{"id":209402,"date":"2009-02-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009"},"modified":"2014-06-17T22:26:33","modified_gmt":"2014-06-17T16:56:33","slug":"d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta &#8230; vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya &#8230; on 5 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta &#8230; vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya &#8230; on 5 February, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 5\"' DAY op EE3mAIa$*,   A *   \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE   A  %\n\nWRIT PETITION No.\"i\u00a7:898 OF    \n\n_BB_'I'.._\\..7\u00a3E..E_._Ni \nS10 late  \" \n\nAged sham 67'y\u00e9.ars,  j  \n\nResidanllapf Clhikkst   Viliagc,\n\nVarthur\ufb02crlyli,' _    %   \n\nBangalore: E\u00e9s:i_VTz:luk;_      PETITIGNER\n\n = By  Advocate)\n\n1.  ' \nSfelate Yijaya Raghava Pillai,\n\n   AMaj0t. b\u00a70.6, 2!\" cross,\nV. ACub\u00a7&gt;onpeL\n' --. Ba.n.ga1ote.\n\n' VA    -- S\u00a3atc of\ufb01amaiaka,\n\n to \n\nBy its Scctetaxy to the Government,\nRevenue Department,\nM.S.B1:iIding,\n\nBangalore ----- 560 001.\n\n3\n\n\n\n3. The: Land Tribunal,\nBangalore East Talulg\n(Fosmc\ufb01y Bangalore South Taluk)\nBangalore   \n\nBy its chairman.  . \n\n(By Sim' S.Shckar Shelty. Adv, ro;%Fj:\u00a7\u00a2spond\u00a2;;\u00a2-;%  % \nShzi R.B.Satixyanaraya::a Singh;  Court (\"iovmnmmt\nPlcadcr for Respondent.-g2:and'_<\/pre>\n<p>This W:it:!&gt;a&lt;\u00a7;i1i;\u00bbn ,aLre;\u00a21g:s%226 and 227 or the<br \/>\nCcnstitution qf  to__  tiie order cf the Land<br \/>\nTribnanl, Bmiguig\u00e9nj E\u00e9isai   i,:0.=3 .2003 wide Anncx.E.<\/p>\n<p>on for pr;1r:c:unce1:3v.3{r:;tu(r\u00a3{ir\u00a3i_e&#039;rs this day, the Caurt deiivered the<br \/>\nfollowingf-&#039;~ &quot; _ &#039; .\n<\/p>\n<p>  {)Rm5:R<\/p>\n<p> ., &#8216;    for the petitioner and the mspondcni.<\/p>\n<p> ._   claims as a tenant u\ufb02agxicuitural land in<\/p>\n<p>V -V suwt\u00e9y  measuring 3 acres 10 gtmias and survey m3.24:&#8217;3<\/p>\n<p>u x V  3 aunts 10 gum.-as of Child; Beliandtsr Viilagc,<\/p>\n<p>   East Taluk since the year 3970.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nIt is stated that the land belonged to one Shri N.Rama<\/p>\n<p>Raddy under whom the petitioner was cultivating the taqds on<\/p>\n<p>warm basis. The petitioner has pnxiuoed RTC extracts&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>that the pctitic.mcr&#8217;s name appcars in the  <\/p>\n<p>consistently {mm the year 1970 unwargism&#8221;upts1A_ti&#8217;1;:  XItvt.i;~;<\/p>\n<p>statcd that a fl3!&#8217;ttDt:.{,tf  trees and in<br \/>\nhas pnxignmd  that he had obtained<br \/>\nloan   tzultivate the land, which would<\/p>\n<p>furt}1t:r_cvidtV-triut:  and pt&#8217;!Sh&#8217;oBS!Si0!1 of land. The<\/p>\n<p>  ttifttnisr-Astate that Rama Roddy, in turn, had wtd<\/p>\n<p>   1971 if! favuur of the first rcspundent and the<\/p>\n<p>pctiti1;_t1cr&#8217;,~;.  of the land as at tenant was to the<\/p>\n<p>t t  1 i&#8221; &#8212;   10f the first mspondcnt.\n<\/p>\n<p> it is the pt3ttit\u00a3JIlt3!&#8221;&#8216;1~; case that but had continued tn mcupy<\/p>\n<p>uu land as a tenant even alter such purchazstc and that he had paid<\/p>\n<p>wara. to the [irst %p0micnt. Though the khata of the land was<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>changed in the name uf the \ufb01rsi respondent,  <\/p>\n<p>column in the RTC extracts  &#8216;i\u00abljt:&#8217;i :\u00e9;e:1_.\u00a7rr:t:V\u00bb,_t:ii&#8221;V&#8217;V<\/p>\n<p>peiitioncr. The petitioner ha&amp;iV,T&#8217;:epugh{&#8220;*.\ufb01\u00a7r&#8217;&#8211;  <\/p>\n<p>\nrespect of the land under the  01: Land<br \/>\nRaibnns Act, 1961. g  the first<br \/>\nrcspnmdcnt had  a writ petition<br \/>\nbefore this      was alluwed and<br \/>\nthe mal1er&#8211;rcm\u00a7i12;i6;i*1   The Tribunal now<br \/>\nhaving rgggcagj ,5j\u00a2\u00a7;g,ggg\u00a7\u00a7%g;;;p;p1ica:son, the present petition is<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A  Ctgunescl for the petitioner would t30I!lt.&#8217;:l}d that {he<\/p>\n<p> would clea\ufb02y demonstrate the pciiti0m:r&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p> \u00e9  of the land, more particularly, as on the<\/p>\n<p>   ti\u00e9gtc, nmnely 1.3.1974. The petitioner was 133::-my a<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;.&#8221;tcfi;an% in mspeci of the land. The Tribunal has ignored Ex?-30,<\/p>\n<p> . fwhcrcin the erstwhile Iand-owner Rama Raddy has adm.it.te:d<\/p>\n<p>i3ti3,i\u00bbi&#8217;\u00a22iL\u00a7i}\ufb02 of Hit? lam} by that gvtiiitagers Tbs: Tribunai has alsu<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>failed it} consider that the petitioner had raised     <\/p>\n<p>casuarina trees and even the  &#8216;vatcm culti\ufb02\u00e9ated  the<\/p>\n<p>ptztitiuner. The finding that sim.&gt;t:_.thcrc &#8216;\u00a7vs;r:6&#8211;\u00a2;asuar:it;a!&#8217;A&#8217;ti:*cesv &#8220;ttxE::&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>land, there was no cultivatian   Vtinding.<br \/>\nThc Tribunal has aim  \u00e9iaimis\u00e9tttxt  Eerdpp\ufb01<br \/>\nRoddy, who was :i    as to the<br \/>\npc:titit.mer&#8217;s      Tlibunai has 3139<br \/>\num1uoxui\u00a3x;:a+t:   the first respondent .<\/p>\n<p>  {hr the mspondcnt would conttznd<\/p>\n<p>that Rama   of the lands, but this petitioner<\/p>\n<p>_-_was . as the land had test its agriculturai<\/p>\n<p> it tsunsisted only 0? casuariraa trees which did<\/p>\n<p>nutgi\ufb01qtrirgi.\u00e9i_f;V..t:i:tJitivation, Rama Raddy was in possession till<\/p>\n<p>  p\ufb01itiuntr hatch} had himself negotiated to purchast:<\/p>\n<p>    Them is my document pnxinoed it} shew that ht&#8217;: was a<\/p>\n<p>   tg\ufb02ant and that he was paying wara.\n<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>I1 is stated by the first respondent that in 1978, \ufb01le<\/p>\n<p>knowledge and consent of the [inst respondent,  <\/p>\n<p>out easuzuina trees in respeci of whielfg&#8221;he&#8211;.had   u &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>before the jurisdictional police  a(:l mi1VV\u00a3Ving that<br \/>\nhe had wrongfully cut   &#8216;es damages,<br \/>\nwhich would cieafiy  The entries<br \/>\nin the RTC   in \ufb02avour of the<br \/>\npetitioner.    tenancy. The<br \/>\npresumoiion&#8217; 4&#8242; * petitioner is a rebullabie<\/p>\n<p>571}!  L*t;nter\u00a7\u00a7iet\u00a7v&#8211;..!.Irv;5i1 in Form no.7 \ufb01fed by the petitioner, it<\/p>\n<p>   that the first respondent is only a nominal<\/p>\n<p>  peliiioeer himself is ihe real owner . This is a<\/p>\n<p>  \u00bbmumdic.s;\u00a73n which would defizat the claim of the petitioner as be<\/p>\n<p>A  &#8216;v.#\u00a2Juid:\u00a31&lt;3 longer be in a positien to claim as; a tenant if he seeks to<\/p>\n<p>  &#039; himself as 21 tenant as the owner of the land and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>&quot; {he application for occupancy rights was mi:-zeomzeived and the<\/p>\n<p>Tyzibenal wuld not be  to be in  Intsafar as E223-1; said<\/p>\n<p>Q<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; <a href=\"\/doc\/1191515\/\">In Durga Dans vs. Collector and<\/a> o\u00a3her:_g (19935 sex: ;413g &#8216;Q16<\/p>\n<p>Supnsme Court has bald that mutation    <\/p>\n<p>su\ufb02icient to establish tenancy.\n<\/p>\n<p>I &#8211; Htmibaiarrmm vs. 1&#8217;v&#8217;irzgzmmag,,   3 &#8216; Vt  <\/p>\n<p>&#8211; mam Balm Paiil mi etgm at gamma<\/p>\n<p>Hwu1re,(2000)1SCC 513g$ V V<\/p>\n<p>To support that   under snction<br \/>\n133 at&#8217; the    1964 as tn the:\n<\/p>\n<p>  \u00a7; Rigms could be dispiatmi<\/p>\n<p>by a  <\/p>\n<p>  w\u00e9utii \u00e9iitphasizc that the pctitiuncr is making<\/p>\n<p> &#8221;  extant wnsmgacnasm that the land is an image: agzmama:<\/p>\n<p>is being utilised presently in concrete: block<\/p>\n<p> _ maltiieg  aubmit tlmt the {mutt may appoint a<\/p>\n<p>t H H u   whu could visit the spot and ascertain this fact and<\/p>\n<p>  that the petition be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>6. It is seen that the RTC extracts eeusistentty reflect that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was in occupation as cultivator under <\/p>\n<p>the erstwhiie owner ef the landlerqt, on    *&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>of the ma by rm 1esp&lt;3mientttv&#039;vt&#039;t&#039;i:e t:et reiteetett it; the RTC<br \/>\nextracts. His name has    T1&#039;teApetitit:mer&#039;s<br \/>\nevidenee to  el\u00a7:\u00a7r:1&#039;:.f{\u00a7af  Ex.R-l, whieh<br \/>\nis an     petitioner and the<br \/>\n same on the gmund that<br \/>\nit has  Such a finding mid not<\/p>\n<p>have been   on the baid a\ufb02egation by the<\/p>\n<p> V&#039; \u00ab-\ufb01mt  in When on the faee of it, there is no<\/p>\n<p> \u00bbv4\u00a7\u00a7ig;:!ii;:.1ure, the presumption week} neeessariiy flow<\/p>\n<p>that   has in fact been executed. Any eentenliun to<\/p>\n<p>  wuuld have to be established at a trial. Hence, the<\/p>\n<p>  of EXR-I whieh clearly acknowledges gmsse\u00e9asien at the<\/p>\n<p>Vt iaziti by the petitioner could not have been :set at naught. The<\/p>\n<p>V relevant date of sue}: pesawssion and txreepation was l.3.}9&#039;?4.<\/p>\n<p>The revenue entries cezztinuuesly indicati%the petititmer as being<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><br \/>\nin uecupaliun of the land under the erstwhile owner, coupled wilh<\/p>\n<p>EXR-I would certainly have to be read in favuur of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>\nThough the evideniieuy value of <\/p>\n<p>the presumption arising &#8220;a  in V<\/p>\n<p>the absence efany entries    and the<br \/>\nfact that the petitioner   of land by the<\/p>\n<p>under  _ &#8221;  approach of the<\/p>\n<p>tribunal [an  1.. {his View of the matter, the<\/p>\n<p>several judginei\ufb01s    would not advanee cam: of the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;Tht:..\u00aba:i}nlention that the land consisted of<\/p>\n<p>  lherefone, (here was as cultivation is also<\/p>\n<p> V.  the cultivation of trees amid be Ierrrml as<\/p>\n<p>  mculxm-g2:e as ihe de\ufb01nition of &#8216;agriculture&#8217; does 110% exclude such<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab   Signi\ufb01eanliy, the respondenfs awn ameriion that the<\/p>\n<p> f A x mguarsna trees had been harvested by the peiiiioner and that on a<\/p>\n<p>A V &#8221; Veompiaini, the petitioner had paid a sum of Rs.l0,O002&#8242;- and with<\/p>\n<p>which he was zrcttis\ufb01ed and not havin pursued the criminal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta &#8230; vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya &#8230; on 5 February, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 5&#8243;&#8216; DAY op EE3mAIa$*, A * THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE A % WRIT PETITION No.&#8221;i\u00a7:898 OF _BB_&#8217;I&#8217;.._\\..7\u00a3E..E_._Ni S10 late &#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209402","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta ... vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya ... on 5 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta ... vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya ... on 5 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-17T16:56:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"D V Narayana Reddy S\\\/O Late Venakta &#8230; vs V Ranganath S\\\/O Alte Vijaya &#8230; on 5 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-17T16:56:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1186,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009\",\"name\":\"D V Narayana Reddy S\\\/O Late Venakta ... vs V Ranganath S\\\/O Alte Vijaya ... on 5 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-17T16:56:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"D V Narayana Reddy S\\\/O Late Venakta &#8230; vs V Ranganath S\\\/O Alte Vijaya &#8230; on 5 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta ... vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya ... on 5 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta ... vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya ... on 5 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-17T16:56:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta &#8230; vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya &#8230; on 5 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-17T16:56:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009"},"wordCount":1186,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009","name":"D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta ... vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya ... on 5 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-17T16:56:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-v-narayana-reddy-so-late-venakta-vs-v-ranganath-so-alte-vijaya-on-5-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"D V Narayana Reddy S\/O Late Venakta &#8230; vs V Ranganath S\/O Alte Vijaya &#8230; on 5 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209402"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209402\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}