{"id":212753,"date":"2009-08-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-03-28T04:00:03","modified_gmt":"2018-03-27T22:30:03","slug":"ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And … on 13 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And … on 13 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL  \n\nDATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF AUGUs3:..2\u00a7;:j9%l'wV;A ~ \n\nBEFORE\n\n  \n\nTHE HONBLE Mr. msm;gm~ ;I_, \n\nWRIT PEITFFION No. 12519 dmgoo9(cm:MA1  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nMI\/s.Chitra Ex1)jbitorS;..._' \u00ab  :4 V \nNo.9\/1, Shankar1\\&ar3:e\u00a3,_'    \"\nE.S.Lane, Chickpet Cross, \nBangalo:-e--56o a53.   \nRepresentmi   if V \"\n\n1. Sri   \"   V\n\ns\/up late *I)}\\_fe1ii5:aiah V'\nAgecgi abc11t'89 --- ' '\n\n. Sri D.V'..JayaiL'i;.\u00a7\ufb01I1\u00ab'a:':;i?r$3.sad,\n\nS}-'0 D.V;I?aLti2r3:am;\nAge: 43 ymra, \n\n A  \"and 2 a.t\u00e9\"x*esidi11g at\n'  ~No.52\u00a32,*N\u20ac.w Diagonal Road,\n'g  011.\n\n.  NV\"areI3   dra Singh,\n\nS\/o'vI_a\"te Balaji Singh,\n\n\" \u00bb  'Aged about 63 years.\n\n    B.N.Mahendralmmar Singh,\n' ~\u00bb  S\/o Narendra Singh,\nAged about 33 years.\n\nBoth partners 3 and 4 are\nR\/an Padmalaya No.4, 2nd Cross,\nMadhav Nagar,\n\n \n\n\n\nBangalore-560 om. ...PE1Tr10Nj::Rs\n(Sri K.Ra.ghavendra Rae, Adv.) %  M  \n\nAND:\n\n1. The Deputy Commissioner,\n& District Magistrate,\nChikaballapura,\nChlkaballapum Dist.\n\n2. N.Sr1nivas, _  \nS\/o Late C.R.Na1'ay2\"maswamy,--  _ \nAged about 48 years\",-- ~  r  V 1  \nR\/aPateI Street, '~ _ f , _ _\nSiddlagahatta'TowI1;\"' \" 7  \nC1nkaba\ufb02aTpiKf\u00a7{_'DiSt5 3; ..   .._.';R._ESPONDENTS\n\n(Sri H.K.Ba%\u00a7e{a;\"*:\u00e91};i\u00a7{3\u20ac}I\u00a7fvf&}1~--..i\u00a71V\u00a7'*Sx~i'Nanjunda Reddy,\nSr.cou11v$eV1WfcrzjVS1'i:.;\u00a7\u00a7.VSoma$hckaga.3Reddy, Adv. for R2 )\n\nThis'W.? is'1?ik=.xi'e\u00bb11r1mf.ir:_ue, the proceedings in case\nNo.Mg%\u00a3'}(ENT)GR28\/ 8698 1, vide Annexum\u00ab~A, allow this\n\n. * V. '_  ..... ..\n\n  been heard and reserved for\n\nV' , In this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking a\n\"   ef prohibition. The core question which falls for\n\n \u00bb eeonsideration is, in what e1rcum' stances, a writ of\n\nGyders, 0%: for pmnouricement of order this day,\nthe   the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Pmmbi\ufb01en can be imam.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
2. The facts germane fer the dispose} of the writ<\/p>\n
petition are as under:\n<\/p>\n
The petitioners claim to be the registered
\nin occupation and possession of Valli  ~
\nfixtures. The said theatre is situated’   K 2
\nTown. They are running  :viIz ‘t3’n_:*e
\nM\/s.enin-a Exhibitors, mg.  Q;\n<\/p>\n
It is not in dispute  gesheendenti was a
\nlessee under the   “I191: in dispute<\/p>\n
that the lease’ peliod ;\u00a2;\u00a71′;f1\u00a21V:I.1o: \u00e9i;~..\u00a21:d.en 02.11.2002.<\/p>\n
Since the  .the petitioners have filed a<\/p>\n
suit in C)’.S_.Ne.   the competent Civil <\/p>\n
V for ejeCtmentV  ‘same is pending adjudication. In<\/p>\n
    the second respondent has \ufb01led a suit<\/p>\n
fer  an alleged agmment to sell stated to<\/p>\n
V . have”‘bee.t:1.e’;{eeuted by the \ufb01rst mtzitiener i.e., one of the<\/p>\n
 .01′ the farm. The said suit is pending<\/p>\n
ail-jediea\ufb01on. The second respondent, it appears, had<\/p>\n
T ”  a suit in O.S.No.267\/O2 seeking relief of injunction<\/p>\n
restraining the petitioners from dismssessirzg him<\/p>\n
9′<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
witheut due process of law. Incidentally the subject \ufb02<\/p>\n
the licence. The seine was questioned by the petitioeers<\/p>\n
by Way of an appeal in appeal No. 114\/08 A4
\nAppellate Txiburxai. The appeai was aeeepied  *
\nTribunal and the order of the \ufb01zstifat’  ” V’
\nnaught. A funding is recorded by
\nproceedings to the e\ufb01ect 1113 \u00e9ecqm:
\nwas not in Iawful posseseion’;”‘ie,ese31gch a\u00e91s’,* oriee the
\ntenancy is terminated,   would be<\/p>\n
a tenant at   passed by
\nthe TIibuna3;,4’Vtif..e. a Writ petition
\nbefore   \/08. This Court<\/p>\n
deeiined ta writ mtition. The second<\/p>\n
respezgdezgt,  ‘by .the order of the learned single<\/p>\n
 \u00e9yuege, r{1;\u00bb:\u00a7;1 ei1._appea1 in W.A.Ne.2299\/08. ineidentaliy,<\/p>\n
the “v\u00e9i’it_ was dismissed as withdrawn on the<\/p>\n
V V _ mou\ufb01d o:fit’heving become infructueus.<\/p>\n
 ‘ .  Few other relevant facts which are requireci te<\/p>\n
‘  noted are certain proceedings which have taken<\/p>\n
  Kplaee during the mndency of the Writ appeal. When the<\/p>\n
writ appeal was iisted on 26.12.2008, a request was<\/p>\n
made by the second respondent in the writ appeal that \ufb02<\/p>\n
\/J<\/p>\n
deteimina\ufb01on is demonstrably wrong. Except in
\nproceedings by way of appeal, the parties
\njudgnem; are estopped from questioning it. __  _
\none another, they may neither puotfsue the    .. t\u00bb
\naction again, nor may they
\nwhich was an essential element     ,
\ncase on hand, as observed  :t\u00ab1uthority
\nfound that the appHeeti.t   of the<\/p>\n
cinema t!”1eat:ne.~. vBut.~hes7f    sought to be<\/p>\n
reversed by  a question
\nwas   inter alia, contending
\nthat oer:-es the   has expired and notice of<\/p>\n
teragsiiastion  issued, the tenancy would be at<\/p>\n
  which case respondent-2 will not fall into<\/p>\n
  the person who is in lawful possession<\/p>\n
   eiann’ renewal of the licence. Indeed, this<\/p>\n
H ‘A   questioii fell for eonsideration before the Tribunal. The<\/p>\n
–‘   having regard to the law laid down by the Apex<\/p>\n
  in the ease of MC. Chockalingam and others vs.<\/p>\n
Mazxiekavasam and others, A.I.R. 1972 SC 104, with<\/p>\n
reference to lawful possession has observed that<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
of a lawful title. There is little difference between him<\/p>\n
and a trespasser. A tenancy at su\ufb01emnce doesT*”‘r1ot
\ncreate the relationship of landlord and tena.g1t!”
\nexpression “holcrling over” is used in   K
\nretaining possession. A
\nbetween a tenant eontinuigzg\u00e9’ in
\ndetemxination of the lease,    the
\nIandlord and a   ‘t11eV’AAlsVIv1d1ord’s
\nconsent. The former is  over or a<\/p>\n
tenant: at   he 3:)’ K ‘<1'-it: is to be noticed<\/p>\n
that   of \ufb01me came to an end on<\/p>\n
2.11.2O(} 2,_ '' Inside  to be no\ufb01ced that the<\/p>\n
    a suit for ejectment and the<\/p>\n
   is  adjudication.\n<\/p>\n
V   noticed that the requirement of the<\/p>\n
 _ aPP1iean:\u00a7 3:0 be found at rule 6 of the Karnataka<\/p>\n
‘ H  {1?Q1\ufb02atiens) Rules, 1971, which would relate<\/p>\n
 “ov\u00a3%r1ers11ip or possession to site, building or<\/p>\n
T  equipment. The said rule would contemplate that if the<\/p>\n
3 appiieant for license is the owner of the site, building or<\/p>\n
equipment he sha\ufb02 produce mfere the Iixtrensirxg #<\/p>\n
Tribmxal are tacitly con\ufb01rmed. A writ appeal was,j~a1so
\nflied. It is no doubt true, in the writ appeal ~
\nwas made by respondent–2 to make an  ‘V
\nmnewal of the licence to the
\nno doubt true that this ccmft
\nrcsp\ufb02ndemz to maintain   \u00a31116:\n<\/p>\n
competent authority. ‘     it
\ncannot be said t:hat   eermimsd the
\n‘competent   ‘az;:;.d9;pplication and
\npass V.   eras asked for is
\n  but what is more<\/p>\n
sigxi\ufb01cand is, the id\u00e911tef\u00ab~._’:_j)1*eg*ess in the writ appeal<\/p>\n
    Tof an application made to the<\/p>\n
   respondent-2 started exhibiting<\/p>\n
   shows that the cyrighai authority<\/p>\n
 _ wouid net “consider the application of respondent-\u00bb2<\/p>\n
K ” ‘  .eii;h;er for gant or refusal of licence or even for<\/p>\n
 the films. Indeed, respondent”? ought to<\/p>\n
T  have taken the proceedings to its logical end in the writ<\/p>\n
dd appeal itself, in as much as, What: was questioned in the<\/p>\n
writ appeal was the order passw by the learned single<\/p>\n
,;\/?\/<\/p>\n
Judge con\ufb01rming the order of the ‘I’i*ibunal.._ By<\/p>\n
withdrawal of the writ appeal, the \ufb01ndings <\/p>\n
the Tribunal stood con\ufb01rmed. It is no <\/p>\n
is open for a litigant to i_n.a.i_ce  ‘ ”  =-of  <\/p>\n
applications or even \ufb01le ciaiiiis ffor’; <\/p>\n
getting it rejected. But however, it”wou1ci z-is res’ V L’<\/p>\n
judicate and could be coneidered   of the
\nprocess of the court. me  respoxidemz-2
\nhaving su\ufb02ered at     as well as<\/p>\n
this court; cm; zeatteif on identical and<\/p>\n
same grounds, i_mieiii’Licii’Vas’,..iV psossession is held to
\nbe not lawful. A V i<\/p>\n
 \u00ab.13.   in the ease of Calcutta<\/p>\n
   Qf\ufb02cer, Companies<\/p>\n
 4.1.1:. 1961 sc 372 has observed<\/p>\n
– -time: ‘ <\/p>\n
.._V  the writ of prohibition or certioreri
\n   not issue against: an executive authority,
\n”\u00bb_the High Courts have power to issue in a \ufb01t<\/p>\n
  .. . case an order pioilibiting an executive<\/p>\n
authority from acting without jurisdiction.
\nWhen’-3 such action of an executive authority
\nacting without jurisdiction subjects or is
\nlikely to subiect a person to 131%!<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
on the merits of the proceedings. A writ of pmhiiai\u00e9ion
\ncannot be issued to a court or an inferior
\nerror of law unless the errer makes it   K
\njurisdiction. A clear disenceiiii
\nmaintained between want: of  in
\nmanner in which it is
\neven there is coram     writ of
\nprohibition wi}I__}.ie to…   nibunal
\nforbidding    in excess<\/p>\n
of its      hand, it: is to be
\nnoticeti   e  itself the orignai
\nauthor-ii:y jiia;i   jurisdiction when an<\/p>\n
appligeaiiori \ufb02eas’  by respondent-2. The said<\/p>\n
  ‘V eras genteel initiaily and the order of the<\/p>\n
 was set at naught by the subsequent<\/p>\n
V V .V  The question weuid be Whether the<\/p>\n
V’ * Voiignaliautho\ufb01ty can once again exercise jmisclietion to<\/p>\n
–‘  eeiisieier an identical application for an identicxal relief<\/p>\n
” “Moi: the maze facts. It would certainly be outside the<\/p>\n
jurisdiction to consider the same. it is no doubt; true<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
that the petitioner filed objections to the appiieatien and %<\/p>\n
brought it to the notice of the concerned authorityjthat<\/p>\n
such a course can not be adopted, in as mueh—aegtiieii’ <\/p>\n
matter stood concluded in the earlier   As’   i <\/p>\n
observed by the Apex Court a  A jpi’o}ii.bifio:1<\/p>\n
certainly be issued to avoideeboseiiofi
\nfact that permission was    in the
\nwrit appeal does not   to
\nreopen the pandora  Of
\ncourse, it is    the petitioner to
\nput _   oi\u00e9jections and seek for
\nan orde-vi.  be once again a fume<\/p>\n
exercise, infas mi;ic1’i.:as,V facts and also having regard<\/p>\n
 to  “eer1ierV”p;roeeeciings which stood terminated in<\/p>\n
 feVoLii~ \u00abpeo’tioner, whether the petitioner can be<\/p>\n
\u00a7:;\u00e91iei\u00abai\u00e9  to start the entire exercise again and<\/p>\n
~V   for one more round of litigation. indeed<\/p>\n
K ” is–._o\ufb02V;en said there must be a finality to all the<\/p>\n
‘   It is to be observed that a litigation must<\/p>\n
i’ eome to an end after the highest oourt has concluded<\/p>\n
the lie. It is not necessary at this stage for the<\/p>\n
22<\/span><\/p>\n
petitioner to undergo all the agony of another iitigajrion<\/p>\n
once again.\n<\/p>\n
15. Having gven my anxious cor1side1f\u00a7’V\u00a7ii:i.eI’1.:’I   ‘ <\/p>\n
of the View that it would be a case the’  <\/p>\n
has exercised jurisdiction 63;: eta._v.”ear}ie3:v
\nConsequently it would be a     the
\ncategory where the Eeek _ to
\nentertain the apAplieation..:T’_  meag<\/p>\n
Want;\n<\/p>\n
 It   that the Triburlal or a court<\/p>\n
can decide Lever’:   but however that by<\/p>\n
itself ‘ iii:   that the respondent has<\/p>\n
  eeeide the issue which has aiready been<\/p>\n
\u00e9ieeiiigi  in the eariier proceeding.<\/p>\n
Coeeequently, I am of the View that the petitioner<\/p>\n
    to the relief sought for.\n<\/p>\n
Petition is allowed. A writ of prohibition shall issue<\/p>\n
‘4 U against respondent-1 in continijing the proceedings<\/p>\n
.~*<\/p>\n
23<\/span><\/p>\n
which are pending before him in MAG(ENT)CR28_\/8Q-
\n81, Vida A}:mexure\u00bbA. ‘ ‘ ‘T A4<\/p>\n
Rule made absolute.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And … on 13 August, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF AUGUs3:..2\u00a7;:j9%l’wV;A ~ BEFORE THE HONBLE Mr. msm;gm~ ;I_, WRIT PEITFFION No. 12519 dmgoo9(cm:MA1 BETWEEN: MI\/s.Chitra Ex1)jbitorS;…_’ \u00ab :4 V No.9\/1, Shankar1\\&ar3:e\u00a3,_’ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And ... on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And ... on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-27T22:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And … on 13 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-27T22:30:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1463,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And ... on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-27T22:30:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And … on 13 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And ... on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And ... on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-27T22:30:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And … on 13 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-27T22:30:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009"},"wordCount":1463,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009","name":"M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And ... on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-27T22:30:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-chitra-exhibitors-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-and-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S,. Chitra Exhibitors vs The Deputy Commissioner And … on 13 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212753\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}