{"id":212057,"date":"2009-08-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-24T07:09:13","modified_gmt":"2015-05-24T01:39:13","slug":"kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009<\/div>\n
R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M)                               1\n\n\n\n      In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh\n\n\n                        R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M)\n                        Date of decision: 18.8.2009\n\n\nKanta Devi and others\n\n                                                    ......Appellants\n\n                        Versus\n\n\nInderaj and others\n\n                                                 .......Respondents\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA\n\n\nPresent:   Mr.Ajay Jain, Advocate,\n           for the appellants.\n\n                ****\n\n\nSABINA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
           Plaintiffs Inderaj    and Bhim Singh filed a suit for<\/p>\n
possession, which was partly decreed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.)<\/p>\n
Dabwali vide judgment and decree dated       14.6.2005.       Defendant<\/p>\n
No.1 Sushil Kumar filed an appeal against the plaintiffs and<\/p>\n
defendants No. 2 and 3. The said appeal was dismissed by the<\/p>\n
Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Sirsa vide judgment and<\/p>\n
decree dated 1.11.2008.     Hence, the present appeal by the legal<\/p>\n
representatives of defendant No.1.\n<\/p>\n
 R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M)                              2<\/span><\/p>\n
           Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the lower appellate<\/p>\n
Court in para Nos. 2 and 3 of its judgment, are as under:-<\/p>\n
           “2.         In brief, the case of the respondents is that<\/p>\n
           they filed a suit for possession of the suit land mentioned<\/p>\n
           in head note of the plaint and the same is situated within<\/p>\n
           the revenue estate of village Chautala. Tehsil Dabwali,<\/p>\n
           District Sirsa. Through this suit, prayer was made that<\/p>\n
           respondent No.1 be directed to execute the sale deed in<\/p>\n
           favour of the appellants qua the suit land and the<\/p>\n
           appellants be restrained to alienate the suit property in<\/p>\n
           any manner. It is also alleged that the sale deed bearing<\/p>\n
           No.1281 dated 5.8.1988 executed by respondent No.1 in<\/p>\n
           favour of the appellants has been set aside, therefore,<\/p>\n
           they are entitled to get the land equivalent to the land<\/p>\n
           which respondent No.1 agreed to sell in their favour.<\/p>\n
           They also prayed that in case the land is not given to<\/p>\n
           them then they be allowed to claim the consideration of<\/p>\n
           the sale deed, registration charges and other expenses<\/p>\n
           and the suffering of mental agony.       Since they have<\/p>\n
           contested the suit up to the Hon’ble Apex Court though<\/p>\n
           they lost the battle.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           3.          Notice of the suit was given to the appellants.<\/p>\n
           They have denied all the averments of the respondents.<\/p>\n
           It is averred that respondent No.1 was not the owner of
\n R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M)                              3<\/span><\/p>\n
            the suit property, therefore, he was not competent to sell<\/p>\n
            the same in favour of the appellants. The appellants were<\/p>\n
            supposed to verify the title of the respondent No.1 and<\/p>\n
            then they should have purchased the suit land but this<\/p>\n
            has not been done by them. Smt. Saraswati Devi was<\/p>\n
            owner in possession of the sit land and the title of the<\/p>\n
            respondent No.1 came to an end in the year 1986 when<\/p>\n
            decree in favour of respondent No.1 was set aside by the<\/p>\n
            Court. It is also alleged that the appellant got the sale<\/p>\n
            deed executed when respondent No.1 was under the<\/p>\n
            influence of liquor because he was addicted to it and no<\/p>\n
            consideration was paid to him and in this way, the<\/p>\n
            appellants are not entitled for anything from the<\/p>\n
            respondents and prayer has been made that the suit of<\/p>\n
            the respondents be dismissed with costs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were<\/p>\n
framed by the trial Court:-\n<\/p>\n
            “1.        Whether the plaintiffs are bona fide purchaser<\/p>\n
            of the land measuring 45 kanals 18 marlas, as detailed in<\/p>\n
            para No.2 of the plaint? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            2.         Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the<\/p>\n
            possession of the suit land measuring 45 kanals 18<\/p>\n
            marlas detailed in the head note of the plaint, as prayed<\/p>\n
            for? OPP
\n R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M)                               4<\/span><\/p>\n
           2-A         In case, issue No.2 is declined, whether the<\/p>\n
           plaintiffs are entitled to compensation i.e. loss suffered by<\/p>\n
           them, if in affirmative then how much ? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           3.          Whether the suit is not maintainable in the<\/p>\n
           present form? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           4.          Whether the suit of the plaintiffs is barred by<\/p>\n
           the principle of resjudicata? OPD<\/p>\n
           4-A         Whether the suit of the plaintiffs is time<\/p>\n
           barred? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           5.          Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder and<\/p>\n
           mis-joinder of necessary parties? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           6.          Whether the plaintiffs have no locus standi<\/p>\n
           and cause of action to file the present suit? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           7.          Whether the plaintiffs are estopped by their<\/p>\n
           own act and conduct to file the present suit? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           8.          Whether the plaint is liable to be rejected<\/p>\n
           under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           9.          Whether the plaintiffs have not come to the<\/p>\n
           Court with clean hands, hence, they are not entitled to<\/p>\n
           any relief? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           10.         Relief. “<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the<\/p>\n
suit filed by the plaintiffs was hopelessly time barred. The plaintiffs<\/p>\n
could have filed the suit within three years from the date they had
\n R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M)                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n
been dis-possessed from the suit land. The plaintiffs had been dis-<\/p>\n
possessed from the suit land in the year 1999.<\/p>\n
            After hearing learned counsel for the appellants, I am of<\/p>\n
the opinion that the present appeal deserves to be dismissed.<\/p>\n
            Learned trial Court, after appreciating the evidence on<\/p>\n
record has held that defendant No.2, while appearing in the witness<\/p>\n
box as DW-1, has deposed that the possession was taken from the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs in the year 1997 and hence, the suit was filed within the<\/p>\n
period of limitation. The sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs was set<\/p>\n
aside. Thereafter, the parties litigated up to the Apex Court. The<\/p>\n
decision of the Apex Court was rendered on 26.10.1998. Hence, the<\/p>\n
suit filed by the plaintiffs in the year 1999 could not be held to be time<\/p>\n
barred. The sale deed in question was executed by Shushil Kumar,<\/p>\n
who was not competent to execute the same but had accepted the<\/p>\n
sale consideration from the plaintiffs at the time of its execution.<\/p>\n
Hence, the Courts below rightly ordered that the plaintiffs were<\/p>\n
entitled to recover the amount of sale consideration etc.<\/p>\n
            No substantial question of law arises in this regular<\/p>\n
second appeal. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                                 (SABINA)
\n                                                  JUDGE<\/p>\n
August 18, 2009
\nanita\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009 R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh R.S.A.No. 942 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.8.2009 Kanta Devi and others ……Appellants Versus Inderaj and others …….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-24T01:39:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-24T01:39:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":951,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-24T01:39:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-24T01:39:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-24T01:39:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009"},"wordCount":951,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009","name":"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-24T01:39:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kanta-devi-and-others-vs-inderaj-and-others-on-18-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kanta Devi And Others vs Inderaj And Others on 18 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212057"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212057\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}