{"id":209494,"date":"2009-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-05-06T06:01:36","modified_gmt":"2018-05-06T00:31:36","slug":"the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Samain Co-Operative … vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
The Samain Co-Operative … vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009<\/div>\n
COCP No. 1183 of 2008                                      -1-\n\n            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                         AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                  COCP No. 1183 of 2008\n                                  Date of decision:- 23.11.2009.\n\n\nThe Samain Co-operative Transport Society Ltd.\n\n                                                    ...Petitioner\n\n                         Versus\n\nShibash Kavi Raj and others\n                                                    ...Respondents<\/pre>\n
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG<\/p>\n
Present:-          Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate
\n                   for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
                   Mr. Ashok Jindal, Addl. A.G. Haryana
\n                   for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
\nRAKESH KUMAR GARG J.\n<\/p>\n
                   As    per      the    averments        made        in   this<\/p>\n
petition, the petitioner Society alongwith others,<\/p>\n
filed CWP No.16131 of 2007 for issuance of a writ<\/p>\n
in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents<\/p>\n
to grant permission to the petitioner to adopt any<\/p>\n
other     alternative         route      as   they      were        not    being<\/p>\n
allowed to ply their buses freely on the routes<\/p>\n
assigned to them on account of a serious law and<\/p>\n
order situation.\n<\/p>\n
2.          The aforesaid writ petition was disposed<\/p>\n
of vide judgment dated 05.11.2007                        in view of the<\/p>\n
statement       of    learned       counsel       for    the        respondent<\/p>\n
with     the    direction         to    the      respondents          to    take<\/p>\n
necessary measures agreed upon by the respondents.
\n COCP No. 1183 of 2008                                      -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
During the course of proceedings in CWP No.15641 of<\/p>\n
2006 at least for a period of 6 months from the<\/p>\n
date of the order whereupon a fresh decision shall<\/p>\n
be taken by the Superintendent of Police, Hisar<\/p>\n
whether or not the police protection is called for.<\/p>\n
It is also relevant to refer to the judgment dated<\/p>\n
27.10.2006 passed in CWP No.15641 of 2006, which<\/p>\n
reads as follows:-\n<\/p>\n
                        “In   this        writ      petition,           it     is
\n                contention           of        counsel            for         the
\n                petitioners that due to law and order
\n                problem created by some miscreants, it
\n                is not possible for the petitioners to
\n                ply     their       buses      on     the        route,       for
\n                which they have valid stage carriage
\n                permits.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                        When notice of motion was issued
\n                on      28.09.2006,           following          order        was
\n                passed by this court:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                    \"Notice           of     motion           for\n                              13.10.2006.\n                                    Ms.       Mamta      Singal     Talwar,\n<\/pre>\n
                              AAG Haryana accepts notice.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                    Counsel                 for               the\n                              petitioners           is      directed           to\n                              supply      3    copies       of     the       writ\n<\/pre>\n
                              petition to the State counsel
\n                              during course of the day.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                    State counsel is directed
\n                              to get necessary instructions
\n                              as to why the State has failed
\n                              to maintain law and order on
\n                              the    route       concerned.              It    be
\n                              further         ascertained          to        what
\n COCP No. 1183 of 2008                                         -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
                               necessary              steps              can        be
\n                               initiated so that the buses of
\n                               the petitioners can ply on the
\n                               routes allotted to them.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                    District Transport Officer,
\n                               Hisar       is       directed             to      come
\n                               present         on    the      next        date      of
\n                               hearing.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                        Thereafter,            on    the      next        date      of
\n                hearing             i.e.         13.10.2006,                   after
\n                perusing affidavit filed by Additional
\n                State        Transport          Controller,              Haryana,
\n                Senior Superintendent of Police, Hisar
\n                was directed to come present in Court
\n                On      17.10.2006,              the          officer            came
\n                present and assured this court that he
\n                will ensure that the buses should run
\n                smoothly,           on     the        basis         of        route-
\n                permits granted to the petitioners.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                        Today, State counsel informs this
\n                court,        on     getting         instructions                from
\n                Shri         Surinder           Pal          Singh,           Deputy
\n                Superintendent of Police, Hisar, that
\n                under         police           escort,             buses         have
\n                started plying and the officer assures
\n                the Court that nobody will be allowed
\n                to over-reach the law and stop buses
\n                of      the     petitioners,                 in     an     illegal
\n                manner.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                        This        satisfies         counsel            for       the
\n                petitioners              and        in       view         of       the
\n                statement           given,       this         writ        petition
\n                stands disposed of.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                        It     is       made    clear             that     if,      in\n                future,         any        such          like            situation\n                arises,        the       petitioners               will       be    at\n                liberty            to      file          a         fresh         writ\n COCP No. 1183 of 2008                                   -4-<\/span>\n\n                petition.\"\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
3.        It is further case of the petition is that<\/p>\n
two security guards were provided to him and the<\/p>\n
bus of the petitioner started plying on 21.12.2007<\/p>\n
and thereafter the aforesaid security was withdrawn<\/p>\n
on 08.01.2008.          After withdrawal of the security,<\/p>\n
it was not possible for the petitioner to ply his<\/p>\n
bus on the route for the reasons mentioned in the<\/p>\n
writ petition.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
4.        Thus, grievance of the petitioner before<\/p>\n
this Court is that despite the aforesaid judgments<\/p>\n
passed by this Court in his favour, the respondents<\/p>\n
have    not    taken    any     action      against       the    illegal<\/p>\n
plying of the vehicles and withdrawal of security<\/p>\n
to its buses and therefore they are liable to be<\/p>\n
punished under the provisions of Contempt of Courts<\/p>\n
Act, 1971.\n<\/p>\n
5.        In     response        to        show        cause     notice,<\/p>\n
separate replies on behalf of respondents by way of<\/p>\n
their    affidavits      were        filed,   stating          that    the<\/p>\n
orders passed by this Court were complied with.<\/p>\n
The relevant part of the affidavit, filed on behalf<\/p>\n
of respondent No.1 reads as follows:-<\/p>\n
                “That some Civil Writ Petitions were
\n                filed     by    the    petitioner         Society      and
\n                others        (hereinafter         called       Society)
\n                bearing        No.    18453       of    2006,    752    of
\n                2007,     15641       of   2006,       16131    of    2007
\n COCP No. 1183 of 2008                                       -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
                against       the     respondents            wherein          this
\n                Hon’ble        Court      was       pleased        to      direct
\n                the      respondents            to        take        necessary
\n                measures             agreed           upon            by        the
\n                respondents           during           the        course         of
\n                proceedings at least for a period of
\n                six           months                and            thereafter
\n                Superintendent            of        Police,       Hisar       will
\n                take     fresh        decision         whether           or      not
\n                Police        protection              is     called           for.
\n                Immediately          on     receipt         of     orders        of
\n                Hon’ble        High         Court,          the        deponent
\n                endorsed        copies         to    all     SHOs\/DSsP           in
\n                District        Police,              Hisar        to       ensure
\n                compliance           with       a     copy       to     Hon’ble
\n                Assistant           Registrar         (Writ)          Punjab      &
\n                Haryana High Court vide Superintendent
\n                of      Police,       Hisar         office        endst.         No.
\n                30831 dated 13.12.2007.                       The deponent
\n                had     a     talk     with         representatives               of
\n                Private        Transport            Societies          in     this
\n                regard        and    buses      of     Coop.          Societies
\n                started         plying          with         effect             from
\n                20.11.2007.               The        Coop.       Society          of
\n                Route No.5, despite repeated requests,
\n                did     not     ask       for       police        protection.
\n                The      needful       was      done        by     the      Local
\n                Police        and      several             challans           were
\n                chalked out in the district who were
\n                unauthoriselly             plying          their       vehicles
\n                at      the    cost       of    Societies.                 It    is
\n                further        respectfully                submitted          that
\n                for sometime, the buses owned by the
\n                various Co-operative Societies did ply
\n                under       police     protection.                 The      Local
\n                Police        did    whatever         was        possible        to
\n                comply        with     orders         of     this       Hon’ble
\n COCP No. 1183 of 2008                                       -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
                Court     by     deputing            large        number       of
\n                staff on duty.             Abruptly on 05.12.2007
\n                in      the     morning,             the     petitioner’s
\n                representatives                 came          to         Police
\n                Station,        Sadar      Hansi,          District       Hisar
\n                and got their statement recorded vide
\n                Daily Diary Register Report No.54 of
\n                same date to the effect that because
\n                of      threats         and       boycott           by        the
\n                villagers, they are not in a position
\n                to ply the buses and they themselves
\n                stopped their buses plying on routes
\n                allotted        to    them.           On     inquiry,         the
\n                representative             of     society           did       not
\n                disclose the names to S.H.O. concerned
\n                from whom threats were received.                               He
\n                replied       that      they      are        residents         of
\n                adjoining villages and do not want to
\n                incur enmity with them.                       Copy of DDR
\n                dated     05.12.2007            of     Police       Station,
\n                Sadar Hansi translated in English is
\n                enclosed at Annexure R-1.                          Under the
\n                circumstances,             the    Local           Police      was
\n                helpless to do anything more for these
\n                Societies.            It    is       further       submitted
\n                that     when    the       petitioner’s            societies
\n                asked         for       stoppage              of         Police
\n                protection, it was necessary to permit
\n                Roadways Buses to ply keeping in view
\n                the convenience of the general public.
\n                This was done by RTA, Hisar and not by
\n                the deponent.           It is further submitted
\n                that     the         deponent          was        not    in     a
\n                position        to    stop       the    Roadways          buses
\n                when     the     petitioner-Society                     stopped
\n                plying        their        Buses.             The        public
\n                convenience was equally necessary.                             A
\n COCP No. 1183 of 2008                                     -7-<\/span><\/p>\n
                representation          was       later     on    received
\n                in      the    month        of     March,        2008     and
\n                needful       was     done       vide    Superintendent
\n                of      Police,       office       No.6322-24           dated
\n                12.03.2008.            Thereafter         the      deponent
\n                was transferred from Hisar and joined
\n                as such at Ambala on 12.06.2008 (FN).
\n                So at no point of time any lapse took
\n                place     on    the     part       of    the     answering
\n                deponent.           It is also submitted that
\n                at the initial stage, the petitioner
\n                Society in respect of route No.5 did
\n                not ask for police protection and at a
\n                latter        stage    vide       their         application
\n                dated      28.02.2008,            asked     for        police
\n                protection.           The same was immediately
\n                given and orders were issued in this
\n                regard vide Superintendent of Police,
\n                Hisar          office            No.6322-24             dated
\n                12.03.2008             and          6109-13             dated
\n                14.03.2008.            Thereafter         the      deponent
\n                was transferred and assumed charge as
\n                Superintendent          of       Police,         Ambala    on
\n                12.06.2008          (AN).         The    deponent        duly
\n                complied        with        the     order         of     this
\n                Hon’ble Court in letter and spirits.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          No    counter         has      been           filed      by     the<\/p>\n
petitioner to controvert the defence as taken by<\/p>\n
the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
6.        From the stand taken by the respondents,<\/p>\n
it is clearly made out that the respondents have<\/p>\n
taken   over    possible        action       to    comply         with    the<\/p>\n
orders passed by this Court by deputing large numbe
\n COCP No. 1183 of 2008                           -8-<\/span><\/p>\n
of staff on duty.        It may also be pointed out here<\/p>\n
that the security of the buses was withdrawn at the<\/p>\n
petitioners’ request as they have stopped plying<\/p>\n
their buses themselves.          Therefore, roadways buses<\/p>\n
were allowed to ply keeping in view the convenience<\/p>\n
of    general    public     by   the     Regional     Transport<\/p>\n
Authority.\n<\/p>\n
7.        Thus, it cannot be said that there was any<\/p>\n
disobedience on the part of the respondents.              There<\/p>\n
is nothing on record to suggest that the security<\/p>\n
of the buses of the petitioners was withdrawn by<\/p>\n
the   respondents       willfully   or   with   any   malafide<\/p>\n
intentions.\n<\/p>\n
8.        Thus, I find no merit in this petition and<\/p>\n
is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
9.        Rule discharged.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\nNovember 23, 2009                   ( Rakesh Kumar Garg )\nvj                                         Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court The Samain Co-Operative … vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009 COCP No. 1183 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1183 of 2008 Date of decision:- 23.11.2009. The Samain Co-operative Transport Society Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Shibash Kavi Raj and others […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Samain Co-Operative ... vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Samain Co-Operative ... vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-06T00:31:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Samain Co-Operative … vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-06T00:31:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1438,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009\",\"name\":\"The Samain Co-Operative ... vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-06T00:31:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Samain Co-Operative … vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Samain Co-Operative ... vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Samain Co-Operative ... vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-06T00:31:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Samain Co-Operative … vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-06T00:31:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009"},"wordCount":1438,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009","name":"The Samain Co-Operative ... vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-06T00:31:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-samain-co-operative-vs-shibash-kavi-raj-and-others-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Samain Co-Operative … vs Shibash Kavi Raj And Others on 23 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209494"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209494\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}