{"id":211834,"date":"2008-11-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-10-21T05:09:48","modified_gmt":"2017-10-20T23:39:48","slug":"r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008<\/div>\n
R.S.A No.1858 of 2005 (O&M)                                        ::1::\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n\n\n                                      Date of decision : November 07, 2008\n\n\n1.     R.S.A No.1858 of 2005\n\n2.     R.S.A No.1859 of 2005\n\n       Hanumant Singh & others vs Sonu & another\n\n\n                               ***\n<\/pre>\n
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI<\/p>\n
                               ***<\/p>\n
Present :    Mr.H.S.Hooda, Sr.Advocate with
\n             Mr.Suraj Mal Kundu, Advocate
\n             for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
             Mr.Alok Jain, Advocate
\n             for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
                               ***<\/p>\n
1.   Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the
\n     judgment ?\n<\/p>\n
2.   To be referred to the Reporters or not ?\n<\/p>\n
3.   Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?\n<\/p>\n
                                ***<\/p>\n
AJAY TEWARI, J<\/p>\n
             This order shall dispose of R.S.A Nos.1858 and 1859 of 2005,<\/p>\n
as common questions of law and facts are involved therein. For the sake of<\/p>\n
convenience, facts are being extracted from RSA No.1858 of 2005.<\/p>\n
             This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree,<\/p>\n
dated 17.3.2005, whereby the learned District Judge, Sonipat accepted the<\/p>\n
appeal of the mortgagor and permitted redemption.<\/p>\n
             The essential facts giving rise to this appeal are that the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs\/respondents No.1 and 2        filed a suit alleging that their<\/p>\n
predecessor-in-interest Raghubir Singh had mortgaged the land in dispute
\n R.S.A No.1858 of 2005 (O&M)                                               ::2::\n<\/p>\n
initially vide mortgage deed dated 21.7.1982 and again by subsequent<\/p>\n
mortgage deed dated 15.7.1988. It was also alleged that Raghubir Singh<\/p>\n
aforesaid had, in a family settlement dated 13.7.1988, made over the land to<\/p>\n
the plaintiffs and, thus, could not execute a fresh mortgage on 15.7.1988. It<\/p>\n
was further alleged that Raghubir Singh had not been heard of since<\/p>\n
September 1988 and that consequently he could have to be declared dead.<\/p>\n
            The appellants also filed a suit for declaration that they had<\/p>\n
become owners of the land in dispute since Raghubir Singh had not<\/p>\n
redeemed the property, despite proceedings under Section 8 of the Bengal<\/p>\n
Regulations Act.\n<\/p>\n
            The learned trial Court accepted the pleas of the appellants and<\/p>\n
consequently decreed their suit while dismissing that of the respondents.<\/p>\n
            In appeal, the learned lower appellate Court set aside the<\/p>\n
findings regarding validity of proceedings under Section 8 of the Bengal<\/p>\n
Regulations Act and consequently held that the respondents had the right to<\/p>\n
redeem the property in dispute.\n<\/p>\n
            Learned counsel for the appellants has pressed the following<\/p>\n
questions of law :-\n<\/p>\n
                      ” i)   Whether non-mentioning of notice of redemption<\/p>\n
                      in the publication is a material defect in the notice under<\/p>\n
                      Section 7 of the Bengal Regulation Act and the judgment<\/p>\n
                      passed under Section 8 of the Act can be ignored in the<\/p>\n
                      subsequent suit ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                      ii)    Whether a petition allowed under Section 8 of the<\/p>\n
                      Bengal    Regulation     Act   can   be   ignored   without<\/p>\n
                      challenging the same ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
 R.S.A No.1858 of 2005 (O&M)                                            ::3::\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                   Iii)   Whether the provisions of limitation of 3 years will<\/p>\n
                   apply challenging the order of the District Judge passed<\/p>\n
                   on the application under Section 8 of the Bengal<\/p>\n
                   Regulation    Act   and    whether   the limitation    will<\/p>\n
                   commence from the date of judgment or from the date of<\/p>\n
                   death of the mortgagor ?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             In my opinion, all the three questions now proposed have been<\/p>\n
dealt with by the learned lower appellate Court. As far as question No.1 is<\/p>\n
concerned, the learned lower appellate Court has quoted relevant portion of<\/p>\n
the notice of the proceedings under the Bengal Regulation Act, which was<\/p>\n
published in a newspaper, and reads as under :-<\/p>\n
                   “In the above noted case, the aforesaid respondent<\/p>\n
                   intentionally avoids the service of summons and he has<\/p>\n
                   concealed his presence. So, this publication is issued<\/p>\n
                   against the said respondent that if he does not appear<\/p>\n
                   before the Court at 10 A.M on 13.11.90, ex-parte<\/p>\n
                   proceedings will be taken against him.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             A perusal of Section 8 of the Bengal Regulation Act shows that<\/p>\n
it is imperative for a notice to contain stipulation regarding the fact that in<\/p>\n
case the mortgagor does not redeem the property within one year, the<\/p>\n
mortgage will be finally foreclosed. In my opinion, there can be no error in<\/p>\n
the view taken by the learned lower appellate Court that the notice was,<\/p>\n
thus, defective.\n<\/p>\n
             As regards question No.2, the learned lower appellate Court<\/p>\n
relied upon the following judgments :-\n<\/p>\n
                   “1.    Khan Bahadur Mehrban Khan vs Makhna and
\n R.S.A No.1858 of 2005 (O&M)                                          ::4::\n<\/p>\n
                  others, AIR 1930 (Privy Council) 142.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                  2. Jadam Jampur Bai alias Venkamma vs Jinki Siddappa<\/p>\n
                  and another AIR (31) 1944 Madras 237.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                  3. Om Parkash vs Jagat Ram,<\/a> 1972 Current Law Journal<\/p>\n
                  386.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                  4.    Murarilal vs Devkaran, AIR 195 Supreme Court 225.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                  5.     Banwari Lal vs Puran Chand and others<\/a>, 1985 PLJ<\/p>\n
                  151.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                  6.      Hukmi and others vs. Bharat Singh and others<\/a>,<\/p>\n
                  (1997-1) PLR 272.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                  7.    Shib Lal vs Badle Ram, 1969 CLJ 294.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                  8.    Ahsan Elahi vs Alla-ud-Din, AIR 1938 Lahore 809.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                  9.     Munshi Ram vs Nauranga and others, AIR 1924<\/p>\n
                  Lahore 176.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                  10.     Jagni Mal vs Bishambar Dayal and others, 1965<\/p>\n
                  PLR 63.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            The learned lower appellate Court ultimately held that since the<\/p>\n
condition of sale in a mortgage deed is a clog on the activity of redemption,<\/p>\n
the provisions of Section 8 of the Bengal Regulation Act have to be strictly<\/p>\n
complied with. Further, in my opinion, the respondents not being party to<\/p>\n
the earlier proceedings which, as shown above were vitiated,           could<\/p>\n
straightway sue for redemption of the property.<\/p>\n
            As regards the third question, it is to be noticed that the<\/p>\n
respondents, as seen above, were not party in the earlier proceedings and<\/p>\n
they are now suing as successors of Raghubir, the presumption of whose<\/p>\n
civil death could not be raised before September 1995, whereafter they filed
\n R.S.A No.1858 of 2005 (O&M)                                     ::5::\n<\/p>\n
the suit within a few months. Thus, the suit cannot be held to have been<\/p>\n
barred by limitation.\n<\/p>\n
            Consequently, I answer all the questions posed against the<\/p>\n
appellants and in favour of the respondents.   The appeal is, therefore,<\/p>\n
dismissed with no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                       ( AJAY TEWARI        )\nNovember      07, 2008.                     JUDGE\n`kk'\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008 R.S.A No.1858 of 2005 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : November 07, 2008 1. R.S.A No.1858 of 2005 2. R.S.A No.1859 of 2005 Hanumant Singh & others vs Sonu & another […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-20T23:39:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-20T23:39:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":915,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008\",\"name\":\"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-20T23:39:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-20T23:39:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-20T23:39:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008"},"wordCount":915,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008","name":"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-20T23:39:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-s-a-no-1858-of-2005-vs-makhna-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R.S.A No.1858 Of 2005 vs Makhna And on 7 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211834"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211834\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}