{"id":211721,"date":"2010-10-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-27T07:14:49","modified_gmt":"2017-11-27T01:44:49","slug":"mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 12687 of 2010(I)\n\n\n1. MARY KIND, AGED 54,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE GENERAL MANAGER,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n3. ANNA.K.P, HEADMISTRESS,\n\n4. P.C.JOSE, HEADMASTER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.G.BASIL\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.GEORGE WILLIAM\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :21\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                           K.T.SANKARAN, J.\n              ------------------------------------------------------\n                    W.P.(C). NO. 12687 OF 2010 I\n              ------------------------------------------------------\n             Dated this the 21st day of October, 2010\n\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>       The petitioner is working as H.S.A.(Physical Science) in<\/p>\n<p>St.Rita&#8217;s High School, Ponnurunni under the corporate management<\/p>\n<p>of the first respondent. According to the petitioner, she is the next<\/p>\n<p>eligible teacher to be appointed as Headmistress in any of the<\/p>\n<p>schools under the corporate management of the first respondent.<\/p>\n<p>However, respondents 3 and 4 were appointed as Headmistress of<\/p>\n<p>St.Mary&#8217;s High School, Vallarpadam and Headmaster of St.Joseph&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>High School, Chathiath respectively.<\/p>\n<p>       2. The reliefs prayed for in the Writ Petition are the following:<\/p>\n<p>       &#8220;(i)   To declare that the petitioner is the next eligible<\/p>\n<p>              teacher to be promoted as HM in the 1st<\/p>\n<p>              respondent&#8217;s school run by the educational<\/p>\n<p>              agency before effecting promotion to 3rd and 4th<\/p>\n<p>              respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) NO.12687 OF 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                     :: 2 ::\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      (ii)  To declare that the action of the 1st respondent in<\/p>\n<p>            promoting 3rd and 4th respondents is unjust, unfair,<\/p>\n<p>            illegal and void ab initio.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      (iii) Restrain     the  3rd   and     4th  respondents in<\/p>\n<p>            discharging their public duty as HM of the 1st<\/p>\n<p>            respondent&#8217;s respective schools run by the<\/p>\n<p>            educational agency.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      (iv)  The 2nd respondent may be directed not to<\/p>\n<p>            approve the promotion of 3rd and 4th respondents.<\/p>\n<p>      (v)   Declare that the petitioner is entitled to be<\/p>\n<p>            promoted as HM of any of the schools of 1st<\/p>\n<p>            respondent educational agency forthwith.<\/p>\n<p>      (vi)  Such other relief as deem fit necessary in the<\/p>\n<p>            interest of justice to the petitioner.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>      3. According to the petitioner, she is senior to respondents 3<\/p>\n<p>and 4. According to the learned counsel appearing for the fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent, the fourth respondent is senior to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel for the first respondent submitted that the schools<\/p>\n<p>under the corporate management of the first respondent have<\/p>\n<p>minority status and therefore, the Manager need not appoint the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) NO.12687 OF 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                     :: 3 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>\nsenior most teacher as the Headmaster.         It is sufficient if a fair<\/p>\n<p>selection procedure is adopted and eligible persons are appointed as<\/p>\n<p>Headmaster.     The learned senior counsel appearing for the first<\/p>\n<p>respondent submitted that such a procedure was followed and<\/p>\n<p>qualified persons (respondents 3 and 4) were appointed as<\/p>\n<p>Headmasters.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       4. Learned senior counsel appearing for the first respondent<\/p>\n<p>also raised an objection that there is an effective alternative remedy<\/p>\n<p>for the petitioner to file an appeal under Rule 44 of Chapter XIV A of<\/p>\n<p>the Kerala Education Rules and therefore, the Writ Petition is not<\/p>\n<p>maintainable.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       5. Rule 44 of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education Rules<\/p>\n<p>provides that a teacher aggrieved by the appointment of a<\/p>\n<p>Headmaster shall have the right of appeal to the Department. In the<\/p>\n<p>present case, the District Educational Officer, Ernakulam is the<\/p>\n<p>authority to approve the appointment of Headmasters. The proposal<\/p>\n<p>for approval of appointment of respondents 3 and 4 would be<\/p>\n<p>forwarded to the District Educational Officer and he has to consider<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) NO.12687 OF 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                    :: 4 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>\nthe question of approval of appointment of respondents 3 and 4. In<\/p>\n<p>that process, he is bound to consider the appeal filed by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner under Rule 44 of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education<\/p>\n<p>Rules.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       6. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that<\/p>\n<p>even assuming that the minority status of the institution under the<\/p>\n<p>first respondent is accepted, it has to be shown before the<\/p>\n<p>educational officer that a fair process of selection was adhered to by<\/p>\n<p>the management in the matter of appointment of respondents 3 and<\/p>\n<p>4. This is a matter to be looked into by the District Educational<\/p>\n<p>Officer.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       7.  The learned Government Pleader submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>appointment of respondents 3 and 4 have not been approved and<\/p>\n<p>the approval was declined by the District Educational Officer on the<\/p>\n<p>ground that the minority status of the educational institution was not<\/p>\n<p>established by producing relevant documents.<\/p>\n<p>       8.  If the District Educational Officer has already declined<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) NO.12687 OF 2010<\/p>\n<p>                                    :: 5 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>\napproval of the appointment of respondents 3 and 4, nothing<\/p>\n<p>survives in this Writ Petition.    However, the petitioner would be<\/p>\n<p>entitled to file a formal appeal under Rule 44 of Chapter XIV A of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Education Rules before the District Educational Officer. No<\/p>\n<p>further directions are necessary in the Writ Petition.<\/p>\n<p>       Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed with the above<\/p>\n<p>observations.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                   (K.T.SANKARAN)<br \/>\n                                                         Judge<\/p>\n<p>ahz\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 12687 of 2010(I) 1. MARY KIND, AGED 54, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, 3. ANNA.K.P, HEADMISTRESS, 4. P.C.JOSE, HEADMASTER, For Petitioner :SRI.A.G.BASIL For Respondent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-27T01:44:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-27T01:44:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":703,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-27T01:44:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-27T01:44:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-27T01:44:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010"},"wordCount":703,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010","name":"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-27T01:44:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mary-kind-vs-the-general-manager-on-21-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mary Kind vs The General Manager on 21 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211721\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}