{"id":209088,"date":"2009-10-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009"},"modified":"2018-03-31T17:50:12","modified_gmt":"2018-03-31T12:20:12","slug":"mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009<\/div>\n
                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                     Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,\n                       Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.\n                               Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                      Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002033\/5096\n                                                            Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002033\n\nAppellant                                    :       Mr. Jai Prakash Arya,\n                                                     R\/o F-650, Mangolpuri,\n                                                     Delhi-110083\n\nRespondent                                   :       Mr. V.R.Bansal\n                                                     Public Information Officer,\n                                                     Superintending Engineer-I\n                                                     (West Zone), MCD, Zonal Office\n                                                     Community Center, Vishal Enclave,\n                                                     Rajauri Garden, Near Police Station ,\n                                                     New Delhi-110027\n\nRTI application filed on                     :       09\/03\/2009\nPIO replied                                  :       Not mentioned\nFirst Appeal filed on                        :       05\/05\/2009\nFirst Appellate Authority order              :       06\/07\/2009\nSecond Appeal Received on                    :       25\/08\/2009\n\nInformation sought:\nAppellant sought information regarding complaint filed on 06\/02\/2009 addressed to Deputy\nCommissioner, MCD. Appellant requested for certified copy of documents (including file\nnoting) on following information:\n    1.     Provide daily progress made on Appellant's complaint mentioned above.\n    2.     Present status of Appellant's complaint including legal action into matter rose therein.\n    3.     Provide the names, designations, phone nos. and other details of the officials who\n           were supposed to take action on the Complaints.\n    4.     Provide the Acts\/rules\/regulations\/orders\/notifications relevant to the complaint\n           mentioned above and the decision making process adopted with regard to the\n           Appellant complaints.\n    5.     Inform approximate time\/period (minimum to max) is normally taken by the MCD to\n           dispose off such complaints.\n    6.     Inform the reasonable and convincing facts\/reasons fro total inaction or inordinate\n           delay into action on applicant's complaints reflecting total negligence\/failure of law\n           and the orders in democratic state of ours which is governed by the rules.\n    7.     Inform the ensured, accountable and transparent procedures\/ processes that are\n           adopted by the MCD under the rules during\/for taking actions into such matters.\n    8.     Inform the approximate time\/period that would be taken by the concerned MCD\n           officials in the matters of the Applicant's complaints.\n    9.     Inform the factual reasons of extending \"undue benefits\" to the law-violators by the\n           MCD officials in the matters of the Appellant's complaints.\n    10.     Inform the reasons of insensitive attitude of MCD officials towards public\n           inconveniences\/ problems arising out of non-implementation of law and order in the\n           present case.\n   11.     How and by which MCD authorities legal actions would be initiated against           the\n           MCD officials who had not been discharging their legal and proper duties,\n           responsibilities and liabilities into the matters of the of the complaint.\n   12.     Inform the details of all legal authorities who should be rightly approached to make\n           complaint against the concerned faculty MCD officials lacking integrity and devotion\n           to duties, responsibilities and liabilities ignoring all rules in the matters of the\n           complaint.\n   13.     Inform about the other sources wherefrom the complaints of the same matters have\n           been received for action.\n   14.     Inform the rule and the transparent way in MCD to easy access to complaints' status,\n           movements and action taken report, as of the Appellant's Complaints.\n   15.     Give details of all the officials guilty of violation of section 217 of IPC and section\n           13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for not taking action against the\n           encroachments and the illegal constructions on public land in the said market in\n           accordance with the laws and the orders required of them.\n   16.     Appellant would like to inspect the files with the MCD, if any, related to the\n           Appellant's complaints and the removal of the encroachments and illegal\n           constructions in the said market. Appellant requested to intimate the date, time and\n           venue, for inspection.\n   17.     Provide certified copy of latest Building Bylaws of MCD in force and Master Plan of\n           Delhi 2021 indicating the relevant pages dealing with the encroachments and\n           unauthorized constructions as appearing in said the market along with penal\n           provisions\/actions against the violators of laws\/ rules\/ orders.\n   18.     Inform the reasons for not uploading complete information and its regular updating\n           on MCD's website as required u\/s 4 of the Act(obligations of Pubic authorities).\n           Inform the details of the officials responsible for compliance of the suo motu\n           disclosure of the information as required under the provisions of the RTI Act.\n   19.     Provide the full list containing the names, designation, phone no. mobile numbers\n           along with official addresses of the officers who are responsible and liable to check\n           the illegalities, inactions and other irregularities in MCD. Which officer (s) shall be\n           liable if the matters are also be liable if the matters are also referred to CBI,\n           Vigilance, other investigating and action taking agencies, Media, Courts etc.\n\nPIO's Reply:\nNo response.\n\nGrounds for First Appeal:\nNo reply was received within mandated period.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority:\nPIO was directed to ensure that the complete and specific reply to the Appellant by 15\/07\/2009.\n\nGrounds for Second Appeal:\nDespite direction of the FAA the PIO didn't provided information sought.\n Relevant Facts<\/pre>\n
 emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n
The following were present
\nAppellant: Mr. Jai Prakash Arya
\nRespondent: Mr. P.R. Meena, APIO on behalf of PIO Mr. V.R.Bansal;
\nThe Respondent shows that the information has been provided to the Appellant on 24\/09\/2009.
\nThe PIO will now provide the following information to the Appellant:
\n1-     Whether the file was made for the complaint lodged by the Appellant. If the file was
\nmade the status of the file. The PIO has given the informant that the file was not handed over by
\nthe JE Mr. Naveen Dahiya. This is a very ambiguous statement which appears to hide more
\ninformation than given.\n<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
The appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
The information as described above will be provided to the Appellant before 25 October 2009<\/p>\n
The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by
\nthe PIO within 30 days as required by the law. The Respondent has brought a chart fixing the
\nresponsibility of the officers for the delay. For one thing the MCD officers have been again
\nplaying their favorite game of passing the papers without adding any value. They have identified
\ntwo officers who appear to be responsible for the very large delay. Mr. Naveen Dahiya JE
\nBuilding West Zone held on to the RTI application for 75 days without doing anything. At the
\nend of 75 days he has passed on the papers to Mr. Suman Tokas, JE Building subsequently Mr.
\nSuman Tokas gave it to Mr. Hitesh Kumar after 9 days without doing anything with the RTI
\napplication Mr. Hitesh Kumar in turn sat on the RTI application for 96 days before handing it
\nover to Mr. Rajesh Sharma. Interestingly the letter shows that Mr. Rajesh Sharma(JE Building)
\nand Mr. Vijender Singh (AE Building) took just four days to provide information. It is clear that
\nMr. Hitesh Kumar and Mr. Naveen Dahiya are responsible for the extraordinary delay in
\nproviding the information.\n<\/p>\n
From the facts before the Commission it is apparent that the deemed PIOs Mr. Hitesh Kumar
\nand Mr. Naveen Dahiya are guilty of not furnishing information within the time specified under
\nsub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI
\nAct.\n<\/p>\n
It appears that the PIOs actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause
\nnotice is being issued to them, and they are directed give their reasons to the Commission to
\nshow cause why penalty should not be levied on them.\n<\/p>\n
They will present themselves before the Commission at the above address on 11 November 2009
\nat 12.00pm alongwith their written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be
\nimposed on them as mandated under Section 20 (1).\n<\/p>\n
This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                           Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                                 Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                            8 October 2009
\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)Rnj<\/p>\n
CC: to Mr. Hitesh Kumar and Mr. Naveen Dahiya through Mr. P.R. Meena, APIO.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002033\/5096 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002033 Appellant : Mr. Jai Prakash Arya, R\/o F-650, Mangolpuri, Delhi-110083 Respondent : Mr. V.R.Bansal Public Information Officer, Superintending Engineer-I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-31T12:20:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-31T12:20:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":526,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-31T12:20:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-31T12:20:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-31T12:20:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009"},"wordCount":526,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009","name":"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-31T12:20:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-jai-prakash-arya-vs-mcd-on-8-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Jai Prakash Arya vs Mcd on 8 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209088"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209088\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}