{"id":211601,"date":"2010-02-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010"},"modified":"2015-10-02T21:02:30","modified_gmt":"2015-10-02T15:32:30","slug":"kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 301 of 2007()\n\n\n1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SMT. UMA SHANMADHURAN, AGED 55 YEARS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :11\/02\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n         ------------------------------------------------\n                   C.R.P.No.301 of 2007\n          -----------------------------------------------\n       Dated the the 11th day of February, 2010\n\n                          O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Revision      is    directed        against       the order<\/p>\n<p>dated  22.3.2006      in     O.P.(Electricity)           No.315\/02<\/p>\n<p>passed by the Additional District Judge (Ad hoc-<\/p>\n<p>II), Ernakulam.        The respondent in the revision<\/p>\n<p>petition   (hereinafter           referred         to    as  &#8216;the<\/p>\n<p>claimant&#8217;) filed the above original petition under<\/p>\n<p>Section 10 and 16 of the Indian Telegraph Act and<\/p>\n<p>Section 51 of the Indian Electricity Act claiming<\/p>\n<p>enhanced  compensation          for     the     trees    cut  and<\/p>\n<p>removed and also towards the diminution of land<\/p>\n<p>value of her property on account of drawing of<\/p>\n<p>electric  lines      through       that      property     by  the<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner (hereinafter referred to as<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;the Board&#8217;).      Towards the compensation for the<\/p>\n<p>trees cut and removed for drawing of the line, the<\/p>\n<p>Board  had   assessed        and     paid      compensation    of<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No.301 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                       :: 2 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>Rs.33,190\/- to the claimant.   Contending that the<\/p>\n<p>compensation paid is unreasonable and inadequate<\/p>\n<p>the claimant preferred the above original petition<\/p>\n<p>(O.P.(Electricity) No.315\/02).  The Board resisted<\/p>\n<p>that   application   contending  that   just   and<\/p>\n<p>reasonable compensation had already been paid.<\/p>\n<p>      2.   In the enquiry over the claim raised,<\/p>\n<p>the claimant was examined and Ext.A1 was marked on<\/p>\n<p>her side.    On the side of the Board only the<\/p>\n<p>detailed valuation statement was got marked.   An<\/p>\n<p>Advocate Commissioner deputed by the court, after<\/p>\n<p>conducting local inspection, filed a report and<\/p>\n<p>plan which were exhibited as Ext.C1.  The electric<\/p>\n<p>lines were admittedly drawn through the property<\/p>\n<p>of the claimant having an extent of 18.6 cents of<\/p>\n<p>land comprising a residential building. The report<\/p>\n<p>of the Advocate Commissioner, Ext.C1, disclosed<\/p>\n<p>that the line was drawn cut across through the<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No.301 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                       :: 3 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>middle of the property.     Though the Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>had assessed the land value at Rs.75,000\/- per<\/p>\n<p>cent noting the importance of the locality wherein<\/p>\n<p>a temple and other public offices are situate<\/p>\n<p>closeby, the court below relying on a sale deed<\/p>\n<p>executed over 7 cents of land situate closeby,<\/p>\n<p>fixed the land value at Rs.20,000\/- per cent.<\/p>\n<p>Fixing the amount for injurious affection on the<\/p>\n<p>land for drawing of the line at 30% and taking<\/p>\n<p>note that the line had been drawn across the<\/p>\n<p>property, the learned District Judge concluded<\/p>\n<p>that the entire land was injuriously affected and<\/p>\n<p>in  that  view   of  the  matter,  compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,11,900\/- was awarded to the claimant for the<\/p>\n<p>diminution of the land value of her property.<\/p>\n<p>      3.   Admittedly, the Board had assessed the<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the trees cut and removed at 10%<\/p>\n<p>annuity   return   and thus   fixed  the  same  at<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No.301 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                        :: 4 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>Rs.33,190\/-. Taking note of the guidelines and the<\/p>\n<p>judicial pronouncements rendered by this court in<\/p>\n<p>ascertaining and fixing compensation towards the<\/p>\n<p>value of the trees, the court below fixed annuity<\/p>\n<p>return at 5% and re-assessed the compensation.  On<\/p>\n<p>such   re-assessment,      additional  compensation<\/p>\n<p>towards the trees cut and removed was found to be<\/p>\n<p>Rs.20,000\/- and it was accordingly awarded.     The<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the Board contended that the<\/p>\n<p>principle enunciated by this court for fixation at<\/p>\n<p>5% annuity return had been found to be not correct<\/p>\n<p>by the Apex Court in the decision in K.S.E.B. v.<\/p>\n<p>Livisha and others {2007(3) K.L.T. 1} and so much<\/p>\n<p>so, the compensation fixed by the court below was<\/p>\n<p>not correct.    Similarly, it is further contended<\/p>\n<p>that the land value fixed and also the percentage<\/p>\n<p>of injurious affection determined was also on the<\/p>\n<p>higher side.   In Livisha&#8217;s case the Apex Court has<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No.301 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                        :: 5 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>held  that    the   importance  of  the  locality,<\/p>\n<p>closeness of the public office etc., have also to<\/p>\n<p>be considered in fixing the compensation for the<\/p>\n<p>diminution of land due to the drawing of the<\/p>\n<p>electric line through the property.<\/p>\n<p>      4. I find that the learned District Judge<\/p>\n<p>has taken the relevant factors with reference to<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A1 title deed over the adjoining land in<\/p>\n<p>fixing the land value.       30% of the land value<\/p>\n<p>fixed towards injurious affection in the given<\/p>\n<p>facts of the case cannot be stated to be excessive<\/p>\n<p>where it is seen that the overhead lines had cut<\/p>\n<p>across through the middle of the property. I find,<\/p>\n<p>stated there is any impropriety in the fixation of<\/p>\n<p>the compensation towards diminution of the land<\/p>\n<p>value by the court below. Enhanced compensation<\/p>\n<p>awarded for the trees cut and removed, is found to<\/p>\n<p>be just and reasonable. In exercise of revisional<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.No.301 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                          :: 6 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>jurisdiction interference with an order passed by<\/p>\n<p>the inferior court is permissible only if there is<\/p>\n<p>jurisdictional infirmity which if not be corrected<\/p>\n<p>would result in miscarriage of justice.     There is<\/p>\n<p>no jurisdictional infirmity in the orders passed<\/p>\n<p>by the court below and no ground is made out for<\/p>\n<p>exercise of revisional jurisdiction in the present<\/p>\n<p>case.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Civil Revision Petition lacks merit and is<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                             (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN)<br \/>\n                                      JUDGE<br \/>\nSK\/-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              \/\/true copy\/\/<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 301 of 2007() 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. SMT. UMA SHANMADHURAN, AGED 55 YEARS, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB For Respondent :SRI.T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN The Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-02T15:32:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-02T15:32:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":816,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-02T15:32:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-02T15:32:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-02T15:32:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010"},"wordCount":816,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010","name":"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-02T15:32:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kerala-state-electricity-board-vs-smt-uma-shanmadhuran-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kerala State Electricity Board vs Smt. Uma Shanmadhuran on 11 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211601"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211601\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}