MANZIL\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BEKAL RESORTS\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.JAJU BABU\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM\n\n Dated :25\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n               PIUS C. KURIAKOSE &\n              C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.\n    ------------------------------------------------\n       L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009\n    ------------------------------------------------\n       Dated this the 25th day of June, 2010\n\n                    JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Pius C. Kuriakose, J<\/p>\n
      These three appeals are preferred by the<\/p>\n
claimants. The lands under acquisition were in<\/p>\n
Kalanad village and the acquisition was pursuant<\/p>\n
to Section 4(1) notification published on 30\/10\/99<\/p>\n
at the instance of the Managing Director, Bakel<\/p>\n
Resorts Development        Corporation.     The Land<\/p>\n
Acquisition Officer relying on the basis document<\/p>\n
fixed the land value at Rs.11,000\/- per cent. The<\/p>\n
reference Court in the first instance would re-fix<\/p>\n
the land value at Rs.9,000\/- per cent. Appeal was<\/p>\n
preferred by the state to which cross objections<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
       were preferred by the claimant. This Court<\/p>\n
       considering the appeals and cross objections vide<\/p>\n
       judgment in LAA.584\/06 and connected cases set<\/p>\n
       aside the award of the Reference Court and<\/p>\n
       remanded the cases back to the Reference Court<\/p>\n
       giving opportunity to both sides to adduce<\/p>\n
       evidence regarding the correct market value of<\/p>\n
       the property. Pursuant to the remand additional<\/p>\n
       documents were produced and witnesses were<\/p>\n
       recalled and examined. The evidence on record<\/p>\n
       before the court after completion of the enquiry<\/p>\n
       pursuant to the remand order consisted of<\/p>\n
       Exts.R1, R2, A1 to A37, C1 to C4 oral evidence of<\/p>\n
       AW1 and AW2, RW1 and RW2. Reliance was<\/p>\n
       mostly placed by the claimant on Exts.A20, A21,<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
       A29 and A30 which were court judgments in<\/p>\n
       respect of acquisition of land in the same village,<\/p>\n
       but pursuant to notifications five years and seven<\/p>\n
       years earlier to the present notification. The<\/p>\n
       Advocate Commissioner in Ext.A2 had made a<\/p>\n
       comparison of the properties covered by Exts.A20,<\/p>\n
       A21, A29 and A30 with the properties under<\/p>\n
       acquisition and submitted a report to the effect<\/p>\n
       that there is perfect comparison between the<\/p>\n
       properties       thereby    indicating that there is<\/p>\n
       justification for awarding value at the rate of<\/p>\n
       Rs.13,000\/- which was the value awarded under<\/p>\n
       Exts.A20, A21, A29 and A30. The Commissioners<\/p>\n
       who were asked to value the properties on the<\/p>\n
       basis of the improvements available on the<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
       properties would report that the property has to<\/p>\n
       be paid value at the rate of Rs.8,000\/-, 9,000\/-<\/p>\n
       and a maximum of Rs.9,500\/- per cent. The<\/p>\n
       learned Subordinate Judge did not become<\/p>\n
       inclined to place any reliance on Exts.A20, A21,<\/p>\n
       A29 or A30. This was because it was noticed that<\/p>\n
       those judgments were in respect of acquisition<\/p>\n
       many years subsequent to the present acquisition.<\/p>\n
       Though Ext.A18 was also relied on, the court<\/p>\n
       below did not accept the claim since Ext.A18 was<\/p>\n
       found to be a property situated in the very town.<\/p>\n
       The court below did not accept recommendations<\/p>\n
       of the Advocate Commissioner based on the<\/p>\n
       improvements         on    the  property in full but<\/p>\n
       ultimately what the court below did was to fix the<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009  -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
       market value at Rs.9,000\/- per cent taking an<\/p>\n
       average of Rs.6,000\/- and Rs.13,000\/- which are<\/p>\n
       respectively the minimum value and maximum<\/p>\n
       value      reflected     by  the    various documents<\/p>\n
       produced.\n<\/p>\n
              2. In these appeals, the appellants have<\/p>\n
       raised various grounds contending that the market<\/p>\n
       value re-fixed by the court below is grossly<\/p>\n
       inadequate. Sri.S.V.Balakrishna Iyer, the learned<\/p>\n
       counsel for the appellants addressed arguments<\/p>\n
       before      us    based     on   the various grounds.<\/p>\n
       Sri.Balakrishna Iyer referred to Exts.A20, A21,<\/p>\n
       A29 and A30 and the various commission reports.<\/p>\n
       According to Sri.Balakrishna Iyer, the learned<\/p>\n
       Subordinate Judge was actually mislead by the<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009  -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
       terms of the remand order passed by this Court<\/p>\n
       which directed the Subordinate Judge to re-fix the<\/p>\n
       market value based on the evidence that comes<\/p>\n
       on     record.     The    learned Subordinate  Judge<\/p>\n
       misunderstood the remand order as one directing<\/p>\n
       him to confine the enquiry to the question as to<\/p>\n
       whether Rs.10,000\/- is the appropriate value to<\/p>\n
       be awarded. Sri.Balakrishna Iyer requested that<\/p>\n
       the appeals be allowed in full and the market<\/p>\n
       value be re-fixed at Rs.15,000\/- per cent.<\/p>\n
              3. All the submissions of Sri.Balakrishna Iyer<\/p>\n
       were very stiffly resisted by Sri.K.Jaju Babu, the<\/p>\n
       Standing Counsel for the Requisitioning Authority<\/p>\n
       who was supported in all his submissions by<\/p>\n
       Smt.Latha T. Thankappan, the learned Senior<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -7-<\/span><\/p>\n
       Government Pleader.\n<\/p>\n
              4. We have considered the rival submissions<\/p>\n
       addressed at the Bar. We have made a reappraisal<\/p>\n
       of the evidence. We have gone through the<\/p>\n
       judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge. We<\/p>\n
       do not find any warrant for interfering with the<\/p>\n
       impugned award at the instance of the claimant.<\/p>\n
       Before this Court also reliance was placed more by<\/p>\n
       Sri.Balakrishna Iyer on Exts.A20, A21, A29 and<\/p>\n
       A30 and the recommendations in Ext.C2 report<\/p>\n
       which was actually based on Exts.A20, A21, A29<\/p>\n
       and A30. Exts.A20, A21, A29 and A30 were<\/p>\n
       certainly court judgments in respect of acquisition<\/p>\n
       of land in the same village. But those cases relate<\/p>\n
       to acquisitions pursuant to notification five years<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -8-<\/span><\/p>\n
       and seven years subsequent. Having regard to the<\/p>\n
       principles laid down by the Supreme Court in<\/p>\n
       G.M., Oil & Natural Gas Cor. Ltd. v. R. Jivanbhai Patel<\/p>\n
       & Anr.<\/a> (2008 SAR (Civil) 894), the court is to be<\/p>\n
       extremely slow and circumspect while relying on<\/p>\n
       post notification documents. Post notification<\/p>\n
       document can be resorted to only when pre-<\/p>\n
       notification documents are not available at all. In<\/p>\n
       the instant case including the basis document<\/p>\n
       several pre-notification documents are available.<\/p>\n
       We therefore, justify the action of the learned<\/p>\n
       Subordinate Judge in having not placed reliance<\/p>\n
       on Exts.A20, A21, A29 and A30.\n<\/p>\n
              5. When the Reference Court ventures to rely<\/p>\n
       on Commissioner’s Report for recommendations of<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -9-<\/span><\/p>\n
       the Advocate Commissioner based on local<\/p>\n
       inspection unless those recommendations are<\/p>\n
       based on market value reflected in a genuine<\/p>\n
       transaction of property and certified copies of<\/p>\n
       those transactions are made available to the court<\/p>\n
       the recommendations of the Commissioner should<\/p>\n
       not be accepted. [see judgment of the Supreme<\/p>\n
       Court      in   Gafar    v. Moradabad Development<\/p>\n
       Authority<\/a> (2007(7) SCC 614)].\n<\/p>\n
              6. Having reappraised the evidence by<\/p>\n
       ourselves, we are of the view that the learned<\/p>\n
       Subordinate Judge was extremely liberal towards<\/p>\n
       the claimants in the matter of determining the<\/p>\n
       market value. According to us, it is more or less<\/p>\n
       the correct market value of the property which<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -10-<\/span><\/p>\n
       has been arrived at by the learned Subordinate<\/p>\n
       Judge. The claimants\/appellants cannot have any<\/p>\n
       legitimate grievance regarding the market value<\/p>\n
       presently re-fixed.\n<\/p>\n
              7. We dismiss these appeals without any<\/p>\n
       order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                         PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
\n                                                     JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                         C. K. ABDUL REHIM
\n                                                     JUDGE
\n       kns\/-\n<\/p>\n
L. A. A. Nos.815, 816 & 817 of 2009 -11-<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM LA.App..No. 815 of 2009() 1. JAMEELA, W\/O. HAMSA, NAUSHAD MANZIL … Petitioner Vs 1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND … Respondent 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BEKAL RESORTS For Petitioner :SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR For Respondent :SRI.K.JAJU BABU The Hon’ble […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-05T08:16:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T08:16:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1137,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T08:16:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-05T08:16:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T08:16:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010"},"wordCount":1137,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010","name":"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T08:16:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jameela-vs-the-special-tahsildar-on-25-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jameela vs The Special Tahsildar on 25 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208930"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208930\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}