{"id":212681,"date":"2004-10-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-10-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004"},"modified":"2016-01-12T05:06:38","modified_gmt":"2016-01-11T23:36:38","slug":"commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004","title":{"rendered":"Commissioner Of Customs &#8230; vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal &#8211; Mumbai<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Commissioner Of Customs &#8230; vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 2005 (182) ELT 429 Tri Mumbai<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: A Wadhwa, S T S.S.<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)<\/p>\n<p>1. After hearing the Ld DR, a common order is being passed in these appeals since the issue involved is the same.<\/p>\n<p>2. After hearing Ld DR and considering the written reply on record we proceed to decide the matter. It is found-<\/p>\n<p>a. These appeals have been filed by revenue and facts herein, have been taken from the case C 209 for reference. The facts in brief are, the respondents presented Bills of Entry on 11.9.2004 for clearance of a vessel imported for breaking at port Alang district Bavnagar Gujarat. Value for duty purpose was declared at US$ 7,465.55 L.T. @ US$ 167.00\/LDT on the basis of a MOA dated 05.09.2000 with M\/s Cane Shipping and Trading S.A.Liberia they (herein after referred to second MOA) &amp; the Respondents. The Respondents importers bill was assessed finally on 15.10.2001. The revenue filed an appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) Customs Ahmedabad to consider the purchase price of the vessel as US$ 12,80,341.80 for 7,465.55 L.T.@ US$ 171.507 L.T. as per MOA dated 17.08.2000 entered into between M\/s Wild Shipping Ltd. Malta the owner of the vessel and M\/s Cane Shipping and Trading S.A.Liberia the buyer of the vessel as the transaction value, for the vessel as the same was offered effective referred to as price MOA) at the time of hr importation into India.<\/p>\n<p>b) Clause 12 of the impugned order in appeal observed that the first MOA ie 17.08.2000, satisfies the requirement of Section 14 of the Customs Act as well as Rule 4 of Customs valuation (Determination of prices of imported goods) rules, 1988. The value mentioned therein has to be considered as assessable value, unless the importer justifies the reduction in price based of evidence, in accordance with second MOA.<\/p>\n<p>c) At Clause 13 of the impugned Order-in-Appeal it has been observed that &#8220;The important point to be noted is the MOA will be considered as an invoice only when it clarifies that the vessel has been sold for export to India.<\/p>\n<p>MOA dated 17.8.2000 between Wild Shipping they seller was and Cane Shipping and trading S.A Liberia they bear order at para 1 rules as follows Now whereas AT para 1 of the MOA dated 17.08.2000 reads as<br \/>\n &#8221; Wild Shipping Ltd of Valetta, Malta (hereinafter called the sellers) have today sold and Cane Shipping and Trading S.A, 80, Broad St. Monrovia, Liberia (hereinafter called the buyers) have today bought for demolition the bulk carrier &#8216;prime&#8217; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; ..with light displacement of 7585 MT = 7465.55 LT &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; . with all her available outfit anchor and chains &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; Excluding master, officers and crews personal effects company logbooks, stationery forms &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; . And items stated in Clause 13 hereunder at port official outer anchorage at west coast India (Alang) &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; .<\/p>\n<p>Further, as per Clause 3 of the said MOA read as:\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;The vessel shall be physically delivered &#8216;AS IS WHERE IS&#8217; and taken over safely afloat, substantially intact, under her own power free of cargo, free of charter, free of fire damage, free of permanent ballast, with all holds empty and hatches closed. No removals except as stated hereunder in Clause 13 with main engine\/all generators in working condition at port of delivery outer anchorage at Alang in India &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; .. The vessel shall be delivered between 20th  August and 15th &#8216; September 2000.<\/p>\n<p>d) The said vessel arrived at Alang anchorage on 2.9.2000, the same was boarded on 4.9.2000 and the Entry Inward was granted on 8.9.200. Thus, the vessel was delivered, at safe outer anchorage port Alang, India. Therefore it is clear that the said vessel was sold to M\/s Cane Shipping and Trading SA vide first MOA dated 17.8.2000 for export and delivery Port Alang India. M\/s Royal Shipping show the vessel to M\/s Cane Shipping and Trading SA vide first MOA dated 17.8.2000 at USD 1280341.80 and this vessel was imported in India on 2.9.2000 for delivery at that price therefore the finding of the Commissioner in Clause 14 of the impugned order that in the MOA dated 17.8.2000 entered between Wild Shipping Ltd and Cane Shipping and Trading SA does not show that the Vessel was sold for export the India is not proper and legal as the same was not based on facts. The price of US$ 1280341.80 at which the vessel was sold wide MOA 17.8.2000, should be the transaction value as per Rule 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. In the case of Sai Baba Ship Breakers wide CI\/680-81\/-WZB\/2000 dated 14.02.2000 it was held by the Tribunal that price reduction after importation of vessel in India cannot be considered.<\/p>\n<p>In the instant case, description of the vessel in both the MOAs are same which are reproduced below:<\/p>\n<p>MOA dated 17.08.2000 entered into between M\/s. Wild Shipping Ltd. and M\/s. Cane Shipping and Trading S.A. shows the vessel description as under:<\/p>\n<p>20. The vessel is described as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>\nNAME OF VESSEL : MV PRIME<\/p>\n<p>EX-NAMES: PERCA 1, ORCA, LENIN SK, LITA<\/p>\n<p>TYPE OF VESSEL: BULK CARRIER<\/p>\n<p>DEAD WEIGHT: 34995 MT<\/p>\n<p>BUILT: 1975, ASTILLEROS ESPANOLES SA, FACTORIA DE SEVILLA, SPAIN<\/p>\n<p>FLAG: MALTA<\/p>\n<p>PORT OF REGISTRY: VALLETTA<\/p>\n<p>GT\/NT: 19309\/11429<\/p>\n<p>LENGTH: 185.93 M<\/p>\n<p>BREADTH:24.20M<\/p>\n<p>DEPTH: 15.20 M<\/p>\n<p>MAIN ENGINE: ONE, MANISES-SULZER-SPAIN, DIESEL ENG NO.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n(310) MODEL: 7RND68, REVOLUTION PER MIN 150, BHP 11550<\/p>\n<p>AESA SULZER<\/p>\n<p>GENERATING SETS: THREE, WARTSILA-VISA-FINLAND,<\/p>\n<p>TYPE 424 TS SPEC: 11040, BHP: 640, RPM: 720<\/p>\n<p>WORKING PROPELLER: NO<\/p>\n<p>SPARE TAILSHAFT: YES<\/p>\n<p>LIGHT WEIGHT: 7585 METRIC TONS\/7465.55 LONG TONS<\/p>\n<p>SPARE ANCHOR: YES<\/p>\n<p>CONSTRUCTION: STEEL<\/p>\n<p>BALLAST TANKS: FORE PEAK\/AFT PEAK\/DOUBLE<\/p>\n<p>BOTTOM\/TOP<\/p>\n<p>SIDE ALTHOUGH TO THE BEST OF THE SELLERS<\/p>\n<p>KNOWLEDGE THE BALLAST TANKS ABOVE WERE<\/p>\n<p>INITIALLY COATED THE SELLERS HAVE NO EVIDENCE OF<\/p>\n<p>SAME AND CAN GIVE NO GUARANTEE AS TO WHETHER<\/p>\n<p>THERE ARE ANY TRACES OR VISIBLE SIGNS OF<\/p>\n<p>COATING(S) LEFT<\/p>\n<p>SINGLE SKIN: YES<\/p>\n<p>TRADING HISTORY: LAST 7 CARGOES, BULK BARLEY,<\/p>\n<p>COAL, ROCK PHOSPHATE, BAGGED RICE, WHEAT IN<\/p>\n<p>BULK, YELLOW CORN, SBM+ SORGHUMS.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>As per MOA dated 5.9.2000 entered into between M\/s. Cane Shipping and trading S. A and M\/s Gujaral Ship Trade corporation, Plot No. 12, Alang, the vessel&#8217;s description reads as follows:<\/p>\n<p>TYPE: BULK CARRIER<\/p>\n<p>NAME: MV PRIME<\/p>\n<p>EX &#8220;PERCA 1&#8221; EX &#8220;ORCA&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\nGRT\/NRT : 19309\/11429 TONS<\/p>\n<p>BUILT: 1975\/SPAIN<\/p>\n<p>FLAG: UAE<\/p>\n<p>LOA X BEAM : 196.00 X 24.20 METERS<\/p>\n<p>LDT: 7585 MT I.E. 7465.55 LONG TONS<\/p>\n<p>MAIN ENGINE: SULZER 7RND68 ABT 11550 BHP<\/p>\n<p>MAIN GENERATORS 3 X WARTSILA 525 KVA<\/p>\n<p>EMERGENCY GENERATOR : 1 X CATTER[O;;ER. ABT 120 HP<\/p>\n<p>WORKING PROPELLER: None<\/p>\n<p>SPARE PROPELLER: NONE<\/p>\n<p>SPARE TAIL SHAFT: YES -ONE<\/p>\n<p>BALLAST TANKS: FORE PEAK\/AFT PEAK\/DOUBLE<\/p>\n<p>BOTTOM TOPSIDE, ALTHOUGH TO THE BEST OF THE<\/p>\n<p>SELLERS KNOWLEDGE THE BALLAST TANKS ABOVE<\/p>\n<p>WERE INITIALLY COATED. THE SELLERS HAVE BO<\/p>\n<p>EVIDENCE OF THE SAME AND CAN GIVE NO GUARANTEE<\/p>\n<p>AS TO WHETHER THERE ARE ANY TRACES OR VISIBLE<\/p>\n<p>SINGS OF COATINGS(S) LEFT.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nLAST CARGOES: BULK BARLEY, COAL, ROCK<\/p>\n<p>PHOSPHATE, BAGGED RICE, WHEAT IN BULK, YELLOW<\/p>\n<p>CORN, SBM + SORGHUMS.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>(e) On a combined reading of the two MOAs it is seen there was no change found in the vessel, for sale by the MOA. Hence transaction value of US dollars which was offered of sale delivery Alang India as per the said first MOA dated 17.8.2000 should be a assessable value declared by the respondents was not tenable. The Commissioner Customs (Appeals) has erred in considering 3 % buying commission to M\/s Cane Shipping and Trading S.A the buyer, in the price offered in the MOA dated 17.8.2000 and accordingly approved the reduction. Such a reduction is not permitable under Customs valuation goods.<\/p>\n<p>f) We find sufficient force in the submissions made by revenue for setting aside the order of lower authorities as we do not find any reason to reduce the value for the goods, which for sale of delivery at port Alang as per original MOA dated 17.8.2000.<\/p>\n<p>3. In view of the findings, the order are set aside &amp; Revenue appeal allowed. After setting aside the order of the lower authority.<\/p>\n<p> (Pronounced in court)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal &#8211; Mumbai Commissioner Of Customs &#8230; vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004 Equivalent citations: 2005 (182) ELT 429 Tri Mumbai Bench: A Wadhwa, S T S.S. ORDER S.S. Sekhon, Member (T) 1. After hearing the Ld DR, a common order is being passed in these appeals since [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Commissioner Of Customs ... vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Commissioner Of Customs ... vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-11T23:36:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Commissioner Of Customs &#8230; vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004\",\"datePublished\":\"2004-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-11T23:36:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004\"},\"wordCount\":1309,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004\",\"name\":\"Commissioner Of Customs ... vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2004-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-11T23:36:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Commissioner Of Customs &#8230; vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Commissioner Of Customs ... vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Commissioner Of Customs ... vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2004-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-11T23:36:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Commissioner Of Customs &#8230; vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004","datePublished":"2004-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-11T23:36:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004"},"wordCount":1309,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004","name":"Commissioner Of Customs ... vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2004-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-11T23:36:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-customs-vs-gujarat-ship-trading-corporation-on-6-october-2004#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Commissioner Of Customs &#8230; vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 6 October, 2004"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}