{"id":211036,"date":"2009-11-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-05T09:19:02","modified_gmt":"2015-09-05T03:49:02","slug":"ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: V. A. Naik<\/div>\n<pre>                                              1\n\n               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY:\n                              NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                       \n                          WRIT PETITION NO.2767 OF 2001\nPETITIONER:\n\n\n\n\n                                                               \n      M\/s Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot, through its Partner Smt. Aruna wd\/o Vinodrao\n      Vora, aged major, occ. Nil, r\/o Anand Villa Building Ambapeth, Amravati\n\n\n\n\n                                                              \n                                          VERSUS\nRESPONDENTS:\n1]     Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar, aged 40 years, resident of near Vijay Oil Mills, Vilas\n\n\n\n\n                                                  \n      Nagar, Amravati.\n2]    Member, Indusdtrial Tribunal, Maharashtra [Amravati Bench] Amravati.\n                                  \n==============================================================\nShri V.M. Deshpande, advocate for the petitioner.\n                                 \nNone for the respondent.\n==============================================================\nCORAM  : SMT. VASANTI  A. NAIK, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>DATE :   3rd November , 2009<br \/>\n                            .\n<\/p>\n<p>ORAL JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>      By   this   petition,   the   petitioner   impugns   the   judgment     passed   by   the <\/p>\n<p>Member, Industrial Court on 6.12.2000 allowing the revision application filed by <\/p>\n<p>the respondent \/ complainant.\n<\/p>\n<p>2]    The respondent is the original complainant. He filed a complaint before the <\/p>\n<p>Labour   Court,   Amravati   under   section   28   of   the   Maharashtra   Recognition   of <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                               ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 15:16:12 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Trade Unions &amp; Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act of 1971 seeking his <\/p>\n<p>reinstatement   in   service   and   alleged   unfair   labour   practice   under   Item   9   of <\/p>\n<p>Schedule IV of the Act of 1971.\n<\/p>\n<p>3]     Since it was mentioned in the paragraph 1 of the complaint that from 1974 <\/p>\n<p>the respondent was working as a Manager, a preliminary objection was raised by <\/p>\n<p>the   petitioner   to   the   tenability   of   the   complaint   on   the   ground   that   the <\/p>\n<p>respondent   was   not   a   workman   within   the   meaning   of   the   term   under   the <\/p>\n<p>provisions   of   section   2(S)   of   the   Industrial   Disputes  Act.   It   was  stated  in   the <\/p>\n<p>preliminary   objection   that   the   respondent   was   discharging   the   duties   of <\/p>\n<p>supervisory and managerial nature and the complaint filed by respondent was <\/p>\n<p>not   tenable.   The   complainant   denied  that   he   was  discharging   the   duties  of   a <\/p>\n<p>Manager and was supervising and controlling the affairs of the firm. On perusing <\/p>\n<p>the   complaint   and   the   say,   the   Presiding   Officer,   Labour   Court,   Amravati <\/p>\n<p>dismissed the complaint filed by the respondent by an order dated 28.10.1993. It <\/p>\n<p>was observed in the order dated 28.10.1993 that the complainant was working <\/p>\n<p>as Manager and hence the complaint was not tenable.  The order passed by the <\/p>\n<p>Labour   Court   on   28.10.1993   was   challenged   by   the   respondent   in   a   revision <\/p>\n<p>before   the   Industrial   Court,   Amravati.   The   Industrial   Court,   Amravati   by   the <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                    ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 15:16:12 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                             3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>impugned order dated 6.12.2000 set aside the order passed by the Labour Court <\/p>\n<p>on 28.10.1993 and directed the Labour Court to decide the matter in the light of <\/p>\n<p>the observations made in the impugned order.\n<\/p>\n<p>4]    Shri V. M. Deshpande, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that <\/p>\n<p>the respondent had himself mentioned in paragraph 1 of the complaint that he <\/p>\n<p>was working as Manager and since the respondent was discharging his duties as <\/p>\n<p>Manager and had supervisory control over the affairs of the firm, he was not a <\/p>\n<p>workman, within the meaning of the term under the provisions of the Industrial <\/p>\n<p>Disputes Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Labour <\/p>\n<p>Court had rightly dismissed the complaint by an order dated 28.10.1993 and it <\/p>\n<p>was not proper on the part of the Industrial Court to have allowed the revision <\/p>\n<p>filed by the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner then submitted <\/p>\n<p>that on a perusal of the objection and the say of the complainant, it is clear that <\/p>\n<p>the   complainant   was   working   in   the   managerial   capacity   and   was   not   a <\/p>\n<p>workman.\n<\/p>\n<p>5]    None appears on behalf of the respondent\/ complainant.\n<\/p>\n<p>6]    On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                            ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 15:16:12 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>complaint, preliminary objection, the say of the complainant, as also the order <\/p>\n<p>dated  28.10.1993   and  impugned  order   dated  26.12.2000,   it   appears   that   the <\/p>\n<p>order passed by the Industrial Court at Amravati on 6.12.2000 is just and proper.\n<\/p>\n<p>The respondent had merely stated in paragraph 1 of the complaint that he was <\/p>\n<p>working as a Manager. None of the paragraphs of the complaint  speak about the <\/p>\n<p>duties   which   were   actually     performed   by   the   respondent.   Though   in   the <\/p>\n<p>preliminary   objection   it   is   stated   by   the   petitioner   that   the   respondent   was <\/p>\n<p>discharging the duties of Manager and used to supervise and control affairs of <\/p>\n<p>the firm, this fact has been specifically denied by the respondent in the say filed <\/p>\n<p>by the respondent. In such a background, in the absence of any evidence or in <\/p>\n<p>the absence  of the admitted position that the respondent was  performing the <\/p>\n<p>duties in the managerial and supervisory capacity, the Presiding Officer, Labour <\/p>\n<p>Court had committed an error in dismissing the complaint by the order dated <\/p>\n<p>28.10.1993. The Industrial Court rightly held that the designation of a person <\/p>\n<p>would not be a  decisive factor for deciding the question as to whether the person <\/p>\n<p>falls within the definition of  the   term workman or not. The Industrial Court <\/p>\n<p>rightly held that it is the nature of the work and the duties which is a decisive <\/p>\n<p>factor. These aspects, according to the Industrial Court were not considered by <\/p>\n<p>the   Labour   Court   and   the   complaint   was   dismissed   merely   because   the   word <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                 ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 15:16:12 :::<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                   5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Manager&#8221;   was   used   in   paragraph   1   of   the   complaint.   The   Industrial   Court <\/p>\n<p>rightly held that the order of the Labour Court could not have been sustained as <\/p>\n<p>it was not a reasoned order. The Industrial Court observed that this aspect of the <\/p>\n<p>matter needs to be considered in detail and it is desirable that the court should <\/p>\n<p>decide   this   issue   only   after   permitting   the   parties   to   file   their   pleadings   and <\/p>\n<p>tender evidence on the same. The approach of the Industrial Court in considering <\/p>\n<p>the revision is just and reasonable, so also is the impugned order as the Industrial <\/p>\n<p>Court  has clearly stated that it would  be desirable  that  the  parties should  be <\/p>\n<p>allowed   to   file   the   pleadings   and   the   material   documents   before   the   Labour <\/p>\n<p>Court   for   deciding   the   issue   of   jurisdiction.   There   is   nothing   wrong   with   the <\/p>\n<p>order passed by  the  Industrial  Court  on 6.12.2000 as  the  complaint does  not <\/p>\n<p>disclose the nature of the duties performed by the respondent and it is not an <\/p>\n<p>admitted   position   that   the   respondent   was   performing   his   duties   in   the <\/p>\n<p>managerial capacity.\n<\/p>\n<p>7]     In the result, the writ petition is dismissed with no orders as to costs. Rule <\/p>\n<p>stands discharged<\/p>\n<p>                                                                         JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>SMP<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                    ::: Downloaded on &#8211; 09\/06\/2013 15:16:12 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009 Bench: V. A. Naik 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2767 OF 2001 PETITIONER: M\/s Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot, through its Partner Smt. Aruna wd\/o Vinodrao Vora, aged major, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-05T03:49:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-05T03:49:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":948,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-05T03:49:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-05T03:49:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-05T03:49:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009"},"wordCount":948,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009","name":"M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-05T03:49:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-amravati-coal-cke-depot-vs-uddavrao-marotrao-mankar-on-5-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Amravati Coal &amp; Cke Depot vs Uddavrao Marotrao Mankar on 5 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211036\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}