{"id":211853,"date":"2009-01-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-19T16:15:14","modified_gmt":"2019-01-19T10:45:14","slug":"puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: H N Das<\/div>\n
      .Sfiit. \n\n THE HIGH COURT ca: KA.R.NATAKsX A? BANCiAI..{\"}RFI\nmsrm TI-HS THE 25\"' DAY 91: ;L%..?*~EIE;iRY, 2009\nB'{\u20ac.F()R.E\nTHE Hom3I.,1%: 1'vfR, JIESTTCE Himi Z\\\u00a7A.<}AM(}\u00a5~\u00a5A?~E 33gg~s:~--".'  Q'  "\n\nRF. A, N0. 22;'?,0{15\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nuuuuuuuuuuuuu run\n\n1 Sm: Puitarudmmma\n'\\<V:"{). {ate Rudraiah\nAged 71 y\u00e9sars\n\n2. Sri, Bhadraiah\nS59. fate Riidraiah _\nAge\u00e9i 46 years  -   _  '\n3, Sri, fagvararnu    """ "\n\ns:a.1a:eRudra:a1;_  Q  \nAg:3d41yrsar\u00a7  " '\n\nA3! are $50. "!7h{)re\u00a7:ai3A*:':\ufb01..--{iIi;2zgt{  .. .' \nBiiaguinbzz D1*w\u00a7;3I\u00e9-- " .' .  \nKasaba Eiobig Mag\u00e9tr\ufb02 tam}: '  "\nRa:\u00b0\u00a7g_3i;3r\u00a2 'Rurai !") i\u00a7:t[ I\n\n%  353939155\u00bb:   \n\n13.3.), 33:13 :F%;;dr;:{mh.v~'\n\n.' .:3.g\u00a3\u20ac\u00a7. 51$ ye-5% \nRfag.  \ufb01lkxge:\nV Kasaiga Hobii, Magadi taiuk\n \ufb01angaiar\u00e9 Rural Dist'\n\n"  'S;n:A\u00a7A--'Ja\u00a7?a:nma\n= $33-'G. ism Easagzpa\nE359. late: Ru\u00e9raia\ufb01\n Age"-:o:i 53 years\nRio. Athimgere viilagc\nMadabai Hobii, Magadi taiuk\nBangaiare Rnrai Dist.\n\n\ufb01g?!\n\naw\n\n \n\n\n\n   \n\n " .  i\u00e9f\ufb01\ufb01isfv\u00e9inma\n\n6. Star. Puttathayaxnxrsa\nWin' Revanna\nDfo. late: Rudraiah\nAged 46 years\n1" Cross, Vijayanagar\n\nBaxlgalore W 40.  Appexzmsv    \n\n{By Sri. Sm'; s. Rae, Adm, fog    4'\nSri. T. Sashagiri R39, Adv.) :\n\n______ --\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 313%. Siddappa @ Siddaiah
\nSE0. late Rudraiah
\nSince dead by His V V’<\/p>\n
114.. Smt.Chandrammg   ‘<\/p>\n
Wfo. Rudraiah, Major _’ ‘ A _ _  .\n<\/p>\n
R;\"0.Basavana?al}}T*3L.v-'    'V   \nThaVarckcrc'Hob\ufb017.._ \" A \" 'V  V\nMagaditalixk .3 'V \u00bb \u00e9 \n\nBarlg-319::   '*--:;., , -\u00bb \"\n\n1B. Smt,  _ \u00e9  \nWit}. Shivaialt, }seiajnr '~V  __ \"\nRig. Ber\u00a2:gowdara::ayiaA' .-- V \" \nKasaba Hobh;  ta'E.;;1<"'\nBagggainge Rurai dist.\n\n'  Wm. E{enukapp&,--\u00ab.Major\nr. Brnp\ufb01at\u00e9r. pf Shivagangw Hotel\n" Lai<.shn1\u00a3va\u00a7'\u00a3j::b\u00a3ta Kaiyarza\n Read\nVras\u00a5;abhav3\ufb011i nagar\n Kamaxsfipalya\n% V, " Magadi Main Read\n vsmngalore 56:5 079.\n\n'   Smt. Puttaihayamma\n\n' " Wii\ufb01. PVI131'{h}', \nRio. Thattcksre, Solar Hobli\nMagadi taiuk\nBangalore Rurai Dist.\n\nww\n\n\n\nER)\n\n313', Parznnashjvaiah\nSfo, Sicidappa, Major\n\n3. T Sn'. Chandrappa\nSEO. Si\u00e9dappa, Major\n\n4. Sn'. Nagaraju\nSE0. Sidciappa, Major \n\nR-2 \u00a30 4 are Rio. Thmepalya village\nHamlet of Belagumba Village\n\nMagadj taluk\n\nBangalore niral dist.\n\n5. Sn'.K.Ha1inath\n\nHan" Enterprises  W\n\nNo.1433,Piw1ineRoad " '\n\nV.Nagar   ; ., \n\nBangai0rew560_1}\u00a3\u20acs{).    ~..;,Respundcnts\n(By Sn". S.N. G3t1g,adi3ara;iA_ctv.; f\u00a7c;:_     .\n<\/pre>\n
Sri. N. Subbashasky, g.”:\u00a7y.,’ fa; R~i(\u00a7:\u00a7&<,$}' amt R42 :6 4
\nSn'.K.1~J,Pa:11,g;csv;,fx5:\u00bbi\u00bb:\u00a2\u00a7)V , * "  <\/p>\n
V map,<\/p>\n
This am is fuea':n;d\u00e9t'se&;riqi:' 935 read with Order 41 Rule my of
\nCPC against the Ivdg1nent'a11<\u00e9'.Vi)earee dated 25.10.2304 passed in Q8.
\nNo. IQ.\/1993 _ on tit: life of Pr}. Civii Judge (Senior Divisien}<\/p>\n
 'di\u00a7n\ufb01ssi1\u00a7gthe.Asuit fer partition and separate pessessicm
\n .qand'Am\u00a2s:r: pr\u00e9\ufb01'\u00a3s. ' ~<\/p>\n
     been hear\u00e9 and reserved for orders, this day,<\/p>\n
 2  NAGMGHAN  gprtmetmced iixe foflowing<\/p>\n
JIEDGIVIENT<\/p>\n
   Regula First Appeal is directed against the judgment and<\/p>\n
dated 25.10.2804 in 0.3. No. 1011993 dismissing the suit cvf the<\/p>\n
 'v  " 'p1\u00e9inti\ufb01's for partitien.\n<\/p>\n
%W”\n<\/p>\n
VI. Wkwther suit filed the plaintiffs is barred by time’?
\nVII. swhcther piaimiffs have \ufb01led this suit withcut any cause of<\/p>\n
action’?\n<\/p>\n
VIII. Whether plainti\ufb01is are entitled $0 the reliefs sm;.gh_’i”  ‘4 3<\/p>\n
this suit’?\n<\/p>\n
IX. What decree or order’?\n<\/p>\n
I. Whether plaintiffs prove\u00bb Vsuit  :-a<_;I1\u00a3:c1;,:1!e'::"j:'s<\/p>\n
a1so the joint fmmjxy propemx  all\u00e9gg\ufb01?\n<\/p>\n
4. Before ghc  three witnesses as
\naw. 1 t0 m%,V3  \u00a7cg_ ;t_1z\u00a31r_l<j:\u00e9~:.\u00a5.:: 1A3:!~i.P'.:,:A1VVVV.*\u00a7<:t\u00a7 Ex,P.28. The defendants
\nexamined t\ufb01gee  ilW.3 and get marked Ex.D.1 to<\/p>\n
Ex.D.3G. The  the parties and on agpreciation<\/p>\n
of pleadiggs 3:31 arid"  evidence hald that there is no joint<\/p>\n
  'bgtween  piainti\ufb01s and iiefendants a3 on the date of<\/p>\n
 Vi\u00a72;::f  passed {he impugneci judgment and decree<\/p>\n
  dismis\u00e9izag the; sci; mace, this appeai by the piaintiffs.<\/p>\n
 =  Stmil S. R30, teamed counsel for the piaimi\ufb01s acntend that<\/p>\n
K  tgfiai Cmxri comzmitted an iflegaiity in hekding that the fmiiy 0f<\/p>\n
  __4'41j\u00a7air1\u00a3i\ufb02f"s and defen\u00e9ants are geparaied hang back. The $133! Conn<\/p>\n
committed an arm" in ant taking into consideration the documentary<\/p>\n
\u00a3;~L~..x..,w<\/p>\n
evidence on reeord and misinterpreted E:=\u00ab:.P.16 and Ex..P.1?. The triai<\/p>\n
Court failed to notice that the defendants have failed to demonstrate the<\/p>\n
eariiet partition by eiacing aeeeptabie evidence. The tziat Court eemmttteti<\/p>\n
an errer by oniy \u00a3'8\u00a7}'i3:'lg on the written statement \ufb01led in <\/p>\n
I35.:"19?(3. The trial Court faiied to ceasider that there were   j" <\/p>\n
statements \ufb01led in (3.3. No. 135:'I97\u20ac}, In the written stateme3:1t— _  u<\/p>\n
04.08.1978 there is :10 reference to the paztitiett between  {?t1elrt;'tiV'a%1"azi\u00a7;?\u00a7t,___ :, At<\/p>\n
Siddaiait. Further it was eat}; in the written et__atemei1t.v_\ufb01ieti on;<\/p>\n
there \u00a35 a reference with regard to the ;3ettitit\u00a7i:._t1nd_that  in reepeet
\n0f heruse coesttuction in surve3tf"':'!-Ft}. f'3t3._ :Ti'.eV  Caurtu vtitholzt
\nconsidering this documentary evidence on   an ezmr in<\/p>\n
hol\u00e9ing that there is  'I't:e Cattft be\u00a7e\u00a5\u00a7?:_"eo_mt;\u00a7itted an error in<\/p>\n
hotding that Rtidreiah  separate applications before the
\nDeputy Commiee1:anjez*tfefiz1e\ufb01:,VAt}t\u00a7ii-tietittfer grant of occupancy rights in<\/p>\n
reseect of  iteme 'cf_ela?irzt Stheduie properties and therefore there is<\/p>\n
:'a._peititiot1V;"  Sear: without ctmsidering the RTC e:~;tract and the<\/p>\n
eerttfiett teeth;  ttte" \u00e9fdetipassed under the Imam Abolitimt Aet had came<\/p>\n
 the eta:-teiusiext thetttthere is at partition, In the abeenee cf rebuttat<\/p>\n
~ jvwie\u00e9ieztee by " defendants the trial Ceurt ought ta have raised a<\/p>\n
4'~–.vVx1:3reeI:9\u00a3t:13ti(tti'A_'th3.t the plaintiffs an\u00e9 defendants constitute joint family and<\/p>\n
H  grreperties are the gem: family pmperties. Merely Because the<\/p>\n
 .\u00bbpe:ties are residing separateiy it Wiil not amount to a eartitien among<\/p>\n
gkvw<\/p>\n
:'\u20acii(i\u00a2iEaiaI1f " '1': isE"f;i:;x"f\u00a71R:er.\u00a2_conten{\u00a7';c\u00a73 that the plamti\ufb01s with an intentit:-n to<\/p>\n
 V mopeni\u00e9s\ufb01f  and their family members are alse izxeiuda\u00e9 in
\n" jgfai-1::_  sc\ufb01e\u00e9uie ";::\ufb01\u00a7pertie3. There is no aceeptaisie evidence on recatd to
\n j\u00e9stablisii that the-rs waists 3 joint fzzsnih-' and ihat tha piaint
\n'   grerperties are the jeini familgs prepertiea. Reliance is placad an<\/p>\n
V'  A  Vfailoawing deeisians.\n<\/p>\n
them. It is ccniended that the reasoning of the trial Court is cenafary to the
\nevidenae can record. Reiiance is placed on the feilcwing decisiezms.\n<\/p>\n
1.  Raghavamma and another Vs. A. C7hencham1}j;i’,,<\/p>\n
amther, AIR 1964 SC’. 136<\/p>\n
gm)<\/p>\n
Bhagwaznt P. Sulakhe Vs. Dig\u00a7un’i3’a;*
\noth\ufb02s, AR1986 SC $9 : V  V 1\n<\/p>\n
3. Duid1iDibya and ushers;\n<\/p>\n
Am 1973 O1issz\u00a7__182 F? \u00bb .  V\u00bb\n<\/p>\n
4. Addspalii \\r’6n\u00a7\u00a73″i\u00e9:V:i,axi\u00ab;x\u00a7 ‘?:\u00a7”s; Nayasimha<\/p>\n
Rae mlemthm 53$-19942b.?”‘?3″  ‘V\n<\/p>\n
6. Per czentra \u00a7Sri’g: ={}a:.:g3:ihair\u00ab,. ‘iea_i*nc_;i__fi:-nunse! for the<\/p>\n
ziefendanis s:11:*,-v;v_)<3:11_3:fi.=:\u00ab:'_ii'ig:".1g21:;.f, and \u00e9ecree of ihe trial (L'-eurt.
\nHe contends x;1at'::\u00ab.:;=; nuaraga;1%%g\u00a2.n;a@g b\u00e9fore the triai Court in ash 323.<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
135519136 34\u00a3\u00a7atingthatat\u00a71er\u20ac:_V i's a p\u00e9rtition between himseif and his brother<\/p>\n
hara\ufb01 \u00e9izd ii&1ti.'3v{ii:d;-lute u1',h:=3 riefendants have filed the suit. The self-acquim\u00e9<\/p>\n
1. Adan Singh V3. Karla: Singh and others, AIR. I95}. SC $93<\/p>\n
O****~*”””‘<\/p>\n
Z1<\/p>\n
10. It is also seen from the reeerd that bath the parties have
\nseparately deait with some ef the schedule preperties on their own<\/p>\n
individual right. This is evident from the RTC. extracts as found at Ex.D.1<\/p>\n
is Ex.D.-‘t, Katha certi\ufb01cate -~ Ex\u00abI).5, Reeerd cf rights -\u00bb Ex.D.l2..<\/p>\n
Ex,D.13. index of lands W Ex.{).14 to Ex.D.25, the gi\ufb01 deed -~   ;. it <\/p>\n
the sale \u00e9eed W Ex.D.11. The Trial Court by care\ufb01llly examiiaingi  ezitire<\/p>\n
documentary evidence en record had rightly gatiierexi.  inteizticm bf  A  f<\/p>\n
parties and concluded that a paxtition elgeady ltekzeti place\u00bb  there  <\/p>\n
no existence ofjeint family as on the date ef\ufb01ling of shit.  fmiiing of
\nthe Trial Ceurt is supported by Jeiiidentfe Q31’:  theveattie is in
\naceerdanee with law. 1 fund no j1t_stifiab\u00a7e’_ V5gfeundViVi<}–l.}_;2tei–fere with this<\/p>\n
finding of the Triai C\u00a7_;"uft}:, 11' M <\/p>\n
11. The iuelgtnente lreiieclil the learned colmsei for the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs  taetsupieort ceee. The Triat Court aise censideted seine<\/p>\n
 the  cited. befereiitiie mid had rightly eettciuded that they are<\/p>\n
ef tie  jtq tIieV”1)la:’eitiffs.\n<\/p>\n
12. ‘Feithe reesens stated above, the apgeal is hereby’ dismissed<\/p>\n
 ._t\u00e9t*t:li neef\u00e9et as to eests. Ordered accordingly.<\/p>\n
Sd\/…\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
LRS .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009 Author: H N Das .Sfiit. THE HIGH COURT ca: KA.R.NATAKsX A? BANCiAI..{“}RFI msrm TI-HS THE 25″‘ DAY 91: ;L%..?*~EIE;iRY, 2009 B'{\u20ac.F()R.E THE Hom3I.,1%: 1’vfR, JIESTTCE Himi Z\\\u00a7A.<}AM(}\u00a5~\u00a5A?~E 33gg~s:~–".' Q' " RF. A, N0. 22;'?,0{15 BETWEEN : uuuuuuuuuuuuu run 1 Sm: Puitarudmmma '\\<V:"{). {ate […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211853","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPuttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-19T10:45:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-19T10:45:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1083,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-19T10:45:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-19T10:45:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-19T10:45:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009"},"wordCount":1083,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009","name":"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-19T10:45:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttarudramma-vs-siddappa-siddaiah-on-16-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Puttarudramma vs Siddappa @ Siddaiah on 16 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211853","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211853"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211853\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}