{"id":211698,"date":"1999-10-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-10-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999"},"modified":"2015-12-03T17:26:49","modified_gmt":"2015-12-03T11:56:49","slug":"parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999","title":{"rendered":"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 1999 VIAD Delhi 528, 82 (1999) DLT 362, 2000 (52) DRJ 69<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D M Sharma<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: D M Sharma<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>DR. M.K. Sharma, J.<\/p>\n<p>1.<br \/>\n     The   present   revision   petition  has   been   preferred   by   the petitioners\/defendants being aggrieved by the order dated 12.3.1997  passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi, in suit No. 96\/1996 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking for leave to defend and passing a  decree  for a sum of Rs. 4 lac with costs and  pendentelite  and  future interest in favour of the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The  respondent filed the aforesaid suit on 4.7.1996 under the  provisions of Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking for a decree for a sum of Rs. 4 lac alongwith interest on the basis of cheques No. 953930  and 953931  for  Rs. 2 lac each issued by the petitioner in favour of  the  respondent.  The case of the plaintiff as set up in the plaint was  that  the plaintiff who is an Ex. Wing Commander of Indian Air Force entered into  an agreement  to  sell dated 18.9.1996 and also executed a  general  power  of attorney, deed of will in 26.1.1996 in respect of the premises No. A-1\/147, Janak Puri, New Delhi in favour of defendant No. 1 for a total sale consideration  of  Rs. 11 lac. He received a sum of Rs. 7 lac comprising  of  Rs. 25,000\/-  received in cash against receipt and Rs. 6,75,000\/- in the  shape of  demand drafts. For the balance amount the defendant issued two  cheques dated  4.3.1996 bearing No. 953930 and 953931 for a sum of Rs. 2 lac  each. The aforesaid cheques when presented to the bank after 10 days as requested by the defendants, were returned dishonoured with the remarks &#8220;insufficient funds&#8221;. It is alleged that the defendants assured the plaintiff that if the same  are presented once again the same would be encashed and  accordingly, the said cheques were presented to the Bank but the same were again  dishonoured and therefore, the aforesaid suit was filed.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   The  defendants\/petitioners sought leave to defend the aforesaid  suit by  moving separate but similar leave applications claiming that a  sum  of Rs. 4 lac in cash was paid to the plaintiff on 21.1.1996 in lieu of the two cheques  which  are  the subject matter of the suit  against  receipt.  The aforesaid leave applications filed by the petitioners were contested by the respondent,  on which the trial court heard the counsel appearing  for  the parties. By the impugned order the said applications were dismissed holding that  the  defendants have failed to raise any triable issue for  grant  of leave by the court to defend the suit and passed a decree as stated above.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the  documents  placed on record namely &#8211; the agreement to sell and the receipt,  if would  have  been considered in its true perspective, the same  would  have made it apparent that the defendants have been able to raise triable issues in  suit and therefore, the impugned order is illegal and void  and  consequently the decree passed is also liable to be set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   It is an admitted position that the petitioners issued one cheque each respectively signed by each one of them from their joint account No. 69326. The  said cheques are with the numbers 953930 and 953931 each for value  of Rs.  2 lac. It is also an admitted position that the aforesaid two  cheques when presented to the back were dishonoured due to insufficient funds which is corroborated by documentary evidence on record in the nature of memorandum of Punjab National Bank, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi issued on 23.3.1996. The  said cheques were again presented in the bank for encasement  and  the same were again dishonoured with similar remarks by another set of memoranda dated 16.4.1996 and delivery of the same to the respondent as a part  of the entire consideration for the sale transaction of Rs. 11 lac thus cannot be  disputed. It is an admitted fact, as is apparent from  the  application seeking for leave that the said transaction was settled for a sale price of Rs.  11 lac. So far the payment of Rs. 7 lac is concerned there is no  dispute  amongst the parties. However, in respect of the balance Rs. 4 lac  of the  sale consideration, two cheques for Rs. 2 lac each totaling Rs. 4  lac were admittedly handed over to the respondent. The trial court has  considered the contents of the receipt and the agreement to sell and on consideration thereof has come to the finding that the defense of the defendants as raised in the application for leave are frivolous and bogus. A copy of  the receipt is also placed on record and that indeed indicates that the balance amount of Rs. 4 lac was sought to be paid by cheques, which when  presented to  the  bank were dishonoured, which is corroborated  by  the  documentary evidence  issued by the bank. For recovery of the aforesaid Rs. 4  lac  the aforesaid suit is instituted by the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   On  consideration of the entire evidence on record I do not  find  any reason to differ from the findings of the trial court, who on  appreciation of  the documentary evidence placed on record, came to the  conclusion  and findings  which are based on cogent reasons that the defense put up by  the defendants is sham and bogus and no triable issue is raised by the  defendants  in the suit. Since the defense sought to be raised by the  defendants was  found to be sham and in the nature of moonshine, the trial  court  declined  to grant any relief to the petitioners. The documents which are  on record  clearly  establish and prove that the defendants did  not  pay  the balance consideration of Rs. 4 lac to the petitioner. The cheques issued by the  petitioners in favour of the defendants towards payment of the  aforesaid sum were dishonoured by the bank and therefore, it is established that no payment of the aforesaid amount of Rs. 4 lac was made by the  petitioner to  the respondents. The trial court was, therefore, justified  in  holding that the defense is sham and moonshine and that no triable issue is  raised in the applications seeking for leave to defend by the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   In  my  considered opinion, the applications seeking  for  leave  were rightly  rejected by the trial court. Consequent decree passed in the  suit is  also  upheld. There is no merit in this petition and the same  is  dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999 Equivalent citations: 1999 VIAD Delhi 528, 82 (1999) DLT 362, 2000 (52) DRJ 69 Author: D M Sharma Bench: D M Sharma ORDER DR. M.K. Sharma, J. 1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioners\/defendants [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-03T11:56:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-03T11:56:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999\"},\"wordCount\":1071,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999\",\"name\":\"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-03T11:56:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-03T11:56:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999","datePublished":"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-03T11:56:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999"},"wordCount":1071,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999","name":"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-10-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-03T11:56:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-suri-another-vs-shri-gur-har-narender-singh-on-12-october-1999#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parveen Suri &amp; Another vs Shri Gur Har Narender Singh on 12 October, 1999"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211698"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211698\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}