{"id":211210,"date":"2011-09-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011"},"modified":"2017-07-25T07:59:59","modified_gmt":"2017-07-25T02:29:59","slug":"state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik &#8230; on 12 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik &#8230; on 12 September, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A K Patnaik<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: R.V. Raveendran, A.K. Patnaik<\/div>\n<pre>                                                                          Reportable\n\n\n              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA\n\n\n\n               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n\n           CIVIL APPEAL NO.   7785        OF 2011\n\n          (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) NO.9154 OF 2008)\n\n                                       \n\nState of West Bengal                                          ... Appellant\n\n\n\n                                 Versus\n\n\n\nHowrah Ganatantrik Nagarik Samity \n\n&amp; Ors.                                                          ... Respondents\n\n\n\n\n\n                                O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>A. K. PATNAIK, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Delay condoned.  Leave granted.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    This   is   an   appeal   against   the   order   dated   28.09.2007 <\/p>\n<p>      of   the   Division   Bench   of   the   Calcutta   High   Court   in <\/p>\n<p>      Writ Petition No. 7987 (W) of 2002.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    The facts  very briefly  are  that during  the British  rule, <\/p>\n<p>      Victoria   Memorial   Hall   was   built   in   the   memory   of <\/p>\n<p>      Queen   Victoria   in   Central   Kolkata.                      After <\/p>\n<p>      independence,  this  monument   continues  to  be  known <\/p>\n<p>      for   its   beautiful   architecture   and   green   surroundings.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      To   the   north   of   the   Victoria   Memorial   Hall   is   a   huge <\/p>\n<p>      stretch of land known as `the Maidan&#8217; which is covered <\/p>\n<p>      by green grass and interspersed with a large number of <\/p>\n<p>      trees, bushes and shrubs.  At the end of about 2 kms.\n<\/p>\n<p>      of   this   greenery   is   the   Esplanade   where   another <\/p>\n<p>      monument known as the `Sahid Minar&#8217; stands, and by <\/p>\n<p>      the   side   of   the  Sahid   Minar  is   a   bus   terminus.     To <\/p>\n<p>      protect and preserve the Victoria Memorial Hall and its <\/p>\n<p>      green   surroundings,   a   public   interest   litigation   (Writ <\/p>\n<p>      Petition No. 7987(W) of 2002) was filed in the Calcutta <\/p>\n<p>      High Court by the respondent nos. 1 to 5.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.        After   hearing   all   concerned   parties   and   considering <\/p>\n<p>      the concerned affidavits and counter-affidavits  as well <\/p>\n<p>      as   recommendations   of   expert   bodies   including   the <\/p>\n<p>      National         Environmental            Engineering         Research <\/p>\n<p>      Institute   (for   short   `NEERI&#8217;),   the   High   Court  inter   alia <\/p>\n<p>      directed in the impugned order that the bus terminus <\/p>\n<p>      at   Esplanade   be   shifted   to   a   distant   place   within   six <\/p>\n<p>      months.     Aggrieved  by   this   direction   in   the   impugned <\/p>\n<p>      order, the State of West Bengal is in appeal before us.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>5.    Learned   counsel   for   the   appellant   submitted   that   the <\/p>\n<p>      High   Court   could   not   have   issued   directions   to   the <\/p>\n<p>      State Government to shift the bus terminus located at <\/p>\n<p>      Esplanade, which had been in existence for more than <\/p>\n<p>      six decades only on the recommendation of NEERI.  He <\/p>\n<p>      submitted that lakhs of people every day arrive at and <\/p>\n<p>      depart from the bus terminus at Esplanade and this is <\/p>\n<p>      because the bus terminus is located  in a central area <\/p>\n<p>      of   Kolkata.     He   submitted   that   shifting   of   the   bus <\/p>\n<p>      terminus   from   Esplanade   will   thus   cause   immense <\/p>\n<p>      inconvenience   to   the   traveling   public.     He   further <\/p>\n<p>      submitted that the bus terminus is situated 2 kms. to <\/p>\n<p>      the north of Victoria Memorial Hall and does not at all <\/p>\n<p>      damage   this   historic   monument.     The   High   Court, <\/p>\n<p>      therefore,   was   not   right   in   thinking   that   for <\/p>\n<p>      preservation   of   the   Victoria   Memorial   Hall,   shifting   of <\/p>\n<p>      the bus terminus was necessary.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    The   respondent   no.2,   who   appeared   in-person   on <\/p>\n<p>      behalf   of   respondent   no.   1,   on   the   other   hand,   relied <\/p>\n<p>      on   the   recommendation   of   NEERI   that   the   bus <\/p>\n<p>      terminus at Esplanade area should be shifted from the <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      existing   location.   He   submitted   that   the   High   Court <\/p>\n<p>      was, therefore, right in directing the shifting of the bus <\/p>\n<p>      terminus   from   Esplanade   within   six   months.     He <\/p>\n<p>      submitted that this is not a fit case in which this Court <\/p>\n<p>      should   interfere   with   the   impugned   order   of   the   High <\/p>\n<p>      Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.    We have considered the submissions made on behalf of <\/p>\n<p>      the   appellant   and   the   respondents   and   we   find   that <\/p>\n<p>      NEERI   has   suggested   some   long   term   measures   for <\/p>\n<p>      preservation  of  the  Victoria  Memorial Hall in Para  5.2 <\/p>\n<p>      of   its   report.     The   relevant   portion   of   Para   5.2   of   the <\/p>\n<p>      report of NEERI  is quoted hereinbelow:\n<\/p>\n<p>      &#8220;5.2    LONG-TERM MEASURES<\/p>\n<p>      Diversion   of   Heavy   Road   Traffic   on   the   Road <\/p>\n<p>      Encircling the VM Monument.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The   pollution   from   auto   exhaust   is   the   most <\/p>\n<p>      important   causative   factor   when   the   Victoria <\/p>\n<p>      Memorial            protection              from         atmospheric <\/p>\n<p>      environment is considered.   Therefore, the traffic <\/p>\n<p>      on   roads   around   the   VM   should   be   minimum <\/p>\n<p>      particularly   complete   banning   of   heavy   traffic.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Bus   terminus   at   Esplanade   Area   (Commercial) <\/p>\n<p>      should also be shifted from the existing location.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>8.    It   will   be   clear   from   the   recommendation   of   NEERI, <\/p>\n<p>      quoted   above,   that   shifting   of   the   bus   terminus   at <\/p>\n<p>      Esplanade   area   has   been   suggested   by   NEERI   as   a <\/p>\n<p>      long-term measure and not as an immediate measure.\n<\/p>\n<p>      A   bus   terminus,   where   lakhs   of   people   arrive   and <\/p>\n<p>      depart through different buses, if shifted immediately, <\/p>\n<p>      will   cause   a   lot   of   inconvenience   to   the   traveling <\/p>\n<p>      public.     Moreover,   before   the   bus   terminus   is   shifted <\/p>\n<p>      from   Esplanade,   another   suitable   place   has   to   be <\/p>\n<p>      found   out   to   which   the   bus   terminus   can   be   shifted <\/p>\n<p>      and   various   conveniences   have   to   be   provided   for   the <\/p>\n<p>      traveling   public   at   the   new   bus   terminus.     All   this <\/p>\n<p>      cannot   be   done   within   a   period   of   six   months.     The <\/p>\n<p>      High Court, therefore, was not justified in directing in <\/p>\n<p>      the   impugned   order   that   the   bus   terminus   at <\/p>\n<p>      Esplanade be shifted within six months.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.      The   recommendation   of   the   NEERI,   quoted   above, <\/p>\n<p>      however,   is   emphatic   that   auto   exhaust   is   the   most <\/p>\n<p>      important   causative   factor   polluting   the   atmospheric <\/p>\n<p>      environment   around   Victoria   Memorial   Hall.     For   this <\/p>\n<p>      reason,   NEERI   has   recommended   that   the   traffic   on <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       roads   around   the   Victoria   Memorial   Hall   should   be <\/p>\n<p>       minimum   and   the   bus   terminus   at   Esplanade   area <\/p>\n<p>       should   be   shifted   from   the   existing   location.     Hence, <\/p>\n<p>       even though the bus terminus is located 2 kms. away <\/p>\n<p>       from   Victoria   Memorial   Hall   the   auto-exhaust   from   a <\/p>\n<p>       large   number   of   buses   at   the   bus   terminus   would <\/p>\n<p>       pollute   the   atmospheric   environment   around   the <\/p>\n<p>       <a href=\"\/doc\/1208005\/\">Victoria Memorial Hall.  In M.C. Mehta v. Union of India  <\/p>\n<p>       &amp;   Ors.<\/a>   [(1997)   2   SCC   353],   this   Court   has   directed <\/p>\n<p>       relocation   industries   from   Taj   Trapezium   Zone   (TTZ) <\/p>\n<p>       for   protection   and   preservation   of   the   Taj   Mahal   in <\/p>\n<p>       Agra.     The   recommendation   by   NEERI   that   the   bus <\/p>\n<p>       terminus   should   be   shifted   from   Esplanade   area   as  a <\/p>\n<p>       long-term measure to protect and preserve the Victoria <\/p>\n<p>       Memorial   Hall,   deserves   serious   consideration,   not <\/p>\n<p>       only   to   preserve  the   monument   but   to   de-congest   the <\/p>\n<p>       city.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.        We   accordingly   modify   the   impugned   order   of   the <\/p>\n<p>       High   Court   and   direct   the   State   Government   to <\/p>\n<p>       consider   and   take   appropriate   action   on   the   NEERI <\/p>\n<p>       report   recommending   relocation   of   the   bus   terminus <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       away from the Esplanade.  The appeal is allowed to the <\/p>\n<p>       extent indicated above. No order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                      &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                            (R. V. Raveendran)<\/p>\n<p>                                                      &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                            (A. K. Patnaik)<\/p>\n<p>New Delhi,<\/p>\n<p>September 12, 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                  Reportable<\/p>\n<p>                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA<\/p>\n<p>                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION<\/p>\n<p>       SPECIAL LEAVE PETTION (C) NOs.1135-1136 OF 2009<\/p>\n<p>Friends of Victoria Memorial                                        &#8230; Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>                                  Versus<\/p>\n<p>Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik Samity <\/p>\n<p>&amp; Ors.                                                           &#8230; Respondents<\/p>\n<p>                                 O R D E R<\/p>\n<p>A. K. PATNAIK, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Delay condoned.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     These Special Leave Petitions under Article 136 of the <\/p>\n<p>       Constitution   are   directed   against   the   orders   dated <\/p>\n<p>       28.09.2007   and   15.02.2008   of   the   Division   Bench   of <\/p>\n<p>       the Calcutta High Court in Writ Petition No.7987 (W) of <\/p>\n<p>       2002.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.       The facts very briefly are that during the British rule, <\/p>\n<p>       Victoria   Memorial   Hall   was   built   in   the   memory   of <\/p>\n<p>       Queen   Victoria   in   Central   Kolkata.                         After <\/p>\n<p>       independence,  this  monument   continues  to  be  known <\/p>\n<p>       for   its   beautiful   architecture   and   green   surroundings.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      To   the   north   of   the   Victoria   Memorial   Hall   is   a   huge <\/p>\n<p>      stretch of land known as `the Maidan&#8217; which is covered <\/p>\n<p>      by green grass and interspersed with a large number of <\/p>\n<p>      trees, bushes and shrubs.  To protect and preserve the <\/p>\n<p>      Victoria   Memorial   Hall   and   its   green   surroundings,   a <\/p>\n<p>      public   interest   litigation   (Writ   Petition   No.   7987(W)   of <\/p>\n<p>      2002)   was   filed   in   the   Calcutta   High   Court   by   the <\/p>\n<p>      respondent nos. 1 to 5.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      After   hearing   all   concerned   parties   and   considering <\/p>\n<p>      the petitions, affidavits and counter affidavits and the <\/p>\n<p>      recommendations   of   expert   bodies,   the   High   Court, <\/p>\n<p>      inter   alia,   directed   in   the   impugned   order   dated <\/p>\n<p>      28.09.2007   that   parking   of   all   cars   around   the <\/p>\n<p>      compound of the Victoria Memorial Hall shown as red-\n<\/p>\n<p>      marked portions in the annexed map and nearby areas <\/p>\n<p>      would be immediately prohibited and such prohibition <\/p>\n<p>      would   continue   for   24   hours   every   day   including   the <\/p>\n<p>      holidays.     A   group   of   persons   describing   itself   as   `the <\/p>\n<p>      Friends of Victoria Memorial&#8217; then filed an application <\/p>\n<p>      before the High Court for modification of the aforesaid <\/p>\n<p>      direction so as to permit morning walkers to park their <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      cars in the north and south zones of Victoria Memorial <\/p>\n<p>      Hall   for   two   hours   in   the   early   morning.     The   High <\/p>\n<p>      Court,   however,   dismissed   the   application   by   the <\/p>\n<p>      impugned   order   dated   15.02.2008   saying   that   car <\/p>\n<p>      parking   has   only   been   prohibited   around   Victoria <\/p>\n<p>      Memorial   Hall   and   persons   desirous   of   morning   walk <\/p>\n<p>      may go to the Maidan which was lying vacant and may <\/p>\n<p>      also   walk   by   the   side   of   Ganges   or   the   Eden   Garden <\/p>\n<p>      area   and   the   area   around   the   grounds   of   Mohun <\/p>\n<p>      Bagan, East Bengal and Mohammedan Sporting Clubs <\/p>\n<p>      where there was no restriction of parking the vehicles.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Aggrieved,   the   petitioner   has   filed  these   Special   Leave <\/p>\n<p>      Petitions.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.           We have heard learned counsel for the parties and <\/p>\n<p>      we   find   from   the   recommendations   of   the   Expert <\/p>\n<p>      Committee   (annexed   to   the   Special   Leave   Petitions   as <\/p>\n<p>      Annexure   P1)   that   a   Committee   of   Experts   has <\/p>\n<p>      observed   that   parking   activities   add   to   pollution   load <\/p>\n<p>      around   the   Victoria   Memorial   Hall   and   have <\/p>\n<p>      accordingly recommended that the parking of vehicles <\/p>\n<p>      on   all   sides   of   the   Victoria   Memorial   Hall   compound <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      should   be   totally   banned.   The   High   Court   appears   to <\/p>\n<p>      have considered these recommendations of the Expert <\/p>\n<p>      Committee   and   directed   in   the   impugned   order   dated <\/p>\n<p>      28.09.2007 that parking around the Victoria Memorial <\/p>\n<p>      Hall on the red-marked portions of the map would be <\/p>\n<p>      prohibited.     The   High   Court   has   also   indicated   in   the <\/p>\n<p>      impugned   order   dated   15.02.2008   that   there   were <\/p>\n<p>      many   other   places   in   Kolkata,   such   as  Maidan,   the <\/p>\n<p>      Eden Garden area and the area around the grounds of <\/p>\n<p>      Mohun   Bagan,   East   Bengal   and   Mohammedan <\/p>\n<p>      Sporting   Clubs   as   well   as   the   area   by   the   side   of   the <\/p>\n<p>      river Ganges where there was no restriction of parking <\/p>\n<p>      the   vehicles.     Those   who   want  to   walk  and   take   their <\/p>\n<p>      cars   to   the   place   of   their   walk   thus   have   sufficient <\/p>\n<p>      number of alternative places in Kolkata where they can <\/p>\n<p>      go for their morning walks.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    We   are,   therefore,   not   inclined   to   interfere   with   the <\/p>\n<p>      impugned   orders   of   the   High   Court   and   accordingly <\/p>\n<p>      dismiss the Special Leave Petitions with no order as to <\/p>\n<p>      costs.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                                      &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                            (R. V. Raveendran)<\/p>\n<p>                                                      &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                            (A. K. Patnaik)<\/p>\n<p>New Delhi,<\/p>\n<p>September 12, 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">13<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik &#8230; on 12 September, 2011 Author: A K Patnaik Bench: R.V. Raveendran, A.K. Patnaik Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7785 OF 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) NO.9154 OF 2008) State of West Bengal &#8230; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik ... on 12 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik ... on 12 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-25T02:29:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik &#8230; on 12 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-25T02:29:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1611,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011\",\"name\":\"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik ... on 12 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-25T02:29:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik &#8230; on 12 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik ... on 12 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik ... on 12 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-25T02:29:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik &#8230; on 12 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-25T02:29:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011"},"wordCount":1611,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011","name":"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik ... on 12 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-25T02:29:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-west-bengal-vs-howrah-ganatantrik-nagarik-on-12-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of West Bengal vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagarik &#8230; on 12 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211210\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}