{"id":212088,"date":"2010-08-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-08-16T02:34:37","modified_gmt":"2018-08-15T21:04:37","slug":"k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT eARc;'A'i;gci'RAe\n\nDATED THIS THE 315T DAY OF AUGU\u00a7T Azaiid\" as  A'\n\n \n\nTHE HON'BLE MRTJLISTICE RAVI cMcA_Li'M'A'T'H'V\n\nREGULAR eT:R:3T APR'5AL~~.tN\u00bb0A:;'s25 or 2001\n\nBETWEEN:  \n\nK.A.Sathi.sh~ii_K;:ma'r'   ..  \n\nS\/o late _A.'S.Kr'i5hna--.Setty,\"\"~-~-- \n\nAge:MajoT';5H.inVd'u,  T *\n\n63\/1,, Gtound\"F:\u00a7ootr\u00bb,._\"-_ \n\nKanakap'ura'RQad.;- \n\nFacing G.ovindap_pa._Roa~d,\n\nBasavana'g'.1dI',~' '-\n\nBa<nga~:ore -- 5=eo_QQ4. ...APPELLANT\n\nA :=(:By  Boralah R., Advocate for\n" _Sri R.K:;'SVhashI_vIf;1ran Shetty, Advocates)\n\nAND}.\n\n._--._..\u00bb-\u00a2...m-- .\n\n 'A  KV\u00a7Anantha Nagaraja Setty\nA  j;HIndu, S\/o late A.S.KrIshna Setty,\n " " Since deceased by his LRs\n\n 1(a) Smt.A.N.Shakunthalamma\n\nW\/o late K.Ananthanagara3'a Setty,\nHindu, Major,\n\nV\/(T\n\n\n\n \n\n(b)\n\n(C)\n\n(Cl)\n\nOiympic Toys & Sports Wear,\n\n85\/A, First Fioor, K.H.Road,\n\nBangaiore -- 560 027.\nSmt.Nagaratnamma (Maiiried-).aj  i' '\nHindu, Major,  \n\nD\/o iate K.Ananthana.garaJaSetty,   H\n\nOlympic Toys & Spoi'i:_sy"'~.,.'\\,_\/year," .\n85\/A, First Fioor, K.H.Ro_a'd_._\nBangaiore -- 56.0 027,---~- _ \n\nSmt.SunItha (ri".arrse'd_)}. }    _\nD\/o iate K.Anantha_nagaraja'~.Se--t'tf,r._,--~\nW\/o Srie'-G.R.N,a'ta'raj, Adv'o_cate,~_ \nHIndu,'M,ajor,  _    \nNo.239, 5243" Cross, 15?" fiviain,\n\n2"'? St_&i'ge",' B.anas'i:arii<a,ri,  \n\n__ \u00a7an'g.a'ioi:e,V_j   \n\n Sri' A'.  .\n\n'i--1inctu,'M_a3oif, _ \nS\/o,_!ate K,An.an'th"anagaraja Setty,\n\na \u00bb No.23, A"'A'NAN*'"HA",\n Rathna'Vr.i,a_s_a.Road,\nniaasavanagudi,\n\n B.ar1,g"a!ore " $60 004.\n\n 2  Setty\n\n Hinriu',1,MaJor,\n S,e*--.o late A.S.Krishna Setty,\n\n_ V Savntce deceased by his LRS\n \n\nSmt.A.S.Annapurnamma\nHindu, Major,\n\nW\/o iate A.S.Narayana Setty,\nMahatma Eiectricai and\nGenera! Traders,\nBasavanahaiii Mam Road,\n\n\n\n \n\n(D)\n\nChickmagalur.\n\nSri A.S.Prakash Kumar\nHindu, Major  . \nS\/o late A.S.Narayana se y,:... j} '\n\nSince deceased by his LRs;V \n\nSmt. Pushpa A.P.\nAge:Major, Hindu, '\nW\/o late A.S.P_rakash,_Kumar,._,\nMahatma Electrical and '  , , \nGeneral Trader:-.,.i' ._  if; \nBasavanahalli Main Road;  " "\nChickma9alur.,~~~-   \n\nSri. \u00abKi'ran7A..';'P." .j   \nHindu, E'-lajor,\u00bb\n\nS\/o"'lat'e ';'%;;._S_. Pita' lzavsh Ku  r,\n\n Mla'haf;'ma Electrical and\n General~Tra'ders,,,,T*2. ' -\n'.Basava.nahall_i'Mam,Road,\n\niii}" "\n\nC~h,i4cl:_n1a'g all; r. \u00bb-- \n\n,Smtu.S'i"i.![V[5El'\n\n. ,__,Hir1_du, Majo--r\u00ab\u00abA'\n\n LA}\/o 'late A.S.Prakash Kumar,\n' -M,\/'vs. .Ma~nnar Textiles,\n\nlVlaVkl<<.\u20ac'ji Chowk, S.R.M.P.T.,\n\nV__M*i,r.s.are - 570 001.\n\n   ?'\u00b07  \n\n.S'ri A.S.Ramesh\nHindu, Major,\n\nS\/o late A.S.Narayana Setty,\nSince deceased by {Rs\n\nA.R.Usha\nHindu, Major,\n\n\n\n \n\nEll)\n\nW\/o late A.S.Ramesh\n\nM\/s. Mahatma Electrical and\nGeneral Traders,\n\nBasavanahalli Maln Road,"   A \nChickmagalur. (Karnataka)  . 5'\n\nA.R.Shreyas .\u00bb \n\nHindu, Major  \n\nS\/o late A.S.Ramesh L'  _ \nM\/s. Mahatma,..Electrlc-aland'-._\nGeneral Traders}. T    \nBasavanahalll Nlarn~R~ga'lj,.v   - _\nChickmagalur. (lgarnataka)   \n\nA.R.Sl1r'u,tlil   \nHindu, M5aj_o_r ~     .\nD\/3) lateA;S=..Rarn\ufb01eSh=..,.--  \nDau'Vgh'te\u00e9f;iv_n,~la,w of * 3'\n\n M.l\\liRlam_achar=z\u00abdra.,.Setty,\n Dealers 'in,'  . N ,,P'rc__kel,_s,\n\nOppo%site.,_to-~..B--:ls"-St\u00e9md,\nShlrala.kop.pa,., (Slj\ufb01karipu ra Taluk)\n\n-- ., fshlmoga' Distrl-ct. (Karnataka)\n\n;,fSrl '"A.S. Nalge\ufb02ndra\n, H.lli--d,vU',. Major,\n\n"M,ahatn"la Electrical and\n\n""General"Traders,\n\nBasay'anahalli Main Road,\n\n VChic'kmagalur.(Karnataka)\n\n  as (ea), "sre A.S.Harish\n\nHindu, Major\n\nS\/o late A.S.Narayan Setty,\nMahatma Electrical and\nGeneral Traders,\nBasavanahalli Main Road,\nChickmagalur. (Karnataka)\n\n3\/\/\u00ab~\n\n\n\n \n\n(f)\n\n(9)\n\n(b)\n\nSmt.A.S,Sudhaman|\n\nHindu, Major,\n\nD\/0 iate A.S.Narayana Setty,\nW\/0 Srinath  \nC\/0 Sri M.M.Kodandarama\nOld Extension Koiar. (Karnataka)\n\nSmt.Uma\nHindu, Major,  ' r\nD\/o late A.S.N_a rayan,a..S_fet_ty,.,,'\nW\/o Amarnatn,'*~~._   , \n~C\/0 Prasannaifuma-r_  }\n\nDonthi Agencies, -- V  '\nGandhinagar, '\nTumm-\n\nSri \n\n     \nS\/o !ate5A. __.i~1.ara.y"a-n_a Sett\nRatfina'TaikiV'e.$,'r\u00bb _  " \nCiiriania React", _  \nArasikere. (Hassan...-District),\n\n. ' (Karnataka) "\n\n_ Sri" K.AnanthaIaxmana Setty\n  i~!.iVn"d(i,i. Major,\n i'S,\/o..,Iat\u00e9j'-A--v;'S.Krishna Setty,\n\n Sinc\u00e9j'jD.\u00e9ceased by his LRs\n\nSmt.A.L.Saroja\n\nHindu, Major,\n\nW\/0 late K.Anantha!axmana Setty,\nRathna Taikies,\n\nCinema Road,\n\nArasikere (Hassan District)\n(Karnataka)\n\nA.L.Sathyanagendra\n\n\n\ni\n\nSetfvfg   ' i\n\n\n\n \n\n(C)\n\nHindu, Major\nS\/o late Ananthalaxmana Setty,\nRathna Talkies,\n\nCinema Road, \nArasikere (Hassan District\n\n(Karnataka)   \nSmt.Padmaja  \n\nHindu, Major ' _  ,_\nD\/0 late K.Ananthalax\u00abma'iia Betty, "\n\nW\/o Radhakrishna Setty,   , ,\nNo. 56\/A, Sri V\u00e9~ni<ten:s--i.ori,- \nRamavki'-isima E_xten~s'ion,, '  V. \nKe_moego;vv_da'vl\\laga.,r,  \nBaingalore 4'---56GCQ19'.~ \n\n Srnt;'Savra,s'w,ath.jV".___\n Hindu, Major'-_ \n\n'D\/jo l,ate'~.KV.+'\\na_rito,aia.xmana Setty,\nW\/0, H. C. Na ga \n\n' ~ _C\/o Si-taiaxlmi Trading,\n_Dealers 'lil.N.Qkla Products etc.,\n\n.  jlv'iain__Road,\n\n* .(e"i\n\n\u00bb  _ ( Karnataka)\n\n.VSi*i?'ijt;.l3'nagyalaxmi\n_Hi.nd*u, Major\n\n"D\/o late K.Ananthaiaxmana Setty,\n\nz aw\/o Venkatesh Murthy,\n\nBhagyalaxmi Agencies,\n\nDealers in Harlicks Products etc.,\nC\/o Venkateshwara Medical Stores,\nNear Burujinahatti Circle,\n\n. Holaikere Main Road,\n\nChitradurga. (Karnataka)\n\nlike\n\n\n\n \n\n(f) Smt. Rekha\nHindu, Major\n\nD\/o late K.AnanthalaxmanaNSetty,--  =   \n\nW\/0 Shiva Kumar,  A A_ \nS\/0 T.L.Gopalal<rishna Setty,,\u00bb , \n\nC\/0 Sri Gurukrupa ProvisionS*tQ.res,i"V_~._L'* . 2 V' \n\nAmeer Ahamad Circle,-..__\nl3.H.Road,  \nShimoga. (Karnataka)  .\n\n5. Smt.M.R.Sumitrarrlma 1{M.;.-.--riei:lj). \nHindu, Major      \nD\/0 late A.S.Krish.n.a Setty,  i " V\nW\/o Sri VM.,:S.'Ran\u00a7jan,atii=.-a.Setty, i "\n\nC\/0 M\/S_\u00a7M.3:'inivasai R'ang_aiavh And" Son,\nGeneral"'M\u00e9r'ch'3nt'9-b.,,    \nstation R.oa;d, ' l  1\n\nKadu '(gKariiataka.)"--.\n\n6. K.A.Chandraka'n:th' \n\nHindu, MajorC__ ' ,   _ \n\nS\/o late A.S.Kris--hna Set_.ty,, \nNo.3371\/11A,_"RamanVa'shre\u00e9"\n\nNear Stj*ai3.ka__ra Leela 'Kav!.x,r.a\u00abna Mantapa,\n\n C.'C.. Black,' iDa_ira{1agere. (Ka rnata ka)\n\n. s ri  .A..M}\u00a7 V  V . \n\nHindu,' Major, * \n\n  S,\/o late"-A.S,._l<rish"na Setty,\n Rathna Tal$..<ie.=5_,\n" " ~ 1;Iiine"ma, Road,'\n.A _ '~VAra.\u20ac5\u00a7kerel-..(Hassan District)\n ._  (_Karn.ataka)\n\n Q SjrEvvK...A.Surendranath\n AHin.du, Major,\n "\u00bb_S\/o late A.S.Krishna Setty,\n H_l'No.1742, 9"' Cross,\n\n\n\n \n\n10.\n\n11\n\n2"" Phase, J.P.Nagar,\nBangalore -- 560 078.\n\nSri K.A.Prabhakar   \nHindu, Major\n\nS\/o late A.S.Krishna Setty,   A 'it\n\nDoor No.4,\n\nJooganahalli, '\n\n33r Cross, 2"" Block,\nRagajinagar,  \nBangalore -- 560" 010.  " \n\nP.S.Sathyanarayana'Seth}  _ _\nS\/o P.Sub.r_amanVya~Setty'-- _ \nB.H.R_oa_d,;5"i'  - " _\nArasgikereg,    _ *_\n(HasS_&.in:,.D.iA_strI<;t')._  ._ " V\n\nOpposite to  oysaleshwara'v(;_oIl,eg,\u00e9,'\n\n.VS.?ri 'PQS. MaVdjl:.uVsudli'zan'a' '\n\nS\/og P.Subrarna-ni\/a.,_S'etty,\nOpposite to .Hoysai|.e"shwara College,\n\n .B.H.Roa.d,' ~ *\n..  Arasi i?l<\n\npossession.\n\n...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
    Senior Counsel for R1(a-b),
\n~. “R2′(A,’D_’—G)’, R3, R5-11,
\niF_Za_2(l3).(.I,I4_i\u00ab,III), R2(c)(I,II,III), R4(A,B,C,D,E,F)~Served)<\/p>\n
This RFA filed under section 96 CPC against the
\nment and Decree dated 18.4.2001
\n O.S.i\\\u00a3o.’52\/95 by the Civil Judge, (Sr.[3n.) and Addl. CEM,
\n‘ Arasikere, dismissing the suit for partition and separate<\/p>\n
passed in<\/p>\n
‘H?\n<\/p>\n
…3_o..\n<\/p>\n
earned huge amounts from his <\/p>\n
purchased moveable and immovable properties in the :’:or”rn_ <\/p>\n
of lands, buildings etc. The p:l?aintiff\u00e9..\u00a7rvas_.al.s:o e’ng*a,g’e.d: in <\/p>\n
the said business. There was a miwsunderst:a’ndin_gmbetween’<\/p>\n
the plaintiff and the defendants and of which
\nthe plaintiff approacheti tihef __to effect a partition
\nin the suit scheduleVAp.ro’pert’ies:.,by?.\u00e9”metes;.and bounds. On
\nbeing denVied  plaintiff filed the
\npresent   and separate possession
\nof   schedule properties and
\nfor  profi..tVsAtifijefennd\ufb01ants 3, 4, 6 and 7 resisted the<\/p>\n
suit of,Athe4’Vpl.a”in’ti’ff and denied the plaint averments. While<\/p>\n
–  Aa’ci’mit’t’i:i1g:’h’rthe relationship, they contend that a partition<\/p>\n
   between the plaintiff and the defendants<\/p>\n
vv’h_ichV___v’vgas–‘Anoticed by virtue of the document dated<\/p>\n
 ,A3,1~3..–;’vl.El81. In terms of the said document the suit<\/p>\n
 -.,V’sch.edule properties and other properties, were partitioned<\/p>\n
 .. _..between the plaintiff and the defendants. As a<\/p>\n
consequence of the division of the properties, the plaintiff<\/p>\n
%~<\/p>\n
_11_.\n<\/p>\n
has executed a document in his own hand\u00a7tlilri’ti~nVg..__taay’i’ng<\/p>\n
received the Pr0Derties as allotted to h_i–i’i’i;~\ufb021’n\u00bbView_of:’t’fie:”–..<\/p>\n
acknowledgement of the plaintiff himself’=wlit.h”reg’ardA tt<;sa_the <\/p>\n
acceptance of the division\u00bbi'o-fg_the 'share
\nthe plea of the plaintiff is   is liable to
\nbe rejected. Thesl.ft-h_er\u00abefoVrel'.  that a partition
\nhaving taken place a.nd.:.th.e acted upon,
\nthe suit  rejected. The trial
\nCourt  On contest, the
\ntrialwolurt  the plaintiff. Aggrieved by
\nthe svame',  the present appeal.\n<\/p>\n
VV”~__Sri Karan Boraiah, the learned counsel<\/p>\n
 the appel.lant–plaintiff contends that the<\/p>\n
Air’n_pugvn’e.d.7~”Jludgment & decree is bad in law. He submits<\/p>\n
 up thatllthie trial Court placed reliance on Exs.D~3 and D4<\/p>\n
A’ –.._’while dismissing the suit. He contends that Ex.D–3 does<\/p>\n
slnot bear his signature and hence the same cannot be<\/p>\n
acted upon. He contends that the partition deed being<\/p>\n
\ufb02ew<\/p>\n
….13….\n<\/p>\n
the case of ROSHAN SINGH AND OTHE-Rs.s[;”‘z\u00ab:V’i’,:;f:<\/p>\n
AND OTHERS reported in AIR 1938 SC 883:\n<\/p>\n
if a document is put into wri:-t_ving,_–Aeffecti,ng “a di:vi.sit:1n, it <\/p>\n
requires to be registered.-.._AdmVi”ttedly,
\nunregistered document, it  upon for any
\npurpose whatsoeve’r1…_..’:’*  if if<\/p>\n
5. H  Senior counsel
\nappearin.g,,,on’Vblehlalf counsel contends
\nthat.:Vthere”lg.VVg\ufb02ireri<or"'-Icommiltted by the trial Court that
\nCallsvlfforl'  submits that Ex.D-3 is a<\/p>\n
document.' ex,ecu'1tedV' by all the family members excepting<\/p>\n
–    He contends that as a consequence to Ex.D–3<\/p>\n
  the plaintiff in his own hand writing has<\/p>\n
Aac.kno’wie,c?gAed the receipt of cash in lieu of his share in the<\/p>\n
 , suitzschedule properties along with other properties. He<\/p>\n
.”-.._”th.efrefore contends, that on a reading of Ex.D–3 and<\/p>\n
.:\u00a7Ex.D~4 the only conclusion that could be drawn is that a<\/p>\n
partition has been effected, that there has been a<\/p>\n
ir<\/p>\n
…..14….\n<\/p>\n
severance of status and that the p_a’rtiti’o~n_13has<\/p>\n
consequently been acted upon, not only  <\/p>\n
but also by the plaintiff. He f’urth.e4rAjj.pl’aces<\/p>\n
Exs.D–13 and 14. The: said ‘V”document\u00a73*VVi,’:E’a’re <\/p>\n
pertaining to the Wealth Ta’>’t\u00b0\u20ac..;i;fficer ain-diithye income–Tax
\nOfficer respectively. ‘   onvthe same, he
\ncontends thatA,_Ex.D–3,,..vi)_a\u00abs  the concerned
\nauthorities:  yvould–‘vindicate that having
\nreceived   upon the same by
\nrecogjniziynij” of\ufb02status and properties, since
\nthe y’e’a..ry”1981.._.AV::Hie_”‘fuV’rther contends that in terms of<\/p>\n
Exs.’D–3 anti, adjust and equitable division has been<\/p>\n
 .ijr\u00a7’adg3:_..rgnjda\ufb02thatthe plaintiff has received the amount<\/p>\n
\u20ac;..’C’j__E5h support of his case he relies on the<\/p>\n
3udg.rnent in the case of K.G.SHIVALINGAPPA(D) By L.Rs.<\/p>\n
    OTHERS v. G.S.ESWARAPPA AND omens reported in<\/p>\n
“AIR .2004 sc 4130 to contend that even though thezre is a<\/p>\n
ii\\@,-\u00bb—-~—–~<\/p>\n
_.15…\n<\/p>\n
partition by way of an unregistered deed, <\/p>\n
looked into in order to show severaricefofg”s.ta’tus,_anal<\/p>\n
division of properties. He fuittheri-pliacesh’ ‘r’e’i-ianc:e.._\u00e9o*n;_the7 ”<\/p>\n
Judgment in the case of\u00bb’ivi.tiNNiiKe.l_dALi
\nSURAI BHAN AND OTHERSu:rexportedVin’  1s’75 sc 1119
\nto contend that, evenji-f_ti;?_e  is not signed by
\none of the parties  not invalidate
\nthe  parties subsequent
\nto the the arrangement has been
\neffected. By relying on the said
\n3udgnnen’the  that even though the plaintiff<\/p>\n
hasvngot signeci”i’:”x.lV’)-?., in view of Ex.D-4 being written in<\/p>\n
.   ?.–.\ufb01~anV%d~writing’ tttt of the plaintiff and in view of the<\/p>\n
  of the plaintiff with reference to the<\/p>\n
pr_opevrties~”divided, the document should be read as a<\/p>\n
 A. document evidencing the partition, severance of status and<\/p>\n
 -..v”division of properties.\n<\/p>\n
7. Heard counsels and examined the records.<\/p>\n
rt<\/p>\n
._16._<\/p>\n
8. The trial Court while considering.'”thtej—cas.e_”ovf<\/p>\n
the parties specifically referredwto  <\/p>\n
Ex.D-3 is a document evidencing pa.rt1iti4on’.’8t’sevei*aAn’i\u00a7e*\u00e9of <\/p>\n
status. Ex.D–4 is a hand.\u00bbwr.i_ttenV”d.ocume;1VtV”o\u00abfthe iplaviintiffi
\nevidencing receipt of money:’etc.,.VV_in   share vide
\nEx.D–3. In deterrhini\ufb02nfg the:’suit:’averments, the trial
\nCourt came tothe co.nc.lusio.’n.Athat.”h_.otvryi’thstanding the fact
\nthat Ex.DfV3._’:vdo:es sighatu’te or the plaintiff, the
\nsame  purposes. It came to
\nthe  jof\ufb02the partition being effected
\nand tl’ie_fpartie’s it, the plaintiff cannot be<\/p>\n
allowed toaresiglefrom the said document. Ex.D~4 has been<\/p>\n
   the  writing of the plaintiff himself. By the<\/p>\n
    he has evidenced the receipt of cash in his<\/p>\n
fax\/ou,r;’ \ufb01ifthe other immovable property that he has<\/p>\n
 by recefiviecl is a house at Bangalore. Therefore, Ex.D—4 is a<\/p>\n
.”–.,_”d\u00bbocument which has been acted upon by the plaintiff<\/p>\n
xghimself in pursuance to the partition effected by virtue of<\/p>\n
Ex.D–3. I find no error committed by the trial Court that<\/p>\n
rr~<\/p>\n
…..1″]…..\n<\/p>\n
calls for any interference. The trial Court has–.ygrightly<\/p>\n
rejected the suit by coming to the  a<\/p>\n
partition has been effected by metes and and”<\/p>\n
the plaintiff has received his”‘d’ue’_s.hare:\ufb02in_ [the ?said<\/p>\n
partition.\n<\/p>\n
9. In the course ,or” ‘d._l’scu’ssing “E)'<';D4Zi, the trial
\nCourt has also taken "meter. the'?.fa.ct*._that it has been<\/p>\n
written by the\u00e9lplaingtiiit there is no reason to<\/p>\n
disbzelievex sa3rne.4;:'T.helearned counsel for the plaintiff
\nhowever contends'A'th_at.:'Ex'.:D~3 is a sham document having<\/p>\n
been executedby the plaintiff for various other reasons<\/p>\n
 Aqot'hVer*fthan'_ evidencing partition. However, there is no<\/p>\n
  on record to support his contention. When<\/p>\n
lar_geV__exteTnts of property, namely, an extent of more than<\/p>\n
 _ 40 schedule properties exist, the contention of the learned<\/p>\n
 –..V”c\u00bbou.’nsel for the appellant that Exs.D-3 and D–4 have come<\/p>\n
.:into being for reasons other than partition or severance of<\/p>\n
status is hard to accept.\n<\/p>\n
rip<\/p>\n
-19..\n<\/p>\n
11. Exs.D-13 and D14 are the acknowledgennents<\/p>\n
of the Wealth Tax Officer and the IncomemjfaljlzwiVylt\ufb01\u00e9fficery.<\/p>\n
They indicate that as a result of the submissli-on\u00bbo_f.  <\/p>\n
to them and the said applicationfhayi’ng,_ been  all T<\/p>\n
the parties concerned, therelevantI”recordsj;pe’rtain*\u00a7.’ng.to<\/p>\n
Wealth Tax and the Income~–Ta\u00bbx haVe_V_ been<\/p>\n
altered. There is my…gl:a;leleti’eh\u00a7’hyfl-..the l\ufb01liafhtvfff to the
\nconsequential changes ‘njacl’fe’}in  Ex.D–13 and<\/p>\n
Ex.D~14 e\\{en’5_thouighg tl~1:ey’~ iilvlfe-re_.___Vl’nade in the year<\/p>\n
1983}-84. _AllA-iA”elt;..;\u00a2V_  of the change in status of
\nthe farnily.ym’etn’b-ers:’w.o’t2l”d imply the acceptance by the<\/p>\n
p|al’rl’tiff. Tlheyychangle of status and the ownership of the<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.propertieTs~.._.have since been altered by the concerned<\/p>\n
  ‘a’tltho.r:i’ti,esfjon*’ the basis of the application made by the<\/p>\n
rrlem.b’ers3’of the family. The plaintiff has failed to shake<\/p>\n
 .. the said evidence on record. Therefore, the evidence<\/p>\n
“z:”pertaining to Exs.D~13 and D–14 require to be accepted.<\/p>\n
it Hence the suit requires to be dismissed on this reasoning<\/p>\n
also.\n<\/p>\n
fff<\/p>\n
……2o……\n<\/p>\n
12. On the basis of the suit averme.nts’_;a_nd’,;~the<\/p>\n
evidence led-in, it would indicate that the_p_ro_p.ertiA_esl”of ithien’ <\/p>\n
family have been equitably divid’_ed:,betjvveerl.u\u00bball’fn_Athe<\/p>\n
members. However, having rec’e,i_v’ecl his,-“I.share of*the~,<\/p>\n
properties, the plaintiff is att”ei<n'pti_ng to~.ta'ke: advantage of<\/p>\n
Ex.D-3 having not   Itlwas therefore
\nvehemently contended of the plaintiff
\nsigning vnoiilegal sanctity. The
\nvery been answered by the
\n _theVVVcase of MUNNA LAL (DEAD)
\nBY L.5R's._v. suR.A1%31l1.snlAi$i'fgVA:fo OTHERS reported in AIR 1975<\/p>\n
S4(\u00a7'11._19..' Iytidwas held therein that in a case where the<\/p>\n
  notusigined by one of the parties, that by itself<\/p>\n
  '\u00abwo,uidf"n,otV.Aii'nvalidate the partition especially in view of the<\/p>\n
fact t'h'at.:the parties by their conduct have shown that the<\/p>\n
 .. _said"partition has been effected. In the present case also,<\/p>\n
i  "it~=can be seen that Exs.D–3 and D–4 having been accepted,<\/p>\n
if the severance of status having taken place, the properties<\/p>\n
being divided into the respective shares by virtue of Ex.D-<\/p>\n
re<\/p>\n
_22_.\n<\/p>\n
Therefore, when the plaintiff admits his signature arid the<\/p>\n
hand writing on Ex.D-4, his contention that it <\/p>\n
unconnected with Ex.D-3 or of a partition <\/p>\n
remained as a mere contention anti ‘not.s–uppo.rt’eo_’ .by7’any<\/p>\n
material or evidence.\n<\/p>\n
14. The trial t:oV_iirt .w’hilei.’j’ei\u00a7’aminingV”Ex”.D–3 took
\nnote of the fact with reoalrdlltoli t’he..:v’eAI1;a_ti_on of each and<\/p>\n
every property’:asl’_’–noi:Aed.:in.’ contains the<\/p>\n
list of%_the_ proipertiesp  by the family. It also indicates
\nthe valuation olfiee\u00e9aeh a4n”d:every property and based on the<\/p>\n
said;’va_iuati.Von__the properties have been fairly divided.<\/p>\n
Even the lviaibilitiesulllof the family have been detailed and<\/p>\n
 dVivstrViybui.te.dV:’_amongst themselves. The share of the plaintiff<\/p>\n
was. accepted by him substantially in the form of cash.<\/p>\n
The evidence on record would indicate that he intended to<\/p>\n
 his residence and business from Arasikere, to<\/p>\n
 ….establish himself at Bangalore. None of the defendants<\/p>\n
had expressed any desire to shift over to Bangalore. It<\/p>\n
\ufb01e\/<..—–\n<\/p>\n
_23….\n<\/p>\n
would therefore imply that in view of the {he<\/p>\n
plaintiff to shift his residence and business..i\u00b0’V:’Vo..:fn’:Ara’sii<ereVV'<\/p>\n
to Bangalore, his share in the1:Apar:titiovn"\u00abwags<\/p>\n
given to him in terms of cagsh.4_<\/p>\n
15. The learn;e_cl\u00ab. defendants further
\ncontends that the house,:’ptopVeArtTy  to the share of
\nthe  at” the guit schedule
\npropertic-:-::s–.,V.V  reference to the suit
\nhouse plaintiff himself in Ex.D-4.\n<\/p>\n
The  “Valued in Ex.D-4. In view of the<\/p>\n
express desi..f\u00e9””of.’V’the plaintiff to shift his business to<\/p>\n
 \u00ab_VSang”a:’lor%e.and  of the existence of the said house at<\/p>\n
 _*Banga’l’oreV,.ufV-it:”probablises the intention of the parties to<\/p>\n
give..__t’he.’\u00abhouse at Bangalore to the Plaintiff. Ex.D-4 is not<\/p>\n
 .. ,j_ust”a” list of properties which the plaintiff has accepted.<\/p>\n
V”‘E–x”.D-4 is an acknowledging document which is clearly<\/p>\n
if written by the plaintiff himself. There has been a<\/p>\n
reference to the division of the wealth, shares, properties<\/p>\n
Zl{…….\n<\/p>\n
__24…\n<\/p>\n
moveable and immovable, with reference to the plvaV_in..t’ifff_ as<\/p>\n
well as other defendants and from certain  <\/p>\n
amounts have also been quantified. :Ther:e_fora,”.Vit <\/p>\n
evident and clear that Ex.D–4 evid:e’n.cinpqreceiptffef”the<\/p>\n
share of the plaintiff is in lieu ‘of the ‘divisiionif’rna\u00a7de,ViVn <\/p>\n
of Ex.D–3. The trial Court____ha.s_ r.i_ghtlv \u00ab–af;’:-vprevvcfiated the
\nevidence and materiai.._”o”n_’record. and :has rightly came to
\nthe conclusion that the “suiit of\ufb01hiel requires 1:0 be<\/p>\n
rejected. .\n<\/p>\n
 ” It “by the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
plain-t~iff that..:VEx.V|5–4.”-caznnot be relied upon, as the said<\/p>\n
 docuni’e’rnt”l’i.h_as been prepared for reasons other than<\/p>\n
 Vev-iden..ci’n%.g hiiseshare. However, it is to be seen that no<\/p>\n
referenvce.tfofEx.D~4 was made by the plaintiff in his plaint<\/p>\n
 iaverrnerits. It was suppressed by the plaintiff. The<\/p>\n
 -..Vw–ith\u00e9Ano|ding of Ex.D—4 would lead to an adverse inference<\/p>\n
 V. ._..against the plaintiff. Assuming that the case of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff requires to be accepted, in view of the large<\/p>\n
l;9\/so<\/p>\n
……25……\n<\/p>\n
amounts of property involved and when <\/p>\n
submits that a particular document has,lvbeer\u00e9\ufb02ivn\u00e9ronglyV’l2<\/p>\n
prepared which bears his handwiritinpiy\u00e9andKsig_nature.i,:yy”wVh_ich<\/p>\n
the defendants attemptedkto miilsuse, the”-l.\u00bb3a:m\u00abe lshoizildgy<\/p>\n
have been pleaded by him.’v’V”AVpparenti”y;ti1*ere.’:’is no such<\/p>\n
pleading with regar’::l..y.._”to :\u00abiy_r*..i:t*l<i.e plaintiw It would
\ntherefore neceyssarilyiyimvply,  t'he.'c\u00e95n.t'.ention that Ex.i:)-<\/p>\n
4 is a  hia_s"nece.ssari!y..~to be rejected.<\/p>\n
 1_7_'.1 the" valuation of the entire suit
\nschedule "evidenced by Ex.D-3, would<\/p>\n
ingjicacte that  adjust and equitable division of the family<\/p>\n
  Theuvaluation made with regard to the entire<\/p>\n
"'_"fami'~i~g):"'–\u00ab._pro'pe'rties were to the extent of a sum of<\/p>\n
F"<s.4l3",2;5,f"7A78.99p\/~. The 1\/9"' share of the plaintiff would<\/p>\n
 A. Vctherefiore be valued at Rs.5,46,975.44p\/-. The amount in<\/p>\n
 received by the plaintiff was to the tune of<\/p>\n
if Rs.5,02,614.47p, leaving a balance payable to the plaintiff<\/p>\n
to a sum of RS.44,360.97p. The said calculation at Ex.D-3<\/p>\n
re"\n<\/p>\n
…26…..\n<\/p>\n
would indicate that the balance of Rs.44,360.95?~o.’wo’ul’f:i,:l:~e<\/p>\n
payable to the plaintiff within 2 to 3 days.._?jIt_waiuidaiggggii<\/p>\n
further indicate that the said b_a|an:cejj,<\/p>\n
received and the plaintiff has__ consedeentlvV-‘en.d’orsed”th’a’ta.cg<\/p>\n
there are no dues from eithevlrwside and’-thV’atV’the;\u00a7document<\/p>\n
stands confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
18.   n:otwith’sta;’ndVirigthe respective claims,
\nthe properti’e.s;i’;_of’Vthe.V’Vf’a’im:ii’y”l’has?\/\u00e9i been divided in a fair,
\njustiand exgmtaolie.An”ia:n~nVer, All the members have received
\napproiximateleou’al*s:_ha.fesI’ There is no unequal division of
\nthe ‘liroperti-es.”\n<\/p>\n
T’   reasoning of the trial Court while<\/p>\n
d~ism.is’si..rig the suit is in tune with the facts 8:<\/p>\n
 A. , circumstances involved. I find no error that calls for any<\/p>\n
 “‘in’terfererice. The Judgment & the decree is in consonance<\/p>\n
with the pleadings and the material evidence. Even<\/p>\n
otherwise, even on equity I’am of the considered view that<\/p>\n
if\u00bb<\/p>\n
._2’7…\n<\/p>\n
the plaintiff has received his due share in the family<\/p>\n
properties and that no injustice has occurred to him.<\/p>\n
For the aforesaid reasons, the appeai beinigdeni\/o*i’d of.  <\/p>\n
merits, is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
Rsk\/~  H<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010 Author: Ravi Malimath IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT eARc;’A’i;gci’RAe DATED THIS THE 315T DAY OF AUGU\u00a7T Azaiid” as A’ THE HON’BLE MRTJLISTICE RAVI cMcA_Li’M’A’T’H’V REGULAR eT:R:3T APR’5AL~~.tN\u00bb0A:;’s25 or 2001 BETWEEN: K.A.Sathi.sh~ii_K;:ma’r’ .. S\/o late _A.’S.Kr’i5hna–.Setty,””~-~– Age:MajoT’;5H.inVd’u, T […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nK A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-15T21:04:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-15T21:04:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2620,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010\",\"name\":\"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-15T21:04:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-15T21:04:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-15T21:04:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010"},"wordCount":2620,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010","name":"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-15T21:04:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-sathish-kumar-vs-k-anantha-nagaraja-setty-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K A Sathish Kumar vs K Anantha Nagaraja Setty on 31 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212088"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212088\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}