{"id":210613,"date":"2009-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-06-17T09:37:55","modified_gmt":"2016-06-17T04:07:55","slug":"shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1467 of 2005()\n\n\n1. SHAJI, S\/O. THANKAPPANACHARY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BIJU. P.G., S\/O. GOPALAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. P.K. NAVAS, S\/O. KASIN RAWTHER\n\n3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.A.GEORGE\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS\n\n Dated :27\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                            K. M. JOSEPH &amp;\n                    M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.\n               --------------------------------------------------\n                 M.A.C.A.NO. 1467 OF 2005 C\n              ---------------------------------------------------\n                    Dated this the 27th July, 2009\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>K.M. Joseph, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      Since insurance is admitted and counsel represents third<\/p>\n<p>respondent Insurance Company, we dispense with service of<\/p>\n<p>notice to the first respondent. Delay is condoned.<\/p>\n<p>      2. We take up the Appeal itself for hearing and dispense<\/p>\n<p>with service of notice on the first respondent in the Appeal.<\/p>\n<p>      3. The Appeal was filed originally by the claimant in a<\/p>\n<p>petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.<\/p>\n<p>Pending the Appeal, he passed away and the additional<\/p>\n<p>appellants are his wife and two children. The Appeal relate to<\/p>\n<p>the quantum of compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. We heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel appearing on behalf of the third respondent<\/p>\n<p>Insurance Company.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.NO.1467\/05 C              2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     5. As against the claim for Rs.9 Lakhs, the tribunal has<\/p>\n<p>awarded a sum of Rs.3,74,469\/=.        Learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>original claimant pointed out that the deceased was a carpenter,<\/p>\n<p>aged 38 years. He would contend that the tribunal has awarded<\/p>\n<p>only a sum of Rs.3,07,200\/= towards permanent disability and<\/p>\n<p>loss of earning power. This is done by the tribunal by taking 16<\/p>\n<p>as the multiplier and the income at Rs.2,000\/= per month. The<\/p>\n<p>per centage of disability though certified under Ext.A14<\/p>\n<p>Disability Certificate at 90 per cent, the tribunal has fixed<\/p>\n<p>disability at 80 per cent. He would further point out that the<\/p>\n<p>deceased was in hospital for 67 days and the tribunal has<\/p>\n<p>awarded only a consolidated sum of Rs.25,000\/= towards pain<\/p>\n<p>and suffering and loss of amenities together. He lastly points<\/p>\n<p>out that the tribunal has erred in awarding only 6 per cent<\/p>\n<p>interest.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6. The first question to be considered is what is to be the<\/p>\n<p>income. The accident took place in the year 1999. No doubt,<\/p>\n<p>there is oral evidence of the original claimant and his vocation<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.NO.1467\/05 C               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>was carpenter. But, having regard to the year of the accident<\/p>\n<p>and the materials available on record, we are not inclined to<\/p>\n<p>disturb the finding regarding the income. But, we see merit in<\/p>\n<p>the contention of the appellants as regards the per centage of<\/p>\n<p>disability. Apparently, the claimant, as a result of the injuries<\/p>\n<p>became paraplegic. It is pointed out by the appellants that even<\/p>\n<p>for meeting the call of the nature, assistance was required. This<\/p>\n<p>means, having regard to the vocation and his age, it can be<\/p>\n<p>safely taken that he was not in a position to continue to earn any<\/p>\n<p>income. If that is so, we feel that the appellants are justified in<\/p>\n<p>demanding that the per centage of disability should be enhanced<\/p>\n<p>to 100 per cent. We do so. On this basic, the appellants would<\/p>\n<p>be entitled to a sum of Rs.76,800\/= more. Likewise, we also<\/p>\n<p>feel that the appellants should be awarded, having regard to the<\/p>\n<p>period of hospitalisation and the condition obtaining due to the<\/p>\n<p>after-effects of the accident, a sum of Rs.15,000\/= more under<\/p>\n<p>the joint heads &#8220;pain and suffering and loss of amenities&#8221;. Thus,<\/p>\n<p>the appellants are entitled to Rs.91,800\/= which is rounded off<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.NO.1467\/05 C               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>to Rs.92,000\/= more. We also award interest at 7.5 per cent on<\/p>\n<p>the amount already awarded and the amount which we award.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed in part and the appellants are<\/p>\n<p>allowed to realise a sum of Rs.92,000\/= more with 7.5 per cent<\/p>\n<p>interest from the date of the petition till the date of realisation<\/p>\n<p>from the third respondent. We also award interest at 7.5 per cent<\/p>\n<p>instead of 6 per cent on the amount already awarded against the<\/p>\n<p>third respondent from the date of the petition till the date of<\/p>\n<p>realisation.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                    Sd\/=<br \/>\n                                                K.M. JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                    JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                                   Sd\/=<br \/>\n                                       M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS,<br \/>\n                                                    JUDGE<br \/>\nkbk.\n<\/p>\n<p>                     \/\/ True Copy \/\/<br \/>\n                                                   PS to Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1467 of 2005() 1. SHAJI, S\/O. THANKAPPANACHARY, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. BIJU. P.G., S\/O. GOPALAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. P.K. NAVAS, S\/O. KASIN RAWTHER 3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., For Petitioner :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) For Respondent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-17T04:07:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-17T04:07:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":620,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-17T04:07:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-17T04:07:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-17T04:07:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009"},"wordCount":620,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009","name":"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-17T04:07:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shaji-vs-biju-p-g-on-27-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210613"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210613\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}