{"id":212468,"date":"2010-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010"},"modified":"2017-03-04T04:40:43","modified_gmt":"2017-03-03T23:10:43","slug":"patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n
 (aj  _S.N;MA.\\{jARPA\n _(b) \"\"'S.w;._'RARA'MESHWARAPRA\n   SQRMALLESHARPA\n\n ~ .j'{d) S.N.PANCHAKSHARAPPA\n\nRESEDING AT KUDUR,\nHONNUR TALUK,\nDAVANAGERE DISTRICT.\n\n..PETITJ:C\u00a7N  'V' \n[By Sri Ravmdranath.P'V, Advocate}   E'\n\n1' SMT MALLAMMA\nW\/O MALLARRA,\nAGED ABOUT 63 YEARS\n\n2. BASAPPA S\/O HANUMAPPA \nSINCE DECEASED BY-HIS L._R_'s'-.._ \n\n(a) B.G.vEERABHADRAR.RA_\nS\/O LATE BASAPPA\n\n(b) S.G.JAYARA_f'        \nS\/O LATE;_BA;iA-PPA   _'   \n\n(c) B. G. BAi\u00a7SAV:AR.AjA'PP.A.\"'::.'j. \nS\/QML_ATE..VB'AS:.A_RRA   * \"\n\n(d) B.}73.RL_JDFA{ATF\"F?;9\\._V'T'   \nS\/OBASAERA    \n\n3. NAM}LA.TN.DAAPPA  A\nfr3;'O _HANU\u00a3V.lAP'PA\nv\u00bb~ET\u00a7NC'E E)ECEAf3\u00abE.E?...B'{ HIS L.R'S\n\n\" V _ S;'O_\"'L_A'|*F[ N_A_N3L}NDAPPA\n'- ._AGE'D 'A:3_c;~;J\"T' 57 YEARS\n\n S\/D [.jATE NANJUNDAPPA\n' A'  AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS\n\nS\/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 52 YEARS\n\nS\/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 51 YEARS\n\n \n\n\n\n(e)\n\n(f)\n\n(9)\n\n(h)\n\n(a)\n\n(b)\n\n(C)\n\n <dj)*T\n\n A (e)\n\n A  AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS\n\nS.N.SHE\u00a7ASA\\\/ARAJAPPA\n\nS\/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 38 YEARS T.\n\nS.\u00a7\\l.SURESHAPPA\nS\/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 35 x{E'A_:\u00e9_\\s\n\nMALLAPPA S\/O HANUM_AP.b'A...7'  _ \nSINCE DECEASED BY_.HI_S_L.R's._ \"\n\nSHANMUKH'A'PEA    \n\nS\/O LA.TvE'*MA'!.:L.A.PP.A;   ..\nAGED 'V.'ABC.V}:|L-'Jfit' 4S'--YEA'R\u00a73_  :\n\nOH'A'N'DRAfPPA'A::7'}V ' \nS',-{O LATE'MA~LLAPPATL_  \u00ab .\nAGED A8OUT'4'3.YEARS_ \n\nSHARADAMMA~_ A\n\n, D\/Q LATEv-MA'LLAPTF'A\n '~',,AG_ED ABOUT D4_3N_\u00a7(EARS\n_V INVD':2.AMOMA__\n\n ' D\/.'O._LAT'E. MA LLAPPA\n'._:AGE D;AEsO'UT 39 YEARS\n\n KA..Ti:Es.'xSAPPA\n\nS\/O'j.LATE MALLAPPA\n\n..5MANJAPPA\n\nS\/O LATE MALLAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS\n\n(ALL ARE RESIDING AT BIKKONAHALLE\nVILLAGE, HOLALUR HOBLI,\nSHEMOGA TALUK)\n\n \n\n\n\nGMBASAPPA\nS\/O PATEL MALLAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 26 YEARS\n\nG.M.PA\u00a3_A\u00e9<SH\/APPA\nS\/O G.D.MA\u00a3_LAPPA\n\nAGED ABOUT 25 YEARS\n(ALL ARE RESIDING AT 31KKONA"HAL_L:Ai'  \nVILLAGE, HOLALUR HOBLI,  '\n\nSHIMOGA TALUK)\n\nK.L.ESWAR\nS\/O KLINGAPPA GOWOA\n\nAGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, _\nRESIDING AT 2"" CROSS, ;\nRAVINDRA NAGAR, "   'E\nNELASIRI, SHIMOGA   V\n\nvEERANGOw{:A,v.PATIz;  _ --. \nS\/O VE E_ R,A13SA.;j\\\/_A.'.NA3O__wD.A PA .\nAGEO A%3OL_1T;S2 \\'rEARS;;j-.   \nRESIDING.\/W ':AI_REirE'RO'R MA.I_'\\: ROAD,\nHIRE'K'ERLiVR:,POS:T;-- *  \nDISTRICT HA."JE_R"I.  "\n\nS.T.CHA'NORAR_T5A\u00ab.'S-JO"MARPA\nAGED ABQUT 41-_YEARS,,--7\nRESIOING AT BIKKONAHALLI\n\n..:<3QM M-.ANALO" P-O_S___'_|_'__,& ,\n"vDIS',\u00a57F?IC'T.&SHiMOGA\n\nE_S'.T.rv@ALLESH'APPA S\/O TIMAPPA\n._  AGED AvBO'ujT"32 YEARS,\n\nA VRESIDINO AT ESIKKONAHALLI\n'T<.OM._MAAuALu POST\n\nDISTRICT SHIMOGA\n\nA 'S,T.MOHAw KUMAR\n= ._S\/'O TIMMAPPA\n\nAGED ABOUT 32 YEARS\nRESIQING AT BIKKONAHALL1\nKOMMANALU POST,\nDISTRICT SHIMOGA.\n\n..RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
{By Sri M.R.RajagODa\u00a7, Advocate for R3,]<\/p>\n
5′<\/p>\n
THIS LRRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC,
\nAGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.6.91, PASSED IN M.;A.,NO
\nS1\/86, ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT’.3UDGE_,
\nSHIMOGA, DISMISSING Ti-\u00e9E APPEAL FILED BY THE A..RPELLA’NT\u00bb
\nFOR CORRECTNESS OF THE ORDER PASSED BY
\nTAHSILDAR, SHIMOGA IN vO.A.c 20\/83~84. \u00ab ”   ” R. ‘E<\/p>\n
IN ‘WP 24443\/ 1991<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1. GOWDA BASAPPA,
\nSINCE DECEASED BY
\nLEGAL REPRESEi\\ITAT.Iu\\\/ES,A..”W = <\/p>\n
(a) B.G.vEERABHADRAERA  ,
\nAGED ABOUTS1 YEARS,’  A<\/p>\n
(b) B.G.JAYAE’PA’,’j;\ufb02.’ _
\nAGED ABDU7  f_5_3Y EARS <\/p>\n
(c) (B.G.) S’;vB.{BA5S5AVARA}Ai5PAHA
\nAGE’D”FABOUT  YEARS” ”\n<\/p>\n
(B) BIS\u00bb.RUDR\/’aI5PA:’,”‘AA.VA   A<\/p>\n
AGEDABOUT-,3o~–.YEARS:\n<\/p>\n
ALL SONS QVF’G.OW.DAA.E;ASAPPA<\/p>\n
A V’  “‘vA–.GOiw.DA– NANJUNDAJDRA,<\/p>\n
3′; ._ “-S’._c3O’w\u00a7DA_ MALLAPRA,<\/p>\n
 I SHAMUKAPPA\n<\/p>\n
–.[j.–(b”)-I A CHANDRARPA<\/p>\n
4](c) KAVIBASAPPA<\/p>\n
W , _AG_ED AE}O~-‘.J_T 70 YEARS,<\/p>\n
V ‘AGED.ASC}UT 68 YEARS,
\n“‘\u00ab\u00abSIN.:_\u00a2Ea:~. “DECEASED BY LR’S<\/p>\n
“AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
\nAGED AGOUT 43 YEARS
\nAGED ABOUT 35 YEARS<\/p>\n
(G) MANJAPPA
\nAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
ALL THE SONS OF OECEASEO 3*”\n<\/p>\n
PETITIONER RESIDING AT
\nBIKKANAHALLI,<\/p>\n
SHIMOGA TALUK<\/p>\n
PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 SONS OF<\/p>\n
HANUMAPPA <\/p>\n
4. GOWDA G.M.E3ASAPPA,
\nAGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, _
\nSON OF PATEL MALLAPPA <\/p>\n
5. G.M.PALAKSHAPPA_
\nAGEO ABOUT 27 Y.E’A~RS 1. I
\nSON OF SR: G.O.MA\u00abT._:.’A_Pr4A  ;<\/p>\n
ALL AGRICUJ__”?URISTS,v._”A.   W A <\/p>\n
RESIDENTS-OF-._BIK\u00a7KAf\\\u00e9A_}fi:AL,  ‘
\nSHIMOGA’TAf;iL.~UK. . = I ‘  ”\n<\/p>\n
       _  PETITIONERS
\nI _ -j_  [By Srfi ‘M.,’EPUCiraiah\u00a7, Advocate]<\/p>\n
1. SMT,n?%ALLA.MA.”\n<\/p>\n
AGED.ABOUT*60″Y1\u00a3ARS,
\nWIFE OE. MALLA_PPA_, <\/p>\n
 . S2.  “PATSEL ESwA’RA9pA;\n<\/p>\n
A  AGEE) ABOUT 71 YEARS,
\n ,SQN”OF..SRI_MAHADEVAPPA,<\/p>\n
._ ‘*’.._aOTEi”.’AGRi’OULTU RISTS,
\n‘  RESIOETATS OF BIKKANAHALLI
\n‘~SHi.MO’GA TALUK<\/p>\n
1′   ..  AOOITIONAL DI-STRICT JUDGE<\/p>\n
“SHIMOGA<\/p>\n
V74.  TAHSILDAR,<\/p>\n
SHIMOGA
\n RESPONDENTS
\n[By Sn’ M.R.Raja Gopal, A\u00e9vocate for R1
\nSri H.HanUmantharayappa, HCGP for R3 & R4]<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
\nAND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL<\/p>\n
gggm<\/p>\n
  On summoning of the said<\/p>\n
r_eto.ro’\u00a3;_.:”i\u00abta.wa’SE._n’otEced that one Kadalaiah was the originai<\/p>\n
 son’>En?iaw became the Barawardar Patei and an order
\n   effect was made on 24.3.1938. Mahadevappa is
\n  father of the original petitioner in LRRP M04993\/1991.<\/p>\n
u:.”Thereafter, the originai petitioner made an appiication for<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
FoR RECORDS IN vo AC 20\/83-84 ON THE FILE oF_THE
\nTAHSILDAR, SHIMDGA AND THOSE IN MA 51 AND 127 oF–‘1–986
\noN THE FILE 09 THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND14…Qt-,tAS.H
\nANNEXURES-A AND B DATED 29.6.9: AND 2G.2.86H_BEA’P,1’NG-\u00ab
\nNO.127\/86 AND 20\/83-84 IN so FAR AS THEY’.;MAr<.E;-\u00ab.TF:E___'*_
\nREGRANTS IN FOVOUR oF R2 AND R3.  "   4 *<\/p>\n
THIS LRRP AND WRIT RETITIo:s:**Ce.M\u00e9INt: Oi\\i"iFVC1RVVVFI.'i$irAL'v.. it
\nHEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE TREAJFoLt,TowIN_<3';\u00ab..-.__  j<\/p>\n
Respondent No.1 Smt.Ma'l'i'a}hm'a W]'oV\u00a7.if'Ia.i-iaopiaiirnade
\nan appiication on 19.12.':I*9_83 v\u00e9ih\u00e9rnoga for
\nre–grant of half share in  3, 4 and 10
\nof i3ikkonahaiI\u00a7~~ Mtge,  in terms of The
\nMysore Viiiaj\ufb01ge  .itAet*\u00a519o8. Objections were
\nfiled toiithiey  Eswarappa contending
\nthat  since there was an earlier<\/p>\n
proceeding i5ef_ore_t;-he'*.ASSistant Commissioner, Shimoga,<\/p>\n
Ea'raeiir\u00a7}are:a.r'Rate: of Bikkonahaiii viilage. After his death,<\/p>\n
re–grant of the iands. The Tahsiidar by taking into<\/p>\n
consideration the entries made in RR\u00bb5 and RR–6 that the<\/p>\n
Q?!"\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
-“iirtspetii’ii.t3’n6.ig in we~iio.24443\/1991. The appellants<\/p>\n
V”veo*nte’nd:”–th’at”t.he–..order of the Tahsildar is erroneous and<\/p>\n
its\/..,__’2favour only. It is contended that the original petitioner in
\n“iil;’P..R:l?i>””i\\IO.4993\/1991 is not a member of the original famiiy
\n …_”V””ofV’i<adalaiah and therefore he is not entitled for re–grant of<\/p>\n
\ufb02iany portion of the iands and consequently at! the lands<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
properties have since been divided between the various<\/p>\n
sharers, re–granted the said lands as foliows;<\/p>\n
i) Srnt.Mailappa W\/0.!’\/iailappa — 0-8-0 anna-:5?’\n<\/p>\n
ii)G.M.E3asappa h-__Q-f\u00e9i-0 a’nn’as:.’_’: .  .<\/p>\n
iii)Basappa, Nanjundappa Mallappay’–,\n<\/p>\n
iv)B.M.Palal<shappa   – ($44-24 aniia's{."v…_\n<\/p>\n
v)Eswarappa bin Mahadevappa  0.74-O..an.nEl_s.
\n(The original petitioner.in~.E,’RRPdi\\io’.~1\u00a739V3iii.3,99I) ” ”<\/p>\n
2. Aggrieved by the ?o.rd–er\u00a7,re–\u00a7]ran_tlng the lands to<\/p>\n
the above mentioned p’ersofns,”..arn_  was flied in<\/p>\n
MA Nq;’5i’\/19\u00e9V:5   orAl’.c__j’l’n’a’l’ petitioner in LRRP
\nNo.4993″\/1991’erict’f’jen”e;5p.eei in MA No.127\/1986 has<\/p>\n
been Vfiled by the[des.pe’ndants of Hunumappa vlz., the<\/p>\n
the should have been re–granted in their<\/p>\n
should have been granted to the writ petitioners alone. It<\/p>\n
is further contended that the said Kadalaiah had four :21:<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
by name Basaiah, Kariyanna, Shivanna and Maitappa.<\/p>\n
Among them, Shivanna and Maiiappa died issueEe~ss_f~and<\/p>\n
the eldest son Basaiah had one son by name  .<\/p>\n
had in turn had two sons Maiiappa and Han’t}r’n”ap’paV”an’dV  <\/p>\n
daughter Nanjavva. Hanumappag d’ted5 i’ssu~el’ess”:’a.nt::;_r<\/p>\n
Nanjavva was married to V’V_l1f5u_ri”naVp’pai.
\nKadlappa had three sons  lylialiappa
\nand Puradappa. The eiidestg  had eight
\nsons. The 4″‘ appeilant’Vin.lyliA.V’Ngot,_1\u00e9.7_,i1’l\u00a7:8o, i.e., Gowda
\nG.M.BasappE_14_tis:, and the other
\nappellants”Va’r\u00a7-iitihe of the original
\nBarwardiar __ :1 K’a..d’la._ppa.; The appellant in<\/p>\n
MA. No.S”1=,!gi9i86 “is noi..t:heV”4member of the original family<\/p>\n
V and “ileingi a\u00bb ..strangVe:r to the family is not entitled for<\/p>\n
in   a_in’y._viands.\n<\/p>\n
 ._  th”e’V..appeals were Considered by the common<\/p>\n
V –Vjudg’men”t:A’a’r’.’d by the impugned order both the appeals<\/p>\n
 “‘V.wvyerwe..rejected confirming the order of the re~grant made<\/p>\n
.’by–the:Tahsildar. Hence the present petitions.<\/p>\n
4. It is contended by Sri.P.V.Ravindranath, learned<\/p>\n
counsel appearing for the legal representatives of the<\/p>\n
Q?\/6\u00b0’<\/p>\n
committed. an e”r’ro_r granting the lands in terms of the<\/p>\n
  He contends that the said Kadalaiah does<\/p>\n
 _namely the petitioners in LRRP No.4993\/1991 as well as
\n correspondents therein and the respondents in<\/p>\n
 Vi\/P.,VN’o;24443\/1991 would not be entitled to any share.<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
the conclusion that since the lands have alreadytieen
\npartitioned and the sharers are in respective posses:s–io”n:o,f4
\nthe said lands in terms of RR.5 and RI”-2.6,
\nmade in terms of the possession of__the_partlielret.1:\/;?!.e’nce’y}he’.,.A
\nsubmits that the re-grant is violatiye
\nAct. He further contends tha’t__Von_’com’i’-nag “the
\nKarnataka Village Offices  “Act,..’1″9E:-.1, ‘the was
\nholding the village office”‘arid.h’e_n\u00a7e.r  is entitled for<\/p>\n
re-gra nt.\n<\/p>\n
7. SriV.M’:RiJd1raiah e’p;a:eAar:tn:gVVfolr the petitioners in WP
\nNo.24443\/1.9-9in’ltio’ntie’ndsVth-at’ none of the other sharers<\/p>\n
are entitleddlforya’ny””‘syhar:e_.\u00bbt.and hence the Tahsildar has<\/p>\n
not b’elyongi:”‘to___thleforiginal family and therefore his branch<\/p>\n
8. Sri.M.R.Rajagopa|, learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
respondent NO.1 by relying on a number of citations<\/p>\n
Q?\/V”\n<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
more than what he would get in the event of his success in<\/p>\n
this petition and the subsequent suit for partition.<\/p>\n
The respondents submit that they  ”<\/p>\n
impugned orders and hence no interife’ren’ce. is_.caEie_d Vfohin’-VA<\/p>\n
these petitions.\n<\/p>\n
A petition that is futiielneied notViib-et}co’nsid\u00a7erVed by
\nthe court on merits.    deem it
\nunnecessary to go intoftsi\u00e9=.Content’i’o.ri’\u00a7~L.i\/..i;;’vr\u00a7ed on merits,
\nfor the   would not be
\nbeneficiai  aniyiiimanner whatsoever.
\nHencelji  the impugned orders<\/p>\n
do not caiiviforiiinte~rferen:rje-i. <\/p>\n
    aforesaid reasons, both petitions are<\/p>\n
i~d,is\u00abposedibffi, <\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nRims<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010 Author: Ravi Malimath (aj _S.N;MA.\\{jARPA _(b) “”‘S.w;._’RARA’MESHWARAPRA SQRMALLESHARPA ~ .j'{d) S.N.PANCHAKSHARAPPA RESEDING AT KUDUR, HONNUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. ..PETITJ:C\u00a7N ‘V’ [By Sri Ravmdranath.P’V, Advocate} E’ 1′ SMT MALLAMMA W\/O MALLARRA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS 2. BASAPPA S\/O HANUMAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY-HIS L._R_’s’-.._ (a) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPatel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-03T23:10:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-03T23:10:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1326,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-03T23:10:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-03T23:10:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-03T23:10:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010"},"wordCount":1326,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010","name":"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-03T23:10:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/patel-eshwarappa-vs-smt-mallamma-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Patel Eshwarappa vs Smt. Mallamma on 10 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212468\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}