{"id":211951,"date":"2009-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-08-25T11:28:45","modified_gmt":"2017-08-25T05:58:45","slug":"sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O … vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar … on 3 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O … vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar … on 3 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
74 \u00bb \"'1.RALIANN;\u00e9's;__o THAMME GOWDA\n\n   STTHAMMEGOWDA\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF I.i;iEc;\ufb01)\"wt>A\" \nAGED Aaom 65 YEARS\n_ Q _'FHvIMMA'RAY_5.' GOWDA\n\n ,Q_T.AG-Ia.f\u00a7,_A:30Ufr 45 YEARS\n\n' ..PET1T10mf+:Rs 3. TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT\nKALKERE VELLAGE '\n CHEKKATHIRUPATHI P03?\n'  AA .-LAKKUR HOBLI\n\" , MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DIST\n\nAGED ABOUT 70 YEARS\nS] 0 THAMME GOWBA\n\nJ:\n\n'-v\n\n \n\n\n\n6 S T MANJUNATHA\nAGED ABOUT 50 YEARS\nS\/O THAMME GOWDA\n\nPETITIONERS 5 85 6 ARE R\/A\nSAMPANGERE VILLAGE,\nMALUR TALUK, KOLAR B131'\n\n7 SRINIVASA GOWDA \nAGED ABOUT 52 YEARS\ns\/0 THIMMARAYA GGWDA\nR\/A KALKERE VILLAGE  \nLAKKUR H0813 \"  V    \nMALUR TALUK, KOLAR I;:>is'r\"=.._ ' _ ..;~--PE'f'IT\u00a7O\u00a7NE\u00a7RS\n\n(BY SR1: MUNIYAPPA  _ _   \n\nSR1: s KALYAN BAsAVA_r\u00a7;A;J, 5;:j)1.Is)'\u00bb\u00bb _\n\nAND :\n\n2 '\u00a7'I-IE'1'25I44iL4\\Si'I;1)AV\u00a3\\\"\u00a7 ' -- H\nMALUR'~l'_A\u00a3;l.}K-_ \n3:31.53 Dlsflfmcr\n\n  L \"willie:-.\"::>E'i:%IJTY C\u00e9hamlsslousa\n\n ~\u00a7s:0I.;AI? 'DISTRICT\n.4_T.x0.L_Ag \"   RESPGNDENTS\n\n' .._gBY $Rf1'_:' LRVIKUMAR, HCGP)\n\nV ' +TI-HVS'WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNEER ARTICLES 226\n\n  N\n  NO'; 81[02 REJECTING THE APPEAL IN AS MUCH AS Y1'\n  VRELATES TO CONFIRMING THE REUECTION OF THE\n\n'4 'APPLICATION MADE BEFORE THE 2\"\" RESPONDENT,<\/pre>\n
L<\/p>\n
\/-\n<\/p>\n
v.\n<\/p>\n
DEPUTY COMMISSEONER, KOLAR DiS’\u00a5’RIC’I’ K01_,_aR-  <\/p>\n
ANX-A; E’I’C., <\/p>\n
This Writ Petition comirlg V—9I1~– .f9rT
\nhearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the :.\u20ac’,efur2i_ madex<\/p>\n
foilowingz V
\nonnegg
\nThe petitioners  .. :4   iipmer
\ndated 4.12.2003 passeti $13?’  Appellate
\nTribunal in Rey;   appeal. The<\/p>\n
said order is”  ‘aig; VA to the petition.<\/p>\n
The petii;ive11erAAh\u00e9;;-3   fora mandaznus te direct<\/p>\n
the seeonti  proceed with the matter<\/p>\n
 beaxmg “I\\Eo.DV.V’CRV.:iG8)’98–99 ti\ufb02 the decision 01’ the<\/p>\n
 i\ufb01:\u20ac),S.No.95\/0}.\n<\/p>\n
  pe\ufb01tioners contend that they are the<\/p>\n
 “‘\u00a7;1’>s?i:ez\ufb01\u00a7*.;  possession of the property bearing Sy.N{).94<\/p>\n
   situate at Ch1’k.’x;at1’rL1pat11i vilkage, Lakknr Hobii,<\/p>\n
 ‘  “e.e’VM51ux Taluk, Koiar district. The second<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
”4<\/p>\n
respondent\/Qeputy Commissioner had   *<\/p>\n
ixiitiated proceedings in Case   <\/p>\n
and had uitimately passed the order   7.:<\/p>\n
wherein the Hakkudharsl \ufb01ghiis–\u00a7#’if1ichd’had Aiigreetee
\nto the fore fathers of  tgiie  “eeineelied.
\nAgainst the said order,    before the
\nKariiataka Appeliede.   $30.7 19\/1998<\/p>\n
and 43\/199-9] *i>ee’eK3rismdi ‘e  Tribunal by its<\/p>\n
order dated’   aeide’ itlie order dated<\/p>\n
30. 1 1.1998vV”peissed– t:’1e.:V_:i3e;;Luty Commissioner and<\/p>\n
remanded. the  _f?ord”vreeonsideratioz1. Dining the<\/p>\n
1\u00a7$eiid.eney{‘o\u00a7,” remafitied matter certain villagers are<\/p>\n
 Vaidp\ufb01ea\ufb01ons for imp}.eading thenzzseives<\/p>\n
as parties  ” proceedings before the Deputy<\/p>\n
” i.i,3::_i1;ui:1.issio:1ei”. The petitioners herein had. objected to<\/p>\n
  Simultaneously, the petitioners herein had<\/p>\n
‘”Vi’a:’ieo.__.i11stituted a suit in O.S.Ne.9E3\/2001 seeking<\/p>\n
 “eeexereeen of their title in respect of the suii eeheeuie<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
‘1<\/p>\n
3. The peti\ufb01oners have relied en <\/p>\n
documents in this Writ Petition te irxdieate\ufb01hatt  A ”<\/p>\n
name of the fore fathers of the petitioixes\ufb01s etxe  <\/p>\n
in the kathedar register \ufb01om the year <\/p>\n
and subsequently the rf:VeI1t1\u20ac:v..:\u00a7’?i?:tI’i\u20ac.&’;
\nname of the petit:ioI}e1\u00b0:::;  it is””i”t:ifi:1}e:?.._e0Iitei1cie{i that
\nwhen this was the pasitieilg Dept1’ty~~.CQmmissioner<\/p>\n
has unilaterally.   \ufb01ghts and<\/p>\n
1’31 any evtetity  :”c;1f:Cier  sustainable. The
\npetitionefs. ‘ec;i1te:VIid’ f \u00bb..:’they have inherited the<\/p>\n
properjty,fr0zii”tI1eir’:–for’e fzithers and are in pOSS6SSi(}Z\u00a3’1<\/p>\n
 V\u00e9ind  oftthetv same and as such their right<\/p>\n
esn\ufb01et ‘i:~e”i1:terf;e 1fed wim.<\/p>\n
 _ [4…-…A’\u00e9V1’he respondents have filed their objection<\/p>\n
 estate\ufb01ent to the Writ Petition. In the objection<\/p>\n
  ‘statement, the ecmtention put forth by the petitioners<\/p>\n
 ” have men opposed an\u00e9 it has been contended that the<\/p>\n
t<\/p>\n
“S<\/p>\n
 eenc1i3.sio13;.\n<\/p>\n
with regard to the right to the property   <\/p>\n
case would have to be deeidtfjd…  _-‘the e-.1:  .4  <\/p>\n
Commissioner since the matter has bees’ rema\ufb01ded :i3:~.yi;j<\/p>\n
the Tribunal. Hence  short   <\/p>\n
eonsidera\ufb01on by this   ‘as ted  the<\/p>\n
proceedings before the   should be ‘<\/p>\n
allowed to    the suit in
\no.s.No.95\/2ooie%odsv}\u00a7e;; a.1a;ge;- to be decided
\nby the    revenue documents
\nwhich are-relied  partiee could also form<\/p>\n
the evi_c\u00a7ez1cedferV_:the’.(3iiri}  te uitimately come to its<\/p>\n
 I13′  regard, a peruse} of the order dated<\/p>\n
 1×2,2(}(“)8_.A\u00e9:’passed by the Tribunal would indicate that<\/p>\n
A    has approved the dismissal of the said<\/p>\n
 Ii’ ep\ufb01lication by neticing mat the same has not been<\/p>\n
‘A   ‘inade ir1vok:i:x}g the appropriate provision of iaw and if<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
‘-T<\/p>\n
fled against the v\ufb02iagers. Presently, the pet.itione,?:sV_Vs1:4e~V._<\/p>\n
claiming right in respect of the property contenriitigf   <\/p>\n
they have inherited the property      <\/p>\n
doubt, the petitioners have referred   7-1:<\/p>\n
documents to establish  <\/p>\n
of declaration of right and tit;et\u00a75versssu;e .si1it..,sc.tiedu1e
\nproperty has been  *  to the plaint<\/p>\n
indicates that  are the<\/p>\n
very    and 94 of<\/p>\n
Ch1’kkatIiimipat11i   Taluk, Kolar District.<\/p>\n
   1-j”‘\u00a3’he._  herein have entezed<\/p>\n
  suit and have \ufb02ied detaiied written<\/p>\n
  statexnent.-sriiereirl the vexy contentions which are now<\/p>\n
‘ ”   objection statement in this Writ Petition<\/p>\n
  urged in the Written statement. Therefore, in<\/p>\n
 Hi” ‘thesaid written statement, the respondents have also<\/p>\n
  “evened with regard to the nature of revenue entries to<\/p>\n
J\u00bb<\/p>\n
p-\n<\/p>\n
“5<\/p>\n
E2<\/p>\n
comes to the conclusion that the   _<\/p>\n
to be withdrawn, yet several other rights whiof:  ‘4 <\/p>\n
open to be decided before the Civil  [fee<\/p>\n
completed. In such event,    to
\nmultiplicity of proceedings ane.e{e:ero;e,    in
\na fact of this nature whe2e_ are involved
\nbetween the   also before<\/p>\n
the Civil    AtheV_ respondents have<\/p>\n
._ also filegiv ‘theirs.   is appropriate that<\/p>\n
the  –  ..-issue before the Deputy<\/p>\n
Commissioner’ gasses  oirder one way or the other.<\/p>\n
     Without pronouncillg upon the right<\/p>\n
  as oi-aj;med~tt1e parties, limiting only to the aspect of<\/p>\n
”  I Lreiief\u00e9i’ prayed before the Karnataka Appellate<\/p>\n
  with regard to the stay of further proceedings<\/p>\n
 = …fore the Deputy Commissioner till the Civil Court<\/p>\n
 ” ” decides the issue, I am of the opinion that the Tribunal<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
7-I<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O … vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar … on 3 August, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna 74 \u00bb “‘1.RALIANN;\u00e9’s;__o THAMME GOWDA STTHAMMEGOWDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF I.i;iEc;\ufb01)”wt>A” AGED Aaom 65 YEARS _ Q _’FHvIMMA’RAY_5.’ GOWDA ,Q_T.AG-Ia.f\u00a7,_A:30Ufr 45 YEARS ‘ ..PET1T10mf+:Rs 3. TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT KALKERE VELLAGE ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O ... vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O ... vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-25T05:58:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\\\/O … vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar … on 3 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-25T05:58:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":836,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\\\/O ... vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-25T05:58:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\\\/O … vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar … on 3 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O ... vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O ... vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-25T05:58:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O … vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar … on 3 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-25T05:58:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009"},"wordCount":836,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009","name":"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O ... vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar ... on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-25T05:58:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatesh-gowda-so-vs-the-tahasildar-malur-taluk-kolar-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Venkatesh Gowda S\/O … vs The Tahasildar Malur Taluk Kolar … on 3 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}