{"id":211773,"date":"2009-07-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-12-28T05:20:04","modified_gmt":"2016-12-27T23:50:04","slug":"shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 30 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 30 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Bench: J.N. Patel, Mridula Bhatkar<\/div>\n
                                               1\n\n               IN THE HIGH COURT  OF  JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY \n                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                   \n                          WRIT PETITION NO. 6839  OF  2008\n\n\n\n\n                                                           \n         1. Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik\n\n       2. Mangesh Yashwant Naik\n           At Post Karve Post Nerul\n           Tal. & Dist. Thane                                                .. Petitioners\n\n\n\n\n                                                          \n    Versus\n\n       1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer,\n\n\n\n\n                                              \n          Thane\n       2. The Collector of Thane District,\n                               \n       3. The State of Maharashtra \n           Through the Chief Secretary,\n           Mantralaya, Mumbai-32                                         .. Respondents\n                              \n    Shri  Rahul Thakur for the the petitioners\n    Shri  V. S. Gokhale, AGP  for respondent -State\n           \n\n                                CORAM: J. N. PATEL &\n                                          MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.\n        \n\n\n\n                                DATED:  30th July, 2009\n\n    J U D G E M E N T  (Per Mridula Bhatkar, J.)\n<\/pre>\n
    1.          Rule,   returnable   forthwith.     Heard   by   consent   of   the   learned <\/p>\n
    counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n
    2.           The petitioners have filed this petition   challenging the refusal to <\/p>\n
    issue certificate of Project Affected Persons by the   Respondent No.1 under <\/p>\n
    the   Maharashtra     Project   Affected   Persons     Rehabilitation   Act,   1999(   By <\/p>\n
    amendment repealing  the Act of  1986, see Section 28 of the  said Act).\n<\/p>\n
                                                           ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:50:49 :::<\/span>
\n                                                  2<\/span><\/p>\n
    3.           Survey No. 275, Gut No. 273   and 274 situate at Village Darve <\/p>\n
    was the ancestral property of the petitioners. The State has acquired said <\/p>\n
    land of the petitioners   for the   Township of Navi Mumbai Project in the <\/p>\n
    year 1986 by passing   award in the Unit Case No.59, Award No. 179. Shri <\/p>\n
    Savalaram   Chandar   Naik-   father   of   petitioner   No.1   and   grandfather   of <\/p>\n
    Petitioner No.2 was then   in possession and was cultivating the said land.\n<\/p>\n
    Savalaram   Chandar   Naik,   and   his     son-   Petitioner   No.1     are     “affected  <\/p>\n
    person”    as   defined   under Section 2 of the Act and   entitled to   the <\/p>\n
    rehabilitation   and the other benefits provided under the provisions of the <\/p>\n
    said Act.   Inter alia, the certificate as project affected person was  issued to <\/p>\n
    the   petitioner   No.1   on   4.3.1987.   However,   the   petitioner   No.1       was   not <\/p>\n
    educated  and he was not found suitable and could not  avail of   benefit <\/p>\n
    under any scheme   or   for employment available under the   Government <\/p>\n
    Scheme for project affected persons.  However,  his son- Petitioner No.2 who <\/p>\n
    is educated, is entitled  to  get the PAP Certificate and so he has applied to <\/p>\n
    the respondents for the same by letter dated 30.1.2006.   The Respondent No.<\/p>\n
    1,   demanded   certain   documents   and   the   petitioner   made   compliance   by <\/p>\n
    producing necessary document and NOC  of all  legal representatives  and <\/p>\n
    award   holder   for   grant   of   certificate   in   favour   of   Petitioner   No.2   on <\/p>\n
    18.07.2006.  The respondents, by letter dated 2.8.2007 communicated refusal to <\/p>\n
    issue such certificate  in favour of  Petitioner  No. 2 on the ground that the <\/p>\n
                                                              ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:50:49 :::<\/span>
\n                                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n
    original   Award   holder   –   Savalaram   Chandar   Naik   was   dead   on   19.6.2007, <\/p>\n
    when the petitioner     No. 2 applied for the PAP Certificate. Hence,   being <\/p>\n
    aggrieved   with   the   said     letter   of   refusal   to   grant   PAP   certificate,   the <\/p>\n
    petitioners have filed the petition.\n<\/p>\n
    4.            The   Respondents   have   filed   affidavit   in   reply     opposing   the <\/p>\n
    application. The  fact of  acquisition of land  from Savalaram Naik  and his <\/p>\n
    status   as   original   award   holder   is   admitted   by   the   respondents.   Learned <\/p>\n
    Counsel appearing for the  Respondent- State has placed reliance  on the GR <\/p>\n
    dated 14th  September, 1998 under which, if the person   in whose name the <\/p>\n
    award is declared, is directly dependent on the person who has applied for <\/p>\n
    the PAP certificate is only   entitled to   receive PAP certificate and in the <\/p>\n
    given case, Savalaram Chandra   being deceased, is not dependent on his <\/p>\n
    grand   son   -Petitioner   No.2   and   hence,   there   is   no   question   to  issue   PAP <\/p>\n
    certificate to  his grandson i.e. Petitioner No.2.\n<\/p>\n
    5.            By this GR, the grandson or  daughter-in-law are entitled to get <\/p>\n
    PAP  certificate, if   they  are living  in joint  family  and      project  affected <\/p>\n
    person is dependent on grandson or  daughter in law.    The Bill No. XXVII <\/p>\n
    of     1999   in   respect   of   this   enactment   was   introduced     with   a   view   to <\/p>\n
    consolidate  and amend the law relating to rehabilitation of persons affected <\/p>\n
                                                               ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:50:49 :::<\/span>
\n                                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
    by   certain   projects   under   the   State   of   Maharashtra.       It   is   a   beneficial <\/p>\n
    legislation in which the State takes responsibility   to resettle the   persons <\/p>\n
    who   are   affected   by   the   act   of   the   State.     On   account   of   lengthy   and <\/p>\n
    cumbersome       procedure   laid   down   in   the   Act   and   also     the     rising <\/p>\n
    expectations of project affected persons, timely settlement   of the displaced <\/p>\n
    persons   due to various projects in the State Could not be achieved and, <\/p>\n
    therefore,   the   Government,   on   21st  October,   1995   appointed   a   Committee, <\/p>\n
    which   submitted   the   report   in   November,   1995   and   after   considering   the <\/p>\n
    recommendation of the Committee, the  law relating to the  rehabilitation of <\/p>\n
    the  project affected person was  amended by laying down adequate,  simple, <\/p>\n
    effective and speedy procedure for rehabilitation of the  persons affected by <\/p>\n
    projects.\n<\/p>\n
    6.            The GR dated 14th   September, 1998, therefore, needs to be read <\/p>\n
    taking into consideration the  statement of objects and  reasons of the said <\/p>\n
    Act, 1999 which clearly   speaks out that it is a   welfare legislation.   The <\/p>\n
    purpose of the scheme is to   give economical support   not only  to the <\/p>\n
    original award holder but   also   extend to   the family   which consists of <\/p>\n
    grandson   or   daughter-in-law   as   they   are   also   included   under   the   GR   as <\/p>\n
    person entitled to obtain PAP Certificate. Dependency of the original award <\/p>\n
    holder   is   the   condition   precedent   for   such   entitlement.   The   GR   further <\/p>\n
                                                                ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:50:49 :::<\/span>
\n                                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n
    restricts the number of such entitled family members to only one. In the <\/p>\n
    other words,   only one member falling in   the   category of the relatives <\/p>\n
    mentioned in  the GR can get  the certificate.  The, fruits of the scheme, if <\/p>\n
    not  timely  given,  then the  purpose of  the scheme  itself is defeated.    By <\/p>\n
    acquisition of land, livelihood of the person is taken away. So,   his son or <\/p>\n
    grandson and the family suffers. The said GR  dated 14th September, 1998 is <\/p>\n
    to be   interpreted   by adopting beneficent rule of construction.       If the <\/p>\n
    Original award holder was dependent during  his life time on the grandson, <\/p>\n
    then   even   after   the   death   of     the     original   award   holder,   that   past <\/p>\n
    dependency is to be considered   and makes the grand son entitled to PAP <\/p>\n
    certificate. Thus, the dependency may exist   before making application for <\/p>\n
    the said certificate and grandson is to be considered as entitled  under the <\/p>\n
    GR to get the PAP Certificate. Such  a construction is only likely to  assist <\/p>\n
    the     achievement   of   the     policy   of   the   Act,   1999.     What     contemplates <\/p>\n
    rehabilitation   and   resettlement   of   the   person     (   inclusive   of   the   family <\/p>\n
    members) the benefit to which a person ( or his family) is  entitled on being <\/p>\n
    uprooted and affected by  virtue of  acquisition of his land cannot  become <\/p>\n
    extinct on  his\/her death unless it is  availed by him or  his family.  The  G.\n<\/p>\n
    R.  rather takes into   contemplation   all  such  contingencies  and  enables <\/p>\n
    the person or any member of his family  to receive  the  benefits.  The G. R.\n<\/p>\n
    only extend the  list of   beneficiaries  to the   relatives  mentioned therein <\/p>\n
                                                              ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:50:49 :::<\/span>
\n                                              6<\/span><\/p>\n
    and  it will be erroneous to  interpret  it as sought to be explained  in the <\/p>\n
    affidavit in reply of the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
    7.          The Petition is therefore   required to be allowed in   terms of <\/p>\n
    prayer Clause (b).\n<\/p>\n
                 “Prayer Clause (b) :  This Honourable Court may be pleased to
\n                 issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or     any other writ,
\n                 order, direction, in the nature of mandamus, directing Respondent <\/p>\n
                 Nos. 1 and 2   herein to issue\/grant a  ‘Project Affected Person <\/p>\n
                 Certificate’  to Petitioner No.2 within a period of 15 days   from
\n                 today”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to <\/p>\n
             costs.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)                                   (J. N. PATEL, J.)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n    jpc\/- \n\n\n\n\n                                                     ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:50:49 :::<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 30 July, 2009 Bench: J.N. Patel, Mridula Bhatkar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6839 OF 2008 1. Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik 2. Mangesh Yashwant Naik At Post Karve Post Nerul Tal. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 30 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 30 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-27T23:50:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 30 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-27T23:50:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1125,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 30 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-27T23:50:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 30 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 30 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 30 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-27T23:50:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 30 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-27T23:50:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009"},"wordCount":1125,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009","name":"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 30 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-27T23:50:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yashwant-savlaram-naik-vs-the-special-land-acquisition-on-30-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Yashwant Savlaram Naik vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 30 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}