{"id":211040,"date":"2009-07-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-26T09:05:48","modified_gmt":"2016-11-26T03:35:48","slug":"anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 15719 of 2009(O)\n\n\n1. ANTO THOMAS KANICHAI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SHAJI, AGED 36 YEARS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. PRADEEP, AGED 39 YEARS,\n\n3. STATE OF KERALA,\n\n4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,\n\n5. THE GEOLOGIST,\n\n6. VILLAGE OFFICER,\n\n7. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :08\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n             S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n                 -------------------------------\n             W.P.(C).NO.15719 OF 2009 (O)\n               -----------------------------------\n          Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009\n\n                     J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
    The writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:<\/p>\n
         i) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other
\n         appropriate writ or direction calling for the
\n         entire records in pursuant of Ext.P4,
\n         dismissal order passed by the Honourable
\n         Munsiff’s Court, Chalakkudy, in I.A.No.444\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         (a)\/2009 in O.S.No.121\/2009 scrutinize and
\n         quash the same.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         ii)   to issue a writ in the nature of
\n         mandamus       directing    the     Honourable
\n         Munsiff Court, Chalakkudy to declare that
\n         petitioner is a necessary party in the
\n         proceedings     of    O.S.No.121\/2009       and
\n         implead    the    petitioner    as    additional
\n         defendant.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         iii) to grant any other reliefs or directions
\n         which are deemed fit and proper to meet
\n         the ends of justice.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         iv) to allow this writ petition (c) with costs.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
    2. Petitioner is stated to be the managing partner of a<\/p>\n
tile factory and an office bearer of All Kerala Tile<\/p>\n
Manufacturers Federation, Trissur. He moved an application<\/p>\n
WPC.15719\/09                   2<\/span><\/p>\n
to get himself impleaded as an additional defendant in<\/p>\n
O.S.No.121\/2009 filed by respondents 1 and 2 for a<\/p>\n
prohibitory injunction to restrain the State, its officers and<\/p>\n
others impleaded as defendants in that suit from unauthorised<\/p>\n
removal of soil from the plaint property, without filling up the<\/p>\n
ditches that had been formed by removal of soil from those<\/p>\n
properties. The application moved by the petitioner under<\/p>\n
Order I Rule 10 (2) of CPC was objected to by the plaintiffs,<\/p>\n
and after hearing both sides, the learned Munsiff dismissed<\/p>\n
that application. Ext.P4 is the copy of that order. Propriety<\/p>\n
and correctness of that order is challenged in the writ petition<\/p>\n
invoking the supervisory jurisdiction vested with this Court<\/p>\n
under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n
       3.    Notice   was    ordered   to    the  respondents.\n<\/p>\n
Govt. Pleader has taken notice for respondents 3 to 7. Though<\/p>\n
notice is served, respondents 1 and 2, the plaintiffs before the<\/p>\n
court below have not entered appearance. I heard the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Govt. Pleader.<\/p>\n
Petitioner is a necessary party and he will be seriously<\/p>\n
affected if any decree is passed as prayed for by the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
WPC.15719\/09                    3<\/span><\/p>\n
in the suit, is the submission of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioner.   Petitioner and several tile factory owners are<\/p>\n
depending upon the raw material of clay for running their<\/p>\n
business, and hence, any prohibitory injunction passed in the<\/p>\n
suit would have disastrous effect in running their factories,<\/p>\n
and so much so, he is a necessary party and if not, atleast a<\/p>\n
proper party in the suit, and his application ought have been<\/p>\n
allowed by the court below, according to his counsel.<\/p>\n
       4. Petitioner has filed an application in his individual<\/p>\n
capacity though he claims to be the managing partner of a<\/p>\n
firm, a tile factory. The question to be considered is whether<\/p>\n
his impleadment in the suit filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents<\/p>\n
seeking reliefs against the defendants already impleaded in<\/p>\n
that suit is warranted. True, the petitioner may be affected by<\/p>\n
the decree of injunction if allowed in the suit as claimed by the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs. But it has to be noted that the relief sought for is<\/p>\n
only against unauthorised and illegal removal of the soil from<\/p>\n
the plaint properties.    Nobody could object to that relief<\/p>\n
because, necessarily, a permit or licence, as contemplated by<\/p>\n
the rules, is required for removal of soil for commercial<\/p>\n
WPC.15719\/09                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
purposes. Further more, it is evident from the claim of the<\/p>\n
petitioner that his interest is commercial, that is, in<\/p>\n
connection with the running of his business of a tile factory.<\/p>\n
That is also to be taken into account whether he can come and<\/p>\n
get himself impleaded in the suit, which is filed by another<\/p>\n
seeking relief against the State and its public officers.<\/p>\n
Plaintiff is the master of the suit and he should be given the<\/p>\n
freedom to select as to from whom the reliefs are to be<\/p>\n
claimed unless it is shown that the reliefs claimed so by the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs cannot be granted without the presence of the<\/p>\n
petitioner in the party array. Petitioner has no right to claim<\/p>\n
that he should be impleaded as an additional defendant in the<\/p>\n
suit. I do not find any illegality or impropriety in the order<\/p>\n
passed by the learned Magistrate turning down the request of<\/p>\n
the petitioner for impleadment as an additional defendant.<\/p>\n
       Writ petition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                             S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
\n                                       JUDGE
\nprp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 15719 of 2009(O) 1. ANTO THOMAS KANICHAI, … Petitioner Vs 1. SHAJI, AGED 36 YEARS, … Respondent 2. PRADEEP, AGED 39 YEARS, 3. STATE OF KERALA, 4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, 5. THE GEOLOGIST, 6. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-26T03:35:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T03:35:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":738,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T03:35:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-26T03:35:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T03:35:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009"},"wordCount":738,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009","name":"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T03:35:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anto-thomas-kanichai-vs-shaji-on-8-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anto Thomas Kanichai vs Shaji on 8 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211040"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211040\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}