{"id":21000,"date":"2009-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-09-07T14:07:55","modified_gmt":"2014-09-07T08:37:55","slug":"daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
 \n\ng _\n\nIN THE men COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGKL\u00e9\"Rfi:_\"\"_4' A'\n\nDATED THIS THE 19TH DAYOF \n\nCRL.P.NO.997{2O03::\"'W  % \n\nBEFORE:-,  ' T  %\n\nTHE HONBLE MR; ,msTIcE \u00a7{.Ar\u00a7A\u00a7J:i)}m;\"\"  \nCRIMINAL PETITION\u20acI_\u00a7_O;9_97 OF 2003\nCRIMINAL PE\"Ti':I'ICN:':*N~Of-033 %or? 2003\n\nBETWEEW    '  \n\nI.\n\nDAISY J;:s_.c'0E\u00ab.,__ _   ' \nWV\/\"Cr Jacoreg 'THOMAS _\nAGED 36 Y':3:;a.--a>_s'\u00ab  ._ ' -\nTHANI'{A'I'HOF'\u00abESTATE'~ \nKOP4't3\"TY VILLAGE ,_  '\nBAGAMANDALA.\n\nAVMADIKERP} * V .. PETITIONER\n\n :'{B}%,.A'Sri.'~-C..H.HEXNUMANTHARAYAPPA SRCOUNSEL FOR\n\n5-I\n\n x .gKODAGU DXST\n\nSri. P }'I Pk'J_NNAPPA, ADVOCATE)\n\nfS'I'A'f\u00a3' .(\u00a7P'AKARNATAKA\n\nBY THE' RA\u00a7GE FOREST OFFICER\nBA53PxMANDALA\n.. RESPONDENT\n\nV'  gay $z1'.B.B2\\LAKRISHNA, HCGP}\n\nI.\n\n   (31?\u00e9L.P.NO.709\/2003:\n\" BETWEEN:\n\nP C ASSAINAR { HUSSAINAR)\nS[G MAMMALI, 54 YRS\nSIDBAPUR (KODAGU)\n\n*2m9F%%A L\n\n\n\n2. BABU JOSEPH s\/0 JOSEPH\n48 YRS V _ V\nMAEIKERIROAD   ._      I\nSIDDAPUR (KODAGU}    PETITIONERSA \n\n{By Sri. S G BI-IAGAVAN, ADVOGATE)\n\nAND\n\nM JAYA S\/O MANA.CHA\n\nMAJOR   \n\nRANGE FOREST OFFICER L\n\nMADIKERI      \n\nKODAGU    V   '\"r..RESPONI)EN'I'\n\n(By sz~i:..r3v.}';2.(g1,i5{i\u00a7;?1S:\u00ab:fg>!_g\u00a7.';--Hc:3P\u00a7  H \u00bb\n\ncI>;L.Ps'AF:i;;E13V\"ti:\/343*; GREG VPRAYING TO QUASH THE\nPROCEEDINGS '13\u00bb: N:>.\"-.2225\/02 on THE FILE on THE\nJMFQ, M_A2;>;KERr 'o.1=*AL4K01gAr:g;V._ursT.,\nThe:\u00a7(~:--4 .petition$~,v_\"ce\ufb01:4i11g on for haering, this day,\nthe  magi;  following:\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
 The \ufb01\u00e9fjtioners arrayed as accused 1 to 3 in<\/p>\n
 “\u00e9”\u00ab.. ‘j”C.C.N\u00a7;B\u00a725\/2002 have \ufb01led mesa petitions to quash<\/p>\n
2. I have heard Sri.S.G.Bhagawan, learned<\/p>\n
counsel appearing for petitioner in Cirl.P.No.’709\/2003<\/p>\n
Sri.C.H. Hanumantharayappa, learned senior eounel<\/p>\n
appearing for petitioner in CrI.P.No.997\/20933:’-\u00ab4_.e;,nd<\/p>\n
learned Government Pleader for State.<\/p>\n
3. The brief facts necesSa_1’y.. for d;sepos\u00e9;:\u00a21″et1;\u00a2sen’ee<\/p>\n
petitions are as follows:\n<\/p>\n
On 18.06.1998 n\u00a7a.;oge  e’:+*o:\u00a2s: A T’<\/p>\n
Bhagamandala lodged f1r$t——-VVin;foi*matjon ‘  with
\nBhagamandala   trespass and
\nfelling of ti1nt>erv.._in    1\/ 15 which
\naccording   a’. goeemment reserve<\/p>\n
forest. [ V\n<\/p>\n
4. The   registereci in Crime
\nNo_,B4\/ ” of Bh\u00e9g\u00e9onanfiala police station against<\/p>\n
  .:C’1*!V._P.No.997\/2003 and others for<\/p>\n
of?eneesV”[.p’oni-ehab’xe’yonder Sections 447, 468, 379,<\/p>\n
  also for violation of Rules 164, I44<\/p>\n
.:  under Section 24 of Karnataka Forest Act;<\/p>\n
 was handed over to COD.\n<\/p>\n
”  The Deputy Superintendent of Police Special<\/p>\n
 ‘Squad COD Bangaiore after detailed investiga\ufb01on<\/p>\n
  L\/”\\”  –\n<\/p>\n
The investigation was initiated <\/p>\n
information \ufb01led under Sec\ufb01on
\nThe ixlvestiga\ufb01on p_roc(_;ede_ei”  ”   K ” V
\nprovisions of Chaptevizj  .. :ofA  me  .<\/p>\n
-Procedure  _  <\/p>\n
Magistrate on  of B.’ isportii in the
\nabsence of   in the form of
\noompiaim:  “Cr.P.C. should<\/p>\n
 Vpro\ufb01fisions of Sections 200,<\/p>\n
202 and    .\n<\/p>\n
The disputes,  is of civil
\nnature. ” ;’I’I1e.  filed a suit for
\n   of 1,77,63,17?\/\u00bb~ from<\/p>\n
pe\ufb01tianegs  No.99?’\/2003 and it<\/p>\n
   Of:S.No.12\/2000 on the \ufb01le of<\/p>\n
Lzdge V(S\u00a5”.Dn.), Madikeri.\n<\/p>\n
     petitioners have \ufb01led
\nMVT\\a%.oP.’No.13935\/1999, inter alia, contending<\/p>\n
 they have not encroached any part of<\/p>\n
reserved forest in Sy.No. 1\/ I5. <\/p>\n
my  g\ufb01w. — 5<\/p>\n
(iv) The learned Magstrate did 11(::\u00bbt_”* –i:”fi:1svs<\/p>\n
jurisdiction to record sworn  <\/p>\n
informant by iiivoldngissprovisioxis  V<\/p>\n
200 C:’.P.C.\n<\/p>\n
(V) The learned     liave ‘V V<\/p>\n
jurisdiction’ 4:9 issse    by
\ninvoldng   Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n
(vi) The:, Q;  j} .5?’ is  in
\n found either in the
\nfirst   said to
\nhave  ii   informant.\n<\/p>\n
Therefore, the Ma\u00e9sirate did not have<\/p>\n
:_’j’7a:::y   ‘against petitioners in<\/p>\n
(‘i’.’1″‘3..;_.l3″.i\\i<")'.'A?:('V'JV".?i;:A\/ <\/p>\n
  The ipijjstest pietjtion \ufb01led by first informant is<\/p>\n
* ~   with Section 200 Cr. P. C.<\/p>\n
  'ieaifned Magistrate did not have any<\/p>\n
  to proceed against petitioners to try<\/p>\n
  wsxrant case instituted upon police remrt<\/p>\n
3 according to provisions of Chapter XIXTE<\/p>\n
W . Q\/sq L45\/\\.'w\u00bbw'Q\/(""'~'y<\/p>\n
(ix) The continuation of proceodings   _<\/p>\n
court: below would be abuse_.~o-f  ‘v <\/p>\n
court.\n<\/p>\n
Therefore. the learned   .\n<\/p>\n
impugned proceedings are <\/p>\n
9. The learned   would submit
\nthat learned Mogistrat\u20ac:”o.i1:  submitted
\nby Depu\ufb01y.    kk Police coo had
\n  invoking Section
\n19o(1io\u20ac?~)..%      <\/p>\n
10.   counsel for petitioners<\/p>\n
 _ Withi ” vvpvestigation papers and impugned<\/p>\n
   :3? ‘ffoiftnt\ufb02atxa the following poirats for<\/p>\n
 V<\/p>\n
“m  wimmer the learned Mam\u00b0s11’ate was justi\ufb01od
\n” in recording sworn statement of \ufb01rst
\ninformant on receipt: of B report submitted by<\/p>\n
the Deputy Superintendent of Police COD?
\n ‘ L\/if<\/p>\n
or that it is a civil dispute or that the7’e…i!.\u00e9 ” 5
\nevzdence’ three courses are open     H
\nMagistrate; Ii} either to  “‘B’V”‘
\nSummary report and dm;)__ 3 f<\/p>\n
or (ii) on  of      ‘<\/p>\n
the police to make   <\/p>\n
take  of  my,
\ndisclosed on    Where the
\nMagistrate,  AtVhe’_ ‘I;?v’   having
\nnot
\n     The revision
\n  \ufb01e”  in criminal
\nT7\u00bb  no order passed by
\nthe    ‘Wm’ * pmaengs
\n the Sessions Judge had<\/p>\n
,   entertain the revision. While<\/p>\n
V   \u00a35.30, the Sessions Judge was not also
\n‘   mam’ ‘ the Magistrate to
\n the ‘B’ summary report once again<\/p>\n
V   to the 2″‘ respondent. Where
\n 1  there is a complaint made to the Aefagistrate
\nA *   the Magistrate refers the complaint to the<\/p>\n
police under Sedion 156(3) and on
\nEnrwestigation the police submit ‘B’ summwy
\nreport and the oaznplainant protests to the
\nacceptance of the ‘B’ summary report, in such
\ncases the Magistrate may take cwnizarwe on<\/p>\n
the original oompiamt made to him,  ” ,
\nsworn statement under Section 200  it
\nthere is no complaint  \u00bbio_ihe   _
\nthe question of the
\ncognizance on the  of
\ndoes not arise,  it
\nmemo is not mine fqreffq_r
\nthere are no V  ” any
\no\ufb01enoe irithe   there is<\/p>\n
also no  ‘There are no
\nsuch  the filed in<\/p>\n
 ;5.:m._:’:  it  not a oomplaint<\/p>\n
 of that eawression as
\nde\ufb01ned  s.e\u00a2t~.;::n 2(a) of the Code of<\/p>\n
_   because oomplaint as
\n”    allegation made orally or<\/p>\n
 to a Magistrate, with a view to his<\/p>\n
    under this Code, that some
\n pertso\u00e9ry whether known or unknown, has<\/p>\n
~oo’mmitted an o\ufb01enoe, but does not include a<\/p>\n
it ‘   report. Therefore, the Sessions Judge
\nV’ was wholly in error in entertaining the<\/p>\n
revision and directing the Magistrate to
\noonsidertheoaseq\ufb01emh.\n<\/p>\n
therefore ailowed, The impugned order
\npassed by the Sessions Judge, is set aside
\nand the order passed by the Magistrate<\/p>\n
so i  ‘<\/p>\n
acc@ting the :3: summary report is re,si:oreg;V1’\u00a7__:  A’
\nThe complainant is sun at lrbertyV\u00a7”-._he’iV’_;s*e” A<\/p>\n
chooses to make a eorr.plwIr\ufb01i [the  V<\/p>\n
Magistrate. ”\n<\/p>\n
In the case on hand,  eepon
\nthe \ufb01rst informant ‘not’  in the
\nform of complaint   RC. and had
\nnot u11derta1_’:e’1’\u00a7’\u00a3~.e:t;zj   alleged against<\/p>\n
peti\ufb01onez\ufb01    \ufb01led the \ufb01rst<\/p>\n
informant   discrepancies in
\nthe ‘B’  Eras’  learned Magistrate to
\nreject    ., \\s<\/p>\n
  ”   has rejected the B report. The<\/p>\n
Ieafeedw   consideration of 13 report did not<\/p>\n
  i\ufb01tres\ufb01gati_1 1\u00a7gATagency to make further investigation.<\/p>\n
..  0therV__A}1and, the learned Magistzate proceeded to<\/p>\n
  ‘swegn statement and issued pmcess by invoking<\/p>\n
. 204 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the procedure adopted by<\/p>\n
 Magisirate and impugned older passed thereon<\/p>\n
 weannot be sustained.   X 5. ~—–<\/p>\n
13. The leariaed Magistrate on receipt of <\/p>\n
not proceeded in aecouiance with law.   ‘A <\/p>\n
reasons as to why first infoxmaestu\/M fdgest <\/p>\n
should suffer on account of errors  <\/p>\n
Magistrate. Therefore I am  opiiaieni
\nreconsideration by the   stage of
\nreceipt ofBrepox’t.  i ii   <\/p>\n
14. ‘i’h<~:l   ii'le;:-iiiied counsel for
\npetitionersi.    fievemment against
\npe\ufb01tioiiexts    i;-a1~"ie…p:;\u00a7nding, is a matter for
\n<:onsid:Veiatio3i.iiiiei2t:f:Iiig  iixivestigatioxz of the case.<\/p>\n
'A   peti\ufb01cns are accepted. The impugned<\/p>\n
is"   The matter is remanded to learned<\/p>\n
Magi-smite  Ie–consideIat1'o1:x from the stage of receipt of B<\/p>\n
   "the light of the observations made herein and in<\/p>\n
ii    with law. Sdl\u00e9<\/p>\n
Iudg:3<\/p>\n
cm\/~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009 Author: N.Ananda g _ IN THE men COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGKL\u00e9”Rfi:_””_4′ A’ DATED THIS THE 19TH DAYOF CRL.P.NO.997{2O03::”‘W % BEFORE:-, ‘ T % THE HONBLE MR; ,msTIcE \u00a7{.Ar\u00a7A\u00a7J:i)}m;”” CRIMINAL PETITION\u20acI_\u00a7_O;9_97 OF 2003 CRIMINAL PE”Ti’:I’ICN:’:*N~Of-033 %or? 2003 BETWEEW ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDaisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-07T08:37:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Daisy Jacob W\\\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-07T08:37:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1057,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Daisy Jacob W\\\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-07T08:37:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Daisy Jacob W\\\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-07T08:37:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-07T08:37:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009"},"wordCount":1057,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009","name":"Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-07T08:37:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/daisy-jacob-wo-dr-jacob-thomas-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Daisy Jacob W\/O. Dr.Jacob Thomas vs State Of Karnataka on 19 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21000\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}