{"id":211538,"date":"1999-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-04-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999"},"modified":"2016-08-21T22:57:43","modified_gmt":"2016-08-21T17:27:43","slug":"prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999","title":{"rendered":"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 1999 (3) AWC 1836, 1999 (82) FLR 616<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V Sahai<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: V Sahai<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>  V.M. Sahai, J. <\/p>\n<p> 1. The question<br \/>\nthat arises for consideration in this petition is whether direction of the Court to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularisation of service can be rejected by the Sub-Divisional<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate without assigning any reason.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. The facts in brief are that the<br \/>\npetitioner was appointed on the post<br \/>\nof collection peon on 31.5.1984 on ad<br \/>\nhoc basis. He continued till 25.4.1990<br \/>\nwith two breaks in service. His<br \/>\nservice was terminated on 25.4.1990,<br \/>\nunder U. P. Temporary Government<br \/>\nServant (Termination of Services)<br \/>\nRules, 1975. He filed C.M. Writ No.<br \/>\n17713 of 1990, in which&#8217; the<br \/>\ntermination order was challenged. It<br \/>\nwas claimed that under<br \/>\nRegularisation of Ad hoc<br \/>\nAppointments (On Posts Outside the<br \/>\nPurview of the Public Service<br \/>\nCommission) Rules, 1979 as amended<br \/>\nby Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad<br \/>\nhoc Appointments (on the posts<br \/>\noutside the purview of the Public<br \/>\nService Commission) (IInd<br \/>\nAmendment) Rules, 1989 (in brief<br \/>\nRules) the petitioner&#8217;s services were<br \/>\nliable to be regularised. Therefore,<br \/>\nthe order terminating his services<br \/>\nwithout considering his claim for<br \/>\nregularisatlon was contrary to law.\n<\/p>\n<p>The termination order was stayed on<br \/>\n20.7.1990. But the respondent did not<br \/>\ncomply with it. The petitioner filed<br \/>\nContempt Petition No. 786 of 1990.\n<\/p>\n<p>The petition was not decided as the<br \/>\nCourt was of the view that stay<br \/>\nvacation application be decided first.\n<\/p>\n<p>The writ petition was dismissed on<br \/>\n30.4.1997. This was challenged in<br \/>\nSpecial Appeal No. 627 of 1997 which<br \/>\nwas disposed of on 1.9.1997. The<br \/>\nrelevant direction of the division<br \/>\nbench is quoted below :\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;The Competent Authority will consider the case of the petitioner-appellant for regularisation of service in accordance with the aforementioned Rules without being influenced by and notwithstanding the order of termination of service and communicate the order within three months of production of a certified copy of this order before him.\n<\/p>\n<p> The writ petition and the Special Appeal are disposed of in the manner aforesaid. The Competent Authority may give an opportunity of hearing to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner-appellant if he feels it necessary.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. It is alleged in the writ petition that the order was communicated immediately but when no order was passed, the petitioner was compelled to approach this Court again by way of Contempt Petition No. 1084 of 1998 which is still pending.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. The respondent by his order dated 12.3.1999 rejected the claim of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. This Court directed the respondent to consider the claim of petitioner for regularisation of service in accordance with Rules (Rules 1989). The impugned order does not disclose as to why petitioner&#8217;s service cannot be regularised under the Rules. From the order, it appears that the respondent has treated the letter 24.9.1997 by which the judgment was communicated as representation. This shows complete non-application of mind. He was directed by this Court to decide the claim of regularisation and not representation. It is further surprising that the respondent decided the claim after 18 months when the order was communicated in 1997. This was failure to discharge the duty by the respondent but I do not propose to say any thing further as if I call for a counter-affidavit, it will further delay -the matter.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. The argument of learned standing counsel that since there was no direction by this Court to pass a reasoned order, the respondent did not commit any illegality or impropriety. The argument is without any merit.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. When this Court directs an authority to decide the claim or representation, then the concerned authority should decide it by a speaking or reasoned order. Even if the judgment or order of this Court does not mention that the claim has to be decided by a speaking or by a reasoned order, then it is implicit in the order and the authority is under legal duty to give reasons in support of the order. He cannot take shelter on the opinion of the State counsel<\/p>\n<p>which may serve as a guideline for him but it cannot form the basis of the order.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8. The petitioner&#8217;s counsel has placed reliance on <a href=\"\/doc\/1592725\/\">Bhagwati Prasad v. Delhi State Mineral Development Corporation,<\/a> 1990 (1) SCCP 361, that the petitioners regularisation cannot be rejected due to artificial breaks in service. The law has already been settled by the Apex Court, therefore, it is not necessary to say anything further. This aspect shall also be examined by the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. The writ petition succeeds and is allowed. The order dated 12.3.1999 Annexure-8 to the writ petition is quashed. The respondent is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner for regularisation as directed in Special Appeal No. 627 of 1997 and in the light of the observations made above within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment before him.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999 Equivalent citations: 1999 (3) AWC 1836, 1999 (82) FLR 616 Author: V Sahai Bench: V Sahai JUDGMENT V.M. Sahai, J. 1. The question that arises for consideration in this petition is whether direction of the Court to consider the claim of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-21T17:27:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-21T17:27:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999\"},\"wordCount\":793,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999\",\"name\":\"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-21T17:27:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1999-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-21T17:27:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999","datePublished":"1999-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-21T17:27:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999"},"wordCount":793,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999","name":"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-21T17:27:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prem-shanker-vs-sub-divisional-officer-bindki-on-16-april-1999#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prem Shanker vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Bindki on 16 April, 1999"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211538"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211538\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}