{"id":211542,"date":"2009-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-08-16T02:05:01","modified_gmt":"2018-08-15T20:35:01","slug":"ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service &#8230; on 3 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service &#8230; on 3 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>Civil Writ Petition No. 9886 of 2009                    1\n\n          IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                        AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                       Civil Writ Petition No. 9886 of 2009\n                                       Date of decision: 3.8.2009\n\nAjay Kumar Yadav                                             ...petitioner\n                             Versus\n\nHaryana Public Service Commission                            ...respondent.\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH\n\n                       *****\n<\/pre>\n<pre>Present:      Mr. S.K. Rana, Advocate\n              for the petitioner.\n\n              Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocate\n              for the respondent\/Commission.\n\n                     *****\n\nRANJIT SINGH J.\n\n\n              Haryana        Public       Service   Commission      issued    an\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>advertisement, Annexure P-1, for recruitment to the post of Fisheries<\/p>\n<p>Officer\/Distt. Fisheries Officer-cum-Chief Executive Officer etc. In all<\/p>\n<p>3 posts were advertised,               one of which is reserved for physically<\/p>\n<p>handicapped (blind). The closing date of this advertisement was<\/p>\n<p>27.2.2009, which in case of applicants from Forward Remote Areas<\/p>\n<p>i.e. States\/Union Territories of North-East Region, Lakshadweep,<\/p>\n<p>Andaman and Nicobar Island etc. was 6.3.2009. The eligible age for<\/p>\n<p>apply as given in the advertisement was between 17 to 40 years as<\/p>\n<p>on 27.2.2009. In the advertisement itself it was also mentioned that<\/p>\n<p>it shall be 45 years for Scheduled Castes\/Tribes, Backward Classes<\/p>\n<p>of Haryana only.\n<\/p>\n<p>              The petitioner being eligible applied for the post meant for<\/p>\n<p>reserved category of backward class. The petitioner, however, was<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 9886 of 2009                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>informed through communication                dated 24.4.2009 that he was<\/p>\n<p>disqualified on the ground that he was over 40 years of age. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was also informed that the age in his case could not be<\/p>\n<p>relaxed as per the Government instructions dated 22.7.1997. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner represented against this order rejecting his candidature on<\/p>\n<p>the ground of age. The petitioner pleaded that he was entitled to be<\/p>\n<p>called for interview as age in his case was relaxable up to 45 years,<\/p>\n<p>he being a backward class category candidate in terms of the<\/p>\n<p>conditions contained in the advertisement, Anneuxre P-1.<\/p>\n<p>              Notice of motion was issued. Copy of the reply is handed<\/p>\n<p>over in the Court today and is taken on record. The copy has already<\/p>\n<p>been supplied to counsel for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Mr. Mehtani, counsel for the Commission would rely upon<\/p>\n<p>the    instructions,     Annexure      P-4,   attached   with   the   petition.<\/p>\n<p>Instructions, Anneuxre P-4 have been issued while amending the<\/p>\n<p>department&#8217;s instructions issued on 25.3.1975, to provide that if any<\/p>\n<p>member\/members belonging to Scheduled casts\/Backward Classes<\/p>\n<p>is\/are selected in the open competition for direct recruitment on the<\/p>\n<p>basis of their own merit they will not be counted against the quota<\/p>\n<p>reserved for Scheduled Castes\/Backward Classes and that they will<\/p>\n<p>be treated as open competition candidates. It is further mentioned<\/p>\n<p>that such candidate should fulfill conditions of eligibility regarding age<\/p>\n<p>etc. as are meant for general category candidates. No doubt these<\/p>\n<p>instructions would give an indication that a candidate belonging to<\/p>\n<p>reserved category when are to compete in an open competition, the<\/p>\n<p>age which is meant for open category candidate will be applicable to<\/p>\n<p>him as well to see his eligibility. These instructions apparently are<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 9886 of 2009              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>applicable in those cases where candidates belonging to S.C. and<\/p>\n<p>B.C. are selected on the basis of their merit and not by virtue they<\/p>\n<p>being for reserved category.           These instructions apparently were<\/p>\n<p>given go bye in the advertisement, Annexure P-1.         The Commission<\/p>\n<p>was fully conscious of this fact that there was no reservation made<\/p>\n<p>for Backward Classes\/Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes. The<\/p>\n<p>reservation in the advertisement was only for physically handicapped<\/p>\n<p>category.       Still no age relaxation was provided for physically<\/p>\n<p>handicapped category. Rather age relaxation apparently has been<\/p>\n<p>provided for in the case of Scheduled Castes\/Scheduled Tribes and<\/p>\n<p>Backward Classes of Haryana only. The advertisement is indicative<\/p>\n<p>of the fact that though scheduled castes\/scheduled tribes or<\/p>\n<p>backward classes candidates would compete in the open general<\/p>\n<p>category but would have the relaxation of age by 5 years.           They<\/p>\n<p>would thus be considered eligible upto the age of 45 years. There<\/p>\n<p>was no other purpose for prescribing this as a condition in the<\/p>\n<p>advertisement.\n<\/p>\n<p>              The instructions relied upon by Mr. Mehtani apparently<\/p>\n<p>would not apply to the situation at hand.          These instructions are<\/p>\n<p>applicable to an eventuality where all reserved category candidates<\/p>\n<p>competing with all comes in overall merit, while considering him in<\/p>\n<p>the general category and not in reserved category. These<\/p>\n<p>instructions would apply to say that his age is to be considered as<\/p>\n<p>that of general category candidate. That is not the situation here.<\/p>\n<p>Here age of the general category candidate was to be between 17 to<\/p>\n<p>40 years whereas in case of Scheduled Castes\/Scheduled Tribes\/<\/p>\n<p>Backward Class of Haryana the age prescribed was 45 years. The<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 9886 of 2009             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>advertisement thus does not give any indication that this age was not<\/p>\n<p>to be taken into consideration for allowing the candidates of<\/p>\n<p>Scheduled Castes\/Scheduled Tribes or Backward Classes of<\/p>\n<p>Haryana.\n<\/p>\n<p>              In the reply, it is not even mentioned that this part of the<\/p>\n<p>advertisement has been so issued by some mistake. The stand,<\/p>\n<p>however, is that this will not make any material difference in view of<\/p>\n<p>the instructions.       The conditions in the advertisement will not be<\/p>\n<p>regulated by the instructions that may be available with the<\/p>\n<p>respondent-Commission. Since the petitioner is less than 45 years<\/p>\n<p>of age and is a backward class candidate, he will be eligible to<\/p>\n<p>appointment to the post advertised and cannot be disqualified only<\/p>\n<p>on the ground of being over age.\n<\/p>\n<p>              The writ petition is accordingly allowed. The directions are<\/p>\n<p>hereby issued to respondent-Commission to consider the case of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner for appointment.         Needless to mention that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner shall be considered on the basis of merit as determined by<\/p>\n<p>the Board if eligible otherwise.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>August 03, 2009                                  ( RANJIT SINGH )\nrts                                                   JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service &#8230; on 3 August, 2009 Civil Writ Petition No. 9886 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 9886 of 2009 Date of decision: 3.8.2009 Ajay Kumar Yadav &#8230;petitioner Versus Haryana Public Service Commission &#8230;respondent. CORAM: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-15T20:35:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service &#8230; on 3 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-15T20:35:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":871,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-15T20:35:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service &#8230; on 3 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-15T20:35:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service &#8230; on 3 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-15T20:35:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009"},"wordCount":871,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009","name":"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-15T20:35:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ajay-kumar-yadav-vs-haryana-public-service-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ajay Kumar Yadav vs Haryana Public Service &#8230; on 3 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211542\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}