{"id":210761,"date":"2010-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010"},"modified":"2017-09-11T01:55:29","modified_gmt":"2017-09-10T20:25:29","slug":"united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH\nAT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 28\"\" DAY or JANUARY 2010 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARALI NA_G_Ai'RiAJ:.i_i,:'~  C C' 1\n\nMFA No.29s5\/zoos  ii\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nUnited India Insurance Co, Ltd., \nHospet Branch,  _ \nThrough its Divisional Office, A V\nRadha Govind Complex,  -- if\nKaikini Road, Karwar;3_Z\"  2;   \nRep. By its Divishi-onai5lMgan'a.ger'  \nSri.S.G.Rane.    ~   '\n\n...Appeilant.\n\n(By Sri.N.R.Ki1pije1uir'*fo'r..iBi,iC\";Sieietharama Rao, Advocate.)\n\nAND:\n\n1.   Narasimha Bhovi\n'Agead  25_yi.ears,\n\nChi;--(3iri_sh Nsarasirnha Bhovi\n\n gfxged a,bio.i.1ti05 years,\n\n   \":iKttrn\".\"~\u00abKaVana Narasimha Bhovi\n\n_,r~__Aged\"iabout 02 years,\n\n 2 &amp; 3 being minors,\n'.._I,{e.p.'by their mother the 13' respondent herein.\n\nr\"\"-.{MM'rP'v#\"'\"\"'\u00ab\n\n\n\n2\n\n4. Srnt.Sushee1a Rama Bhovi\nAged about 53 years,\n\n5. Kum.Geetha Rama Bhovi\nAged about 24 years,\n\nAll are R\/o. Itaguli,\nSirsi Taluk.\n\n6. Sri. Roopesh B. Naika,  \nAge: Major, 1\n\nR\/o. Neernalli Cross,\nHuiekal Road, Sirsi. _ ,  \n\ni  ,;.--Re_spVor}fd'ents.\n\n(Smt.Vidya for K.Raghaven*dr_a Rad,' A'Cz\\tVoc.ate,iifor  to\n(R.6 M Notice Served.)\n\nThis  W.C. Act against the\n\njudgment dates 'I8i\/1\/i2ti'Q8iii'paiS~s.e--d in WCA\/SR\/43\/2007 on\n\nthe file of the\u00b0*\u00ab.LabVotir i~-,Office1' and Commissioner for\nWo--rk_men_\u00bb\u00bb'5fIorhpensa\"t'1'o.n_,__gNorth Canara District, Karwar,\n\nawiazfdiiriga evornpertsation of Rs.-\u00a327,140\/~ with interest @\n\n -v'1\"hisi.44\"axpii3:ea'i'i.i coming on for dictating judgment this\n\n C_.our't\" made the following:\n\nE\n\n\n\n3\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>The present appeal is by the insurer opflhthe<\/p>\n<p>Tractor and Trailer respectively bearing re_g&#8217;ist&#8211;r,at..ion-__&#8221;A_<\/p>\n<p>Nos.KA&#8211;3l\/T-386 and 387 owned byJresp&#8217;onci\u00e9;ii&#8217;~vlNs&#8217;oV.5.:i <\/p>\n<p>namely Sri.Rupesh B. Naika. The a&#8217;ppe&#8217;_liaintii&#8217;i_n&#8217;su&#8217;re:fi:&#8217;hais~1..1<\/p>\n<p>challenged in this appeal the legaE._iVty..V_andii&#8217;co_r1\u00b0eVct~nie&#8217;s:s&#8221;&#8216;of the<br \/>\norder dated \u00a38\/l\/2008 pass,-ed inpV.l&#8217;v&#8221;v&#8217;i{:i7f\\,\/S-R\/43720-07\/ion the<\/p>\n<p>file of the Labour Officer  W-i:,l&#8217;rl&lt;r1}.eiiri5&#039;_s.viC__ompensation<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner,  \u00a7:_Kan&#8230;nad\u00abai&quot;&#039;  .D_i_sftrict, Karwar<\/p>\n<p>(hereinafter re&#039;fe&#039;1~&#8211;r_ed to&#039;i:as&#8211;  n1is&#039;si&#039;0&#039;i1er&#039; for short).\n<\/p>\n<p>2)  i his &#8211; Vi  order the learned<br \/>\nCommissioner dir&#8217;ec_:ted.ilthi&#8217;s appellant insurer to pay to the<\/p>\n<p>re&#8217;spoin&#8217;die1iitiiNio&#8217;s.ll&#8217;~t_o 5 herein (respectively claimants No.1<\/p>\n<p> to 5 before &#8216;ti:-e:&#8221;&#8216;l.eariizle&#8217;d Commissioner) a total compensation<\/p>\n<p>i&#8221;.~-oifi&#8217;R.s.4,2i7&#8212;-i_1\u00bb!-ll)\/-&#8220;V&#8217;yvith interest thereon at the rate of 12%<\/p>\n<p> the death of the deceased Narasimha Bovi the<\/p>\n<p>lot; claimant No.l, father of claimant No.2 and 3,<\/p>\n<p>(&#8221;&#8217;\u00a7-\\&#8221;&#8217;\\&#8221;#<\/p>\n<p>son of claimant No.4 and brother of claimant No.5 before<\/p>\n<p>the learned Commissioner in the said case.<\/p>\n<p>3) Heard the arguments of Sri.N.R.Kuppel&#8217;ur_l&#8217;~.;lor<\/p>\n<p>Sri.B.C.Seeth_ararn Rao, the learned counsel-:_:iio&#8217;r5.&#8217;.j[the&#8217;v&#8230;_l&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>appellant insurer and Srnt.\\\/idya, the_.l.earned&#8221;lcvouf;.5el <\/p>\n<p>the respondent&#8211;clairnants. Respondent*.VN&#8217;o.i6lil the<\/p>\n<p>the said Tractor and Trailer has~..fp\u00a7gmain.ed&#8230;ab.se_nti&#8221;gdesplite<br \/>\nreceipt of notice of this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4) The learned counsel ford\u00bb:the._Vil&#8217;appe_llant insurer<\/p>\n<p>strongly con:t:endsiitliaVt,&#8217;VVriVsl&lt;,to.._the Loader employed by the<br \/>\nowner ofthe saidTracistor~a:i_d&#039;&quot;Tir&#039;aliler was not covered under<br \/>\nthe__ insurpapnlcea poli&#039;c-yd&#039; in\/h_i:ch is marked as Ex.Rl and<\/p>\n<p>therefor:e\u00ab.the_ learn-ed Commissioner was not justified in<\/p>\n<p> on this appellant insurer to pay the<\/p>\n<p>__&quot;s-a_idUamount..  compensation to the claimants in the said<\/p>\n<p> A<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>5) Per contra the learned counsel for the<br \/>\nrespondent&#8211;clairnants strongly contends that a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.25\/&#8211; has been collected by the appellant insurer under<\/p>\n<p>the policy at Ex.R1 towards the risk to one <\/p>\n<p>employed by the owner of the said Tractor  aif1d,: ii  <\/p>\n<p>therefore the present appeal deserves to be&#8221;d.2i&#8217;snii.ss~e:d.  <\/p>\n<p>6) The factum of accid_e&#8217;nt, the death the<br \/>\ndeceased as a result of the said acxci&#8211;de&#8221;pn.t,i&#8221;-the reiiiavti.orz&#8217;lship of<\/p>\n<p>the deceased with the claiir_r1an~t,s5i;;&#8217;thiei.V&#8221;_\u00bboiWnership and<\/p>\n<p>insurance  are all not in<br \/>\ndispute. Oniiiperusali of Ex.R1 insurance<br \/>\npolicy, it could   Schedule of Premium reads<br \/>\n 0 V&#8217; p &#8216; &#8230;&#8230; _.\n<\/p>\n<p>  00.0.0&#8242;:~\u00abiiiS&#8217;iC.}Vi.\u00a7&#8217;DULE or iPREMI&#8217;UM<\/p>\n<p>B: T11) mrarsic 785.00<\/p>\n<p> Premium for Trailer 375.00<\/p>\n<p>0 .Cc.e1puls&#8217;ory ?A to Owner&#8211;DriVer 100.00<\/p>\n<p> 0 &#8220;iimouim 200000<\/p>\n<p> employee 1 25.00<br \/>\n Loading on &#8220;FF Premium 1,160.00<\/p>\n<p>Total Liability Premium Rs.2,445.00<\/p>\n<p>(_,~__(\\,.w-~\\_,,.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7) Thus it is clear from the above contents of the<\/p>\n<p>Schedule of Premium that an additional premium of <\/p>\n<p>has been collected by the appellant insurer from_.&#8217;4&#8217;tlae<\/p>\n<p>of the said Tractor and Trailer towards<\/p>\n<p>employee. It is established by the:\u00ab.clia_i_niants_..Epthat<\/p>\n<p>deceased was employed in the sai&#8217;dlc:.:i&#8221;ractlot*-<br \/>\nthe owner thereof as the Loader  as a<br \/>\nresult of the injury  i&#8217;rl:lv&#8217;ltill*.llev:..laceident that<br \/>\noccurred while   Tractor and<br \/>\nTrailer. Ther&#8217;e&#8217;fo&#8211;1&#8217;ei of the learned counsel &#8216;for<br \/>\nthe appellant irisurevr respect of the deceased<br \/>\n as&#8221;&#8221;l&#8217;a:h..e._i.lsoader in the said Tractor and<\/p>\n<p>Trailer&#8221;not;&#8221;&#8216;coiv.ered under Ex.R.1 insurance policy<\/p>\n<p> vi &#8216;cannot be aicce_pt&#8217;e\u00e9;1.e<\/p>\n<p> Th_e&#8221;:.learned counsel for the appellant insurer<\/p>\n<p> the word &#8217;employee&#8217; used in the schedule of<\/p>\n<p>  refers to the driver employed by the owner but not<\/p>\n<p>(W1-*&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;.\u00bb&#8217;*-\u00ab~&#8230;&#8230;\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n<p>to any other employee. This contention cannot be accepted<\/p>\n<p>for the reason that another some of Rs.l00\/- ha.s&#8217;*fb&#8221;ei_enV&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>collected as additional premium in respect of tjhie  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>owner-driver.\n<\/p>\n<p>9) The learned counsel for <\/p>\n<p>cited the following decisions:\n<\/p>\n<p>l) 2007 AIR SCW 728()_____lca_se.._\u00bbbetween _.%<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/doc\/130854\/\">United India Ifisjizjran-ee vs.<br \/>\nSerjerao and<\/a> 0thefsv.&#8217;   &#8216;D it i l<\/p>\n<p>2) 2007 A\u00a7E1&#8243;{:..:VVS\u00abC\\7\u00a7el 37s4..sasxeswween<\/p>\n<p>  vs. Brzj<\/p>\n<p>3) EFAVC&#8217;  Case between<br \/>\n,_&#8217;f!\\\/evv __Inc1ii&#8221;d&#8221;~,A.ssurance Co. Ltd., vs.<\/p>\n<p>2  5:4dr\u00a7i&#8217;esf4jKu&#8217;mari and others.\n<\/p>\n<p>liIi\\._  1382 case between The<br \/>\n Manager, vs. Smt.\/Ikkawwa<\/p>\n<p> __ A alnfothers.\n<\/p>\n<p>o~\u00a7i5)l.Vl&#8221;iAIR 2004 sc 4338 case between<br \/>\nT.  WNati0nal Insurance Co. Ltd, vs.<\/p>\n<p>Chim\/zamma and others.\n<\/p>\n<p>r__\u00a7-&#8220;&#8216;-\u00a2*&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;-&#8220;&#8216;-\u00bb..-=&#8211;~&#8212;-~\\_:,<\/p>\n<p>Suffice it to say that the principles laid down in the above<\/p>\n<p>said decisions need not be discussed in detaii in viewj&#8217;o..f&#8217;f\u00abt_h&#8217;c,<\/p>\n<p>fact that risk in respect of one person employed &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>owner of the said Tractor and Trail.-e&#8217;r&#8221;i:\u00abas &#8216;i.4beenf&#8217;-ctoyeriedii\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>under EX.R.l insurance policy. Therefo&#8217;r_e;*.E am o&#8217;fAtht3~ Vi.4e&#8217;Wy ii<\/p>\n<p>that the learned Commissioner&#8221;&#8221;i&#8217;.h&#8217;as righi_tl&#8221;y_.&#8217;.1heldiii the<br \/>\nappellant insurer liable  pay ainount of<br \/>\nCompensation to the re_sp0ndAe.t1t_&#8211;cVlaii&#8217;r1&#8242;;:an&#8221;t\u00a7&amp;*..f.,&#8217;; .. <\/p>\n<p>10) For the 3._rea;soins.viiaforeisaidf.tihe&#8221;&#8216;p&#8217;resent appeal is<\/p>\n<p>hereby  merits. Whatever<\/p>\n<p>amount is deposiiited  insurer with this Court<\/p>\n<p>in this apppepalikshall.  iitransmitted to the learned<\/p>\n<p>C9&#8217;&#8211;.(3::t1f[&#8216;3iI3&#8217;_I.1satiiioini&#8217;Commissioner concerned for its<br \/>\n  the claimants.\n<\/p>\n<p>gal&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7UE\u00aeE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28&#8243;&#8221; DAY or JANUARY 2010 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARALI NA_G_Ai&#8217;RiAJ:.i_i,:&#8217;~ C C&#8217; 1 MFA No.29s5\/zoos ii BETWEEN: United India Insurance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-210761","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-10T20:25:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-10T20:25:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":944,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010\",\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-10T20:25:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-10T20:25:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-10T20:25:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010"},"wordCount":944,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010","name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-10T20:25:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/united-india-insurance-co-ltd-vs-smt-sangeetha-narasimha-bhovi-on-28-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sangeetha Narasimha Bhovi on 28 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210761","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=210761"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/210761\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=210761"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=210761"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=210761"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}