{"id":211440,"date":"2010-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-22T00:57:39","modified_gmt":"2016-06-21T19:27:39","slug":"ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister … vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister … vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 3\"\" DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINcIaIOE_RjI., V \n\n \n\nVVRIT PETITION NO.29666 or ;7:.O1OmI_S\u00a7LS;E:).'  \n\nC\/w WRIT PETITION NO.29Si1 Of 2010-  - _ . \" \n\nIn WRIT PETITION No.29666 or \nBETWEEN: \n\nM\/S BETTAIAH HOLY CROSS SIsT_EjR SOCII_=TY\"~--.._*.. \n\nHOLY CROSS CONVENT      \"\n\nSINGASANDRA VILLAGE I   '\n\nBANGALORE 560 068  ._ 5  _  - \n\nREPRESENTED BY ITS        \n\nPOWER OF ATTORN_.E'T\"H,OLDER\" .j  \" .   \u00bb\n\nFATHER ARULANANDAM   .      PETITIONER\n\n(BY SRIZIAJESHA A'KLL_IvM.AR\u00ab.. RS;4,I.:AD,VOCj\u00bb\\TE FOR\nAKS LAW ASSOCIATES,ADVOCATES)\nAND: 3 '   \n\n1. THE STATE OF I<'ARNATAI_ECI'AL\"*D_EPIJTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)\n\n BANGALORE 'DISTRICT,\nBAN GALO RE -. \n\n' \"  CN.SLINANDAMMA\n\n\u00ab 'MO RAMAKRISHNAPPA\n A<3.E'D\u00ab.A.BOuT 50 YEARS\n \u00abR\/A':j CHIKKA BEGUR VILLAGE\n .BEc3DR POST\n'-BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
 “(BY SRI R.DEVADAS, AGA FOR R1 & R2;\n<\/p>\n
SRI P.B.RA3u, ADVOCATE FOR R3)<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF
\nTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
\nDATED 15.09.2010 AS PER ANNEXURE~A PASSED BY THE_’2,”\u00b0
\nRESPONDENT.\n<\/p>\n
In WRIT PETITION No.29′.-311\/2010:\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
M\/S BETTAIAH HOLY CROSS SISTER SOCIETY .<\/p>\n
HOLY CROSS CONVENT, SINGASANDRA vILI;AGE~ ..<\/p>\n
BANGALORE 560 068 I  <\/p>\n
REPRESENTED BY ITS   A<\/p>\n
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
\nFATHER ARULANANDAMS.  _  .,,PETITION ER<\/p>\n
(BY SRI AJESH KUMAR.S.’; ‘ADVQ’CATE”:EQR’-.,\u00a2
\nAKS LAW ASSOCIATES, ~ADvOCATES)_;   _<\/p>\n
AND:   _  ‘<\/p>\n
1. THE STATE OF KA’RNATAKA:._ .\n<\/p>\n
BY THE REvEN.UE~\u00bb.SEC_RETARY_   _
\nVIDHANA SOUDHA,*BANGALOgR.E –\n<\/p>\n
2. THE THASI’LDA.Rf;.  <\/p>\n
\nBANGALORE SOUTH TALUI<, \nBANGALORE I    '\n\n3. SMT. N.SUNANDAMMA  \u00bb--\nW\/O RAMAKRISYHNAPPA\nI MAJOR: '   I.\n<\/pre>\n
 * R\/ATv.’C’IIIIg.I<A BEGUR '\\fl'–L-LAGE
\n BEGUR POST _ "\n<\/p>\n
=.BANGALO’RE*S_OUTH TALUK  RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
‘ V”(BY–.SRI”R.DEvADAS, AGA FOR R1 & R2;
\n_. “SR1 P.B.RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R3)<\/p>\n
 \u00bb_THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF<\/p>\n
‘THE-VCONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER<\/p>\n
<_"DATEfD I2;'08.2010 AND PAHANI PATRIKE AS PER ANNEXURES-A AND<\/p>\n
 'NOTICI=. 'UNDER SEC.39 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT AS
\n' '.rP_ER~1ANNExURE~B DATED 29.08.2010 AND ETC.<\/p>\n
"THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY<\/p>\n
.'fjv._IIE<ARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
\n FQ:;LOWING:\n<\/p>\n
QRDER<\/p>\n
As both the petitions arise from the same proceed-ing.5,<\/p>\n
these petitions are clubbed, heard and being disposesiyoif _<\/p>\n
common order.\n<\/p>\n
2. The full advertance to the factsrof \u00abbe a<\/p>\n
necessary. In the petition filed bythe respov_n”dent LDR <\/p>\n
of the original grantee invoking  of  Karnataka
\nScheduled Castes and schedeCi”e–dsTi_ribes”Transfer
\nof Certain Lands) Act, .1978  the Assistant
\nCommissioner  in favour of
\nthe petitioner  of the iands to the
\nGovernmentand.  rrestor.e’their possession in favour of
\nthe original grantee eriue’ order, dated 05.08.2010
\npassed  Assi’stant’__’_C:rJmmissioner is challenged by the<\/p>\n
petit_ion:e\u00abr.  Appeal No.SC\/ST\/A56\/10-11. In the said<\/p>\n
‘.’g_avppeaCi. ‘pro.c’eed’iVng.s;s’.;;.th.e Deputy Commissioner had first granted<\/p>\n
fan -ex parte  order of stay without noticing that the<\/p>\n
.1 resp_ondentn No.3 had fiied the caveat petition. When the fiiing of<\/p>\n
V.’C-C’gthe.C.’caveatAApetition was brought to his notice, he vacated the<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘v._isinteri%n’ order of stay.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01BH.\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
3. In the fitness of the things, the Deputy Commissioner<\/p>\n
ought to have recaiied the earlier order granting the stay and<\/p>\n
thereafter ought to have heard both the parties and reconsideied<\/p>\n
the petitioner’s request for the grant of stay. <\/p>\n
the passing of the Assistant Commissioner’s orde~r~-\u00bba’nf:d..   <\/p>\n
without putting the petitioner on notice r-regvardirafgir<\/p>\n
proceedings, the Tahsiidar effected\u00bb’th__e muta_ti”on errtry;  <\/p>\n
of the respondent No.3 based on the”‘viiiissistant’Cornn’iissioner’s
\norder.\n<\/p>\n
4. The Deputy_iCommis’si’on’er’sgorderdiscontinuing the
\ninterim order”‘of’  t’he’–.Tah’s’ii~eiar’s order effecting the
\nmutation entry’in:_favourV”of ‘ith_is:’i…rte;’;_’pondent No.3 are chailenged<\/p>\n
in these two write’;-e.titions_ resfipectiveiy.<\/p>\n
 i.’:gi\/i”ea.nwizi.ii.e, the “” “Tahsiidar vide his notice, dated<\/p>\n
 the petitioner to vacate the iands by<\/p>\n
“’15.o9.2o1..p%.\n<\/p>\n
 riea’rd_r’tf2e iearned advocates, Sri Ajesh Kumar for the<\/p>\n
  R.Devdas for respondent Nos.1 and 2 (the Special<\/p>\n
iii\ufb01eputy\ufb01ommissioner and the Tahsiidar) and Sri P.B.Raju for the<\/p>\n
if if ‘-rrespfondent No. 3.\n<\/p>\n
F2811<\/p>\n
5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
7. On making their initial submissions, they agree in<\/p>\n
principie that these petitions could be disposed of with a<\/p>\n
direction to the Deputy Commissioner to dispose of theVr’\u00bb.\u00a7na_Vin<\/p>\n
matter itself (Appeal No.SC\/ST\/A56\/10-11). As the__effectivngV’i’<\/p>\n
mutation entry is without notice to the petiti_oner’::~an’d: even’  <\/p>\n
before the expiry of period prescribed foii,fiiing\u00e9,the.a.:p.pe-al”ainidfas<\/p>\n
the Tahsildar’s order calling upon.\u00bbi’th_e.: petit_ioner  ye,cate_i’\u00a7 the <\/p>\n
lands is not in keeping with Ruie 3  the same are<\/p>\n
iiabie to be quashed and accVo~~rd:,i’ngi’y tt;e.y”ar,e.:quashed.<\/p>\n
8. Similarly, the”D__epuity’not justified in
\nrefusing to co’n’ti’nu;e;gthe’f1:inte’rim-‘or’d’ei*~iiiereiy on the ground of
\nfiling of the caveat  Commissioner ought to
\nhave heardthe ‘learned: adfvolcates for the petitioner and the 3′”
\nresponde.njt’i. ought”to..—-.have considered granting an interim<\/p>\n
order,’ iiiiiiriat”apa,rt~,::’if..the petitioner is dispossessed during the<\/p>\n
‘Cut’t’*….l?’3ndency”‘of the’.V’app5eai, the ends ofjustice would suffer.<\/p>\n
 gConsi_d’ering ali these aspects of the matter, both these<\/p>\n
 disposed of with the following directions:<\/p>\n
 The Deputy Commissioner shali dispose of the main<\/p>\n
matter-\u00abAppeal No. SC\/ST\/A56\/10–11 as expeditiously<\/p>\n
\ufb01ght<\/p>\n
b)<\/p>\n
d)<\/p>\n
as possible and in any case within 2 months from the
\ndate of the production of the certified copy ofvVto.day’s
\norder. t<\/p>\n
Both the petitioner and the resporide-nt.–iii’-iE.o.’iit: ..<\/p>\n
appear before the Deputy Comtmiss-iohier’:on4.1’8.i1:.~2_ti\u00a3{).’<\/p>\n
at 3.00 pm. without waiting fofaiiyVnotiteifromii the <\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner. _ V<\/p>\n
During the perideni:;*–,I._.’t:of_  petitioner shaii
\nnot be dispossessed..f–rorifi-the-y”i:a_ri’ri”‘i_nAitjuestion.<\/p>\n
During th\u00e9.:,gipp’eai;”ithe entries in the
\nrevenge    were as on the date of
\nthey  ‘ order by the Assistant<\/p>\n
Commti’s.sio:ier’. _ <\/p>\n
 10.\u00bbi.i9.ecordingtiy’–..bot_hyithe petitions are disposed of. No<\/p>\n
order as to cost.s;._k’i.,.. __<\/p>\n
Sci\/r
\nWe Iitdge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister … vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3″” DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINcIaIOE_RjI., V VVRIT PETITION NO.29666 or ;7:.O1OmI_S\u00a7LS;E:).’ C\/w WRIT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister ... vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister ... vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-21T19:27:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister … vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-21T19:27:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":935,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister ... vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-21T19:27:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister … vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister ... vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister ... vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-21T19:27:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister … vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-21T19:27:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010"},"wordCount":935,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010","name":"M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister ... vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-21T19:27:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-bettaiah-holy-cross-sister-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-3-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S. Bettaiah Holy Cross Sister … vs The State Of Karnataka By The on 3 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211440"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211440\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}