{"id":212420,"date":"2011-03-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011"},"modified":"2016-09-26T13:21:31","modified_gmt":"2016-09-26T07:51:31","slug":"mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                               File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000268\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a014,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a014,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Lal\u00a0Purohit\n           17\u00a0E\u00a0\/\u00a0450\n           Chaupsani\u00a0Housing\u00a0Board\n           Jodhpur\n           Rajasthan\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n           Respondents\n\n\n\n           North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Bikaner\u00a0Division\n           Bikaner\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0S.R.Meena,\u00a0APIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0ADEE\n                                     Shri\u00a0L.R.Meena,\u00a0Sr.DPO\n                                     Shri\u00a0V.K.Sharma,\u00a0CPI\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                 Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nThe\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0objective\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0achieved\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0\n\nbeen\u00a0given\u00a0his\u00a0additional\u00a0increment.\u00a0\u00a0Even\u00a0so,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0\n file\u00a0notings\/communications\u00a0 \u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0advance\u00a0increment\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0approved,\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0\n\nAppellant \u00a0 so \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 can \u00a0 satisfy \u00a0 himself \u00a0 as \u00a0 to \u00a0 how \u00a0 the \u00a0 decision \u00a0 was \u00a0 arrived \u00a0 at \u00a0 for \u00a0 providing\u00a0\n\nadditional\u00a0increment\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0why\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0such\u00a0a\u00a0delay.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                             at\n                                                    New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                          File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000268\n\n\n                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.28.6.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Bikaner.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0April\u00a01995,\u00a0three\u00a0employees\u00a0of\u00a0Bikaner\u00a0Division\u00a0including\u00a0 \u00a0himself\u00a0 \u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       appeared \u00a0 for \u00a0 Part \u00a0 B \u00a0 of \u00a0 Civil \u00a0 Engg. \u00a0 Exam \u00a0 and \u00a0 were \u00a0 declare \u00a0 successful \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 as \u00a0 a \u00a0 form \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       encouragement\u00a0\u00a0they\u00a0were\u00a0given\u00a0an\u00a0advance\u00a0\u00a0increment.\u00a0\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0extended\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       him\u00a0while\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0two.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0context,\u00a0he\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0rules\u00a0by\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       additional\u00a0increment\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0two\u00a0employees\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0rules\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       denied\u00a0the\u00a0increment\u00a0even\u00a0after\u00a0\u00a0being\u00a0declared\u00a0as\u00a0successful.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a030.8.10\u00a0informing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       him\u00a0that\u00a0reply\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0on\u00a021.7.10,\u00a0while\u00a0enclosing\u00a0a\u00a0 \u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0reply.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.8.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       not\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0till\u00a0date.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0directions\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a019.10.10\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0department.\u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.18.11.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0grievance\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0redressed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       since \u00a0 after \u00a0 reviewing \u00a0 the \u00a0 \u00a0 facts\u00a0 and\u00a0 circumstances,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 has\u00a0 been\u00a0 given\u00a0 an\u00a0 additional\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       increment.\u00a0 \u00a0 The\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0however,\u00a0complained\u00a0at\u00a0this\u00a0stage\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0giving\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       increment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     The\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0objective\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0 \u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0achieved\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0given\u00a0his\u00a0additional\u00a0increment.\u00a0\u00a0Even\u00a0so,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       is\u00a0directed\u00a0 \u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0file\u00a0notings\/communications\u00a0 \u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0advance\u00a0increment\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n          Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0approved,\u00a0 \u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0can\u00a0satisfy\u00a0himself\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0how\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         decision\u00a0was\u00a0arrived\u00a0at\u00a0for\u00a0providing\u00a0additional\u00a0increment\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0why\u00a0there\u00a0was\u00a0such\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         delay. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 information \u00a0 should \u00a0 reach \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 by \u00a0 14.4.11 \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 to \u00a0 submit \u00a0 a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a021.4.11.<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                           \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                   Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Lal\u00a0Purohit<br \/>\n         17\u00a0E\u00a0\/\u00a0450<br \/>\n         Chaupsani\u00a0Housing\u00a0Board<br \/>\n         Jodhpur<br \/>\n         Rajasthan<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n         North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Bikaner\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Bikaner<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<br \/>\n         North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Bikaner\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Bikaner<\/p>\n<p>4.       Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000268 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a014,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0March\u00a014,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Mohan\u00a0Lal\u00a0Purohit 17\u00a0E\u00a0\/\u00a0450 Chaupsani\u00a0Housing\u00a0Board Jodhpur Rajasthan The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office Bikaner\u00a0Division Bikaner Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0S.R.Meena,\u00a0APIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0ADEE Shri\u00a0L.R.Meena,\u00a0Sr.DPO Shri\u00a0V.K.Sharma,\u00a0CPI Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice The\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0objective\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0achieved\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0 been\u00a0given\u00a0his\u00a0additional\u00a0increment.\u00a0\u00a0Even\u00a0so,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0 file\u00a0notings\/communications\u00a0 \u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0advance\u00a0increment\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0approved,\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 so \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-26T07:51:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-26T07:51:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":417,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-26T07:51:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-26T07:51:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-26T07:51:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011"},"wordCount":417,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011","name":"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-26T07:51:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mohan-lal-purohit-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Mohan Lal Purohit vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212420\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}