{"id":21007,"date":"2009-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-02-09T10:04:29","modified_gmt":"2016-02-09T04:34:29","slug":"venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 20 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 20 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 20\" DAY OF Novemasg '2bfo--\u00a7'~;. 2\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. 9.9. DINAKARAN, c'_:'t~VII'V\u00e9I=itt'.-IsV\"\":'v.v.'.rj:.E \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.3=i:sI.IcELvL,\u00e9.sABE\u00a7A'ajiT. \n\nwan APPEAL No.35{54:_\/'2\u00a7)09.('LB-LLJC)L5\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1\n\n \n\nVENKATALAKs;'H'r\u00a7aA:bri:9M7g.._V A\nAGED:_'AE}Q-UT.?6 I-xfEAR5._ ' \nw\/_.o~ LATE.-ANAN.TH_AiAH_:  A\n\nR. \/or MA'rH'3K.E'm.= ._ \" \n\n_YES_HWA'N:1'H rm RA H'0sLi,\n BANG'A'LOR\u00a5E r4.omH TALUK,\n\n1a3AN'GALofR\u00a7 '  _ \n\nSR1' A\" s,AfHY:._\\ NA:-~RAYANA\n\n. AGED\" 53'vEARs\n\nSE\/'0 LATE ANAVNTHAIAH\n\n\"  R~,to\"r~=L. MATHIKERE\n\nYESHVJVANTHPURA HOBLI,\n\n  _ \"BAN\u00bbG'A_L\"QRE NORTH TALUK,\n\n  3A'r3:.GA:L'oRE\n\nSRIKODANDARAMA\n\n\"AG-ED 48 YEARS\n\nS'j'0 LATE ANANTHAIAH\n\n\"  R\/OF MATHIKERE\n.A YESHWANTHPURA\n\nA H HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,\n\nBANGALORE\n\n\n\n4 SRI M A NARASIMHAMURTHY\nAGED 42 YEARS\nS\/O LATE ANANTHAIAH\nR\/OF MATHIKERE\nYESHWANTHPURA HOBLI\nBANGALORE NORTH TALUK\nBANGALORE\n\n5 SRI A SRINIVASA \nAGED 40 YEARS \nS\/O LATE ANANTHAIAH '\nR\/OF MATHIKERE  \nYESHWANTHPURA HOLBL1\nBANGALORE NORTH TALUK\nBANGALORE D   -A  \n\n6 SRI M A 3AYARAMA  \nAGED 58.\u00bb.YEARS~--\u00bb._f.   x \nS\/0 LATE 'ANAN\"{H..AIAVH~A\"_j~~_V' ' \"\nR\/O_FJ.MA\u00a7THVIKE.RE   \nYESBw'AN'THPURL.AG\"H_OSBL; A\n\n BAISJGALORE 5*\u00bb:-O\"R_TH TALLUK\n\"BAN_GALOfRE  _  \"\n\n7 SM':'._INDIRAM'MA'-\n;' ~ AGED 55 'YEARS\n \/O LATE..__D_EVAPRASAN NA,\n\"DAUGHTER-xN-LAw OF\n 'v!__I-KTE AANANTHAIAH,\nO --AfG_ED'j5B YEARS,\nR\/GjFfRAILWAY GOLLAHALLI,\n.._NEL.f\\MANGALA TALUK,\n\nO' .. BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. ..APPELLANTS.\n\n    Sri : L M CHIDANANDAYYA, ADV. )\n\nFZAND :\n\n1 THE COMMISSIONER\nBANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE\n\n\n\nJ.C. ROAD,\nBANGALORE 52\n\nTHE JOINT COMMISSIONER\nBANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE\nBANGALORE WEST, SAMPIGE ROAD,\nMALLESWARAM,BANGALORE.\n\nTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER\n\nBANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALI--E*{'E.~.:'::~..:\"L~::  \nMATHIKERE WARD, SAMp:GE\u00ab RO.Ar.).,  , V  *\n\nMALLESWARAM, BANGAl'..._OR_E. AL?\n\nTHE ASSISTANT EXEVCUTIVVAE.,_E'NGIr4'i\u00a7'Ef{,_V_V.V  A\n\nBANGALORE MAHANAEGIARA PAL\"1'KE'_;\n\nMATHIKERE WARD, MAT_mr}_DR,\nHOBLI, BANGALORE!Ne:)RTHj;TLA,uK,\nBANGALORE.  V     \n\n10 SRI M_.R'ANANlDA\u00a7RA.'M'\u00ab..  \ns\/O 41;ATE;'M_. s RA'M_VAIAHj--   A \"\" \"\nAGED ABOUT 34S'5YEA*-RS,  \nR.1ATO~VG'O*s\u00a2;g4LA..TExTE'N--sIO\u00bbN,\n,'MAT'HvIE;:K*\n\nTi-\u00a315 wRIT APPEAL IS FILED 11\/5 4 OF THE\n\n   \u00a7.<A'RNATAKA HIGi~i COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET\n\nTQASITDE THE ORDER FASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION\n\n  120947\/2006 DATED 1O\/O5\/2009.\n\n\n\nTHIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR\nPRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, SABHAHIT J.,\nDELIVERED THE FOLLO'WING:- \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
This appeal is filed by the petiitioners<\/p>\n
W.P.No.10947\/2006 being aiggmriieved ,b\\,r:tih_e_iorde’r<\/p>\n
dated 10\/6\/2009 wi1eVrein,AI:__ti:’:’–e_z Iea’;1=aged’\u00ab <\/p>\n
Judge of this Court has de.ci’iV–ned   tot’<\/p>\n
respondents 1 to 4against’respondents Svvto 11 in
\npreventing unauthorized\u00bb :”cQni’st_ruic_tion in the
\nscheduie property and\u00bb  writ petition.<\/p>\n
2.  ‘ii\u00a77he-.Q:”‘~\u00abi.._app*e|Iants herein filed
\nW.P.l\\i0,19V94?’.\/\ufb01ii\ufb01\u00e9-\u00ab._:’:”*seeking for mandamus<\/p>\n
dire-*c.ti_ngu”respo”nd.ents 1 to 4 to take steps to<\/p>\n
i  gpreaxkent tsn_authoHriied construction in the schedule<\/p>\n
   accordance with the Karnataka<\/p>\n
Mu__nic_ipai}~’Icorporations Act, 1976 (hereinafter<\/p>\n
 xreferre\u00e9l to as the ‘Act’) and direct respondents 5 to<\/p>\n
  1-into demolish the unauthorized construction made<\/p>\n
 .. _..i\u00a7n a portion of the schedule property belonging to<\/p>\n
the petitioners in accordance with the Act and<\/p>\n
\\\\J}<.\u00bb<\/p>\n
passed such other relief\/s as this Court may deem
\nfit. The schedule property is described as under:-<\/p>\n
"All that piece and parcel of <\/p>\n
land bearing Sy.N0.7, measuring  :_. <\/p>\n
39 guntas, situated at Mathikere__\\'[il.I.ag\u00a5A.e, _
\nYeshwanthpura Hobli, gi3'aVn'galo–.re.g
\nTaluk, Bangalore Dist. Bo.un:'de'd oln.t'h.e_- _  <\/p>\n
East by : ""ATni1aiappa._S(K–tirita;:
\n V.i-s\u00a7\u00a7c'1"'\u00a25l5"??"sI\u00e9iici. <\/p>\n
\nWest by V  _  R%P\u00a7.d””\u00abVli”l  <\/p>\n
North by :    land<\/p>\n
Soyzitizyby  : V’  Mun’_ir_aya”ppa’s land”<\/p>\n
 ._It of the petitioners that
\nthe sc-hedulle _ t.’pro”perty was endowed to<\/p>\n
Hanf\u00e9ulmanthadeyarui Temple. The husband of the 15″<\/p>\n
pretitioxner.yviitsnganthaiah was the Archak in the said<\/p>\n
teinple an Archak of the said temple was<\/p>\n
culltivagfyiingillthe land personally without any claim by<\/p>\n
l  others and no other persons were cultivating<\/p>\n
.’  ‘”i’.h’e’lsaid schedule property and after enactment of<\/p>\n
“the Karnataka Religious and Charitable Inams<\/p>\n
Abolition Act, 1955, the schedule property by virtue<\/p>\n
L\/Q”\n<\/p>\n
of provisions of the said Act, stood vested with the
\nGovt., thereby, making it a provision for<\/p>\n
late.Archaka Ananthaiah filed an applicatici\u00abn”if:.cf:-r”r,e-<\/p>\n
grant of the land claiming to be <\/p>\n
tenant of the land for grant o_f.~o._r_:cupancva..right4_’_as’atit<\/p>\n
permanent tenant. The  <\/p>\n
Commissioner referred ‘teh_e’~..matter_tothe’:Ta’hVsi’:ldar,”V V<\/p>\n
Bangalore North Taluk for..iir’1’gspectio.n”oiithe land to
\nascertain whether’ the. -lia’teV.V?X:iJc4haV\u00a7ta:.Ananthaiah was
\npersonallx \u00a2\ufb02\/\/4\/&vat’i’h\u00a7 .   property and
\nwhether. ” iorvvgiregistration as a
\n Section 5 of the said Act
\nand the’iT.ahsViVld’ar’._ “stii3n1itted a report in favour of<\/p>\n
AV_n.a.nt_haiah’,i”‘hus_l::and of the 15’ petitioner. The<\/p>\n
‘ ;Speci.al’.ii3e’pu_ty Commissioner issued endorsement<\/p>\n
 confirming the issue of grant in<\/p>\n
,_poss.e’ssio’n and enjoyment prior to the Karnataka<\/p>\n
it  iRiel.igious and Charitable Inams Abolition Act, 1955.<\/p>\n
4. It is further averred that since the Act was<\/p>\n
amended and the power of Special Deputy<\/p>\n
xi-*~<\/p>\n
Commissioner for Inams Abolition was taken'”away<\/p>\n
and the said power was given to the Lan\u00e9;l_”:’l’ri-i5i.a.na.l<\/p>\n
to consider the application and pass ortjiersfeveini’  <\/p>\n
respect of the Inam lands-“‘and.A_in <\/p>\n
amendment of the Act,’ L.Rs\u00aba__of_V_A.the\u00bb.’l_atev.Aricha.lta=,.<\/p>\n
Ananthaiah were advisedv..o:’?to\u00bbfileV’ Formtibeforeii<\/p>\n
the Tribunal seekin-g_.for,o’cctipaVhic_y ri\ufb02_cjh’t’ in respect
\nof the schedule  No.7 was
\nfiled. The__   North Taluk
\nafter ho\u00a7~d’i’n’_gV  lejel.d’ that late.Archaka
\nAnantlwavialiitilf’;ani;i;.:t–h\u00e9j’.pe’titioiiers were in possession
\nand  the schedule property<\/p>\n
and passejd -the-._orcler-‘ggranting occupancy right in<\/p>\n
 fa_v\u20ac>.ur__iAVofVVV_the”‘petitioners 1 to 5 as the name of the<\/p>\n
 ‘ \u00a7:iet.i.tEo.ners.::”5—-_to 11 were left out as they are the<\/p>\n
sons  daughter-in~law of late.Archaka<\/p>\n
 Ananthaiah.\n<\/p>\n
     5. It is further averred that late.M.S.Ramaiah<\/p>\n
….was not an agriculturist and he was a civil<\/p>\n
contractor carrying on civil work and he was not<\/p>\n
K5′<\/p>\n
entitled to hold the schedule property or to’*make<\/p>\n
an application seeking for grant of occupan:cy:44,,rig’hVt<\/p>\n
in respect of the schedule property. <\/p>\n
Chairman of an Educational “1!-“rus’t.—n_  re’s_pon-dent<\/p>\n
in the writ petition, consisti”n,gi*-ohfi indv5_\u00abyid.ual’s::”.and\u00bb,<\/p>\n
association of individuals-.._an,d non.eag.ri_”cul’iu’rist. It V<\/p>\n
appears that late.M,\u00a7.Ra.mai.aijlVc!.aimsto have filed
\nan application to the__j’urisdiictjiionanl.’Special Deputy
\nCommissioner, jurisdiction to
\ngrant the   i{es.pect of the schedule
\npropert-y iS:a_;sed~jo’nV’thlesaigd alleged application,
\nalleged =  V  ‘filed, the Spl. Deputy
\nCommissi-onernlli  holding any enquiry and<\/p>\n
wvi\u00bb*i:i:;o:uht issuing notice to any one of the parties who<\/p>\n
‘  be affected, passed an order granting<\/p>\n
 right on 12\/4\/1977. Aggrieved by the<\/p>\n
 said petitioners filed Appeal No.26-4\/2002<\/p>\n
 “..jn=EV3efore the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal<\/p>\n
 ‘(hereinafter referred to as ‘i(A”l”) and the same is<\/p>\n
impending consideration. The order of granting<\/p>\n
occupancy right in favour of late.Archaka<\/p>\n
\\\/’?7~\u00bb<\/p>\n
Ananthaiah dated 3\/3\/1989 is passed___ in<\/p>\n
accordance with law and the respondents’:ivvithovut<\/p>\n
being in possession and enjoyment of the yscyhetiuiiie <\/p>\n
property, in order to create.:th\u00bbErd piarhtiy”‘ri_gVhtfand V<\/p>\n
obstructions and to claim the’xini.prove’ments. <\/p>\n
property has encroached.,:vy:a’~.Vportio.n ‘C-fyitvheescheiduleii’<\/p>\n
property on the easternyyi-side. and commenced the
\nconstructions  of law and
\nsince the .n1att_er to the
\nunauthorrizxie.’-_g:jV1iA:.:iiQ: contrary to the
\nproviVysions”~\u00bbofthe  th’eVVV.–p\ufb01etitioners apart from
\ninitiatiyng\u00e9i availabie to them
\nin Iavv;\u00bb._._Va,re’  advised to submit a<\/p>\n
re.p5r.es’entatioI’i.,to_vthe respondents 1, 3 and 4,<\/p>\n
are-que.sutingVii”‘vthem to prevent the illegal and<\/p>\n
H  constructions made by the<\/p>\n
respondents 5 to 11 without any sanctioned plan<\/p>\n
  anidy\u00e9cointrary tot he provisions of the Act and since<\/p>\n
respondents 5 to 11 are very powerfui persons,<\/p>\n
2 “petitioners are constrained to file the writ petition<\/p>\n
seeking for the above referred relief.<\/p>\n
x\ufb01
\nV<\/p>\n
\u00ab:12:\u00ab<\/p>\n
8. Learned counsel appearing for-..\u00bb the<\/p>\n
appellantf:i=reiterated the grounds urged <\/p>\n
petition and submitted that the ieaineesdisiiigteL<\/p>\n
Judge ought to have issued’n1a’n.da”.musilVaS_so–u’gh”t<\/p>\n
for and was not justified <\/p>\n
petition filed by the appeilants.\n<\/p>\n
9. We have ‘gAi._\\._..r’\u00a7–~.n carefiu”i~–..consideration to the
\ncontention ofgthe learned ‘coiV;ns’e_lVa”ppearing for the
\nappellants andidissci\u00e9utiniitzedgth~e”nia’terial on record.
\n _’1Vn3ma’te’ri,ai. on record would clearly
\nshow tnatcp on._iVthe of the complaint given<\/p>\n
against responcients .5 to 11, respondents 1 to 4<\/p>\n
 [3-Hsusevdl:’und.er’-:’Section 321 (1) to (3) of the Act and<\/p>\n
res.._pon_vd’e.n:tNo.1 preferred the appeal before the<\/p>\n
 it \u00bb71″he said appeal is dismissed for non-<\/p>\n
ll’-pitoslecution and the application for restoration is<\/p>\n
 …_pending. The averment made in the writ petition<\/p>\n
it would clearly show that the petitioners claim to be<\/p>\n
\\(:\u00bb:.\n<\/p>\n
-: 14 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
is justified and does not suffer from any error or<\/p>\n
illegality as to call for interference in M.t_E*.–ViVs”–.:i}’:.l.fra-<\/p>\n
court app’eal. Accordingly, we pass  <\/p>\n
The appeal isV\u00bbdisn1isVse_cl’. V
\nSince the appeal is it is
\nunnecessary to :thLe.A”‘~appliAcation for
\ncondonation qf  the appeal,<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Ch\u00e9ei \u00a7z3s%ice<\/p>\n
x%_% ; Sd\/_
\n~-a  eeeee JUDQE<\/p>\n
Web lil_’ostA:1’~”Yes\/ No<\/p>\n
 fmvs  s<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 20 November, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 20″ DAY OF Novemasg ‘2bfo–\u00a7’~;. 2 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. 9.9. DINAKARAN, c’_:’t~VII’V\u00e9I=itt’.-IsV””:’v.v.’.rj:.E THE HON’BLE MR.3=i:sI.IcELvL,\u00e9.sABE\u00a7A’ajiT. wan APPEAL No.35{54:_\/’2\u00a7)09.(‘LB-LLJC)L5 BETWEEN: 1 VENKATALAKs;’H’r\u00a7aA:bri:9M7g.._V A AGED:_’AE}Q-UT.?6 I-xfEAR5._ ‘ w\/_.o~ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVenkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-09T04:34:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 20 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-09T04:34:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1241,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-09T04:34:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 20 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-09T04:34:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 20 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-09T04:34:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009"},"wordCount":1241,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009","name":"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-09T04:34:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/venkatalakshmamma-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Venkatalakshmamma vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 20 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21007\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}