{"id":210354,"date":"2009-01-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-12-11T04:28:23","modified_gmt":"2014-12-10T22:58:23","slug":"b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>in THE HIGH court? or KARNATAKA AT ~  &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>DATED 1&#8217;1-us THE 22&#8243; DAY OF JANUARY,&#8217; &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>PRESENT<\/p>\n<p>mm HOWBLE am. P.l). nINAKARAx;&#8217;m?&#8217;uEF J\ufb01g\ufb01c\ufb01 &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>AND _ % 4<br \/>\nTHE I-IOWBLE MR.&amp;\u00a3E_\u00a7TIQE&#8217;;&#8221;V&#8217;# \u00a7,!\u00a7{\ufb013HA!;iIT&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Writ Petitiog No. 142%&#8217; T_<br \/>\nWrit      PIL)<br \/>\nwrit Petjggon No. ;4$:91&#8243;:%:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3_V 2o1&lt;).3j_:&#039;   39 % <\/p>\n<p>Between:  &#8230;.  N &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>B.Krishna Bhai.\n<\/p>\n<p>Aged about 376  V  ._   =<\/p>\n<p>Son of late B. Nan}&#8217;iya:1.a Bhat ; = V <\/p>\n<p>510.399, 3 P Road T  V&#8217;   <\/p>\n<p>Gir\ufb01gagar, Be_inga}ore 5661,08 V : Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>(By    Advocate}<\/p>\n<p>V cf<br \/>\nA _  Principal Sqcmtary<\/p>\n<p>oepa-rtmnjt of Healtll and Medical Services<\/p>\n<p>    &#8216;!_1&#8217;ka_sV$oudI}iaa, Dr Ambcdkar Veeclhi<br \/>\n&#8216; &#8216; .  Bangalore&#8217; 560 ()0 I<\/p>\n<p>   State Government Medical<br \/>\n.  &#8216;\u00a3);\ufb01&lt;:&#039;t:x\u00a7s Association, by its Secretary<\/p>\n<p>.. \ufb01lialisia Rao circic, Bangalore 560 009<\/p>\n<p>3. Medicai Council of india<\/p>\n<p>by its Secretazy,<\/p>\n<p>No.9, Temple Lane, Khotle Road   _<br \/>\nNew Delhi 1 19 011 :Respo&#8217;:Jg:1cI1ts ?&#8217;<br \/>\n(Sm: Niloufer Akbar, AGA for R1;  2 A  .g _ . V V .<br \/>\nSri Ravi Verma Kumar, Senior Advocate, =__for;-\u00a3~.&#8217;a?vi 2\/rams<br \/>\nAssociates, for R2   W  A V&#8211;  &#8216;<br \/>\nSzi N.Khetty, Advocate for R3 )<\/p>\n<p>Writ petition \ufb01led under Articles 326 Sn 227 off the<br \/>\nConstitution of India praying to dixeQt~~&#8211;f3i1\u00e9&#8221;.rc5&amp;pondei1i:s;. 3.\/to 3 to<br \/>\nmake necessary efforts to mstbre &#8216;i;11e_assistancc and<br \/>\nservice to the patients ail over the &#8216; [tails it Wa\u00a7sA.be\u00bbfQm etc,<\/p>\n<p>Writ D\u00a2tit__i_g1_ No.14gs5-gggoas&#8217;  ~ I&#8217;; V<\/p>\n<p>Between:\n<\/p>\n<p>S.V-asudeva,       _<\/p>\n<p>Advocate, aged &#8216;abcut 68 &#8216;3x\u00a7a,;~s  V &#8221;   ~<\/p>\n<p>Ne.?8\/2,Sus1me&#8217;ia Road  <\/p>\n<p>Doddamavallj &#8221; _ Q , <\/p>\n<p>Baliigalore 56,5004 &#8221;     &#8216; :Pet1&#8217;tio}:1er<\/p>\n<p>{Sz*I\u00a73 .Va$u1;l.c\u00a7\u00a7:a,&#8221;;)a1*1;3f-in~;5\u00e9f\u00e9i$i1)<\/p>\n<p>And:  V<\/p>\n<p> .. The G&lt;&#039;m;r1  xmgtit L:\u00ab&#039;\u00a73i&quot;i{a111ata}{a<br \/>\nBy its Chief \ufb01ecyctaxjfr,<br \/>\n. . .&#039;.\u00ab{i\u00a7,_ha12a soudhgz, &#039;Bangalore 560 {)0 1<\/p>\n<p>  I-Ieralth and Famiiy pianning<br \/>\n_  {3(iv;&#039;c:_1i:_1m:\ufb01t of Karnataka<br \/>\n  &quot;ii-ijt&#039;:11:;_3na sjoudha, Bangalore 1<\/p>\n<p>  Diixector of Health,<br \/>\n Govezhment of Karnataka<br \/>\nAntanda rao circle, Bangalore<\/p>\n<p>4. President,<\/p>\n<p>Kazmaizaka Medical O\ufb01ices Association<br \/>\nVictoria Hospital<\/p>\n<p>Bangalore<\/p>\n<p>5. Chairman<br \/>\nIndian Medical Council<\/p>\n<p>No.9, Tempic Lane<\/p>\n<p>Kotle Road  &#8216;  &#8221; &#8216; &#8216;<br \/>\nNew Delhi 110 911 __    :Respo11tioJ:its<\/p>\n<p>( Smt Niloufer Akbar, AGA for R31 \u00abto R7.3;i  ;   .A .,<\/p>\n<p>Sri Ravi Vanna Kumar, Senior Advoc\u00e9tt\u00e9g fc_\u00ab~r_  &#8216;fverxna Kumar<\/p>\n<p>Associates, forR.a4   .  =  7 &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Sri N.Khctty, Advocato..fc:r_R..5 )<br \/>\nWrit petition&#8217; &#8216; Iil\ufb01d  8a 227 of the<\/p>\n<p>Constitution of India, p\u00bbraying to-.direot the jrospondents 1 to 3 to<\/p>\n<p>make necessa1fj*t&#8221;E:\u00a31&#8243;ofts to; restore th\u00e9&#8221;&#8221;medica1 assistance and<\/p>\n<p>service to the patients&#8217;  over tho &#8216;State as it was before etc.,<\/p>\n<p>These Writ  &#8220;op for pxeiioamaxy hearing this<br \/>\nday, tho Court drziivereci  foI1owing:-<\/p>\n<p>V A_ J\ufb01bommxw<br \/>\n   \u00ab t:j{:)\u00a7z1;%;\u00a2r;\u00a7;: by P.\u00a3}.D1nakara11, co.)<\/p>\n<p>  Sinc6.__oommo:t;;:gues\ufb01ons arise for consideration 1&#8217;11 both. the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.(2V&#8217;\u00a3.-it-1\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7,&#8221;{&#8216;.1fl\u20ac}7 am \ufb01\u00e9md together and by consent, they are taken up<\/p>\n<p>:2)&#8221;&#8221;7I&#8217;heso public interest litigations are \ufb01led seeking<\/p>\n<p> writ: or direction to the State of Karnataka to take<\/p>\n<p>W .\n<\/p>\n<p>immediate action to put an end to the strike by doctors svorv1V;it1 g*i_n<\/p>\n<p>the government hospitals and to issue a dizection that  it <\/p>\n<p>practising medicine cannot go on strike a\ufb01&#8217;ecting__ftheV gieneraii&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>pubiic. The prayers also include seeking d\ufb01eceeg :2; tie, <\/p>\n<p>Government and the Ministry of Health  :&#8217;Fami1y[  to it<\/p>\n<p>take appropriate disciplinary _procee\u20aciit2gs agaiesta<br \/>\ndoctors who have acted again&#8221;st_ &#8211; public<br \/>\ninterest and to deal with them,  law; to declare<br \/>\nthat the stnke called   &#8216;fi\ufb01edicai oeieers&#8217;<br \/>\nAssociation,     unconstituticzial<br \/>\nand that tl1ey&#8217;:&#8217;:__I1a\\{eA   from medical service to<br \/>\nwhich they have been  \u00e9iovemment hospital all over<br \/>\nthe State;   Indian Medicai Cou_nci1~ 55*&#8217;-1&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>  action against the members of the<\/p>\n<p>   Association, who have acted iilegaily<\/p>\n<p>T&#8217;  Imco\ufb01stitutioizaiiy.\n<\/p>\n<p>    Viii\ufb01etitioners in these PILS have only vindicated the<\/p>\n<p>   of the public at large and particularly that of the common<\/p>\n<p>it V{j2;3ei1&#8217;4&#8243;e\u00a7&#8217;Hthe society, who are below the middle class, economically<\/p>\n<p> and downtmeiden, and those who mostly need the medicai<\/p>\n<p>facilities of the Government hospitals. The stiike called <\/p>\n<p>Karnataka Medical O\ufb01icers&#8217; Association that the  ~<\/p>\n<p>doctors propose to go on strike from 1&#8217;2.11__.20{)_$ neces&#8217;sl:tatedV  <\/p>\n<p>petitioners to approach this Court in the al3ovt\u00e9_&#8221;P\u20ac3\u20ac.s,&#8217;lt \u00bbt_k1&#8217;atj&#8217;tot\u00a7 if<\/p>\n<p>days after commencement of the strikelV_tJ&#8217;3i_tl1e    <\/p>\n<p>4) NoI1.nal1y&#8217;, this Court jwould   the<br \/>\nPress reports; but at the same  i&#8217;i\u00a7\ufb02&#8217;\ufb01ltawj!&#8217;.  ._proper for this<br \/>\nCourt to close the eyes to the   Press an\u00e9<br \/>\nthe media with   intetisifying the<br \/>\nstrike througl1o11t&#8211;.   boycotting of emergency<br \/>\nservices like   (labour), Medico-legal<br \/>\nservices etc:  the  131 November, 2008.<\/p>\n<p>    to our notice that except in teaching<\/p>\n<p>;_._hos\u00a7:ite33.,_  medical help and treament across the<\/p>\n<p>  hospitals and \u00a5&#8217;rima1y Health Centres that<\/p>\n<p>l  tl3leV.l~:&#8217;Iealt}3. anti Fmily Welfare Department, su\ufb01fezecl.<\/p>\n<p> .\u00a7{oWe1;e:%,VVWe_..\u00a7lso appreciate that some of the doctors were on duty<\/p>\n<p>   .c_a}e of the emergency labour and admizlisfzative sections<\/p>\n<p>1\/ help the yoor age\u00e9 needy, that too with skeletal strength.<\/p>\n<p>3) If any person of medical profusion<br \/>\n(tioctors on duty) were to resort to such strikes,<\/p>\n<p>demivi\ufb01\ufb01 the immediate medical attention   A4<\/p>\n<p>treatment to the persons in real need, the<br \/>\nauthorities should not hesitate   &#8216;<br \/>\npxovisions of the Essential Serviees<br \/>\nAct. 1968 if necessary by tereatin\u00a3.Ati3.e metiieei 1 &#8216;<br \/>\nservices to the person in vree&#8217;i&#8217;~~._nee&#8217;tV&#8217;i to<br \/>\n essential service.&#8221; L\u00bb t  t <\/p>\n<p>{ empha  ._sup&#8217;f\u00a7i\u00a3e;\u00a7A}Vt&#8221; .. __ V ,  &#8216; *~ . . M<\/p>\n<p>1}) Despite ?he&#8217;\u00ab1_eibove c_1i.\u20acetion\u00b0x&#8211;:No,3;\u00abwe are rather<\/p>\n<p>surprised that&#8221;   a very lenient View<br \/>\nagainst the   in November, 2008. Of<br \/>\ncauzse, the Goverexjment  action under Ruie 10643 of<br \/>\nKagjnataka   R&#8221;tde.s__\u00a7::y issuing notices to the doctors who<\/p>\n<p>we1:1t:g);\u00a31\ufb01ro;=,%&amp;A&#8221;*\u00a7.\u00a3).11.2O08 to 13.11.2008 causing much<\/p>\n<p>:;A&#8221;&#8216;.i_\u00a7e1C(}I1Vt3ilE}f&#8217;xf3&#8242;,AVi.](3,fJ  uf&#8217;_i;he&#8217;;= \ufb01ublic health service which is in clear<\/p>\n<p>vifieletion oft&#8217;I.:stajn&#8221;\u00a3I:3i:hf  &#8220;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>pursuance of a strike. We am unable   <\/p>\n<p>taken by the Government in this Iegaid, as in g;t;\u00a7S;9gzri91ation.M<\/p>\n<p>of the directions of the Qivision Bench  iu:sT_s&#8217;i&#8217;1edV}i1;1 Writ<br \/>\npetition No.-43362\/1999 dated &#8216;:I.$&#8217;;3\u00a2.2&lt;.3o5i., I  ~   &#039; &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>12) With the  &#8220;of  the same as<br \/>\nhereunder &#8216; T . A V. &#8216;<br \/>\n&#8220;&#8230;..the 1&#8217;-.\u00a7ta_!:e #i2atl1.{iri1;ie:&gt;s\u00e9:&#8221;&#8216;$ho1ild not hesitate to<br \/>\napply the up:ovisi_6&#8217;s;t.;s~_ d=\u00a3, t!:;\u00e9 Essential Services<br \/>\nMaintenance &#8220;Act, v1S2_68\u00ab,\\if&#8217;z1uecessary by treating the<br \/>\n V.medic;3gl $e:~vice\u00a7 in \u00abperson in real need to be an<\/p>\n<p>13)&#8217;   \u00a7r~;t\u00a7ed law that the govemment servants have<\/p>\n<p>. .  to go  &#8216;strike ether fundamentally, statuto\ufb01ly or mora\ufb01y.<\/p>\n<p>  time and again, have declared that the employees<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A  .\u00a7:{\u00e91;1*\u00a3:_&#8221;&#8216;n&#8221;G fgmdamental right to resort to strike. There is no statutory<\/p>\n<p> fLpn;;vuision empowe\ufb01ng the employees to_ go 013. strike. The<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;C&#8217;t:(VZ!&#8217;V&#8217;+It3I&#8217;I{1I1\u20acIi&#8217;i employees cannot take the society at ransom by going<\/p>\n<p>E1<\/p>\n<p>on striice. Even if there is any injustice to some<br \/>\n(iemocra\ufb01c welfare State, the Government doctors   _<br \/>\nresort to the machinery provided under various   u<br \/>\nnedressal of their grievance. The strike,   in .&#8217;<br \/>\nmisused. which result in n1ai~admi13ist1&#8217;a\u00a7ion.\u00abV&#8221;If&#8217;1::ie<br \/>\nsociety as a whole. \u00a311 a society    ecale<br \/>\nunemployment and number    eagerly<br \/>\nwaiting for employment in the   or in the<br \/>\npublic sector undeI*ta}.:n::gs: ;*  st\ufb01iee  jnsti\ufb01ed on any<\/p>\n<p>equitable ground.\n<\/p>\n<p>14) For  instead of going on strike,<br \/>\nif the gevennznent sexivants&#8217; \u00a310 eotee more work henestly, diiigently<\/p>\n<p>andi.Ve.\ufb01icien\ufb02\u00a7;,  Ages_ture&#8221;;\u00a7eoLdd not only be appreciated by the<\/p>\n<p> autho&#8217;z31&#8217;ty:V   &#8221; at large. The mason being, in a<\/p>\n<p> .r;i em9crae3?  they are government empioyees, they are<\/p>\n<p>A &#8221; ~n paxeeief governing body and owe duty to the society<br \/>\n &#8220;&#8221;-&#8216;:Q.&#8217;~.,(&#8216;;iicVie&#8212;T\u00a5:\u00a7{.R;\u00a7.f\u00a7A.3ARAJAN vs. GQVERNMENT 012&#8217; TAMILNADU AND<br \/>\n&amp;  MR 2003 Sc 3032). of eeuree, in the instant case, few<br \/>\nVVeegcve;enment doctors were sineexeiy working in the hospitals<\/p>\n<p>V\u00a7:1enes\ufb02y and diligentiy not being in\ufb02uenced by the strike calle\u00e9. In<\/p>\n<p>our considered opinion, their sezvices duxing the   _<\/p>\n<p>desexves to be appreciated by the Governmextt and   u <\/p>\n<p>con\ufb01dence that the Government woulci aniqounce &#8216;tad :&#8217;V&#8217; .&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>doctors who worked during the Ielevazrt atriicetpexixnd.<\/p>\n<p>15) It is neediess to  the ti\u00e9veitxment<br \/>\nthat in Karnataka there is also    Kamataka<br \/>\nState Civil Selvices (.   5:5, 1966 which<br \/>\ngoverns the \ufb01eld,  But, we do<br \/>\nnet u31derstanc&#8217;ivt&#8221;ht)x*:I&#8217;VAV.t&#8217;Vi;&#8221;t3:    Act had not been<br \/>\nbrought to the:&#8221;&#8216;.;to&#8217;ti:&lt;:e&#039;    by the authorities or<br \/>\noverlooked by the  Section 3 of the Karnataka<br \/>\nState Qivil  (?re\u00a7e11ti9;r_.tof Strikes) Act, 1966 which governs<\/p>\n<p>the  gates&#039; deVt:\u00a7a1*\u20act\u00a7&quot;&#039;\u00a3.\u00a51at no State Civil Servant shall resort to<\/p>\n<p> ~16)  ob&#039;\u00a7ewed by the: Apex Court in the case of AIR 2003<\/p>\n<p> (:nzp:&#039;a)V,&quot;&#039;wh.ateve1&#039; the reason may be, it may not be proper<\/p>\n<p>  ge\u00bb\u00a7rern&quot;A&#039;2ne11t servants to resort to stnk&#039; 6, even &#039;though they<\/p>\n<p>  Vt ,  ge\ufb01uxltle and bona \ufb01de grievance. That has to be redzessed<\/p>\n<p>&#039;By Iesorting to the mackxinexy prcvided uncier the statutory<\/p>\n<p>powers governing&#039; the government servants, but not a<\/p>\n<p>shake.\n<\/p>\n<p>1&#8242;?) We do acknowledge the seivicieefivoti it<\/p>\n<p>profession as a noble service. Every&#8217; it_3jU.It\u00a2tiA.vC.f\u20aciZ\u20ac1}&#8211;.&#8217;E\u00a5fQ1.3.ght fori<\/p>\n<p>txeatmezit should iIz$tantaneousijg_&amp;&#8217;be   V\u00a5)Vj]:&#8217;CS\u20acI&#8217;VC<br \/>\nlife and thereafter the   allowed to<br \/>\noperate in order to   even any<br \/>\nisolated incident hga\u00e9   assault on a dector,<br \/>\nsuch an   i1\u00e9&#8217;v&#8217;e~V&#8211; been proceeded under<br \/>\ngenera}  iaiw; V  .C311!101T be a gmund for<br \/>\ndeclaring a publicu&#8221; is argued by Szti Ravi Verma<br \/>\n  f:\u00a7e:-:nio1&#8242; ie\u00a3)&#8211;&#8216;aii:;:1\u00a7_e1\u00a2:&#8217;1br the 4*&#8221; respondent that same of<\/p>\n<p>the AiI:i_e&lt;:lAic::2&#039;::.i.. jprgtessitixiais were attacked for the lapses committed.<\/p>\n<p>   &#039;  <\/p>\n<p>V .18)   do not contemplate death by negligence.<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;at the government hospitals positioned to meet the<\/p>\n<p> is, therefore, duty bound to extend medical<\/p>\n<p>  V  Vasisiletiaiieei for pieserving life, as observed by the Apex Court in the<\/p>\n<p>&quot;of PLPARAMANANQ KATARA Vs UMON 09&#039; INDIA Arm<\/p>\n<p>5%&#039;?\n<\/p>\n<p>g&#8217;_WWW,,W,,,t<\/p>\n<p>ma %  <\/p>\n<p>20) We also Iepose our mn\ufb01dence in the .,<br \/>\nkeeping in mind the status of the doctors, which ja.   M<br \/>\nprofession, whether they are employed in Go\\}enunei1t  <\/p>\n<p>elsewheze, the Government will come  a s.o {lufion &#8221;<br \/>\ntheir reasonable grievances prompigly.<\/p>\n<p>21) With these dixeciions, we..r:.1ose   &#8216;1:\u00a7ev\u00a3i&#8217;fio1:1s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>'i _ :i,__.    Vjius\ufb01ce\n\n  Sd\/-2:\n\nIudgm\u00e9\n\n.\/\"\n, 4 r\n\n1Hm=:.x- Yz\"\u00ab;_:\/s;_No  ~\n\n\n\n\"W\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n     \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit in THE HIGH court? or KARNATAKA AT ~ &#8221; DATED 1&#8217;1-us THE 22&#8243; DAY OF JANUARY,&#8217; &#8216; PRESENT mm HOWBLE am. P.l). nINAKARAx;&#8217;m?&#8217;uEF J\ufb01g\ufb01c\ufb01 &#8221; AND _ % 4 THE I-IOWBLE MR.&amp;\u00a3E_\u00a7TIQE&#8217;;&#8221;V&#8217;# \u00a7,!\u00a7{\ufb013HA!;iIT&#8221; Writ Petitiog No. 142%&#8217; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-10T22:58:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-10T22:58:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1735,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009\",\"name\":\"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-10T22:58:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-10T22:58:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-10T22:58:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009"},"wordCount":1735,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009","name":"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-10T22:58:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-krishna-bhat-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-22-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B Krishna Bhat vs State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}